Softened gravity and the extension of the standard model up to infinite energy

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2015, Issue 2, 2015, Pages

  Giudice, Gian F ^a   Isidori, Gino ^b,c   Salvio, Alberto ^d   Strumia, Alessandro ^e,f  

^a CERN   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c INFN LABORATORI NAZIONALI DI FRASCATI   (Italy)

^d INSTITUTO DE FÍSICA TEÓRICA UAM CSIC   (Spain)

^e INFN SEZIONE DI PISA   (Italy)

^f NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS AND BIOPHYSICS   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Higgs Physics; Renormalization Group; Standard Model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924299969     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2015)137     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. M. Farina, D. Pappadopulo and A. Strumia, A modified naturalness principle and its experimental tests, JHEP08 (2013) 022 [arXiv:1303.7244] [INSPIRE].
2. J.P. Fatelo, J.M. Gerard, T. Hambye and J. Weyers, Symmetry breaking induced by top loops, Phys. Rev. Lett.74 (1995) 492 [INSPIRE].
3. T. Hambye, Symmetry breaking induced by top quark loops from a model without scalar mass, Phys. Lett.B 371 (1996) 87 [hep-ph/9510266] [INSPIRE].
4. R. Hempfling, The next-to-minimal Coleman-Weinberg model, Phys. Lett.B 379 (1996) 153 [hep-ph/9604278] [INSPIRE].
5. F. Vissani, Do experiments suggest a hierarchy problem?, Phys. Rev.D 57 (1998) 7027 [hep-ph/9709409] [INSPIRE].
6. P.H. Frampton and C. Vafa, Conformal approach to particle phenomenology, hep-th/9903226 [INSPIRE].
7. K.A. Meissner and H. Nicolai, Conformal symmetry and the standard model, Phys. Lett.B 648 (2007) 312 [hep-th/0612165] [INSPIRE].
8. W.-F. Chang, J.N. Ng and J.M.S. Wu, Shadow Higgs from a scale-invariant hidden U(1)(s) model, Phys. Rev.D 75 (2007) 115016 [hep-ph/0701254] [INSPIRE].
9. R. Foot, A. Kobakhidze and R.R. Volkas, Electroweak Higgs as a pseudo-Goldstone boson of broken scale invariance, Phys. Lett.B 655 (2007) 156 [arXiv:0704.1165] [INSPIRE].
10. R. Foot, A. Kobakhidze, K.L. McDonald and R.R. Volkas, A solution to the hierarchy problem from an almost decoupled hidden sector within a classically scale invariant theory, Phys. Rev.D 77 (2008) 035006 [arXiv:0709.2750] [INSPIRE].
11. S. Iso, N. Okada and Y. Orikasa, The minimal B-L model naturally realized at TeV scale, Phys. Rev.D 80 (2009) 115007 [arXiv:0909.0128] [INSPIRE].
12. M. Shaposhnikov and C. Wetterich, Asymptotic safety of gravity and the Higgs boson mass, Phys. Lett.B 683 (2010) 196 [arXiv:0912.0208] [INSPIRE].
13. S. Iso and Y. Orikasa, TeV scale B-L model with a flat Higgs potential at the Planck scale — in view of the hierarchy problem, PTEP2013 (2013) 023B08 [arXiv:1210.2848] [INSPIRE].
14. T. Hur and P. Ko, Scale invariant extension of the standard model with strongly interacting hidden sector, Phys. Rev. Lett.106 (2011) 141802 [arXiv:1103.2571] [INSPIRE].
15. M. Shaposhnikov, Asymptotic safety of gravity and the Higgs-boson mass, Theor. Math. Phys.170 (2012) 229 [Teor. Mat. Fiz.170 (2012) 280] [INSPIRE].
16. C. Englert, J. Jaeckel, V.V. Khoze and M. Spannowsky, Emergence of the electroweak scale through the Higgs portal, JHEP04 (2013) 060 [arXiv:1301.4224] [INSPIRE].
17. E.J. Chun, S. Jung and H.M. Lee, Radiative generation of the Higgs potential, Phys. Lett.B 725 (2013) 158 [arXiv:1304.5815] [INSPIRE].
18. M. Heikinheimo, A. Racioppi, M. Raidal, C. Spethmann and K. Tuominen, Physical Naturalness and Dynamical Breaking of Classical Scale Invariance, Mod. Phys. Lett.A 29 (2014) 1450077 [arXiv:1304.7006] [INSPIRE].
19. T. Hambye and A. Strumia, Dynamical generation of the weak and Dark Matter scale, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 055022 [arXiv:1306.2329] [INSPIRE].
20. C.D. Carone and R. Ramos, Classical scale-invariance, the electroweak scale and vector dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 055020 [arXiv:1307.8428] [INSPIRE].
21. A. Farzinnia, H.-J. He and J. Ren, Natural electroweak symmetry breaking from scale invariant Higgs mechanism, Phys. Lett.B 727 (2013) 141 [arXiv:1308.0295] [INSPIRE].
22. R. Foot, A. Kobakhidze, K.L. McDonald and R.R. Volkas, Poincaré protection for a natural electroweak scale, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 115018 [arXiv:1310.0223] [INSPIRE].
23. D. Chway, T.H. Jung, H.D. Kim and R. Dermisek, Radiative electroweak symmetry breaking model perturbative all the way to the Planck scale, Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (2014) 051801 [arXiv:1308.0891] [INSPIRE].
24. M. Holthausen, J. Kubo, K.S. Lim and M. Lindner, Electroweak and conformal symmetry breaking by a strongly coupled hidden sector, JHEP12 (2013) 076 [arXiv:1310.4423] [INSPIRE].
25. C.T. Hill, Is the Higgs boson associated with Coleman-Weinberg dynamical symmetry breaking?, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 073003 [arXiv:1401.4185] [INSPIRE].
26. J. Guo and Z. Kang, Higgs naturalness and dark matter stability by scale invariance, arXiv:1401.5609 [INSPIRE].
27. S. Benic and B. Radovcic, Electroweak breaking and Dark Matter from the common scale, Phys. Lett.B 732 (2014) 91 [arXiv:1401.8183] [INSPIRE].
28. P.H. Chankowski, A. Lewandowski, K.A. Meissner and H. Nicolai, Softly broken conformal symmetry and the stability of the electroweak scale, Mod. Phys. Lett.A 30 (2015) 1550006 [arXiv:1404.0548] [INSPIRE].
29. H. Davoudiasl and I.M. Lewis, Right-handed neutrinos as the origin of the electroweak scale, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 033003 [arXiv:1404.6260] [INSPIRE].
30. K. Allison, C.T. Hill and G.G. Ross, Ultra-weak sector, Higgs boson mass and the dilaton, Phys. Lett.B 738 (2014) 191 [arXiv:1404.6268] [INSPIRE].
31. G.M. Pelaggi, Predictions of a model of weak scale from dynamical breaking of scale invariance, arXiv:1406.4104 [INSPIRE].
32. W. Altmannshofer, W.A. Bardeen, M. Bauer, M. Carena and J.D. Lykken, Light dark matter, naturalness and the radiative origin of the electroweak scale, JHEP01 (2015) 032 [arXiv:1408.3429] [INSPIRE].
33. R. Foot, A. Kobakhidze and A. Spencer-Smith, Criticality in the scale invariant standard model (squared), arXiv:1409.4915 [INSPIRE].
34. M.B. Einhorn and D.R.T. Jones, Naturalness and dimensional transmutation in classically scale-invariant gravity, arXiv:1410.8513 [INSPIRE].
35. O. Antipin, M. Redi and A. Strumia, Dynamical generation of the weak and dark matter scales from strong interactions, JHEP01 (2015) 157 [arXiv:1410.1817] [INSPIRE].
36. I. Antoniadis, A possible new dimension at a few TeV, Phys. Lett.B 246 (1990) 377 [INSPIRE].
37. R. Sundrum, Fat euclidean gravity with small cosmological constant, Nucl. Phys.B 690 (2004) 302 [hep-th/0310251] [INSPIRE].
38. A. Salvio and A. Strumia, Agravity, JHEP06 (2014) 080 [arXiv:1403.4226] [INSPIRE].
39. D.F. Litim and F. Sannino, Asymptotic safety guaranteed, JHEP12 (2014) 178 [arXiv:1406.2337] [INSPIRE].
40. P.J. Redmond and J.L. Uretsky, Conjecture concerning the properties of nonrenormalizable field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.1 (1958) 147 [INSPIRE].
41. N.N. Bogolyubov, A.A. Logunov and D.V. Shirkov, The method of dispersion relations and perturbation theory Sov. Phys. JETP37 (1960) 574.
42. 4theory in the strong coupling limit: analytical results, J. Exp. Theor. Phys.107 (2008) 413 [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.134 (2008) 490] [arXiv:1010.4081] [INSPIRE].
43. I.M. Suslov, Exact asymptotics for β-function in QED, J. Exp. Theor. Phys.108 (2009) 980 [arXiv:0804.2650] [INSPIRE].
44. N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Electric-magnetic duality, monopole condensation and confinement in N = 2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys.B 426 (1994) 19 [Erratum ibid.B 430 (1994) 485] [hep-th/9407087] [INSPIRE].
45. D.F. Litim, M. Mojaza and F. Sannino, Vacuum stability of asymptotically safe gauge-Yukawa theories, arXiv:1501.03061 [INSPIRE].
46. G. Marques Tavares, M. Schmaltz and W. Skiba, Higgs mass naturalness and scale invariance in the UV, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 015009 [arXiv:1308.0025] [INSPIRE].
47. D.J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Asymptotically free gauge theories. 1, Phys. Rev.D 8 (1973) 3633 [INSPIRE].
48. D.J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Ultraviolet behavior of nonabelian gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.30 (1973) 1343 [INSPIRE].
49. D.J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Asymptotically free gauge theories. 2, Phys. Rev.D 9 (1974) 980 [INSPIRE].
50. H.D. Politzer, Reliable perturbative results for strong interactions?, Phys. Rev. Lett.30 (1973) 1346 [INSPIRE].
51. S.R. Coleman and D.J. Gross, Price of asymptotic freedom, Phys. Rev. Lett.31 (1973) 851 [INSPIRE].
52. T.P. Cheng, E. Eichten and L.-F. Li, Higgs phenomena in asymptotically free gauge theories, Phys. Rev.D 9 (1974) 2259 [INSPIRE].
53. E.S. Fradkin and O.K. Kalashnikov, Asymptotically free SU(5) model of unified interaction, Phys. Lett.B 64 (1976) 177 [INSPIRE].
54. O.K. Kalashnikov, Asymptotically free models of unified interaction, Lebedev-77-206 (1977) [INSPIRE].
55. 6model of unified interaction, Lett. Nuovo Cim.21 (1978) 5 [INSPIRE].
56. O.K. Kalashnikov, Asymptotically free SU(2) × SU(2) × SU(4) model of unified interaction, Phys. Lett.B 72 (1977) 65 [INSPIRE].
57. B. Pendleton and G.G. Ross, Mass and mixing angle predictions from infrared fixed points, Phys. Lett.B 98 (1981) 291 [INSPIRE].
58. S.R. Coleman and E.J. Weinberg, Radiative corrections as the origin of spontaneous symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev.D 7 (1973) 1888 [INSPIRE].
59. C.G. Callan and S. Coleman, The fate of the false vacuum. 2. First quantum corrections, Phys. Rev.D 16 (1977) 1762 [INSPIRE].
60. G. Isidori, G. Ridolfi and A. Strumia, On the metastability of the standard model vacuum, Nucl. Phys.B 609 (2001) 387 [hep-ph/0104016] [INSPIRE].
61. J.R. Espinosa, G.F. Giudice and A. Riotto, Cosmological implications of the Higgs mass measurement, JCAP05 (2008) 002 [arXiv:0710.2484] [INSPIRE].
62. J. Elias-Miro et al., Higgs mass implications on the stability of the electroweak vacuum, Phys. Lett.B 709 (2012) 222 [arXiv:1112.3022] [INSPIRE].
63. G. Degrassi et al., Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the standard model at NNLO, JHEP08 (2012) 098 [arXiv:1205.6497] [INSPIRE].
64. D. Buttazzo et al., Investigating the near-criticality of the Higgs boson, JHEP12 (2013) 089 [arXiv:1307.3536] [INSPIRE].
65. S.C. Frautschi and J. Kim, SU(5) Higgs problem with adjoint + vector representations, Nucl. Phys.B 196 (1982) 301 [INSPIRE].
66. K.G. Klimenko, On necessary and sufficient conditions for some Higgs potentials to be bounded from below, Theor. Math. Phys.62 (1985) 58 [INSPIRE].
67. K. Kannike, Vacuum stability conditions from copositivity criteria, Eur. Phys. J.C 72 (2012) 2093 [arXiv:1205.3781] [INSPIRE].
68. G. D’Ambrosio, G.F. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, Minimal flavor violation: an effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys.B 645 (2002) 155 [hep-ph/0207036] [INSPIRE].
69. A.J. Buras, K. Gemmler and G. Isidori, Quark flavour mixing with right-handed currents: an effective theory approach, Nucl. Phys.B 843 (2011) 107 [arXiv:1007.1993] [INSPIRE].
70. G. Isidori, Flavor physics and CP-violation, arXiv:1302.0661 [INSPIRE].
71. CMS collaboration, Search for heavy narrow dilepton resonances in pp collisions ats=7$$ \sqrt{s}=7 $$TeV ands=8$$ \sqrt{s}=8 $$TeV, Phys. Lett.B 720 (2013) 63 [arXiv:1212.6175] [INSPIRE].
72. CMS collaboration, Search for narrow resonances using the dijet mass spectrum in pp collisions ats=8$$ \sqrt{s}=8 $$TeV, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 114015 [arXiv:1302.4794] [INSPIRE].
73. ATLAS collaboration, Search for high-mass dilepton resonances in pp collisions ats=8$$ \sqrt{s}=8 $$TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 052005 [arXiv:1405.4123] [INSPIRE].
74. ATLAS collaboration, Search for new phenomena in the dijet mass distribution using pp collision data ats=8$$ \sqrt{s}=8 $$TeV with the ATLAS detector, arXiv:1407.1376 [INSPIRE].
75. E. Salvioni, G. Villadoro and F. Zwirner, Minimal Z′ models: present bounds and early LHC reach, JHEP11 (2009) 068 [arXiv:0909.1320] [INSPIRE].
76. E. Salvioni, A. Strumia, G. Villadoro and F. Zwirner, Non-universal minimal Z′ models: present bounds and early LHC reach, JHEP03 (2010) 010 [arXiv:0911.1450] [INSPIRE].
77. R. Barbieri, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi and A. Strumia, Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2, Nucl. Phys.B 703 (2004) 127 [hep-ph/0405040] [INSPIRE].
78. G. Cacciapaglia, C. Csáki, G. Marandella and A. Strumia, The minimal set of electroweak precision parameters, Phys. Rev.D 74 (2006) 033011 [hep-ph/0604111] [INSPIRE].
79. CMS collaboration, Search for heavy neutrinos and W bosons with right-handed couplings in proton-proton collisions ats=8$$ \sqrt{s}=8 $$TeV, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 3149 [arXiv:1407.3683] [INSPIRE].
80. V. Cirigliano, M. Gonzalez-Alonso and M.L. Graesser, Non-standard charged current interactions: β decays versus the LHC, JHEP02 (2013) 046 [arXiv:1210.4553] [INSPIRE].
81. Rmodel, Phys. Lett.B 420 (1998) 333 [hep-ph/9708205] [INSPIRE].
82. R.R. Volkas, Prospects for mass unification at low-energy scales, Phys. Rev.D 53 (1996) 2681 [hep-ph/9507215] [INSPIRE].
83. G. Valencia and S. Willenbrock, Quark-lepton unification and rare meson decays, Phys. Rev.D 50 (1994) 6843 [hep-ph/9409201] [INSPIRE].
84. M. Carpentier and S. Davidson, Constraints on two-lepton, two quark operators, Eur. Phys. J.C 70 (2010) 1071 [arXiv:1008.0280] [INSPIRE].
85. QCDSF collaboration, G.S. Bali et al., The strange and light quark contributions to the nucleon mass from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 054502 [arXiv:1111.1600] [INSPIRE].