Determinants of hunting rental prices: A hedonic analysis

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 63-72

  Meilby, Henrik ^a,b   Strange, Niels ^a   Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark ^a   Helles, Finn ^a  

^a DANISH FOREST LANDSCAPE RES INST   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Hedonic pricing; Hunting leases; Hunting rights; Private forestry; Valuation

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

HEDONIC PRICING; HUNTING LEASES; HUNTING RIGHTS;

CONSUMER PRODUCTS;

FORESTRY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; QUERCUS; TERMINALIA LATIFOLIA;

QUERCUS; TERMINALIA;

EID: 32844466713     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827580500463813     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bennett, J. & Whitten, S. (2003). Duck hunting and wetland conservation: Compromise or synergy? Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51, 161-173.
2. Bodmer, R., Fang, T. G., Moya, L. & Gill, R. (1994). Managing wildlife to conserve Amazonian forests: Population biology and economic considerations of game hunting. Biological Conservation, 67, 29-35.
3. Buschena, D. E., Anderson, T. L. & Leonard, J. L. (2001). Valuing non-marketed goods: The case of elk permit lotteries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41, 33-43.
4. Dansk Skovforening (1998). Regnskabsoversigter for privatskovbruget 1998 [Accounting tables for private forest estates in Denmark]. Copenhagen: Danish Forest Association. (In Danish.)
5. Freeman, A. M. III (1985). Methods for assessing the benefits of environmental programs. In A. V. Kneese & J. L. Sweeney (Eds.), Handbook of natural resource and energy economics (Vol. I, pp. 223-269). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
6. Gorenzel, W. P., Mastrup, S. A. & Fitzhugh, E. L. (1991). Economic relationships of brushpiles, forage production and California quail hunting. Journal of Range Management, 44, 129-133.
7. Helles, F. & Meilby, H. (1998a). Cost accountancy in European farm forest enterprises, Denmark. In P. Hyttinen & T. Kallio (Eds.), Methodological issues of cost accountancy in European farm forest enterprises (pp. 35-41). EFI Proceedings No. 20. Joensuu, Finland: European Forest Institute.
8. Helles, F. & Meilby, H. (1998b). Sampling schemes of forest accountancy data networks, Denmark. In P. Hyttinen & T. Kallio (Eds.), Sampling schemes for monitoring the socioeconomics of farm forestry (pp. 83-84). EFI Proceedings No. 28. Joensuu, Finland: European Forest Institute.
9. Horne, P. & Petajisto, L. (2003). Preferences for alternative moose management regimes among Finnish landowners: A choice experiment approach. Land Economics, 79, 472-482.
10. Hussain, A., Zhang, D. W. & Armstrong, A. B. (2004). Willingness to pay for hunting leases in Alabama. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 28, 21-27.
11. Jordan, L. A. & Workman, J. P. (1989). Economics and management of fee hunting for deer and elk in Utah. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 17, 482-487.
12. Livengood, K. R. (1982). Value of big game from markets for hunting leases - The hedonic approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64, 1082.
13. Livengood, K. R. (1983). Value of big game from markets for hunting leases - The hedonic approach. Land Economics, 59, 287-291.
14. Loomis, J. B. (1995). Four models for determining environmental quality effects on recreational demand and regional economics. Ecological Economics, 12, 55-65.
15. Loomis, J. B. & Fitzhugh, L. (1989). Financial returns to California landowners for providing hunting access: Analysis and determinants of returns and implications to wildlife management. Transactions of the 54th North American Wildlife & Natural Resource Conference (pp. 196-201).
16. Meilby, H. (1999). Variation og tendens i privatskovbrugets regnskabstal [Trends and variation in private forest estates' accounting data]. Dansk Skovbrugs Tidsskrift, 84, 145-177. (In Danish.)
17. Mendelsohn, R. (1987). Modeling the demand for outdoor recreation. Water Resources Research, 23, 961-967.
18. Messonnier, M. L. & Luzar, E. J. (1990). Hedonic estimation of implicit price and demand for a Louisiana deer hunting lease attribute. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 22, 129-135.
19. Møller, C. M. (1933). Boniteringstabeller og bonitetsvise tilvækstoversigter for bøg, eg og rødgran i Danmark [Yield tables for beech, oak and Norway spruce in Denmark]. Dansk Skovforenings Tidsskrift, 18, 457-513, 537-623. (In Danish.)
20. Palmquist, R. B. (1991). Heodonic methods. In J. B. Braden & C. D. Kolstad (Eds.), Measuring the demand for environmental quality (pp. 77-120). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
21. Rasker, R., Martin, M. V. & Johnson, M. V. (1991). Economics: Theory versus practice in wildlife management. Conservation Biology, 6, 338-349.
22. Roeder, A. (1987). Ermittlung von Jagdwertminderung infolge Strassenneubau auf mathematisch-statistischer Grundlage [Investigating the reduction of hunting values as a consequence of road construction using mathematical-statistical methods]. Der Forst- und Holzwirt, 42, 120-122.
23. Ruff, R. L. & Isaac, T. A. (1987). Public access and fee hunting on private non-industrial forests in Wisconsin. Transactions of the 52nd North American Wildlife & Natural Resource Conference (pp. 483-495).
24. Standiford, R. B. & Howitt, R. E. (1992). Solving empirical bioeconomic models: A rangeland application. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74, 421-433.
25. Standiford, R. B. & Howitt, R. E. (1993). Multiple use management of California's hardwood rangelands. Journal of Range Management, 46, 176-182.
26. Statistics Denmark (2001). Statistisk Årbog 2001 [Statistical yearbook 2001]. Copenhagen: Statistics Denmark. An English version can be retrieved from http://www.dst.dk/HomeUK/Statistics/ofs/Publications/Yearbook. aspx (Accessed 1 April 2005).
27. Steinback, D. W., Conner, R. J., Glover, M. K. & Inglis, J. M. (1987). Economic and operational characteristics of recreational leasing in the Edwards Plateau and Rio Grande Plains of Texas. Transactions of the 52nd North American Wildlife & Natural Resource Conference (pp. 496-515).
28. Thorsen, B. J. & Strange, N. (2000). En økonomisk vurdering af konvertering til naturnœr skovbrug [An economic evaluation of the conversion to near-natural forestry]. Report for the Danish Forest and Nature Agency. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of the Environment. (In Danish.)
29. Turner, K. R., Pearce, D. & Bateman, I. (1994). Environmental economics: An elementary introduction. New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.