Supply of hunting leases from non-industrial private forest lands in alabama

Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-14

  Zhang, Daowei ^a   Armstrong, James B ^a   Hussain, Anwar ^b  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hedonic pricing; Hunting lease; Lease fee; Non industrial private forest lands; Sample selection bias

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248206897     PISSN: 10871209     EISSN: 1533158X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10871200500470910     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Baen, J. S., 1997. The growing importance and value implications of recreational hunting leases to agricultural land investors. Journal of Real Estate Research, 14 (3):399–414. [CSA]
2. Benson, D. E., 2001. Wildlife and recreation management on private lands in the United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 29 (1):359–371. [CSA]
3. Breen, R., 1996. Regression Models:Censored, Sample-Selected, or Truncated, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series No. 07–111 Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications, Inc.
4. Brown, T. L., Decker, D. J., and Kelly, J. W., 1984. Access to private lands for hunting in New York:1963–1980. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 12 (4):344–349. [CSA]
5. Clark, R. N., and Stankey, G. H., The Recreation Opportunity Spectrum:A Framework for Planning, Management, and Research. General Technical Report PNW-98, USDA Forest Service. 1979.
6. Copeland, J. D., 1998. “ Recreational access to private lands:Liability problems and solutions ”. In Natural resources income opportunities on private lands conference, Edited by:Kays, J. S., Smallidge, P. J., Grafton, W. N., and Parkhurst, J. A., 237–248. Maryland:University of Maryland Cooperative Extension Service.
7. Garrod, G. D., and Willis, K. G., 1992. Valuing goods characteristics:An application of the hedonic price method to environmental attributes. Journal of Environmental Management, 34:59–76. [CSA]
8. Greene, W. H., 1993. Econometric Analysis, 210–220. New York:Macmillan Publishing Company.
9. Guynn, D. E., and Schmidt, J. L., 1984. Managing deer hunters on private lands in Colorado. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 12 (1):12–19. [CSA]
10. Guynn, D. E., and Steinbach, D. W., 1987. “ Wildlife values in Texas ”. In Valuing Wildlife:Economic and Social Perspectives, Edited by:Decker, D. D., and Goff, G., 117–124. Colorado:Westview Press.
11. Heckman, J., 1979. Sample bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47:153–161. [CSA]
12. Jones, D., Munn, I. A., Grado, S. C., and Jones, J. C., Fee Hunting:An Income Source for Mississippi’s Non-Industrial, Private Landowners. Bulletin FO164. 2001. Forest and Wildlife Research Center. Mississippi State University
13. Jordan, L. A., and Workman, J. P., Overview of fee hunting for deer and elk on private land in Utah. Transactions of the 54th North American Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference. pp. 190–195.
14. Jud, D. G., and Seaks, T. G., 1994. Sample selection bias in estimating housing sales prices. Journal of Real Estate Research, 9 (3):289–298. [CSA]
15. Le Goffe, P., 2000. Hedonic pricing of agriculture and forestry externalities. Environmental and Resource Economics, 15:379–401. [CROSSREF][CSA]
16. Livengood, K. R., 1983. Value of big game from markets for hunting leases:The hedonic approach. Land Economics, 59 (3):287–291. [CSA]
17. Loomis, J. B., and Fitzhugh, L., Financial returns to California landowners for providing hunting access:Analysis and determinants of returns and implications to wildlife management. Transactions of the 54th North American Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference. pp. 196–201.
18. Lynch, L., and Robinson, C., 1998. “ Barriers to recreational access opportunities on private lands ”. In Natural Resources Income Opportunities on Private Lands Conference, Edited by:Kays, J. S., Smallidge, P. J., Grafton, W. N., and Parkhurst, J. A., Maryland:University of Maryland Cooperative Extension Service.
19. Marion, W. R., Recreational access to private lands in Florida. Transactions of the 54th North American Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference. pp. 202–209.
20. McGlincy, J., and Durham, H., 1996. “ Wildlife recreation market surveys:An aid to establishing lease prices ”. In A Symposium on the Economics of Wildlife Resources on Private Lands, Edited by:Johnson, R., 63–70. Auburn, AL:Auburn University.
21. Messonnier, M. L., and Luzar, E. J., 1990. A hedonic analysis of private hunting land attributes using an alternative functional form. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 22 (2):129–135. [CSA]
22. Morrill, W. I., Fee access views of a private wildlife management consultant. Transactions of the 52nd North American Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference. pp. 530–543.
23. Noonan, P. F., and Zagata, M. D., 1982. Wildlife in the market place:Using the profit motive to maintain wildlife habitat. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 10 (1):46–49. [CSA]
24. Palmquist, R., 1989. Land as a differentiated factor of production:A hedonic model and its implications for welfare measurement. Land Economics, 65 (1):23–29. [CSA]
25. Pope, C. A., and Stoll, J. R., 1985. The market value of ingress rights for white-tailed deer hunting in Texas. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 17 (1):177–182. [CSA]
26. Rosen, S., 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets:Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82:34–55. [CROSSREF][CSA]
27. Ruff, R. L., and Isaac, T. A., Public access and fee hunting on private non-industrial forests in Wisconsin. Transactions of the 52nd North American Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference. pp. 483–495.
28. Scarpa, R., Buongiorno, J., Hseu, J., and Abt, K. L., 2000. Assessing the non-timber value of forests:A revealed preference hedonic model. Journal of Forest Economics, 6 (2):83–103. [CSA]
29. Shelton, R. S., 1987. “ Fee hunting systems and important factors in wildlife commercialization on private lands ”. In Valuing Wildlife:Economic and Social Perspectives, Edited by:Decker, D. D., and Goff, G., 109–116. Colorado:Westview Press.
30. Smith, L. D. J., Berner, A. H., Cuthbert, F. J., and Kitts, J. A., 1992. Interest in fee hunting by Minnesota small-game hunters. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 20 (2):20–26. [CSA]
31. Steinbach, D. W., Conner, R. J., Glover, M. K., and Inglis, J. M., Economic and operational characteristics of recreational leasing in the Edwards Plateau and Rio Grande Plains of Texas. Transactions of the 52nd North American Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference. pp. 496–515.
32. Stolzenberg, R. M., and Relles, D. A., 1990. Theory testing in a world of constrained research design. Sociological Methods and Research, 18 (4):12 [CSA]
33. Taff, S. J., Perspectives on the Sale of Hunting Access Rights to Private Lands in Minnesota. Staff Paper. # P91–39. 1991. Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Minnesota
34. Vella, F., 1998. Estimating models with sample selectivity bias:A survey. The Journal of Human Resources, 33:127–168. [CSA]
35. Wright, B., and Kaiser, R. A., 1986. Wildlife administrators’ perceptions of hunter access problems:A national overview. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 14 (1):30–35. [CSA]
36. Wright, B. A., Cordell, H. K., and Brown, T. L., 1990. “ Public recreational access:A national study of policies and practices of private landowners ”. In Social Science and Natural Resource Recreation Management, Edited by:Vining, J., 181–198. Colorado:Westview Press.
37. Zhang, D., 1996. Forest tenures and land value in British Columbia. Journal of Forest Economics, 2 (1):7–30. [CSA]