Effects of background sound on consumers' sensory discriminatory ability among foods

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 43, Issue , 2015, Pages 71-78

  Pellegrino, Robert ^a   Luckett, Curtis R ^a   Shinn, Sara E ^a   Mayfield, Sarah ^a   Gude, Kelly ^a   Rhea, Abbey ^a   Seo, Han Seok ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Background sound; Carbonated soda; Conversation; Discriminatory ability; Overall difference test; Potato chips

Indexed keywords

SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 84924250034     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.02.014     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Allik J., McCrae R.R. Toward a geography of personality traits patterns of profiles across 36 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2004, 35:13-28.
2. Bi J. Sensory discrimination tests and measurements: Statistical principles, procedures and tables 2008, Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA.
3. Bisogni C.A., Falk L.A., Madore E., Blake C.E., Jastran M., Sobal J., et al. Dimensions of everyday eating and drinking episodes. Appetite 2007, 48:218-231.
4. Brant L.J., Fozard J.L. Age changes in pure-tone hearing thresholds in a longitudinal study of normal human aging. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1990, 88:813-820.
5. Cassidy G., MacDonald R.A.R. The effect of background music and background noise on the task performance of introverts and extraverts. Psychology of Music 2007, 35:517-537.
6. Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics and Biomechanics (CHABA) Speech understanding and aging. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1988, 83:859-895.
7. Christensen C.M., Vickers Z.M. Relationship of chewing sounds to judgments of food crispness. Journal of Food Science 1981, 46:574-578.
8. Crawford H.J., Strapp C.M. Effects of vocal and instrumental music on visuospatial and verbal performance as moderated by studying preference and personality. Personality and Individual Difference 1994, 16:237-245.
9. Crisinel A.S., Spence C. Crossmodal associations between flavoured milk solutions and musical notes. Acta Psychologica 2011, 138:155-161.
10. Crisinel A.S., Jacquier C., Deroy O., Spence C. Composing with cross-modal correspondences: Music and odors in concert. Chemosensory Perception 2013, 6:45-52.
11. Drake B.K. Food crushing sounds: Comparisons of objective and subjective data. Journal of Food Science 1965, 30:556-559.
12. Ennis D.M. The power of sensory discrimination methods. Journal of Sensory Studies 1993, 8:353-370.
13. Eysenck H.J. The biological basis of personality 1967, C.C. Thomas Publisher, Springfield, IL.
14. Fahmy T. XLSTAT [Computer software] 1993, Addinsoft, New York, NY.
15. Fiegel A., Meullenet J.F., Harrington R.J., Humble R., Seo H.S. Background music genre can modulate flavor pleasantness and overall impression of food stimuli. Appetite 2014, 76:144-152.
16. Findlay C. Compusense [Computer software] 1986, Compusense Inc., Guelph, ON, Canada.
17. Furnham A., Bradley A. Music while you work: The differential distraction of background music on the cognitive test performance of introverts and extroverts. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1997, 11:445-455.
18. Furnham A., Strbac L. Music is as distracting as noise: The differential distraction of background music and noise on the cognitive test performance of introverts and extraverts. Ergonomics 2002, 45:203-217.
19. Gottfried J.A., Dolan R.J. The nose smells what the eye sees: Crossmodal visual facilitation of human olfactory perception. Neuron 2003, 39:375-386.
20. Hedge A. The open-plan office: A systematic investigation of employee reactions to their work environment. Environment and Behavior 1982, 14:519-542.
21. Hedner M., Larsson M., Arnold N., Zucco G.M., Hummel T. Cognitive factors in odor detection, odor discrimination, and odor identification tasks. Journal of Clinical Experimental Neuropsychology 2010, 32:1062-1067.
22. Hellbrück J., Oguey M.C., Seiler C. Are sex specific differences in loudness perception an artefact of ear canal size?. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie 1984, 31:439-446.
23. Hockey G.R.J. Effects of noise on human efficiency and some individual differences. Journal of Sound Vibration 1972, 20:299-304.
24. Jahncke H., Hygge S., Halin N., Green A.M., Dimberg K. Open-plan office noise: Cognitive performance and restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2011, 31:373-382.
25. Kappes S.M., Schmidt S.J., Lee S.Y. Descriptive analysis of cola and lemon/lime carbonated beverages. Journal of Food Science 2006, 71:S583-S589.
26. LeCompte D.C., Neely C.B., Wilson J.R. Irrelevant speech and irrelevant tones: The relative importance of speech to the irrelevant speech effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1997, 23:472-483.
27. Lin F.R., Niparko J.K., Ferrucci L. Hearing loss prevalence in the United States. JAMA Internal Medicine 2011, 171:1851-1853.
28. Lynn R., Martin T. National differences for thirty-seven nations in extraversion, neuroticism, psychoticism and economic, demographic and other correlates. Personality and Individual Differences 1995, 19:403-406.
29. Martini A., Mazzoli M., Rosignoli M., Trevisi P., Maggi S., Enzi G., et al. Hearing in the elderly: A population study. Audiology 2001, 40:285-293.
30. McCown W., Keiser R., Mulhearn S., Williamson D. The role of personality and gender in preference for exaggerated bass in music. Personality and Individual Difference 1997, 23:543-547.
31. McCroskey J.C., Burroughs N.F., Daun A., Richmond V.P. Correlates of quietness: Swedish and American perspectives. Communication Quarterly 1990, 38:127-137.
32. McFadden D. Sex differences in the auditory system. Developmental Neuropsychology 1998, 14:261-298.
33. Meilgaard M.C., Civille G.V., Carr B.T. Sensory Evaluation Techniques 2007, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 4th ed.
34. Mojet J., Koster E.P. Sensory memory and food texture. Food Quality and Preference 2005, 16:251-266.
35. North A.C. The effect of background music on the taste of wine. British Journal of Psychology 2012, 103:293-301.
36. Plomp R., Mimpen A.M. Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1979, 66:1333-1342.
37. Rogers D.S., Harkrider A.W., Burchfield S.B., Nabelek A.K. The influence of listener's gender on the acceptance of background noise. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2003, 14:372-382.
38. Salvi R.J., Lockwood A.H., Frisina R.D., Coad M.L., Wack D.S., Frisina D.R. PET imaging of the normal human auditory system: Responses to speech in quiet and in background noise. Hearing Research 2002, 170:96-106.
39. SAS Institute JMP: Statistics and graphics guide 2000, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
40. Seo H.S., Jeon K.J., Hummel T., Min B.C. Influences of olfactory impairment on depression, cognitive performance, and quality of life in Korean elderly. European Archives of Otorhinolaryngology 2009, 266:1739-1745.
41. Seo H.S., Hummel T. Auditory-olfactory integration: Congruent or pleasant sounds amplify odor pleasantness. Chemical Senses 2011, 36:301-309.
42. Seo H.S., Gudziol V., Hähner A., Hummel T. Background sound modulates the performance of odor discrimination task. Experimental Brain Research 2011, 212:305-314.
43. Seo H.S., Hähner A., Gudziol V., Scheibe M., Hummel T. Influence of background noise on the performance in the odor sensitivity task: Effects of noise type and extraversion. Experimental Brain Research 2012, 222:89-97.
44. Seo H.S., Lohse F., Luckett C.R., Hummel T. Congruent sound can modulate odor pleasantness. Chemical Senses 2014, 39:215-228.
45. Shepherd D.C., Goldstein R., Rosenblüt B. Race difference in auditory sensitivity. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1964, 7:389-393.
46. Smith D.S. Preferences for differentiated frequency loudness levels in older adult music listening. Journal of Music Therapy 1989, 26:18-29.
47. Sobal J., Nelson M.K. Commensal eating patterns: A community study. Appetite 2003, 41:181-190.
48. Spence C., Deroy O. On why music changes what (we think) we taste. Iperception 2013, 4:137-140.
49. Stafford L.D., Fernandes M., Agobiani E. Effects of noise and distraction on alcohol perception. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 24:218-224.
50. Stafford L.D., Agobiani E., Fernandes M. Perception of alcohol strength impaired by low and high volume distraction. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 28:470-474.
51. Vickers Z.M. Sensory, acoustical, and force-deformation measurements of potato chip crispness. Journal of Food Science 1987, 52:138-140.
52. Woods A.T., Poliakoff E., Lloyd D.M., Kuenzel J., Hodson R., Gonda H., et al. Effect of background noise on food perception. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22:42-47.
53. Yang W., Kang J. Soundscape and sound preferences in urban squares: A case study in Sheffield. Journal of Urban Design 2005, 10:61-80.
54. Yurkstas A.A. The masticatory act: A review. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1965, 15:248-260.
55. Zampini M., Spence C. The role of auditory cues in modulating the perceived crispness and staleness of potato chips. Journal of Sensory Studies 2004, 19:347-363.
56. Zampini M., Spence C. Modifying the multisensory perception of a carbonated beverage using auditory cues. Food Quality and Preference 2005, 16:632-641.
57. Zellner D.A., Bartoli A.M., Eckard R. Influence of color on odor identification and liking ratings. American Journal of Psychology 1991, 104:547-561.