Not all attention orienting is created equal: Recognition memory is enhanced when attention orienting involves distractor suppression

Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Volumn 120, Issue , 2015, Pages 28-40

  Markant, Julie ^a   Worden, Michael S ^b   Amso, Dima ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Distractor suppression; Recognition memory; Selective attention; Spatial cueing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; ATTENTIONAL BIAS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTRACTIBILITY; EYE MOVEMENT; FACILITATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROMODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; RECALL; RECOGNITION; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL CORTEX; ADOLESCENT; BRAIN; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OCULOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPATIAL LEARNING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN; CUES; EYE MOVEMENT MEASUREMENTS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPATIAL LEARNING; VISUAL CORTEX; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84924126510     PISSN: 10747427     EISSN: 10959564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2015.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Baldauf D., Desimone R. Neural mechanisms of object-based attention. Science 2014, 344(6182):424-427. 10.1126/science.1247003.
2. Ballesteros S., Reales J.M., Garcia E., Carrasco M. Selective attention affects implicit and explicit memory for familiar pictures at different delay conditions. Psicothema 2006, 18(1):88-99.
3. Brewer J.B., Zhao Z., Desmond J.E., Glover G.H., Gabrieli J.D.E. Making memories: Brain activity the predicts how well visual experience will be remembered. Science 1998, 281:1185-1187. 10.1126/science.281.5380.1185.
4. Broadway J.M., Hilimire M.R., Corballis P.M. Orienting to external versus internal regions of space. Consequences of attending in advance versus after the fact. Psychophysiology 2011, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01307.x.
5. Chadick J.Z., Gazzaley A. Differential coupling of visual cortex with default or frontal-parietal network based on goals. Nature Neuroscience 2011, 14(7):830-832. 10.1038/nn.2823.
6. Clapp W.C., Rubens M.T., Gazzaley A. Mechanisms of working memory disruption by external interference. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20(4):859-872. 10.1093/cercor/bhp150.
7. Corbetta M., Kincade J.M., Ollinger J.M., Mcavoy M.P., Gordon L. Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3(3):292-297.
8. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3(3):201-215. 10.1038/nrn755.
9. Cox R.W. AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Computers and Biomedical Research 1996, 29(0014):162-173.
10. Dosher B.A., Lu Z.-L. Noise exclusion in spatial attention. Psychological Science 2000, 11:139. 10.1111/1467-9280.00229.
11. Emadi N., Esteky H. Neural representation of ambiguous visual objects in the inferior temporal cortex. PLoS ONE 2013, 8(10):e76856. 10.1371/journal.pone.0076856.
12. Friston K., Buechel C., Fink G.R., Morris J., Rolls E., Dolan R.J. Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. NeuroImage 1997, 6:218-229. 10.1006/nimg.1997.0291.
13. Gandhi S.P., Heeger D.J., Boynton G.M. Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1999, 96(6):3314-3319.
14. Gazzaley A., Nobre A.C. Top-down modulation: Bridging selective attention and working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2012, 16(2):129-135. 10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.014.
15. Gazzaley A., Rissman J., D'Esposito M. Functional connectivity during working memory maintenance. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2004, 4(4):580-599.
16. Gersch T.M., Schnitzer B.S., Dosher B.A. Visual memory during pauses between successive saccades. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(16):1-18. 10.1167/8.16.15.
17. Golomb J.D., Pulido V.Z., Albrecht A.R., Chun M.M., Mazer J.A. Robustness of the retinotopic attentional trace after eye movements. Journal of Vision 2010, 10(3):1-12. 10.1167/10.3.19.
18. Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E., Heekeren K., Voss T., Moerth D., Thelen B., Meincke U. Blunted inhibition of return in schizophrenia - evidence from a longitudinal study. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry 2004, 28:389-396. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2003.11.010.
19. Greenberg A.S., Esterman M., Wilson D., Serences J.T., Yantis S. Control of spatial and feature-based attention in frontoparietal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 2010, 30(43):14330-14339. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4248-09.2010.
20. Hauer B.J.A., MacLeod C.M. Endogenous versus exogenous attentional cuing effects on memory. Acta Psychologica 2006, 122:305-320. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.12.008.
21. Johnson M.H., Tucker L.A. The development and temporal dynamics of spatial orienting in infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1996, 63:171-188. 10.1006/jecp.1996.0046.
22. Kahn I., Davachi L., Wagner A. Functional-neuroanatomic correlates of recollection: Implications for models of recognition memory. The Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 24(17):4172-4180. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0624-04.2004.
23. Kastner S., Pinsk M.A., De Weerd P., Desimone R., Ungerleider L.G. Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation. Neuron 1999, 22:751-761.
24. Kim H. Differential neural activity in the recognition of old versus new events: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping 2013, 34:814-836. 10.1002/hbm.21474.
25. Klein R.M. Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature 1988, 334:430-431.
26. Klein R.M. Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4(4):138-147. 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01452-2.
27. Klein R.M., MacInnes W.J. Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science 1999, 10(4):346-352. 10.1111/1467-9280.00166.
28. Konishi S., Wheeler M.E., Donaldson D.I., Buckner R.L. Neural correlates of episodic retrieval success. NeuroImage 2000, 12:276-286. 10.1006/nimg.2000.0614.
29. Kuhl B.A., Dudukovic N.M., Kahn I., Wagner A. Decreased demands on cognitive control reveal the neural processing benefits of forgetting. Nature Neuroscience 2007, 10(7):908-914. 10.1038/nn1918.
30. Kuo B.-C., Stokes M.G., Murray A., Nobre A.C. Attention biases visual activity in visual STM. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2014, 1-13. 10.1162/jocn_a_00577.
31. Lepsien J., Pollmann S. Covert reorienting and inhbition of return: An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2002, 14(2):127-144.
32. Mayer A.R., Seidenberg M., Dorflinger J.M., Rao S. An event-related fMRI study of exogenous orienting: Supporting evidence for the cortical basis of inhibition of return?. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16(7):1262-1271.
33. McDermott K.B., Jones T.C., Petersen S.E., Lageman S.K., Roediger H.L.I.I.I. Retrieval success is accompanied by enhanced activation in anterior prefrontal cortex during recognition memory: An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12(6):965-976.
34. Murphy J.W., Foxe J.J., Peters J.B., Molholm S. Susceptibility to distraction in autism spectrum disorder: Probing the integrity of oscillatory alpha-band suppression mechanisms. Autism Research 2014, 1-17. 10.1002/aur.1374.
35. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1980, 32:3-25. 10.1080/00335558008248231.
36. Posner M.I., Cohen Y. Components of visual orienting. Attention and Performance 1984, vol. X:531-556. Erlbaum Lawrence Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
37. Posner M.I., Rafal R.D., Choate L.S. Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1985, 2(3):211-228. 10.1080/02643298508252866.
38. Possin K.L., Filoteo J.V., Song D.D., Salmon D.P. Space-based but not object-based inhibition of return is impaired in parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47(7):1694-1700. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.006.
39. Qin S., van Marle H.J.F., Hermans E.J., Fernandez G. Subjective sense of memory strength and the objective amount of information accurately remembered are related to distinct neural correlates at encoding. The Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(24):8920-8927. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2587-10.2011.
40. Richards J.E. Localizing the development of covert attention in infants with scalp event-related potentials. Developmental Psychology 2000, 36(1):91-108. 10.1037/0012-1649.36.1.91.
41. Rueda M.R., Fan J., McCandliss B.D., Halparin J.D. Development of attentional networks in childhood. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:1029-1040. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.012.
42. Sestieri C., Capotosto P., Tosoni A., Romani G.L., Corbetta M. Interference with episodic memory retrieval following transcranial stimulation of the inferior but not the superior parietal lobule. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51:900-906. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.01.023.
43. Slotnick S.D., Schwarzbach J., Yantis S. Attentional inhibition of visual processing in human striate and extrastriate cortex. NeuroImage 2003, 19(4):1602-1611.
44. Smith A.T., Singh K.D., Greenlee M.W. Attentional suppression of activity in the human visual cortex. NeuroReport 2000, 11(2):271-277.
45. Squire R.F., Noudoost B., Schafer R.J., Moore T. Prefrontal contributions to visual selective attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2013, 36:451-466. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150439.
46. Szekely A., Jacobsen T., D'Amico S., Devescovi A., Andonova E., Herron D., Bates E. A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 51(2):247-250.
47. Talsma D., White B.J., MathÔt S., Munoz D.P., Theeuwes J. A retinotopic attentional trace after saccadic eye movements: evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2013, 25(9):1563-1577. 10.1162/jocn_a_00390.
48. Uncapher M.R., Rugg M.D. Selecting for memory? The influence of selective attention on the mnemonic binding of contextual information. The Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29(25):8270-8279. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1043-09.2009.
49. Uncapher M.R., Wagner A. Posterior parietal cortex and episodic encoding: Insights from fMRI subsequent memory effects and dual-attention theory. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 2009, 91:139-154. 10.1016/j.nlm.2008.10.011.
50. Vann S.D., Aggleton J.P., Maguire E.A. What does the retrosplenial cortex do?. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2009, 10:792-802. 10.1038/nm2733.
51. Wagner A., Shannon B.J., Kahn I., Buckner R.L. Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9(9):445-453. 10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.001.
52. Wechsler D. Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) 1999, Harcourt Assessment, San Antonio, TX.
53. Xue G., Dong Q., Lu Z.-L., Mumford J.A., Poldrack R.A. Complementary role of frontoparietal activity and cortical pattern similarity in successful episodic memory encoding. Cerebral Cortex 2013, 23:1562-1571. 10.1093/cercor/bhs143.
54. Yantis S., Serences J.T. Cortical mechanisms of space-based and object-based attentional control. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2003, 13(2):187-193. 10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00033-3.
55. Zanto T.P., Gazzaley A. Neural suppression of irrelevant information underlies optimal working memory performance. The Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29(10):3059-3066. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4621-08.2009.
56. Zhang Y., Meyers E.M., Bichot N., Serre T., Poggio T.A., Desimone R. Object decoding with attention in inferior temporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2011, 108(21):8850-8855. 10.1073/pnas.1100999108.