Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotically assisted laparoscopy for newly diagnosed uterine cancers

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 123, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1031-1037

  Leitao Jr , Mario M ^a   Bartashnik, Aleksandra ^a   Wagner, Isaac ^a   Lee, Stephen J ^a   Caroline, Ari ^a   Hoskins, William J ^a   Thaler, Howard T ^a   Abu Rustum, Nadeem R ^a   Sonoda, Yukio ^a   Brown, Carol L ^a   Jewell, Elizabeth L ^a   Barakat, Richard R ^a   Gardner, Ginger J ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SURGERY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; UTERUS CANCER; VERY ELDERLY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; UTERINE NEOPLASMS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIRECT SERVICE COSTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ECONOMIC; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; UTERINE NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84900451233     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000223     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 2013;63: 11-30.
2. Leitao MM, Barakat RR. Advances in the management of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2011;120: 489-92.
3. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Mannel RS, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP 2. J Clin Oncol 2009;27: 5331-6.
4. Kornblith AB, Huang HQ,Walker JL, Spirtos NM, Rotmensch J, Cella D. Quality of life of patients with endometrial cancer undergoing laparoscopic international federation of gynecology and obstetrics staging compared with laparotomy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2009;27: 5337-42.
5. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Mannel RS, et al. Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 study. J Clin Oncol 2012;30: 695-700.
6. Summitt RL Jr, Stovall TG, Steege JF, Lipscomb GH. A multicenter randomized comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in abdominal hysterectomy candidates. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92: 321-6.
7. Nieboer TE, Hendriks JCM, Bongers MY, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB. Quality of life after laproscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119: 85-91.
8. Gendy R, Walsh CA, Walsh SR, Karantanis E. Vaginal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204: 388.e1-8.
9. Jacoby VL, Autry A, Jacobson G, Domush R, Nakagawa S, Jacoby A. Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114: 1041-8.
10. Einarsson JI, Matteson KA, Schulkin J, Chavan NR, Sangi- Haghpeykar H. Minimally invasive hysterectomies - a survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010;17: 167-75.
11. Lau S, Vaknin Z, Ramana-Kumar AV, Halliday D, Franco EL, Gotlieb WH. Outcomes and cost comparisons after introducing a robotics program for endometrial cancer surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119: 717-24.
12. Leitao MM Jr, Briscoe G, Santos K, Winder A, Jewell EL, Hoskins WJ, et al. Introduction of a computer-based surgical platform in the surgical care of patients with newly diagnosed uterine cancer: outcomes and impact on approach. Gynecol Oncol 2012;125: 394-9.
13. Wright JD, Burke WM, Wilde ET, Lewin SN, Charles AS, Kim JH, et al. Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012;30: 783-91.
14. Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, Burke WM, Lu YS, Neugut AI, et al. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA 2013;309: 689-98.
15. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN, et al. A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 357.e1-7.
16. Barnett JC, Judd JP, Wu JM, Scales CD Jr, Myers ER, Havrilesky LJ. Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116: 685-93.
17. Martin AD, Nunez RN, Castle EP. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy: a complete cost analysis. Urology 2011;77: 621-5.
18. Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL, Carlson MJ, Valmadre S, Phillips GS, et al. A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009;114: 162-7.
19. Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden U. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15: 589-94.