Sip1 downstream effector ninein controls neocortical axonal growth, ipsilateral branching, and microtubule growth and stability

Neuron

Volumn 85, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 998-1012

  Srivatsa, Swathi ^a,b   Parthasarathy, Srinivas ^a,b   Molnár, Zoltán ^c   Tarabykin, Victor ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN NINEIN; PROTEIN SIP1; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CYTOSKELETON PROTEIN; NERVE PROTEIN; NIN PROTEIN, MOUSE; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; SIP1 PROTEIN, MOUSE;

ARTICLE; CELL ELONGATION; MICROTUBULE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NEOCORTEX; NERVE FIBER GROWTH; NERVE PROJECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; ANIMAL; CELL CULTURE; CORPUS CALLOSUM; CYTOLOGY; DEFICIENCY; FOREBRAIN; GENETICS; HEK293 CELL LINE; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOUSE; NERVE FIBER; PHYSIOLOGY; TRANSGENIC MOUSE;

ANIMALS; AXONS; CELLS, CULTURED; CORPUS CALLOSUM; CYTOSKELETAL PROTEINS; HEK293 CELLS; HUMANS; MICE; MICE, TRANSGENIC; MICROTUBULES; NEOCORTEX; NERVE TISSUE PROTEINS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROSENCEPHALON;

EID: 84924263870     PISSN: 08966273     EISSN: 10974199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.01.018     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Acebes A., Ferrús A. Cellular and molecular features of axon collaterals and dendrites. Trends Neurosci. 2000, 23:557-565.
2. Ahmad F.J., Baas P.W. Microtubules released from the neuronal centrosome are transported into the axon. J.Cell Sci. 1995, 108:2761-2769.
3. Akhmanova A., Steinmetz M.O. Tracking the ends: a dynamic protein network controls the fate of microtubule tips. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9:309-322.
4. Baird D.H., Myers K.A., Mogensen M., Moss D., Baas P.W. Distribution of the microtubule-related protein ninein in developing neurons. Neuropharmacology 2004, 47:677-683.
5. Bouckson-Castaing V., Moudjou M., Ferguson D.J., Mucklow S., Belkaid Y., Milon G., Crocker P.R. Molecular characterisation of ninein, a new coiled-coil protein of the centrosome. J.Cell Sci. 1996, 109:179-190.
6. Bouissou A., Vérollet C., Sousa A., Sampaio P., Wright M., Sunkel C.E., Merdes A., Raynaud-Messina B. gamma-Tubulin ring complexes regulate microtubule plus end dynamics. J.Cell Biol. 2009, 187:327-334.
7. Burkhalter A. Intrinsic connections of rat primary visual cortex: laminar organization of axonal projections. J.Comp. Neurol. 1989, 279:171-186.
8. Conde C., Cáceres A. Microtubule assembly, organization and dynamics in axons and dendrites. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 10:319-332.
9. Courchet J., Lewis T.L., Lee S., Courchet V., Liou D.Y., Aizawa S., Polleux F. Terminal axon branching is regulated by the LKB1-NUAK1 kinase pathway via presynaptic mitochondrial capture. Cell 2013, 153:1510-1525.
10. Dammermann A., Merdes A. Assembly of centrosomal proteins and microtubule organization depends on PCM-1. J.Cell Biol. 2002, 159:255-266.
11. Deck M., Lokmane L., Chauvet S., Mailhes C., Keita M., Niquille M., Yoshida M., Yoshida Y., Lebrand C., Mann F., et al. Pathfinding of corticothalamic axons relies on a rendezvous with thalamic projections. Neuron 2013, 77:472-484.
12. Fame R.M., MacDonald J.L., Macklis J.D. Development, specification, and diversity of callosal projection neurons. Trends Neurosci. 2011, 34:41-50.
13. Garavelli L., Mainardi P.C. Mowat-Wilson syndrome. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2007, 2:42.
14. Goebbels S., Bormuth I., Bode U., Hermanson O., Schwab M.H., Nave K.A. Genetic targeting of principal neurons in neocortex and hippocampus of NEX-Cre mice. Genesis 2006, 44:611-621.
15. Higashi Y., Maruhashi M., Nelles L., Van de Putte T., Verschueren K., Miyoshi T., Yoshimoto A., Kondoh H., Huylebroeck D. Generation of the floxed allele of the SIP1 (Smad-interacting protein 1) gene for Cre-mediated conditional knockout in the mouse. Genesis 2002, 32:82-84.
16. Keating T.J., Borisy G.G. Centrosomal and non-centrosomal microtubules. Biol. Cell 1999, 91:321-329.
17. Keating T.J., Peloquin J.G., Rodionov V.I., Momcilovic D., Borisy G.G. Microtubule release from the centrosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94:5078-5083.
18. Kritzer M.F., Goldman-Rakic P.S. Intrinsic circuit organization ofthe major layers and sublayers of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the rhesus monkey. J.Comp. Neurol. 1995, 359:131-143.
19. McKinsey G.L., Lindtner S., Trzcinski B., Visel A., Pennacchio L.A., Huylebroeck D., Higashi Y., Rubenstein J.L. Dlx1&2-dependent expression of Zfhx1b (Sip1, Zeb2) regulates the fate switch between cortical and striatal interneurons. Neuron 2013, 77:83-98.
20. Miquelajauregui A., Van de Putte T., Polyakov A., Nityanandam A., Boppana S., Seuntjens E., Karabinos A., Higashi Y., Huylebroeck D., Tarabykin V. Smad-interacting protein-1 (Zfhx1b) acts upstream of Wnt signaling in the mouse hippocampus and controls its formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:12919-12924.
21. Mogensen M.M., Malik A., Piel M., Bouckson-Castaing V., Bornens M. Microtubule minus-end anchorage at centrosomal and non-centrosomal sites: the role of ninein. J.Cell Sci. 2000, 113:3013-3023.
22. Molnár Z., Blakey D., Bystron I., Carney R. Neuroanatomical Tract-Tracing 3 2006, Springer, New York.
23. Molyneaux B.J., Arlotta P., Menezes J.R., Macklis J.D. Neuronal subtype specification in the cerebral cortex. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 8:427-437.
24. Murphy D.B., Vallee R.B., Borisy G.G. Identity and polymerization-stimulatory activity of the nontubulin proteins associated with microtubules. Biochemistry 1977, 16:2598-2605.
25. Nishizaki Y., Takagi T., Matsui F., Higashi Y. SIP1 expression patterns in brain investigated by generating a SIP1-EGFP reporter knock-in mouse. Genesis 2014, 52:56-67.
26. Nityanandam A., Parthasarathy S., Tarabykin V. Postnatal subventricular zone of the neocortex contributes GFAP+ cells to the rostral migratory stream under the control of Sip1. Dev. Biol. 2012, 366:341-356.
27. O'Leary D.D., Terashima T. Cortical axons branch to multiple subcortical targets by interstitial axon budding: implications for target recognition and "waiting periods". Neuron 1988, 1:901-910.
28. Ohama Y., Hayashi K. Relocalization of a microtubule-anchoring protein, ninein, from the centrosome to dendrites during differentiation of mouse neurons. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2009, 132:515-524.
29. Parthasarathy S., Srivatsa S., Nityanandam A., Tarabykin V. Ntf3 acts downstream of Sip1 in cortical postmitotic neurons to control progenitor cell fate through feedback signaling. Development 2014, 141:3324-3330.
30. Saito T. Invivo electroporation in the embryonic mouse central nervous system. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1:1552-1558.
31. Seuntjens E., Nityanandam A., Miquelajauregui A., Debruyn J., Stryjewska A., Goebbels S., Nave K.A., Huylebroeck D., Tarabykin V. Sip1 regulates sequential fate decisions by feedback signaling from postmitotic neurons to progenitors. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12:1373-1380.
32. Shinohara H., Sakayori N., Takahashi M., Osumi N. Ninein is essential for the maintenance of the cortical progenitor character by anchoring the centrosome to microtubules. Biol. Open 2013, 2:739-749.
33. Srivatsa S., Parthasarathy S., Britanova O., Bormuth I., Donahoo A.L., Ackerman S.L., Richards L.J., Tarabykin V. Unc5C and DCC act downstream of Ctip2 and Satb2 and contribute to corpus callosum formation. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5:3708.
34. Stearns T., Kirschner M. Invitro reconstitution of centrosome assembly and function: the central role of gamma-tubulin. Cell 1994, 76:623-637.
35. Stepanova T., Slemmer J., Hoogenraad C.C., Lansbergen G., Dortland B., De Zeeuw C.I., Grosveld F., van Cappellen G., Akhmanova A., Galjart N. Visualization of microtubule growth in cultured neurons via the use ofEB3-GFP (end-binding protein 3-green fluorescent protein). J.Neurosci. 2003, 23:2655-2664.
36. Thomson A.M., Lamy C. Functional maps of neocortical local circuitry. Front. Neurosci. 2007, 1:19-42.
37. van den Berghe V., Stappers E., Vandesande B., Dimidschstein J., Kroes R., Francis A., Conidi A., Lesage F., Dries R., Cazzola S., et al. Directed migration of cortical interneurons depends on the cell-autonomous action of Sip1. Neuron 2013, 77:70-82.
38. Vasquez R.J., Howell B., Yvon A.M., Wadsworth P., Cassimeris L. Nanomolar concentrations of nocodazole alter microtubule dynamic instability invivo and invitro. Mol. Biol. Cell 1997, 8:973-985.
39. Verschueren K., Remacle J.E., Collart C., Kraft H., Baker B.S., Tylzanowski P., Nelles L., Wuytens G., Su M.T., Bodmer R., et al. SIP1, a novel zinc finger/homeodomain repressor, interacts with Smad proteins and binds to 5'-CACCT sequences in candidate target genes. J.Biol. Chem. 1999, 274:20489-20498.
40. Wang C.L., Zhang L., Zhou Y., Zhou J., Yang X.J., Duan S.M., Xiong Z.Q., Ding Y.Q. Activity-dependent development of callosal projections in the somatosensory cortex. J.Neurosci. 2007, 27:11334-11342.
41. Wang X., Tsai J.W., Imai J.H., Lian W.N., Vallee R.B., Shi S.H. Asymmetric centrosome inheritance maintains neural progenitors in the neocortex. Nature 2009, 461:947-955.
42. Weng Q., Chen Y., Wang H., Xu X., Yang B., He Q., Shou W., Chen Y., Higashi Y., van den Berghe V., et al. Dual-mode modulation of Smad signaling by Smad-interacting protein Sip1 is required for myelination in the central nervous system. Neuron 2012, 73:713-728.
43. Wilson M., Mowat D., Dastot-Le Moal F., Cacheux V., Kääriäinen H., Cass D., Donnai D., Clayton-Smith J., Townshend S., Curry C., et al. Further delineation of the phenotype associated with heterozygous mutations in ZFHX1B. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2003, 119A:257-265.
44. Zheng Y., Wong M.L., Alberts B., Mitchison T. Nucleation of microtubule assembly by a gamma-tubulin-containing ring complex. Nature 1995, 378:578-583.