Patent failure: How judges, bureaucrats, and lawyers put innovators at risk

Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-331

  Bessen, James ^a   Meurer, Michael J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924536262     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (292)

1. Acs, Zoltan, and David Audretsch. 1990. Innovation and Small Firms. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
2. Adams, John, Daniel Pare, and Puay Tang. 2001. "Patent Protection of Computer Programmes." European Commission, Directorate-General Enterprises.
3. Agrawal, Ajay, and Rebecca Henderson. 2002. "Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT." Management Science, 48(1): 44-60.
4. Aghion, Philippe, Nick Bloom, Richard Blundell, Rachel Griffith, and Peter Howitt. 2005. "Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship." Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(2): 701-28.
5. Aharonian, Gregory. 2000. "E-data wins appeal, but exaggerates importance; EPC/EPO voting," PATNEWS, November 15, 2000.
6. Akerlof, George A. 1970. "The Market for 'Lemons': Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism." Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(3): 488-500.
7. Allison, John R., and Mark Lemley. 1998. "Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents." AIPLA Quarterly Journal 6: 185-277.
8. Allison, John R., and Mark Lemley. 2002. "The Growing Complexity of the United States Patent System." Boston University Law Review 82(1): 77-144.
9. Allison, John R., and Mark Lemley. 2007. "The Unnoticed Demise of the Doctrine of Equivalents." Stanford Law Review 59: 955-84.
10. Allison, John R., Mark Lemley, Kimberly A. Moore, and Derek Trunkey. 2004. "Valuable Patents." Georgetown Law Journal 92(3): 435-79.
11. Allison, John R., and Emerson H. Tiller. 2003. "The Business Method Patent Myth." Berkeley Technology Law Journal 18(4): 987-1084.
12. American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA). 2005. Report of the Economic Survey. Washington, D.C.: Fetzer-Kraus.
13. American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA). 2006. "Comments on Proposed Rules: "Changes to Practice for Continuing Applications, Requests for Continued Examination Practice, and Applications Containing Patentably Indistinct Claims.'" April 24, 2006, available online at http://www.aipla.org/Template.cfm?template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=11276.
14. Anand, Bharat N., and Tarun Khanna. 2000. "The Structure of Licensing Contracts." Journal of Industrial Economics 48(1): 103-35.
15. Anton, James J., and Dennis A. Yao. 1994. "Expropriation and Inventions: Appropriable Rents in the Absence of Property Rights." American Economic Review 84(1): 190-209.
16. Anton, James J., and Dennis A. Yao. 2002. "The Sale of Ideas: Strategic Disclosure, Property Rights, and Contracting." Review of Economic Studies 69(3): 513-31.
17. Armstrong, Jeff S., Michael R. Darby, and Lynne G. Zucker. 1998a. "Geographically Localized Knowledge: Spillovers or Markets?" Economic Inquiry 36(1):65-86.
18. Armstrong, Jeff S., Michael R. Darby, and Lynne G. Zucker. 2001. "Commercializing Knowledge: University Science, Knowledge Capture, and Firm Performance in Biotechnology." NBER Working Paper No. 8499.
19. Arora, Ashish. 1995. "Licensing Tacit Knowledge: Intellectual Property Rights and the Market for Know-How." Economics of Innovation and New Technology 4: 41-59.
20. Arora, Ashish. 1996. "Contracting for Tacit Knowledge: The Provision of Technical Services in Technology Licensing Contracts." Journal of Development Economics 50(2): 233-56.
21. Arora, Ashish, Marco Ceccagnoli, and Wesley M. Cohen. 2003. "R&D and the Patent Premium." NBER Working Paper No. 9431.
22. Arora, Ashish, Wesley Cohen, and John Walsh. 2003. "Research Tool Patent and Licensing and Biomedical Innovation." In Wesley Cohen and Stephen A. Merrill, eds., Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
23. Arora, Ashish, Andrea Fosfuri, and Alfonso Gambardella. 2001. Markets for Technology:The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy. Cambridge, Mass.:The MIT Press.
24. Arora, Ashish, and Robert Merges. 2004. "Specialized Supply Firms, Property Rights, and Firm Boundaries." Industrial and Corporate Change 3(13): 451-75.
25. Arrow, Kenneth. 1962. "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention." In Richard R. Nelson, ed., The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity:Economic and Social Factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 609-25.
26. Arundel, Anthony, and Isabelle Kabla. 1998. "What Percentage of Innovations are Patented? Empirical Estimates for European Firms." Research Policy 27(2):127-41.
27. Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM). "Licensing Survey Summary." AUTM Publications, various years, available online at http://www .autm.net/about/dsp.publications.cfm.
28. Atkinson, Scott, Alan Marco, and John L. Turner. 2006. "Uniformity and Forum Shopping in U.S. Patent Litigation." Working Paper.
29. Ayres, Ian, and Paul Klemperer. 1999. "Limiting Patentees' Market Power Without Reducing Innovation Incentives: The Perverse Benefits of Uncertainty and Non-Injunctive Remedies." Michigan Law Review 97(4): 985-1033.
30. Ayres, Ian, and Eric Talley. 1995. "Solomonic Bargaining: Dividing a Legal Entitlement to Facilitate Coasean Trade." Yale Law Journal 104(5): 1027-117.
31. Bar-Gill, Oren, and Gideon Parchomovsky. 2006. "A Marketplace for Ideas?" Texas Law Review 84(2): 395-431.
32. Barney, Jonathan A. 2002. "A Study of Patent Mortality Rates: Using Statistical Survival Analysis to Rate and Value Patent Assets." AIPLA Quarterly Journal 30(3): 317-52.
33. Barton, John H. 2000. "Reforming the Patent System." Science 287: 1933-34.
34. Baudry, Marc, and Beatrice Dumont. 2006. "Patent Renewals as Options: Improving the Mechanism for Weeding Out Lousy Patents." Review of Industrial Organization 28(1): 41-62.
35. Benjamin, Stuart, and Arti K. Rai. 2006. "Who's Afraid of the APA? What the Patent System Can Learn from Administrative Law." Georgetown Law Journal 95: 270-336.
36. Bessen, James. 2005. "Patents and the Diffusion of Technical Information." Economics Letters 86(1): 121-28.
37. Bessen, James. 2006a. "The Value of U.S. Patents by Owner and Patent Characteristics." Boston University School of Law Working Paper No. 06-46.
38. Bessen, James. 2006b. "Estimates of Firms' Patent Rents from Firm Market Value." Boston University School of Law Working Paper No. 06-14.
39. Bessen, James, and Robert M. Hunt. 2004a. "An Empirical Look at Software Patents." Working Paper 03-17/R, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
40. Bessen, James, and Robert M. Hunt. 2004b. "The Software Patent Experiment." Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review 2004(Q3): 22-32.
41. Bessen, James, and Robert M. Hunt. 2007. "An Empirical Look at Software Patents." Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 16(1): 157-89.
42. Bessen, James, and Eric Maskin. 2007. "Sequential Innovation, Patents, and Imitation." RAND Journal of Economics, forthcoming.
43. Bessen, James, and Michael J. Meurer. 2005a. "Lessons for Patent Policy from Empirical Research on Patent Litigation." Lewis and Clark Law Review 9(1):1-27.
44. Bessen, James, and Michael J. Meurer. 2005b. "The Patent Litigation Explosion." Boston University School of Law Working Paper No. 05-18.
45. Bessen, James, and Michael J. Meurer. 2006. "Patent Litigation with Endogenous Disputes." American Economic Review 96(2): 77-81.
46. Bessen, James, and Michael J. Meurer. 2007. "The Private Costs of Patent Litigation." Boston University School of Law Working Paper No. 07-08.
47. Bhagat, Sanjai, John M. Bizjak, and Jeffrey L. Coles. 1998. "The Shareholder Wealth Implications of Corporate Lawsuits." Financial Management 27(4):5-27.
48. Bhagat, Sanjai, James A. Brickley, and Jeffrey L. Coles. 1994. "The Costs of Inefficient Bargaining and Financial Distress: Evidence from Corporate Lawsuits." Journal of Financial Economics 35(2): 221-47.
49. Blair, Roger D., and Thomas F. Cotter. 2005. Intellectual Property: Economic and Legal Dimensions of Rights and Remedies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Boldrin, Michele, and David K. Levine. 2005. "Against Intellectual Monopoly." Economic and Game Theory, November 11, 2005, available online at http://www.dklevine.com/general/intellectual/against.htm.
51. Branstetter, Lee, and Yoshiaki Ogura. 2005. "Is Academic Science Driving a Surge in Industrial Innovation? Evidence from Patent Citations." NBER Working Paper No. 11561.
52. Brewer, M. B., Michael R. Darby, and Lynne G. Zucker. 1998. "Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises." American Economic Review 88(1): 290-306.
53. Burk, Dan, and Mark Lemley. 2002. "Is Patent Law Technology-Specific?" Berkeley Technology Law Journal 17(4): 1155-1206.
54. Burk, Dan, and Mark Lemley. 2003. "Policy Levers in Patent Law." Virginia Law Review 89(7):1575-1696.
55. Burk, Dan, and Mark Lemley. 2005. "Quantum Patent Mechanics." Lewis and Clark Law Review 9(1):29-56.
56. Campbell-Kelly, Martin. 2005. "Not All Bad: An Historical Perspective on Software Patents." Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review 11(2):191-248.
57. Caves, Richard E., Harold Crookell, and Peter J. Killing. 1983. "The Imperfect Market for Technology Licenses." Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 45(3): 249-67.
58. Challu, Pablo. 1995. "Effects of the Monopolistic Patenting of Medicine in Italy since 1978." International Journal of Technology Management 10(2):237-51.
59. CHI Research, Inc. 2003. "Small Serial Innovators: The Small Firm Contribution to Technical Change." Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy, February 2003.
60. CHI Research, Inc. 2004. "Small Firms and Technology: Acquisitions, Inventor Movement, and Technology Transfer." Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy, January 2004.
61. Chien, Colleen V., and Mark A. Lemley. 2003. "Are the U.S. Patent Priority Rules Really Necessary?" Hastings Law Journal 54(5): 1299-1333.
62. Christensen, Clayton. 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press/Harvard University Business School Press.
63. Clay, Karen. 2006. "Squatters, Production, and Violence." Working Paper.
64. Cockburn, Iain, and Zvi Griliches. 1988. "Industry Effects and Appropriability Measures in the Stock Market Valuation of R&D and Patents." American Economic Review 78(2): 419-23.
65. Cockburn, Iain, and Rebecca Henderson. 1994. "Racing to Invest? The Dynamics of Competition in Ethical Drug Discovery." Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 3(3): 481-519.
66. Cockburn, Iain, and Rebecca Henderson. 2003. "The IPO Survey on Strategic Management of Intellectual Property." Intellectual Property Owners Association, Washington, D.C., November 2003.
67. Cockburn, Iain, Sam Kortum, and Scott Stern. 2003. "Are All Patent Examiners Equal? Examiners, Patent Characteristics, and Litigation Outcomes." In Wesley Cohen and Stephen A. Merrill, eds., Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
68. Cockburn, Iain, and Megan MacGarvie. 2006. "Entry, Exit and Patenting in the Software Industry." Working Paper.
69. Cohen, Julie E., and Mark A. Lemley. 2001. "Patent Scope and Innovation in the Software Industry." California Law Review 89(1): 1-57.
70. Cohen, Linda R., and Jun Ishii. 2005. "Competition, Innovation and Racing for Priority at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office." Working Paper.
71. Cohen, Wesley, Akira Goto, Akiya Nagata, Richard R. Nelson, and John P. Walsh. 2002. "R&D Spillovers, Patents and the Incentives to Innovate in Japan and the United States." Research Policy 31(8-9): 1349-67.
72. Cohen, Wesley, Richard R. Nelson, and John P. Walsh. 2000. "Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not)." NBER Working Paper No. 7552.
73. Cordes, Joseph J., Henry R. Hertzfeld, and Nicholas S. Vonortas. 1999. "Survey of High Technology Firms." Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy, April 1999.
74. Crafts, Nicholas. 2004. "Steam as a General Purpose Technology: A Growth Accounting Perspective." Economic Journal 114: 338-51.
75. Cukier, Kenn. 2005. "A Market for Ideas: A Survey of Patents and Technology." Economist, October 22, 2005.
76. Cutler, David, and Lawrence Summers. 1988. "The Costs of Conflict Resolution and Financial Distress: Evidence from the Texaco-Pennzoil Litigation." RAND Journal of Economics 19(2): 157-72.
77. Darby, Michael R., Andrew Wang, and Lynne G. Zucker. 2004. "Joint Ventures, Universities, and Success in the Advanced Technology Program." Contemporary Economic Policy 22(2): 145-61.
78. Darby, Michael R., I. I. Welch, and Lynne G. Zucker. 2001. "Going Public When You Can in Biotechnology." Working Paper.
79. Darby, Michael R., and Lynne G. Zucker. 2001. "Change or Die: the Adoption of Biotechnology in the Japanese and U.S. Pharmaceutical Industries." Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy 7: 85-125.
80. David, Paul A. 1990. "The Dynamo and the Computer: An Historical Perspective on the Modern Productivity Paradox." American Economic Review 80(2):355-61.
81. de Laat, Paul B. 2000. "Patenting Mathematical Algorithms: What's the Harm?:A Thought Experiment in Algebra." International Review of Law and Economics 20(2): 187-204.
82. Demsetz, Harold. 1967. "Toward a Theory of Property Rights." American Economic Review 57(2): 347-59.
83. De Soto, Hernando. 2000. The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else. New York: Basic.
84. DiMasi, Joseph A., Ronald W. Hansen, and Henry G. Grabowski. 2003. "The Price of Innovation: New Estimates of Drug Development Costs." Journal of Health Economics 22(2): 151-85.
85. Dreyfuss, Rochelle. 1989. "The Federal Circuit: A Case Study in Specialized Courts." New York University Law Review 64(1): 1-77.
86. Dreyfuss, Rochelle. 2004. "The Federal Circuit: A Continuing Experiment in Specialization." Case Western Reserve Law Review 54(3): 769-801.
87. Duffy, John F. 2000. "On Improving the Legal Process of Claim Interpretation:Administrative Alternatives." Washington University Journal of Law and Policy 2: 109-66.
88. Duffy, John F., and Craig A. Nard. 2006. "Rethinking Patent Law's Uniformity Principle." Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-17.
89. Dutton, H. I. 1984. The Patent System and Inventive Activity During the Industrial Revolution. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
90. Eisenberg, Rebecca, and Michael A. Heller. 1998. "Can Patents Deter Innovation?:The Anti-Commons in Biomedical Research." Science 280: 698-701.
91. Ellickson, Robert C. 1991. Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
92. Evenson, Robert, and Sunil Kanwar. 2003. "Does Intellectual Property Protection Spur Technological Change?" Oxford Economic Papers 55(2): 235-64.
93. Falvey, Rod, Neil Foster, and David Greenaway. 2006. "Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth." Review of Development Economics 10(4): 700-719.
94. Fauchart, Emmanuelle, and Eric von Hippel. 2006. "Norms-Based Intellectual Property Systems: The Case of French Chefs." MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper 4576-06.
95. Federal Trade Commission. 2003. "To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy." Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
96. Feldman, Maryann P., and Maryellen R. Kelley. 2003. "Leveraging Research and Development: Assessing the Impact of the U.S. Advanced Technology Program." Small Business Economics 20(2): 153-65.
97. Feldman, Robin. 2005. "Rethinking Rights in Biospace." Southern California Law Review, 79(1): 1-44.
98. Fisk, Catherine L. 1998. "Removing the 'Fuel of Interest' from the 'Fire of Genius':Law and the Employee-Inventor, 1830-1930." University of Chicago Law Review 65(4): 1127-98.
99. Frischmann, Brett M., and Mark Lemley. 2007. "Spillovers." Columbia Law Review 107: 257.
100. Gallini, Nancy, and Suzanne Scotchmer. 2004. "Intellectual Property: When Is It the Best Incentive System?" Innovation Policy and the Economy 2: 51-78.
101. Gallini, Nancy, and Brian Wright. 1990. "Technology Transfer under Asymmetric Information." RAND Journal of Economics 21(1): 147-60.
102. Gambardella, Alfonso, Dietmar Harhoff, and Bart Verspagen. 2006. "The Value of Patents." Working Paper.
103. Gambardella, Alfonso, Paola Giuri, and Alessandra Luzzi. 2006. "The Market for Patents in Europe." Working Paper.
104. Gans, Joshua, David Hsu, and Scott Stern. 2002. "When Does Start-Up Innovation Spur the Gale of Creative Destruction?" RAND Journal of Economics 33(4):571-86.
105. Gerard, David. 1998. "The Development of First-Possession Rules in U.S. Mining, 1872-1920: Theory, Evidence, and Policy Implications." Resources Policy 24(4): 251-64.
106. Gill, P. E., W. Murray, M. A. Saunders, J. A. Tomlin, and M. A. Wright. 1986. "On Projected Newton Barrier Methods for Linear Programming and an Equivalence to Karmarkar's Projective Method." Mathematical Programming 36(2): 183-209.
107. Ginarte, Juan Carlos, and Walter G. Park. 1997a. "Determinants of Patent Rights: A Cross-National Study." Research Policy 26(3): 283-301.
108. Ginarte, Juan Carlos, and Walter G. Park. 1997b. "Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth." Contemporary Economic Policy, 15(3): 51-61.
109. Glasscock, C. B. 1935. The War of the Copper Kings: The Builders of Butte and Wolves of Wall Street. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
110. Goolsbee, Austin. 1998. "Does Government R&D Policy Mainly Benefit Scientists and Engineers?" American Economic Review 88: 298-302.
111. Gort, Michael, and Steven Klepper. 1982. "Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations." Economic Journal 92(367): 630-53.
112. Gould, David M., and William C. Gruben. 1996. "The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Economic Growth." Journal of Development Economics 48(2):323-50.
113. Grabowski, Henry, and John Vernon. 2000. "Effective Patent Life in Pharmaceuticals." International Journal of Technology Management 19(1-2):98-120.
114. Graham, Stuart J. H., Bronwyn H. Hall, Dietmar Harhoff, and David C. Mowery. 2002. "Post-Issue Patent 'Quality Control': A Comparative Study of U.S. Patent Re-examinations and European Patent Oppositions." NBER Working Paper No. 8807.
115. Graham, Stuart J. H., Bronwyn H. Hall, Dietmar Harhoff, and David C. Mowery. 2004. "Prospects for Improving U.S. Patent Quality via Post-grant Opposition." In Innovation Policy and the Economy 4. Cambridge and London:The MIT Press/National Bureau of Economic Research, 115-32.
116. Graham, Stuart J. H. and Dietmar Harhoff. 2006. "Can Post-Grant Reviews Improve Patent System Design? A Twin Study of U.S. and European Patents." Working Paper.
117. Griliches, Zvi. 1981. "Market Value, R&D, and Patents." Economic Letters 7(2):183-87.
118. Gustafsson, Charlotta. 2005. "Private Value of Patents in a Small Economy: Evidence From Finland." Working Paper.
119. Hall, Bronwyn H. 1990. "The Manufacturing Sector Master File: 1959-1987." NBER Working Paper No. 3366.
120. Hall, Bronwyn H. 1993. "Industrial Research During the 1980s: Did the Rate of Return Fall?" Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Microeconomics 2: 289-343.
121. Hall, Bronwyn H. 2000. "Innovation and Market Value." In R. Barrell, G. Mason and M. O'Mahoney, eds., Productivity, Innovation and Economic Performance. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 188-98.
122. Hall, Bronwyn H. 2005. "Exploring the Patent Explosion." Journal of Technology Transfer 30(2): 35-48.
123. Hall, Bronwyn H., and Dietmar Harhoff. 2004. "Post-Grant Patent Reviews in the United States: Design Choices and Expected Impact." Berkeley Technology Law Journal 19(3): 989-1015.
124. Hall, Bronwyn H., Adam B. Jaffe, and Manuel Trajtenberg. 2001. "The NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools." NBER Working Paper No. 8498.
125. Hall, Bronwyn H., Adam B. Jaffe, and Manuel Trajtenberg. 2005. "Market Value and Patent Citations." RAND Journal of Economics 36(1): 16-38.
126. Hall, Bronwyn H., and Rosemarie Ziedonis. 2001. "The Patent Paradox Revisited:An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979-1995." RAND Journal of Economics 32(1): 101-28.
127. Hall, Bronwyn H., and Rosemarie Ziedonis. 2007. "An Empirical Analysis of Patent Litigation in the Semiconductor Industry." Working Paper.
128. Hall, Robert E., and Charles I. Jones. 1999. "Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker Than Others?" Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(1): 83-116.
129. Hansmann, Henry, and Rainier Kraakman. 2002. "Property, Contract, and Verification:The Numerus Clausus Problem and the Divisibility of Rights." Journal of Legal Studies 31(2): 373-420.
130. Harhoff, Dietmar, Frederic M. Scherer, and Katrin Vopel. 2003. "Exploring the Tail of Patented Invention Value Distributions." In Ove Grandstrand, ed., Economics, Law and Intellectual Property. The Hague: Kluwer, 279-309.
131. Haslem, Bruce. 2005. "Managerial Opportunism During Corporate Litigation," Journal of Finance 60: 2013-41.
132. Hayashi, Fumio. 1982. "Tobin's Marginal Q and Average Q: A Neoclassical Interpretation." Econometrica 50(1): 213-24.
133. Hayter, Earl W. 1947. "The Patent System and Agrarian Discontent, 1875-1888." Mississippi Valley Historical Review 34(1): 59-82.
134. Heller, Michael A. 1998. "The Tragedy of the Anti-Commons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets." Harvard Law Review 111(3): 621-88.
135. Heller, Michael A. 1999. "The Boundaries of Private Property." Yale Law Journal 108(6):1163-1223.
136. Henry, Matthew, and John L. Turner. 2006. "The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's Impact on Patent Litigation." Journal of Legal Studies 35(1):85-117.
137. Holbrook, Timothy R. 2006. "Possession in Patent Law." Southern Methodist University Law Review 59: 123-76.
138. Hounshell, David A. 1984. From the American System to Mass Production-1800-1932. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
139. Hubbard, Tim, and James Love. 2004a. "A New Trade Framework for Global Healthcare R&D." PLoS Biology 2(2): 52.
140. Hubbard, Tim, and James Love. 2004b. "We're patently going mad: lifesaving drugs must be developed differently-for all our sakes." Guardian, March 4, 2004.
141. Hunt, Robert M. 2004. "Patentability, Industry Structure, and Innovation." Journal of Industrial Economics 52(3): 401-25.
142. Hunt, Robert M. 2006. "When Do More Patents Reduce R&D?" American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings 96(2): 87-91.
143. Hunter, Starling David. 2003. "Have Business Method Patents Gotten a Bum Rap? Some Empirical Evidence." MIT Sloan Working Paper No. 4326-03.
144. Jaffe, Adam B. 2000. "The U.S. Patent System in Transition: Policy Innovation and the Innovation Process." Research Policy 29(4-5): 531-57.
145. Jaffe, Adam B., and Josh Lerner. 2004. Innovation and Its Discontents. Princeton:Princeton University Press.
146. Jensen, Paul H., Alfons Palangkaraya, and Elizabeth Webster. 2005. "Patent Application Outcomes across the Trilateral Patent Offices." Working Paper.
147. Johnson, Simon, John McMillan, and Christopher Woodruff. 2002. "Property Rights and Finance." American Economic Review 92(5): 1335-56.
148. Kaplow, Louis, and Steven Shavell. 1995. "Do Liability Rules Facilitate Bargaining? A Reply to Ayres and Talley." Yale Law Journal 105(1): 221-33.
149. Kappos, David J., and Ray Strimaitis. 2005. "Collaborative Innovation and the Patent System-Replacing Friction with Facilitation." Unpublished Manuscript.
150. Keefer, Philip, and Stephen Knack. 1995. "Institutions and Economic Performance:Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures." Economics and Politics 7(3): 207-27.
151. Keefer, Philip, and Stephen Knack. 1997. "Why Don't Poor Countries Catch Up? A Cross-National Test of an Institutional Explanation." Economic Inquiry 35(3): 590-602.
152. Kerner, Sean Michael. 2005. "A Primer on Software Patents." Internetnews.com, May 20, 2005, available online at http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3506836.
153. Kesan, Jay P., and Gwendolyn G. Ball. 2006. "How Are Patent Cases Resolved? An Empirical Examination of the Adjudication and Settlement of Patent Disputes." Washington University Law Review 84: 237-312.
154. Khan, B. Zorina. 2005. The Democratization of Invention: Patents and Copyrights in American Economic Development, 1790-1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
155. Khan, B. Zorina, and Kenneth Sokoloff. 1990. "The Democratization of Invention During Early Industrialization: Evidence from the United States, 1790-1846." Journal of Economic History 50(2): 363-78.
156. Khan, B. Zorina, and Kenneth Sokoloff. 1993. " 'Schemes of Practical Utility:' Entrepreneurship and Innovation among 'Great Inventors' in the United States, 1790-1865." Journal of Economic History 53(2): 289-307.
157. Kieff, F. Scott. 2001. "Property Rights and Property Rules for Commercializing Inventions." Minnesota Law Review 85(3): 697-754.
158. Kitch, Edmund W. 1977. "The Nature and Function of the Patent System." Journal of Law and Economics 20(2): 265-90.
159. Klemens, Ben. 2006. Ma+h You Can't Use: Patents, Copyright, and Software. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution Press.
160. Klevorick, Alvin K., Richard C. Levin, Richard R. Nelson, and Sidney G. Winter. 1987. "Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development." Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3: 783-820.
161. Klock, Mark, and Pamela Megna. 1993. "The Impact of Intangible Capital on Tobin's Q in the Semiconductor Industry." American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings 83(2): 265-69.
162. Kremer, Michael. 1998. "Patent Buyouts: A Mechanism for Encouraging Innovation." Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(4): 1137-67.
163. Lach, Saul, and Mark Schankerman. 2004. "Royalty Sharing and Technology Licensing in Universities." Journal of the European Economic Association 2(2-3):252-64.
164. Lamoreaux, Naomi R., and Kenneth L. Sokoloff. 1996, "Long-Term Change in the Organization of Inventive Activity." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93: 12686-692.
165. Lamoreaux, Naomi R., and Kenneth L. Sokoloff. 1997. "Inventors, Firms, and the Market for Technology in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries." NBER Historical Working Paper No. 98.
166. Lamoreaux, Naomi R., and Kenneth L. Sokoloff. 1999. "Inventors, Firms, and the Market for Technology in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries." In Naomi R. Lamroeaux, Daniel M. G. Raff, and Peter Temin, eds., Learning by Doing in Markets, Firms, and Countries. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 19-60.
167. Landes, William M., and Richard A. Posner. 2003. The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
168. Lanjouw, Jean O. 1998. "Patent Protection in the Shadow of Infringement: Simulation Estimations of Patent Value," Review of Economic Studies 65: 671-710.
169. Lanjouw, Jean O., and Iain M. Cockburn. 2001. "New Pills for Poor People? Empirical Evidence after GATT." World Development 29(2): 265-89.
170. Lanjouw, Jean O., and Josh Lerner. 1997. "The Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights: A Survey of the Empirical Literature." NBER Working Paper No. W6296.
171. Lanjouw, Jean O., and Josh Lerner. 2001. "Tilting the Table? The Use of Preliminary Injunctions." Journal of Law and Economics 44(2): 573-603.
172. Lanjouw, Jean O., Ariel Pakes, and Jonathan Putnam. 1998. "How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: The Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data." Journal of Industrial Economics 46(4): 405-32.
173. Lanjouw, Jean O., and Mark Schankerman. 2004. "Protecting Intellectual Property Rights: Are Small Firms Handicapped?" Journal of Law and Economics 47(1): 45-74.
174. Lemley, Mark A. 2001. "Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office." Northwestern Law Review 95(4): 1495-1532.
175. Lemley, Mark A. 2005a. "Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding." Texas Law Review 83(4): 1031-75.
176. Lemley, Mark A. 2005b. "The Changing Meaning of Patent Claim Terms." Michigan Law Review 104(1): 101-129.
177. Lemley, Mark A. 2006. "Should Patent Infringement Require Proof of Copying?" Michichigan Law Review 105(7): 1525-536.
178. Lemley, Mark, and Kimberly Moore. 2004. "Abolishing Patent Continuations." Boston University Law Review 84(1): 63-123.
179. Lemley, Mark A., and Carl Shapiro. 2007. "Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking." Texas Law Review 85: 1991.
180. Lerner, Josh. 1995. "Patenting in the Shadow of Competitors." Journal of Law and Economics 38(2): 463-95.
181. Lerner, Josh. 1999. "Small Businesses, Innovation, and Public Policy." In Zoltan Acs, ed., Are Small Firms Important? New York: Kluwer, 159-68.
182. Lerner, Josh. 2000. "150 Years of Patent Protection." NBER Working Paper No. 7478.
183. Lerner, Josh. 2002. "150 Years of Patent Protection." American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings 92(2): 221-25.
184. Lerner, Josh. 2006a. "Using Litigation to Understand Trade Secrets: A Preliminary Exploration." Working Paper.
185. Lerner, Josh. 2006b. "Trolls on State Street?: The Litigation of Financial Patents, 1976-2005." Working Paper.
186. Levin, Richard C., Stephen A. Merrill, and Mark B. Myers. 2004. A Patent System for the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
187. Libecap, Gary. 1989. Contracting for Property Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
188. Lichtman, Douglas. 2004. "Rethinking Prosecution History Estoppel." University of Chicago Law Review 71(1): 151-82.
189. Long, Clarissa. 2004. "Information Costs in Patent and Copyright." Virginia Law Review 90(2): 465-549.
190. Lueck, Dean. 1995. "The Rule of First Possession and the Design of the Law." Journal of Law and Economics 38(2): 393-436.
191. Lunney, Glynn, Jr. 2001. "E-Obviousness." Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review 7: 363-421.
192. Lunney, Glynn, Jr. 2004. "Patent Law, the Federal Circuit, and the Supreme Court: A Quiet Revolution." Supreme Court Economic Review 11: 1.
193. Lustig, Irvin, Roy Marsten, Matthew Saltzman, Avid Shanno, and Radhika Subramanian. 1990. "Interior Point Methods for Linear Programming: Just Call Newton, Lagrange, Fiacco and McCormick!" Interfaces 20(4): 105-16.
194. Macdonald, Stuart. 1998. "What the Patent System Offers the Small Firm." ESRC Summary Report.
195. Machlup, Fritz. 1958. "An Economic Review of the Patent System." Study No. 15, U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
196. Machlup, Fritz, and Edith Penrose. 1950. "The Patent Controversy in the Nineteenth Century." Journal of Economic History 10(1): 1-29.
197. MacLeod, Christine. 1988. Inventing the Industrial Revolution: The English Patent System, 1660-1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
198. MacLeod, Christine. 1998. "James Watt, Heroic Invention and the Idea of the Industrial Revolution." In Maxine Berg and Kristine Bruland, eds., Technological Revolutions in Europe: Historical Perspectives. Cheltenham: Elgar, 96-115.
199. MacLeod, Christine, Jennifer Tann, Andrew James, and Jeremy Stein. 2003. "Evaluating Inventive Activity: The Cost of Nineteenth-Century U.K. Patents and the Fallibility of Renewal Data." Economic History Review 56(3): 537-62.
200. Maney, Kevin. 2005. "You really can find identities of top patentholders." USA Today, December 23, 2005, available online at http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/technology/maney/2005-12-13-patent_x.htm.
201. Mann, Ronald J. 2005. "Do Patents Facilitate Financing in the Software Industry?" Texas Law Review 83(4): 961-1030.
202. Mann, Ronald J., and Thomas Sager. 2005. "Patents, Venture Capital, and Software Startups." University of Texas Law and Economics Research Paper No. 57.
203. Mansfield, Edwin. 1986. "Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study." Management Science 32(2): 173-81.
204. Mansfield, Edwin, Mark Schwartz, and Samuel Wagner. 1981. "Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study." Economic Journal 91(364): 907-18.
205. Maskus, Keith E. 2006. Reforming U.S. Patent Policy: Getting the Incentives Right. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
206. Mass, William. 1989. "Mechanical and Organizational Innovation: The Drapers and the Automatic Loom." Business History Review 63: 876-929.
207. Menell, Peter S. 2006. "Are Software Patents 'Anything under the Sun Made by Man...'?" presentation at Boston University School of Law, November 17, 2006, available online at http://www.researchoninnovation.org/swconf/program .htm.
208. Menell, Peter S. 2007. "A Method for Reforming the Patent System." Working Paper.
209. Merges, Robert P. 2005. "A Transactional View of Property Rights." Working Paper.
210. Merges, Robert P. 2006. "Patents, Entry and Growth in the Software Industry." Working Paper.
211. Merges, Robert P. and Richard R. Nelson. 1990. "On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope." Columbia Law Review 90(4): 839-916.
212. Merrill, Thomas W., and Henry E. Smith. 2000. "Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle." Yale Law Journal 110(1): 1-70.
213. Merton, Robert K. 1961. "Singletons and Multiples in Scientific Research." American Philosophical Society Proceedings 105: 470-86.
214. Meurer, Michael J. 1989. "The Settlement of Patent Litigation." RAND Journal of Economics 20(1): 77-91.
215. Meurer, Michael J. 2003. "Controlling Opportunistic and Anti-Competitive Intellectual Property Litigation." Boston College Law Review 44(2): 509-44.
216. Meurer, Michael J., and Craig A. Nard. 2005a. "Invention, Refinement and Patent Claim Scope: A New Perspective on the Doctrine of Equivalents." Georgetown Law Journal 93(6): 1947-2012.
217. Meurer, Michael J., and Craig A. Nard. 2005b. "Patent Policy Adrift in a Sea of Anecdote: A Reply to Lichtman." Georgetown Law Journal 93(6): 2033-36.
218. Miller, Joseph Scott. 2005. "Enhancing Patent Disclosure for Faithful Claim Construction." Lewis and Clark Law Review 9(1): 177-230.
219. Mokyr, Joel. 1999. The British Industrial Revolution: An Economic Perspective. Boulder: Westview.
220. Moore, Kimberly. 2001. "Forum Shopping in Patent Cases: Does Geographic Choice Affect Innovation?" North Carolina Law Review 79(4): 889-938.
221. Moore, Kimberly. 2002. "Judges, Juries and Patent Cases-An Empirical Peek Inside the Black Box." Michigan Law Review 99(2): 365-409.
222. Moore, Kimberly. 2005. "Markman Eight Years Later: Is Claim Construction More Predictable?" Lewis and Clark Law Review 9: 231-47.
223. Moser, Petra. 2002. "How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth-Century World Fairs." NBER Working Paper No. 9909.
224. Moser, Petra. 2006. "What Do Inventors Patent?" Working Paper.
225. Mossoff, Adam. 2001. "Rethinking the Development of Patents: An Intellectual History, 1550-1800." Hastings Law Journal 52(6): 1255-322.
226. Mossoff, Adam. 2007. "Patents as Constitutional Private Property: The Historical Protection of Patents Under the Takings Clause." Boston University Law Review 87, forthcoming.
227. Mowery, David C., Richard R. Nelson, Bhaven N. Sampat, and Arvids A. Ziedonis. 2004. Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry Technology Transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
228. Nard, Craig A. 2001. "A Theory of Claim Interpretation." Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 14(1): 1-82.
229. Nard, Craig A., and Andrew P. Morriss. 2005. "Constitutionalizing Patents:From Venice to Philadelphia." Berkeley Electronic Press Journal of Law and Economics 2(2): 4.
230. National Science Foundation, Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences. 2005. "The U.S. Research And Experimentation Tax Credit In The 1990s," Infobrief, NSF 05-316.
231. Newell, Allen. 1986. "Response: The Models are Broken, The Models are Broken." University of Pittsburgh Law Review 47(4): 1023-35.
232. Nimmer, Melville B. and David Nimmer. 2006. Nimmer on Copyright. San Francisco:Matthew Bender.
233. Noel, Michael C., and Mark Schankerman. 2006. "Strategic Patenting and Software Innovation." CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5701.
234. North, Douglass C. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York:W. W. Norton.
235. North, Douglass C., and Barry Weingast. 1989. "Constitutions and Commitment:Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England." Journal of Economic History 49(4): 803-32.
236. Nuvolari, Alessandro. 2004. "Collective Invention during the British Industrial Revolution: The Case of the Cornish Pumping Engine." Cambridge Journal of Economics 28(3): 347-63.
237. Ocean Tomo, LLC. 2006. Results of Live Patent Auction, April 6, 2006, Ritz-Carlton Hotel, San Francisco, available online at http://www.oceantomo.com/auctions.html.
238. Oppenheim, Charles. 1998. "How SMEs Use the Patent Literature." Summary Report for the Economic and Social Research Council, United Kingdom.
239. O'Rourke, Maureen. 2000. "Toward a Doctrine of Fair Use in Patent Law." Columbia Law Review 100(5): 1177-1250.
240. Ostrom, Elinor. 1991. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
241. Oz, Effy. 1998. "Acceptable Protection of Software Intellectual Property: A Survey of Software Developers and Lawyers." Information and Management 34(3):161-73.
242. Pakes, Ariel. 1986. "Patents as Options: Some Estimates of the Value of Holding European Patent Stocks." Econometrica 54(4): 755-84.
243. Pakes, Ariel, and Mark Schankerman. 1984. "The Rate of Obsolescence of Patents, Research Gestation Lags, and the Private Rate of Return to Research Resources." In Zvi Griliches, ed., R&D, Patents and Productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press/NBER.
244. Pakes, Ariel, and Mark Schankerman. 1986. "Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries during the Post-1950 Period." Economic Journal 96: 1052-76.
245. Petherbridge, Lee. 2006. "Positive Examination." Idea 46: 173-219.
246. Petherbridge, Lee, and R. Polk Wagner. 2004. "Is the Federal Circuit Succeeding? An Empirical Assessment of Judicial Performance." University of Pennsylvania Law Review 152(3): 1105-80.
247. Post, Robert C. 1976. " 'Liberalizers' versus 'Scientific Men' in the Antebellum Patent Office." Technology and Culture 17(1): 24-54.
248. PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2006. "2006 Patent and Trademark Damages Study," available online at http://www.pwc.com/extweb/pwcpublications.nsf/docid/b3a557aca66760b48525711c0074d8e7.
249. Putnam, J. 1996. The Value of International Patent Protection. Ph.D. Diss., Yale University.
250. Qian, Yi. 2006. "Do National Patent Laws Stimulate Innovation in a Global Patenting Environment? A Cross-Country Analysis of Pharmaceutical Patent Protection, 1978-2002." Working Paper.
251. Quillen, Cecil D., Jr. 1993. "Proposal for the Simplification and Reform of the United States Patent System." AIPLA Quarterly Journal 21(3): 189-212.
252. Quillen, Cecil D., Jr., and Ogden H. Webster. 2001. "Continuing Patent Applications and Performance of the U.S. Patent Office." Federal Circuit Bar Journal 11(1): 1-21.
253. Quillen, Cecil D., Jr., and Ogden H. Webster. 2006. "Continuing Patent Applications and Performance of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office: Updated." Federal Circuit Bar Journal 15(4):635-77.
254. Rai, Arti K. 2003. "Engaging Facts and Policy: A Multi-Institution Approach to Patent Law." Columbia Law Review 103(5): 1035-135.
255. Risch, Michael. 2006. "The Failure of Public Notice in Patent Law." Working Paper.
256. Rivette, Kevin G., and David Kline. 2000. Rembrandt in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press/Harvard University Business School Press.
257. Rosenberg, N., and Manuel Trajtenberg. 2001. "A General Purpose Technology at Work: The Corliss Steam Engine in the late Nineteenth-Century U.S." NBER Working Paper 8485.
258. Rosenberg, Nathan. 2003. "Property Rights and Economic Growth." Paper presented at the Gosta Bohman Foundation, available online at http://www.ratioinstitutet.nu/pdf/wp/nr_propertyrights.pdf.
259. Sakakibara, Mariko, and Lee Branstetter. 2001. "Do Stronger Patents Induce More Innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese Patent Law Reforms." RAND Journal of Economics 32(1): 77-100.
260. Sales, Reno. 1964. Underground Warfare at Butte. Butte, Mont.: World Museum of Mining.
261. Saltzman, Matthew. 1994. "Internet Commentary. Re: The Karmarkar Algorithm (long)," available online at http://www.cs.uvic.ca/~wendym/courses/445/06/interiorpoint.txt.
262. Sampat, Bhaven N. 2004. "Examining Patent Examination: An Analysis of Examiner and Applicant Generated Prior Art." Manuscript, NBER Summer Institute 2004.
263. Samuelson, Pamela. 1990. "Benson Revisited: The Case Against Patent Protection for Algorithms and Other Computer Program-Related Inventions." Emory Law Review 39(4): 1025-1154.
264. Schankerman, Mark. 1998. "How Valuable is Patent Protection: Estimates by Technology Fields." RAND Journal of Economics 29(1): 77-107.
265. Scherer, F. M. 2006. "The Political Economy of Patent Policy Reform in the United States." Working Paper.
266. Scherer, F. M., and S. Weisburst. 1995. "Economic Effects of Strengthening Pharmaceutical Patent Protection in Italy." International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law 26: 1009-24.
267. Seabright, Paul. 2004. In the Company of Strangers. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
268. Scotchmer, Suzanne, and Stephen M. Maurer. 2002. "The Independent Invention Defence in Intellectual Property." Economica 69: 535-47.
269. Serrano, Carlos J. 2005. "The Market for Intellectual Property: Evidence from the Transfer of Patents." Working Paper.
270. Shapiro, Carl. 2006. "Prior User Rights." American Economic Review 96(2): 92-96.
271. Shapiro, Robert J., and Kevin A. Hassett. 2005. "The Economic Value of Intellectual Property." U.S.A. for Innovation Working Paper.
272. Shavell, Steven. 2002. "Economic Analysis of Property Law." Harvard University School of Law Discussion Paper No. 399.
273. Shavell, Steven, and Tanguy van Ypersele. 2001. "Rewards versus Intellectual Property Rights." Journal of Law and Economics 44(2): 525-47.
274. Singleton, Solveig. 2006. "Solutions for Software Patents: Notes From under My Desk." The Progress and Freedom Foundation, Progress on Point 13.33, available online at http://www.pff.org/issues-pubs/pops/pop13.33softwarepatents .pdf.
275. Smith, Henry E. 2003. "The Language of Property: Form, Context, and Audience." Stanford Law Review 55: 1105-91.
276. Smith, Henry E. 2004. "Property and Property Rules." New York University Law Review 79(5): 1719-98.
277. Strandburg, Katherine J. 2004. "What Does the Public Get? Experimental Use and the Patent Bargain." Wisconsin Law Review 2004(1): 81-155.
278. Svejnar, Jan. 2002. "Transition Economies: Performance and Challenges." Journal of Economic Perspectives 16(1): 3-28.
279. Taylor, C., and Z. Silbertson. 1973. The Economic Impact of the Patent System: A Study of the British Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
280. Thursby, Jerry G., and Marie C. Thursby. 2003. "University Licensing and the Bayh-Dole Act." Science 301: 1052.
281. Umbeck, John. 1981. A Theory of Property Rights, with Application to the California Gold Rush. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
282. USPTO. 1994. "Public Hearings on Software Patents," available online at http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/hearings/software/sanjose/index.html.
283. Vermont, Samson. 2006. "Independent Invention As a Defense to Patent Infringement." Michigan Law Review 105(3) pp. 475-504.
284. von Tunzelmann, G. N. 1978. Steam Power and British Industrialization to 1860. Oxford: Clarendon.
285. Wagner, R. Polk. 2007. "Did Phillips Change Any Thing? Empirical Analysis Of The Federal Circuit's Claim Construction Jurisprudence," available online at http://www.claimconstruction.com/.
286. Wagner, R. Polk, and Lee Petherbridge. 2004. "Is the Federal Circuit Succeeding? An Empirical Assessment of Judicial Performance." University of Pennsylvania Law Review 152: 1105-180.
287. Wallsten, Scott. J. 2000. "The Effects of Government-Industry R&D Programs on Private R&D: The Case of the Small Business Innovation Research Program." RAND Journal of Economics 31: 82-100.
288. Warshofsky, Fred. 1994. The Patent Wars. New York: John Wiley.
289. Wilson, Daniel J. 2005. "Beggar Thy Neighbor? The In-State vs. Out-of-State Impact of State R&D Tax Credits," Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper 2005-08.
290. Woodard, Colin. 2004. The Lobster Coast: Rebels, Rusticators, and the Struggle for a Forgotten Frontier. New York: Viking.
291. Wright, Brian D. 1983. "The Economics of Invention Incentives: Patents, Prizes, and Research Contracts." American Economic Review 73(4): 691-707.
292. Ziedonis, Rosemarie H. 2004. "Patent Litigation in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry." In Wesley Cohen and Stephen A. Merrill, eds., Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.