Integrating patient-reported outcomes into orthopaedic clinical practice: Proof of concept from FORCE-TJR

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 471, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 3419-3425

  Ayers, David C ^a   Zheng, Hua ^a   Franklin, Patricia D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONFERENCE PAPER; DISEASE SEVERITY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; JOINT PROSTHESIS; KNOWLEDGE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MUSCULOSKELETAL FUNCTION; MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON; ORTHOPEDICS; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT MONITORING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVATE PRACTICE; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REIMBURSEMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; STANDARDIZATION; SYMPTOM; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

EID: 84885951801     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3143-z     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Ahmed S, Berzon RA, Revicki DA, Lenderking WR, Moinpour CM, Basch E, Reeve BB, Wu AW; International Society for Quality of Life Research. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy. Medical Care. 2012;50:1060-1070.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation - United States, 2007-2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:1261-1265.
3. Collins NJ, Roos EM. Patient-reported outcomes for total hip and knee arthroplasty: commonly used instruments and attributes of a "good" measure. Clin Geriatr Med. 2012;28:367-394.
4. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
5. Crowne DP, Marlowe D. The Approval Motive: Studies in Evaluative Dependence. New York, NY: Wiley; 1964.
6. Franklin PD, Allison JJ, Ayers DC. Beyond joint implant registries: a patient-centered research consortium for comparative effectiveness in total joint replacement. JAMA. 2012;308:1217-1218.
7. th Annual Report 2012. Available at: http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/NjrCentre/Portals/0/ Documents/England/Reports/9th-annual-report/NJR%209th%20Annual%20Report%202012. pdf. Accessed June 24, 2013.
8. New Zealand Orthopaedic Association. The New Zealand Joint Registry Thirteen Year Report: January 1999 to December 2011. Available at: http://nzoa.org.nz/system/files/NJR%2013%20Year%20Report.pdf. Accessed June 24, 2013.
9. Rolfson O, Rothwell A, Sedrakyan A, Chenok KE, Bohm E, Bozic KJ, Garellick G. Use of patient-reported outcomes in the context of different levels of data. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(suppl 3):66-71.
10. Sacks JJ, Luo YH, Helmick CG. Prevalence of specific types of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the ambulatory health care system in the United States, 2001-2005. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010;62:460-464.
11. Wainer H. Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000.