The trend towards minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for endometrial cancer: An ACS-NSQIP evaluation of surgical outcomes

Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 136, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 512-515

  Scalici, Jennifer ^a   Laughlin, Brittney B ^a   Finan, Michael A ^a   Wang, Bin ^b   Rocconi, Rodney P ^a  

^a University of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Complications; Endometrial cancer; Minimally invasive surgery; NSQIP; Surgical outcome research

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGIST CLASSIFICATION; ANGINA PECTORIS; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; BLACK PERSON; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CANCER SURGERY; COMORBIDITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST CONTROL; DEMOGRAPHY; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; EXPLORATORY LAPAROTOMY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION COST; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; KIDNEY FAILURE; LAPAROTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL HISTORY; MEDICARE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MORBIDITY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REIMBURSEMENT; SEPTIC SHOCK; WOUND COMPLICATION; AGED; CLINICAL PRACTICE; ECONOMICS; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; EVALUATION STUDY; FACTUAL DATABASE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITAL COST; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; ROBOTICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRENDS; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DATABASES, FACTUAL; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HOSPITAL COSTS; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OPERATIVE TIME; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; ROBOTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84924275819     PISSN: 00908258     EISSN: 10956859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.11.014     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. R. Siegel, J. Ma, Z. Zou, and A. Jemal Cancer statistics, 2014 CA Cancer J Clin 64 2014 9 29
2. V.L. Jacoby, A. Autry, G. Jacobson, R. Domush, S. Nakagawa, and A. Jacoby Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches Obstet Gynecol 114 2009 1041 1048
3. J.L. Walker, M.R. Piedmonte, N.M. Spirtos, S.M. Eisenkop, J.B. Schlaerth, and R.S. Mannel Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2 J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 27 2009 5331 5336
4. J.L. Walker, M.R. Piedmonte, N.M. Spirtos, S.M. Eisenkop, J.B. Schlaerth, and R.S. Mannel Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 30 2012 695 700
5. A.B. Kornblith, H.Q. Huang, J.L. Walker, N.M. Spirtos, J. Rotmensch, and D. Cella Quality of life of patients with endometrial cancer undergoing laparoscopic international federation of gynecology and obstetrics staging compared with laparotomy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 27 2009 5337 5342
6. S.F. Khuri, J. Daley, W. Henderson, K. Hur, J. Demakis, and J.B. Aust The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program Ann Surg 228 1998 491 507
7. A.S. Fink, D.A. Campbell, R.M. Mentzer, W.G. Henderson, J. Daley, and J. Bannister The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals: initial demonstration of feasibility Ann Surg 236 2002 344 353 [discussion 353-354]
8. ACS NSQIP. Surgical Quality Improvement [ http://site.acsnsqip.org/ ]
9. 2014 Medicare Hospital Reimbursement Rates [ http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare.html ]
10. A.M. Ingraham, K.E. Richards, B.L. Hall, and C.Y. Ko Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach Adv Surg 44 2010 251 267
11. A.M. Ingraham, M.E. Cohen, K.Y. Bilimoria, J.M. Feinglass, K.E. Richards, and B.L. Hall Comparison of hospital performance in nonemergency versus emergency colorectal operations at 142 hospitals J Am Coll Surg 210 2010 155 165
12. A.M. Ingraham, M.E. Cohen, K.Y. Bilimoria, J.B. Dimick, K.E. Richards, and M.V. Raval Association of surgical care improvement project infection-related process measure compliance with risk-adjusted outcomes: implications for quality measurement J Am Coll Surg 211 2010 705 714
13. R.P. Rocconi, C. Meredith, and M.A. Finan Evaluation of the learning curve of robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancies J Robot Surg 5 2011 189 193
14. L.G. Seamon, D.E. Cohn, D.L. Richardson, S. Valmadre, M.J. Carlson, and G.S. Phillips Robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer Obstet Gynecol 112 2008 1207 1213
15. M.P. Lowe, P.R. Johnson, S.A. Kamelle, S. Kumar, D.H. Chamberlain, and T.D. Tillmanns A multiinstitutional experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer Obstet Gynecol 114 2009 236 243
16. M.C. Bell, J. Torgerson, U. Seshadri-Kreaden, A.W. Suttle, and S. Hunt Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques Gynecol Oncol 111 2008 407 411
17. L.B. Landeen, M.C. Bell, H.B. Hubert, L.Y. Bennis, S.S. Knutsen-Larson, and U. Seshadri-Kreaden Clinical and cost comparisons for hysterectomy via abdominal, standard laparoscopic, vaginal and robot-assisted approaches S D Med J S D State Med Assoc 64 2011 197 199 [201, 203 passim]
18. J.D. Wright, C.V. Ananth, A.I. Tergas, T.J. Herzog, W.M. Burke, and S.N. Lewin An economic analysis of robotically assisted hysterectomy Obstet Gynecol 123 2014 1038 1048
19. M.M. Leitao, A. Bartashnik, I. Wagner, S.J. Lee, A. Caroline, and W.J. Hoskins Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotically assisted laparoscopy for newly diagnosed uterine cancers Obstet Gynecol 123 2014 1031 1037
20. K.C. Podratz Quality improvement in gynecologic surgery: the new frontier Am J Obstet Gynecol 195 2006 891 895