Random comparative study between intrauterine device Multiload Cu375 and Tcu 380a inserted in the postpartum period;Estudio comparativo al azar entre los dispositivos intrauterinos Multiload Cu375 y TCu 380A, colocados durante el posparto

Ginecologia y Obstetricia de Mexico

Volumn 74, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 306-311

  Ricalde, Roger Lara ^a   Tobías, Gerardo Menocal ^a   Pérez, Carlos Ramos ^a   Ramírez, Norma Velázquez ^a  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PERINATOLOGÍA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Abdominal ultrasound; Cervical dilatation; MLCu 375; Postpartum IUD; Tcu 380A

Indexed keywords

COPPER INTRAUTERINE DEVICE; MULTILOAD COPPER INTRAUTERINE DEVICE;

ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENITAL TRACT INFECTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; PAIN; PREGNANCY; PUERPERIUM; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; ULTRASOUND; UTERINE CERVIX DILATATION; UTERUS CAVITY; UTERUS PERFORATION; VAGINAL DELIVERY; ADULT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRACEPTION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICE EXPULSION; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES, COPPER; POSTPARTUM PERIOD;

EID: 35349012199     PISSN: 03009041     EISSN: 03009041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Reynoso L, Arévalo N, Lara R, Aznar R. Aplicación postplacenta de cinco tipos diferentes de dispositivos intrauterinos. Ginec Obstet Mex 1982;50:107-10.
2. World Health Organization, Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction. Task Force on Intrauterine Devices for Fertility Regulation. Comparative multicenter trial of three IUDs inserted immediately following delivery of the placenta. Contraception 1980;22:9-15.
3. Lara RR. Complicaciones del DIU postparto. En: Acosta A. Publicaciones Científicas del XV Congreso Latinoamericano de Ginecoobstetricia. Asunción, 1996;pp:21-25.
4. Celen S, Möröy P, Sucak A, Aktulay A, Danisman N. Clinical autcomes of early postplacental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Contraception 2004;69:279-82.
5. Cole LP, Edelman DA, Potts D, Wheeler RW, Laufe LE. Postpartum insertion of modified intrauterine devices. J Reprod Med 1984;29:667-82.
6. Tatum HJ, Saavedra R, Ramos R, et al. Immediate postplacental insertion of GYNE-T 380 and GYNE-T 380 postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices: Randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:1231-5.
7. Grimes D, Schultz K, van Vliet H, Standwood N. Immediate post-partum insertion of intrauterine devices: a Cochrane review. Hum Reprod 2002;17:549-54.
8. Thiery M, Van der Pas H, Van Kets H. The MLCu 375 intrauterine contraceptive device. Adv Contracept 1985;1:37-44.
9. Champion CB, Behlicovic B, Moreno AJ, et al. A Three-year evaluation of TCu 380Ag and Multiload Cu 375 intrauterine devices. Contraception 1988;38:631-35.
10. Thiery M, Van Kets H, Van der Pas H. Immediate postplacental IUD insertion: The expulsion problem. Contraception 1985;31:331-49.
11. Secretaría de Salud. Norma Oficial Mexicana de los Servicios de Planificación Familiar. NOM.005SSA2-1993:59-61.
12. Instituto Nacional de Perinatología. Normas y Procedimientos de Ginecología y Obstetricia 2002:147-50.
13. Azen SP, Roy S, Pike MC, Casagrande J, Mishell DR. A new procedure for the statistical evaluation of intrauterine contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977;128:329-35.
14. Hernández VM, Becerril FLC. Uso del DIU TCu 380 modificado con filamentos de cromo en el posparto inmediato. Ginec Obst Mex 2000;68:70-75.
15. O'Hanley K, Huber DH. Postpartum IUD: Keys for success. Contraception 1992;45:351-61.
16. Chi IC. What we have learned from recent IUD studies: A researcher's perspective. Contraception 1993;48:81-108.
17. Bonilla RF, Aguilar ZMA, Cázares MML, Hernández OME, Luna RMA. Factores de expulsión del dispositivo intrauterino TCu 380A aplicado en puerperio inmediato y tardío. Rev Med IMSS 2005;43:5-10.
18. Chi IC, Ji G, Siemens AJ, Waszak CS. IUD insertion at cesarean section-the Chinese experience. Adv Contracept 1986;2:145-53.
19. Lara RR, Sánchez RA, Aznar R. Aplicación del dispositivo intrauterino a través de la incisión de la cesárea. Ginec Obstet Mex 1989;57:23-27.
20. Letti MAL, López RJG, Martines-Costa SH, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonographic assesment of the expulsion rate of intrauterine devices inserted in the immediate post partum period: a pilot study. Contraception 2005;72:192-95.
21. Aznar R, Guerrero A, Alvarado A, Arévalo N, Lara R. Relationship between expulsion rate of IUDs inserted postplacenta and their sites in uterine cavity: an X Ray study. Contracept Deliv Systems 1982;3:197-200.
22. Ortiz JD, Guerrero BC, Wheeler RG, Waszak CS. Use of echosonography to monitor uterine placement of intrauterine devices after immediate postpartum insertions. Int Gynaecol Obstet 1987;25:53-57.