Trends in the diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy in the United States

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 115, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 495-502

  Hoover, Karen W ^a   Tao, Guoyu ^a   Kent, Charlotte K ^a  

^a CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METHOTREXATE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; GROUPS BY AGE; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES;

ABORTIFACIENT AGENTS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; METHOTREXATE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, ECTOPIC; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77649159671     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d0c328     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Chang J, Elam-Evans LD, Berg CJ, Herndon J, Flowers L, Seed KA, et al. Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance-United States, 1991-1999. MMWR Surveill Summ 2003;52:1-8.
2. Grimes DA. Estimation of pregnancy-related mortality risk by pregnancy outcome, United States, 1991 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:92-94
3. Ectopic pregnancy-United States, 1990-1992. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1995;44:46-48
4. Van Den Eeden SK, Shan J, Bruce C, Glasser M. Ectopic pregnancy rate and treatment utilization in a large managed care organization. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:1052-1057
5. Medical management of ectopic pregnancy. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 94. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:1479-1485
6. Ankum WM, Mol BW, Van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 1996;65:1093-1099
7. Barnhart KT, Sammel MD, Gracia CR, Chittams J, Hummel AC, Shaunik A. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in women with symptomatic first-trimester pregnancies. Fertil Steril 2006; 86:36-43.
8. Marchbanks PA, Annegers JF, Coulam CB, Strathy JH, Kurland LT. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy. A population-based study. JAMA 1988;259:1823-1827
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. DES update home. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/DES/. Retrieved August 12, 2009.
10. Mol BW, Ankum WM, Bossuyt PM, Van der Veen F. Contraception and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Contraception 1995;52:337-341
11. Peterson HB, Xia Z, Hughes JM, Wilcox LS, Tylor LR, Trussell J. The risk of ectopic pregnancy after tubal sterilization. U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group. N Engl J Med 1997;336:762-767
12. Barnhart KT. Clinical practice. Ectopic pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2009;361:379-387
13. Clayton HB, Schieve LA, Peterson HB, Jamieson DJ, Reynolds MA, Wright VC. Ectopic pregnancy risk with assisted reproductive technology procedures. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107: 595-604.
14. Medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2006;86: S96-102.
15. Lipscomb GH, Stovall TG, Ling FW. Nonsurgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1325-1329
16. Ory SJ. New options for diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy. JAMA 1992;267:534-537
17. Zane SB, Kieke BAJr, KendrickJS, Bruce C. Surveillance in a time of changing health care practices: estimating ectopic pregnancy incidence in the United States. Matern Child HealthJ 2002;6:227-236
18. Thomson Reuters (Healthcare) Inc. MarketScan research databases, user guide and database dictionary. Available at http://home.thomsonhealthcare.com/ marketscanuniversity/index.aspx?page=product. Retrieved August 12, 2009.
19. Graczykowski JW, Mishell DRJr. Methotrexate prophylaxis for persistent ectopic pregnancy after conservative treatment by salpingostomy. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:118-122
20. Freeman PR. The role of p-values in analysing trial results. Stat Med 1993;12:1443-1452
21. Landis RJ, Heyman ER, Koch GG Average partial association in three-way contingency tables: a review and discussion of alternative tests. International Statistical Review 1978;46: 237-254
22. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959;22:719-748
23. Goodman SN. Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 1: The P value fallacy. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:995-1004.
24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2007. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2009.
25. Tao G, Tian LH, Peterman TA. Estimating Chlamydia screening rates by using reported sexually transmitted disease tests for sexually active women aged 16 to 25 years in the United States. Sex Transm Dis 2007;34:180-182
26. Mol BW, Hajenius PJ, Engelsbel S, Ankum WM, Hemrika DJ, Van der Veen F, et al. Treatment of tubal pregnancy in the Netherlands: an economic comparison of systemic methotrexate administration and laparoscopic salpingostomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:945-951
27. Westrom L, Joesoef R, Reynolds G, Hagdu A, Thompson SE. Pelvic inflammatory disease and fertility. A cohort study of 1,844 women with laparoscopically verified disease and 657 control women with normal laparoscopic results. Sex Transm Dis 1992;19:185-192
28. Sunderam S, ChangJ, Flowers L, Kulkarni A, Sentelle G, Jeng G, et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance-United States, 2006. MMWR Surveill Summ 2009;58:1-25.
29. Ratelle S, Yokoe D, Blejan C, Whelan M, Tang Y, Platt R, et al. Predictive value of clinical diagnostic codes for the CDC case definition of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID): implications for surveillance. Sex Transm Dis 2003;30:866-870
30. KorhonenJ, Stenman UH, Ylostalo P. Serum human chorionic gonadotropin dynamics during spontaneous resolution of ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1994;61:632-636
31. Shalev E, Peleg D, Tsabari A, Romano S, Bustan M. Spontaneous resolution of ectopic tubal pregnancy: natural history. Fertil Steril 1995;63:15-19
32. Jones RK, Zolna MR, Henshaw SK, Finer LB. Abortion in the United States: incidence and access to services, 2005. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2008;40:6-16.