A hedonic analysis of the complex hunting experience

Journal of Forest Economics

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 51-66

  Lundhede, Thomas Hedemark ^a   Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl ^a   Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Game; Implicit prices; Natural resource management; Recreation; Social aspects of hunting; Wildlife

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; COMMERCE; DECISION MAKING; LAND USE; NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

GAME; IMPLICIT PRICES; NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; RECREATION; WILDLIFE;

COSTS;

HEDONIC ANALYSIS; HUNTING; NATURAL RESOURCE; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

DENMARK;

EID: 84924235651     PISSN: 11046899     EISSN: 16181530     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2015.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Boman M., Mattsson L., Ericsson G., Kristrom B. Moose hunting values in Sweden now and two decades ago: the Swedish hunters revisited. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2011, 50:515-530.
2. Boxall P.C., Macnab B. Exploring the preferences of wildlife recreationists for features of boreal forest management: a choice experiment approach. Can. J. For. Res.-Rev. Can. Rech. For. 2000, 30:1931-1941.
3. Buschena D.E., Anderson T.L., Leonard J.L. Valuing non-marketed goods: the case of elk permit lotteries. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2001, 41:33-43.
4. Cropper M.L., Deck L.B., McConnell K.E. On the choice of functional form for hedonic price functions. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1988, 70:668-675.
5. Danish Hunting Association Annual Report 2007 2008, 21.
6. Danish Ministry of Environment Wildlife Information 08 2008, 16.
7. Fix P.J., Manfredo M.J., Loomis J.B. Assessing validity of elk and deer license sales estimated by contingent valuation. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 2005, 33:633-642.
8. Fredman P., Svensson B., Lindberg K., Holmstedt A. Ekonomiska värden i svenskt friluftsliv - en enkätundersökning 2010, Forskningsprogrammet Friluftsliv i förändring[[nl]]The Research Programme Outdoor Recreation under Change, (in Swedish), Report no. 14, Sweden, 54 pp.
9. Freeman A.M. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods 1993, Resources for the Future, Washington.
10. Goodwin B.K., Offenbach L.A., Cable T.T., Cook P.S. Discrete-continuous contingent valuation of private hunting access in Kansas. J. Environ. Manage. 1993, 39:1-12.
11. Halvorsen R., Pollakowski H.O. Choice of functional form for hedonic price equations. J. Urban Econ. 1981, 10:37-49.
12. Halvorsen R., Palmquist R. The interpretation of dummy variables in semi-logarithmic equations. Am. Econ. Rev. 1980, 70:474-475.
13. Hansen H.P. Jagt i Danmark år 2000 2000, (Master thesis), University of Roskilde, (in Danish).
14. Hunt L.M., Haider W., Bottan B. Accounting for varying setting preferences among moose hunters. Leis. Sci. 2005, 27:297-314.
15. Hussain A., Munn I.A., Grado S.C., West B.C., Jones W.D., Jones J.C. Hedonic analysis of hunting lease revenue and landowner willingness to provide fee-access hunting. For. Sci. 2007, 53:493-513.
16. Hussain A., Zhang D.W., Armstrong A.B. Willingness to pay for hunting leases in Alabama. South. J. Appl. For. 2004, 28:21-27.
17. Hussain A., Munn I.A., Hudson D., West B. Attribute-based analysis of hunters' lease preferences. J. Environ. Manage. 2010, 91:2565-2571.
18. Jacobsen J.B., Lundhede T.H., Thorsen B.J. Valuation of wildlife populations above survival. Biodivers. Conserv. 2012, 21:543-563.
19. Jacobsen L.B., Jensen F.S., Bakhtiari F., Thorsen B.J. Friluftslivets nationaløkonomiske fodaftryk 2014, Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, (in Danish), 129 pp.
20. Vildt & Landskab. Resultater af 6 års integreret forskning i Danmark 2003-2008 2009, Hornslet Print, Denmark, http://www.e-pages.dk/hobo/files/vildt_og_landskab_final_ipaper.pdf (in Danish only), 108 pp. N. Kanstrup, T. Asferg, T.S. Jensen, M. Flinterup, B.J. Thorsen (Eds.).
21. Kennedy P.E. Estimation with correctly interpreted dummy variables in semi-logarithmic equations. Am. Econ. Rev. 1981, 71:801.
22. Knoche S., Lupi F. Valuing deer hunting ecosystem services from farm landscapes. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 64:313-320.
23. Lancaster K.J. New approach to consumer theory. J. Polit. Econ. 1966, 74:132-157.
24. Le Goffe P. Hedonic pricing of agriculture and forestry externalities. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2000, 15:397-401.
25. Little J.M., Berrens R. The southwestern market for big-game hunting permits and services: a hedonic pricing analysis. Hum. Dimens. Wildl.: Int. J. 2008, 13(3):143-157.
26. Livengood K.R. Value of big game from markets for hunting leases - the hedonic approach. Land Econ. 1983, 59:287-291.
27. Lund J.F. Hvilken rolle spiller jagt i forvaltningen af det åbne land?. Paper presented at the Conference Hunting, Wildlife and Society 2014.
28. Mattsson L., Boman M., Ericsson G. Jakten i Sverige - Ekonomiska värden och attityder jaktåret 2005/06 2008, (in Swedish only). https://sverigesradio.se/diverse/appdata/isidor/files/4061/10200.pdf.
29. Mattsson L. The economic value of wildlife for hunting. Scand. For. Econ. 1989, 30:42-51.
30. Meilby H., Strange N., Thorsen B.J., Helles F. Determinants of hunting rental prices: a hedonic analysis. Scand. J. For. Res. 2006, 21:63-72.
31. Messonnier M.L., Luzar E.J. Hedonic estimation of implicit price and demand for a Louisiana deer hunting lease attribute. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1990, 72:1360.
32. Mozumder P., Starbuck C.M., Berrens R., Alexander S. Lease and fee hunting on private lands in the U.S.: a review of the economic and legal issues. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 2007, 12:1-14.
33. Munn I.A., Hussain A. Factors determining differences in local hunting lease rates: insights from blinder-oaxaca decomposition. Land Econ. 2010, 86:66-78.
34. Nguyen T.N., Shaw W.D., Woodward R.T., Paterson R., Boyle K. An empirical study of option prices for hunting permits. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 63:476-484.
35. Palmquist R. Hedonic methods. Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality 1991, 43-77. Elsevier Science Publishers, North Holland, Amsterdam. J.E. Braden, C.D. Kolstad (Eds.).
36. Pope C.A., Stoll J.R. The market value of ingress rights for white-tailed deer hunting in Texas. South. J. Agric. Econ. 1985, 17:177-182.
37. Rhyne J.D., Munn I., Hussain A. Hedonic analysis of auctioned hunting leases: a case study of Mississippi sixteenth section lands. Hum. Dimens. Wildl.: Int. J. 2009, 14:227-239.
38. Rosen S. Hedonic prices and implicit markets - product differentiation in pure competition. J. Polit. Econ. 1974, 82:34-55.
39. Shrestha R.K., Alavalapati J.R.R. Effect of Ranchland attributes on recreational hunting in Florida: a hedonic price analysis. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 2004, 36:763-772.
40. Taylor L. The hedonic method. A Primer on the Economic Evaluation of the Environment 2003, 331-393. Kluwer, Dordrecht. P. Champ, T. Brown, K. Boyle (Eds.).
41. Thorsen B.J., Strange N. Økonomisk vurdering af en konvertering til naturnær skovdrift 2001, (in Danish only), 88 pp.
42. van Garderen K., Shah C. Exact interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. Econ. J. 2002, 5:149-159.
43. Vedel S.E., Thorsen B.J., Jacobsen J.B. First-movers, non-movers, and social gains from subsidising entry in markets for nature-based recreational goods. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68:2363-2371.
44. Zhang D., Hussain A., Armstrong J.B. Supply of hunting leases from non-industrial private forest lands in Alabama. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 2006, 11:1-14.