Structuring situational information: A road map of the multiple pathways to different situational taxonomies

European Psychologist

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 176-189

  Rauthmann, John F ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Characteristics; Classes; Cues; Situation; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924260259     PISSN: 10169040     EISSN: 1878531X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000225     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. Argyle, M., Furnham, A., & Graham, J. A. (1981). Social situations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Asendorpf, J. B. (2009). Personality: Traits and situations. In P. J. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 43-53). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4. Battistich, V. A., & Thompson, E. G. (1980). Students' perceptions of the college milieu: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 74-82.
5. Bem, D. J. (1981). Assessing situations by assessing persons. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective (pp. 245-257). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Block, J., & Block, J. (1981). Studying situational dimensions: A grand perspective and some limited empiricism. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective (pp. 85-106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Bond, M. H. (2013). A general model for explaining situational influence on individual social behavior: Refining Lewin's formula. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 1-15.
8. Craik, K. H. (1981). Environmental assessment and situational analysis. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective (pp. 37-48). New York, NY: Academic Press.
9. de Raad, B. (2004). Situations that matter to personality. In A. Eliasz, S. E. Hampson, & B. de Raad (Eds.), Advances in personality psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 179-204). Hove, UK: Routledge.
10. Eckes, T. (1995). Features of situations: A two-mode clustering study of situation prototypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 366-374.
11. Edwards, J. A., & Templeton, A. (2005). The structure of perceived qualities of situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 705-723.
12. Endler, N. S. (1981). Situational aspects of interactional psychology. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective (pp. 361-373). New York, NY: Academic Press.
13. Endler, N. S. (1983). Interactionism: A personality model but not yet a theory. In M. M. Page (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation 1982: Personality - current theory & research (pp. 155-200). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
14. Endler, N. S., Hunt, J. M., & Rosenstein, A. J. (1962). An S-R inventory of anxiousness. Psychological Monographs, 76, 1-33.
15. Fleeson, W. (2007). Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior. Journal of Personality, 75, 825-861.
16. Fleeson, W., & Noftle, E. E. (2008). The end of the personsituation debate: An emerging synthesis in the answer to the consistency question. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1667-1684.
17. Forgas, J. P. (1976). The perception of social episodes: Categorical and dimensional representations in two different socialmilieus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 199-209.
18. Fournier, M. A., Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2008). Integrating dispositions, signatures, and the interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 531-545.
19. Fournier, M. A., Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2009). The interpersonal signature. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 155-162.
20. Frederiksen, N. (1972). Toward a taxonomy of situations. American Psychologist, 27, 114-123.
21. Frederiksen, N., Jensen, O., & Beaton, A. (1972). Prediction of organisational behaviour. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
22. Funder, D. C. (2006). Towards a resolution of the personality triad: Persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 21-34.
23. Funder, D. C. (2008). Persons, situations and person-situation interactions. In O. P. John, R. Robins, & L. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality (3rd ed., pp. 568-580). New York, NY: Guilford.
24. Funder, D. C. (2009). Persons, behaviors and situations: An agenda for personality psychology in the postwar era. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 120-126.
25. Furr, R. M. (2009). Personality psychology as a truly behavioral science. European Journal of Personality, 23, 369-401.
26. Furr, R. M., & Funder, D. C. (2004). Situational similarity and behavioral consistency: Subjective, objective, variablecentered, and person-centered approaches. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 421-447.
27. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983/2008). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Gould, S. J. (1981). Themismeasure ofman. New York, NY: Norton.
29. Hogan, R. (2009). Much ado about nothing: The personsituation debate. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 249.
30. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102-138). New York, NY: Guilford.
31. Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79-94). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
32. Kelley, HH., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H. T., Rusbult, C. E., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
33. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
34. Kenny, D. A., Mohr, C. D., & Levesque, M. J. (2001). A social relations variance partitioning of dyadic behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 128-141.
35. Kenrick, D. T., & Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23-34.
36. Kiers, H. A. L., & van Mechelen, I. (2001). Three-way component analysis: Principles and illustrative application. Psychological Methods, 6, 84-110.
37. King, G. A., & Sorrentino, R. M. (1983). Psychological dimensions of goal-oriented interpersonal situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 140-162.
38. Krahé, B. (1990). Situation cognition and coherence in personality: An individual-centered approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39. Krause, M. S. (1970). Use of social situations for research purposes. American Psychologist, 25, 748-753.
40. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
41. Magnusson, D. (1971). An analysis of situational dimensions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 32, 851-867.
42. Magnusson, D. (1981). Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Miller, G. F. (2007). Reconciling evolutionary psychology and ecological psychology: How to perceive fitness affordances. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39, 546-555.
44. Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the cross-rods: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333-352). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Moos, R. H. (1973). Conceptualizations of human environments. American Psychologist, 28, 652-665.
46. Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
47. Nascimento-Schulze, C. M. (1981). Towards situational classification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 149-152.
48. Nystedt, L. (1981). A model for studying the interaction between the objective situation and a person's construction of the situation. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective (pp. 375-391). New York, NY: Academic Press.
49. Pervin, L. A. (1976). A free-response description approach to the analysis of person-situation interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 465-474.
50. Pervin, L. A. (1978). Definitions, measurements, and classifications of stimuli, situations, and environments. Human Ecology, 6, 71-105.
51. Price, R. H. (1974). A taxonomic classification of behaviours and situations and the problem of behavior-environment congruence. Human Relations, 27, 567-585.
52. Price, R. H., & Blashfield, R. K. (1975). Explorations in the taxonomy of behavioral settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 3, 335-351.
53. Rauthmann, J. F. (2012). You say the party is dull, I say it is lively: A componential approach to how situations are perceived to disentangle perceiver, situation, and perceiver × situation variance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 519-528.
54. Rauthmann, J. F., Gallardo-Pujol, D., Guillaume, E. M., Todd, E., Nave, C. S., Sherman, R. A.,⋯ Funder, D. C. (2014). The situational eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 677-718.
55. Reis, H. R. (2008). Reinvigorating the concept of situation in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 311-329.
56. Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
57. Rotter, J. B. (1981). The psychological situation in sociallearning theory. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective (pp. 169-178). New York, NY: Academic Press.
58. Rozin, P. (2001). Social psychology and science: Some lessons from Solomon Asch. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 2-14.
59. Saucier, G., Bel-Bahar, T., & Fernandez, C. (2007). What modifies the expression of personality tendencies? Defining basic domains of situation variables. Journal of Personality, 75, 479-504.
60. Serfass, D. G., & Sherman, R. A. (2013). Personality and the perceptions of situations from the Thematic Apperception Test. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 708-718.
61. Sherman, R. A., Nave, C. N., & Funder, D. C. (2010). Situational similarity and personality predict behavioral consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 330-343.
62. Sherman, R. A., Nave, C. S., & Funder, D. C. (2012). Properties of persons and situations related to overall and distinctive personality-behavior congruence. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 87-101.
63. Sherman, R. A., Nave, C. S., & Funder, D. C. (2013). Situational construal is related to personality and gender. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 1-14.
64. Swann, W. B., & Seyle, C. (2005). Personality psychology's comeback and its emerging symbiosis with social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 155-165.
65. ten Berge, M. A., & de Raad, B. (1999). Taxonomies of situations from a trait psychological perspective: A review. European Journal of Personality, 13, 337-360.
66. ten Berge, M. A., & de Raad, B. (2001). The construction of a joint taxonomy of traits and situations. European Journal of Personality, 15, 253-276.
67. ten Berge, M. A., & de Raad, B. (2002). The structure of situations from a personality perspective. European Journal of Personality, 16, 81-102.
68. van Heck, G. L. (1984). The construction of a general taxonomy of situations. In H. Bonarius, G. L. Van Heck, & N. Smid (Eds.), Personality Psychology in Europe: Theoretical and Empirical Developments (pp. 149-164). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
69. van Heck, G. L. (1989). Situation concepts: Definitions and classification. In P. J. Hettema (Ed.), Personality and environment: Assessment of human adaptation (pp. 53-69). Oxford, UK: Wiley.
70. van Heck, G. L., & Welvaart, A. W. (1984). Individuele versus algemene situatietaxonomieën [Individual versus general situation taxonomies]. Gedrag: Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 12, 15-29.
71. Wagerman, S. A., & Funder, D. C. (2009). Situations. In P. J. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 27-42). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
72. Yang, Y., Read, S. J., & Miller, L. (2006). A taxonomy of situations from Chinese idioms: Goal processes as a central organizing principle. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 750-778.
73. Yang, Y., Read, S. J., & Miller, L. (2009). The concept of situations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 1018-1037.