Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in U.S. total joint replacement registries: Rationale, status, and plans

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

Volumn 96, Issue , 2014, Pages 104-109

  Franklin, Patricia D ^a   Lewallen, David ^b   Bozic, Kevin ^c   Hallstrom, Brian ^d   Jiranek, William ^e   Ayers, David C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^e VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIA; ARTHRALGIA; ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; JOINT PROSTHESIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTER; SELF REPORT; SURGEON; UNITED STATES; ARTHROPLASTY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; HUMANS; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; REGISTRIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84924274774     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: 15351386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00328     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 physical and mental component summary scales: a user's manual. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1994.
2. Ethgen O, Bruyère O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 May;86(5):963-74.
3. Franklin PD, Li W, Ayers DC. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: functional outcome after total knee replacement varies with patient attributes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Nov;466(11):2597-604.
4. Ayers DC, Bozic KJ. The importance of outcome measurement in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3409-11. Epub 2013 Aug 10.
5. Franklin PD, Harrold L, Ayers DC. Incorporating patient-reported outcomes in total joint arthroplasty registries: challenges and opportunities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3482-8.
6. The New Zealand Joint Registry thirteen year report: January 1999 to December 2011. http://www.nzoa.org.nz/news/new-zealand-joint-registry-thirteen-year-report. Accessed 2014 Apr 14.
7. Rothwell AG, Hooper GJ, Hobbs A, Frampton CM. An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Mar;92(3):413-8.
8. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. National Joint Registry for England and Wales: 9th annual report 2012. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/Portals/0/Documents/England/Reports/9th-annual-report/NJR%209th%20Annual%20Report%202012.pdf. Accessed 2014 Apr 14.
9. Devlin NJ, Parkin D, Browne J. Patient-reported outcome measures in the NHS: new methods for analysing and reporting EQ-5D data. Health Econ. 2010 Aug;19(8):886-905.
10. Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation. 2013 measure updates and specifications report: elective primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) all-cause unplanned 30-day risk-standardized readmission measure (version 2.0). March 2013. http://www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/content.aspx?id=46501. Accessed 2014 May 9.
11. Ayers DC, Zheng H, Franklin PD. Integrating patient-reported outcomes into orthopaedic clinical practice: proof of concept from FORCE-TJR. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3419-25.
12. Franklin PD, Allison JJ, Ayers DC. Beyond joint implant registries: a patient-centered research consortium for comparative effectiveness in total joint replacement. JAMA. 2012 Sep 26;308(12):1217-8.
13. Function and Outcomes Research for Comparative Effectiveness in Total Joint Replacement (FORCE-TJR). http://force-tjr.org. Accessed 2014 Feb 6.
14. American Joint Replacement Registry. http://teamwork.aaos.org/ajrr/default. aspx. Accessed 2014 Feb 6.
15. Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative. http://marcqi. org. Accessed 2014 Feb 6.
16. California Joint Replacement Registry. http://caljrr.org. Accessed 2014 Feb 6.
17. Virginia Joint Registry. http://vajointregistry.org. Accessed 2014 Feb 6.
18. Ware JE Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine. 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3130-9.
19. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)-development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 Aug;28(2):88-96.
20. Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klässbo M, Roos EM. Hip disability and osteo-arthritis outcome score (HOOS)-validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003 May 30;4:10. Epub 2003 May 30.
21. Hawker G, Melfi C, Paul J, Green R, Bombardier C. Comparison of a generic (SF-36) and a disease specific (WOMAC) (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) instrument in the measurement of outcomes after knee replacement surgery. J Rheumatol. 1995 Jun;22(6):1193-6.
22. Davis AM, Perruccio AV, Canizares M, Hawker GA, Roos EM, Maillefert JF, Lohmander LS. Comparative, validity and responsiveness of the HOOS-PS and KOOS-PS to the WOMAC physical function subscale in total joint replacement for osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Jul;17(7):843-7. Epub 2009 Jan 31.
23. Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard DJ, Carr AJ, Dawson J. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Aug;89(8):1010-4.
24. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register annual report 2009. http://www.shpr.se/Libraries/Documents/AnnualReport-2009-EN. sflb.ashx. Accessed 2014 Apr 14.
25. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 10th annual report 2013. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/Reports, PublicationsandMinutes/Annualreports/tabid/86/Default.aspx. Accessed 2014 Apr 14.
26. Baker P, Petheram T, Jameson S, Reed M, Gregg P, Deehan D. The association between body mass index and the outcomes of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Aug 15;94(16):1501-8.
27. Baker PN, Deehan DJ, Lees D, Jameson S, Avery PJ, Gregg PJ, Reed MR. The effect of surgical factors on early patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) following total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Aug;94(8): 1058-66.
28. Clement ND, Jenkins PJ, MacDonald D, Nie YX, Patton JT, Breusch SJ, Howie CR, Biant LC. Socioeconomic status affects the Oxford knee score and Short-Form 12 score following total knee replacement. Bone Joint J. 2013 Jan;95(1):52-8.
29. Clement ND, MacDonald D, Burnett R, Breusch SJ. Diabetes does not influence the early outcome of total knee replacement: a prospective study assessing the Oxford knee score, Short Form 12, and patient satisfaction. Knee. 2013 Dec;20(6):437-41. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
30. Clement ND, MacDonald D, Simpson AH, Burnett R. Total knee replacement in patients with concomitant back pain results in a worse functional outcome and a lower rate of satisfaction. Bone Joint J. 2013 Dec;95(12):1632-9.
31. Williams DP, Price AJ, Beard DJ, Hadfield SG, Arden NK, Murray DW, Field RE. The effects of age on patient-reported outcome measures in total knee replacements. Bone Joint J. 2013 Jan;95(1):38-44.
32. Ashley L, Jones H, Thomas J, Newsham A, Downing A, Morris E, Brown J, Velikova G, Forman D, Wright P. Integrating patient reported outcomes with clinical cancer registry data: a feasibility study of the electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes from Cancer Survivors (ePOCS) system. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(10):e230. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
33. Rolfson O, Rothwell A, Sedrakyan A, Chenok KE, Bohm E, Bozic KJ, Garellick G. Use of patient-reported outcomes in the context of different levels of data. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93(Suppl 3):66-71.