Augmented Reality in Surgery

Archives of Surgery

Volumn 139, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 170-174

  Shuhaiber, Jeffrey H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUGMENTED REALITY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; ERGONOMICS; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; REVIEW; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY; SURGERY; SURGICAL TRAINING; TECHNOLOGY; VIRTUAL REALITY;

FORECASTING; HUMANS; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; RESEARCH; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGERY; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; THORACIC SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 0842309828     PISSN: 00040010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.139.2.170     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Tang SL, Kwoh CK, Teo MY, Sing NW, Ling KV. Augmented reality systems for medical applications. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 1998;17(3):49-58.
2. Day R, Heilbrun MP, Koehler S, McDonald P, Peters W, Siemionow V. Three-point transformation for integration of multiple coordinate systems: applications to tumor, functional, and fractionated radiosurgery stereotactic planning. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1994;63:76-79.
3. Peters TM. Enhanced display of three-dimensional data from computerized x-ray tomograms. Comput Biol Med. 1975;5:49-52.
4. St-Jean P, Sadikot AF, Collins L, et al. Automated atlas integration and interactive three-dimensional visualization tools for planning and guidance in functional neurosurgery. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998;17:672-680.
5. Smith KR, Frank KJ, Bucholz RD. The NeuroStation - a highly accurate, minimally invasive solution to frameless stereotactic neurosurgery. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1994;18:247-256.
6. Lavallee S, Cinquin P, Szeliski R, et al. Building a hybrid patient's model for augmented reality in surgery: a registration problem. Comput Biol Med. 1995;25:149-164.
7. Tuceryan M, Greer DS, Whitaker RT, et al. Calibration requirements and procedures for a monitor-based augmented reality system. IEEE Trans Visualization Computer Graphics. 1995;1:255-273.
8. Kutulakos KN, Vallino J. Affine object representations for calibration-free augmented reality. In: Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium; March 30 to April 3, 1996; Santa Clara, Calif, Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society; 1996:25-26.
9. Azuma RT, Bishop G. Improving static and dynamic registration in an optical see-through HMD. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques; July 1994; New York, NY. New York, NY: ACM Press; 1994:197-204.
10. Edwards EK, Rolland JP, Keller KP. Video see-through design for merging of real and virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium; September 18-22, 1993; Seattle, Wash. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society; 1993:223-233.
11. Adelstein BD, Johnston ER, Ellis SR. A testbed for characterizing dynamic response of virtual environment spatial sensors. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology November 15-18, 1992; Monterey, Calif. New York, NY: ACM Press; 1992:15-22.
12. Grimson WL, Lozano-Perez T, Wells WM, Ettinger GJ, White SJ, Kikinis R. An automatic registration method for frameless stereotaxy, image-guided surgery, and enhanced reality visualization. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; June 20-24, 1994; Seattle, Wash. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society; 1994:430-436.
13. Masutani Y, Dohi T, Yamane F, Iseki H, Takakura K. Augmented reality visualization system for intravascular neurosurgery. Comput Aided Surg. 1998;3:239-247.
14. Satava RM. Emerging medical applications of virtual reality: a surgeon's perspective. Artif Intell Med. 1994;6:281-288.
15. Soler L, Delingette H, Malandain G, et al. An automatic virtual patient reconstruction from CT-scans for hepatic surgical planning. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2000;70:316-322.
16. Pearl RK, Evenhouse R, Rasmussen M, et al. The Virtual Pelvic Floor, a teleimmersive educational environment. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:345-348.
17. Satava RM. Accelerating technology transfer: new relationships for academia, industry, and government. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1998;50:1-6.
18. Herline AJ, Stefansic JD, Debelak JP, et al. Image-guided surgery: preliminary feasibility studies of frameless stereotactic liver surgery. Arch Surg. 1999;134:644-650.
19. Sato Y, Nakamoto M, Tamaki Y, et al. Image guidance of breast cancer surgery using 3-D ultrasound images and augmented reality visualization. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998;17:681-693.
20. DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Blackwell M, et al. The Otto Aufranc Award: image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. Clin Orthop. 1998;355:8-22.
21. Blackwell M, Morgan F, DiGioia AM III. Augmented reality and its future in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop. 1998;354:111-122.
22. Dario P, Carrozza MC, Marcacci M, et al. A novel mechatronic tool for computer-assisted arthroscopy. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2000;4:15-29.
23. Enislidis G, Wagner A, Ploder O, Truppe M, Ewers R. Augmented reality in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Med Virtual Real. 1995;1:22-24.
24. Wagner A, Rasse M, Millesi W, Ewers R. Virtual reality for orthognathic surgery: the augmented reality environment concept. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55:456-463.
25. Enislidis G, Wagner A, Ploder O, Ewers R. Computed intraoperative navigation guidance - a preliminary report on a new technique. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;35:271-274.
26. Roth M, Lanza DC, Zinreich J, Yousem D, Scanlan KA, Kennedy DW. Advantages and disadvantages of three-dimensional computed tomography intraoperative localization for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 1995; 105:1279-1286.
27. Freysinger W, Gunkel AR, Thumfart WF. Image-guided endoscopic ENT surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1997;254:343-346.
28. Metson R, Cosenza M, Gliklich RE, Montgomery WW. The role of image-guidance systems for head and neck surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125:1100-1104.
29. Mason TP, Applebaum EL, Rasmussen M, Millman A, Evenhouse R, Panko W. Virtual temporal bone: creation and application of a new computer-based teaching tool. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;122:168-173.
30. Fried MP, Kleefield J, Gopal H, Reardon E, Ho BT, Kuhn FA. Image-guided endoscopic surgery: results of accuracy and performance in a multicenter clinical study using an electromagnetic tracking system. Laryngoscope. 1997;107:594-601.
31. Colt HG. Therapeutic thoracoscopy. Clin Chest Med. 1998;19:383-394.
32. Damiano RJ. Endoscopic coronary arery bypass grafting: the first steps on a long journey. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120:806-807.
33. Schaff HV. New surgical techniques: implications for the cardiac anesthesiologist: mini-thoracotomy for coronary revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1997;11 (2, suppl 1):6-9.
34. Tang LW, D'Ancona G, Bergsland J, Kawaguchi A, Karamanoukian HL. Robotically assisted video-enhanced-endoscopic coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Angiology. 2001;52:99-102.
35. Mehmanesh H, Henze R, Lange R. Totally endoscopic mitral valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123:96-97.
36. Moussa I, Oetgen M, Subramanian V, Kobayashi Y, Patel N, Moses J. Frequency of early occlusion and stenosis in bypass grafts after minimally invasive direct coronary arterial bypass surgery. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:311-313.
37. Nakamura Y, Kishi K. Robotic stabilization that assists cardiac surgery on beating hearts. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;81:355-361.
38. Czernuszenko M, Pape D, Sandin D, DeFanti T, Dawe G, Brown M. The ImmersaDesk and Infinity Wall projection-based virtual reality displays. Comput Graph (ACM). 1997;31(2):46-49.
39. Siegel J, Bauer M. A field usability evaluation of a wearable system. In: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Wearable Computers; October 13-14, 1997; Cambridge, Mass. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society; 1997: 18-23.
40. Berguer R. Surgery and ergonomics. Arch Surg. 1999;134:1011-1016.
41. Troccaz J, Peshkin M, Davies B. Guiding systems for computer-assisted surgery: introducing synergistic devices and discussing the different approaches. Med Image Anal. 1998;2:101-119.