The effects of age on patient-reported outcome measures in total knee replacements

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 95 B, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 38-44

  Williams, D P ^a   Price, A J ^a   Beard, D J ^a   Hadfield, S G ^b   Arden, N K ^a   Murray, D W ^a   Field, R E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b EPSOM GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; KNEE FRACTURE; KNEE INSTABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXFORD KNEE SCORE; PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN SYNDROME; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REOPERATION; SELF REPORT; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84874063562     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B1.28061     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. No authors listed. National Joint Registry for England and Wales: 8th Annual report, 2011. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk (date last accessed 12 September 2012).
2. Lidgren L, Robertsson O, W-Dahl A. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register: annual report 2009. http://www.knee.nko.se/english/online/ uploadedFiles/113-SVK2009ENGL1.0.pdf (date last accessed 12 September 2012).
3. Santaguida PL, Hawker GA, Hudak P.L., et al Patient characteristics affecting the prognosis of total hip and knee joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. Can J Surg 2008; 51:428-436.
4. Gill GS, Chan KC, Mills DM 5- to 18-year follow-up study of cemented total knee arthroplasty for patients 55 years old or younger. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12:49-54.
5. Diduch DR, Insall JN, Scott W.N., Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez D. Total knee replacement in young, active patients: long-term follow-up and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997; 79-A:575-582.
6. Duffy GP, Crowder AR, Trousdale R.R., Berry DJ Cemented total knee arthroplasty using a modern prosthesis in young patients with osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22(SUPPL.):67-70.
7. Belmar CJ, Barth P, Lonner J.H., Lotke PA Total knee arthroplasty in patients 90 years of age and older. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14:911-914.
8. Price AJ, Longino D, Rees J., et al Are pain and function better measures of outcome than revision rates after TKR in the younger patient? Knee 2010; 17:196-199.
9. Adam RF, Noble J. Primary total knee arthroplasty in the elderly. J Arthroplasty 1994; 9:495-497.
10. Berend ME, Thong AE, Faris G.W., et al Total joint arthroplasty in the extremely elderly: hip and knee arthroplasty after entering the 89th year of life. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18:817-821.
11. Price AJ, Dodd CA, Svard U.G., Murray DW Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 60 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005; 87-B:1488-1492.
12. Alfonso DT, Howell RD, Strauss E.J., Di Cesare PE. Total hip and knee arthroplasty in nonagenarians. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22:807-811.
13. Dixon P, Parish EN, Chan B, Chitnavis J., Cross MJ Hydroxyapatite-coated, cementless total knee replacement in patients aged 75 years and over. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004; 86-B:200-204.
14. Bullens PH, van Loon CJM, de Waal Malefijt MC, Laan RFJM, Veth RPH. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16:740-747.
15. No authors listed. The Health and Social Care Information Centre. Provisional Monthly Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in England: a guide to PROMs methodology (Version 3), 2011. http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk/Ease/ servlet/Attach-mentRetriever?site-id=1937&file-name=d:\efmfiles\1937\ Accessing\DataTables\PROMs\Annual%202011\PROMs%20Guide-V3.pdf&short-name= PROMs%20Guide-V 3.pdf&u-id=9154 (date last accessed 12 September 2012).
16. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D., Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998; 80-B:63-69.
17. Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K., et al The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007; 89-B:1010-1014.
18. No authors listed. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16:199-208.
19. American Society of Anesthesiologists. New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 1963; 24:111.
20. Walters SJ, Brazier JE Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Qual Life Res 2005; 14:1523-1532.
21. Tai CC, Cross MJ Five- to 12-year follow-up of a hydroxyapatite-coated, cementless total knee replacement in young, active patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006; 88-B:1158-1163.
22. Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P., et al Health-related quality of life after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1998; 80-A:163-173.
23. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith C.H., Campbell J., Stitt LW Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient- relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthop Rheumatol 1988; 1:95-108.
24. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD The. MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36®): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30:473-483.
25. Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Johnston D.W., Suarez-Almazor ME. The effect of age on pain, function, and quality of life after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161:454-460.
26. Bourne RB, McCalden RW, MacDonald S.J., Mokete L., Guerin J. Influence of patient factors on TKA outcomes at 5 to 11 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 464:27-31.
27. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34:220-233.
28. Escobar A, Quintana JM, Bilbao A, et al Effect of patient characteristics on reported outcomes after total knee replacement. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007; 46:112-119.
29. Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007; 89-B:893-900.
30. Scott CE, Howie CR, MacDonald D, Biant LC Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010; 92-B:1253-1258.
31. Nilsdotter AK, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM Knee arthroplasty: are patients' expectations fulfilled? A prospective study of pain and function in 102 patients with 5-year follow-up. Acta Orthop 2009; 80:55-61.
32. Noble PC, Conditt MC, Cook K.F., Mathis KB The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 452:35-43.
33. Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; 198:43-49.
34. Bonnin M, Laurent JR, Parratte S, et al Can patients really do sport after TKA? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18:853-862.
35. Roos EM, Toksvig-Larsen S. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1:17.
36. Talbot S, Hooper G, Stokes A., Zordan R. Use of a new high-activity arthroplasty score to assess function of young patients with total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25:268-273.
37. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty: an end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1969; 51-A:737-755.
38. Noble PC, Scuderi GR, Brekke A.C., et al Development of a New Knee Society Scoring System. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470:20-32.
39. Beard DJ, McKibbin H, Dawson J., Jackson W, Price AJ Development of the Oxford KYAQ (Knee - Young/Active Questionnaire) as Adjunct to the Oxford Knee Score (abstract). Paper presented at ISAKOS Congress 2011.
40. Judge A, Arden NK, Price A, et al Assessing patients for joint replacement: can pre-operative Oxford hip and knee scores be used to predict patient satisfaction following joint replacement surgery and to guide patient selection? J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011; 93-B:1660-1664.
41. Kennedy LG, Newman JH, Ackroyd C.E., Dieppe PA When should we do knee replacements? Knee 2003; 10:161-166.
42. Bremner-Smith A.T., Ewings P, Weale AE Knee scores in a 'normal' elderly population. Knee. 2004; 11:279-282.
43. Wright JG, Coyte P, Hawker G., et al Variation in orthopedic surgeons' perceptions of the indications for and outcomes of knee replacement. CMAJ 1995; 152:687-697.
44. Mancuso CA, Ranawat CS, Esdaile J.M., Johanson NA, Charlson ME Indications for total hip and total knee arthroplasties: results of orthopaedic surveys. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11:34-46.
45. Jüni P., Dieppe P, Donovan J., et al Population requirement for primary knee replacement surgery: a cross-sectional study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003; 42:516-521.