Kinematic earthquake rupture inversion in the frequency domain

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 199, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 1138-1160

  Fan, Wenyuan ^a   Shearer, Peter M ^a   Gerstoft, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Earthquake ground motions; Earthquake source observations; Fourier analysis; Inverse theory

Indexed keywords

FAULTING; FOURIER ANALYSIS; FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; RANDOM ERRORS;

COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT; EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS; EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; EARTHQUAKE SOURCE OBSERVATIONS; FREQUENCY DOMAINS; FREQUENCY-BASED APPROACHES; INVERSE THEORY; RUPTURE VELOCITIES;

EARTHQUAKES;

EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; FAULT GEOMETRY; FOURIER TRANSFORM; GROUND MOTION; INVERSE PROBLEM; SEISMIC SOURCE; SLIP RATE;

EID: 84924031792     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggu319     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aki, K. Richards, P.G., 2002. Quantitative Seismology, University Science Books.
2. Allmann, B.P. Shearer, P.M., 2007. A high-frequency secondary event during the 2004 Parkfield earthquake, Science, 318(5854), 1279-1283.
3. Boyd, S.P. Vandenberghe, L., 2004. Convex Optimization, Cambridge University Press.
4. Causse,M., Dalguer, L.A. Mai, P.M., 2014. Variability of dynamic source parameters inferred from kinematic models of past earthquakes, Geophys. J. Int., 196(3), 1754-1769.
5. Claerbout, J.F. Fomel, S., 2008. Image estimation by example: geophysical soundings image construction: multidimensional autoregression, http://sepwww.stanford.edu/sep/prof/.
6. Cormier, V.F., 2007. Theory and observations-forward modeling/synthetic body wave seismograms, in Treatise on Geophysics, pp. 157-189, ed. Schubert, G., Elsevier.
7. Cotton, F. Campillo, M., 1995. Frequency domain inversion of strong motions: application to the 1992 Landers earthquake, J. geophys. Res., 100(B3), 3961-3975.
8. Dettmer, J., Benavente, R., Cummins, P.R. Sambridge, M., 2014. Transdimensional finite-fault inversion, Geophys. J. Int., 199(2), 735-751.
9. Ely, G.P., Day, S.M. Minster, J.-B., 2008. A support-operator method for viscoelastic wave modelling in 3-D heterogeneous media, Geophys. J. Int., 172(1), 331-344.
10. Ely, G.P., Day, S.M. Minster, J.-B., 2009. A support-operator method for 3-D rupture dynamics, Geophys. J. Int., 177(3), 1140-1150.
11. Fukahata, Y., Yagi, Y. Rivera, L., 2014. Theoretical relationship between back-projection imaging and classical linear inverse solutions, Geophys. J. Int., 196(1), 552-559.
12. Gallovĭc, F. Zahradńik, J., 2012. Complexity of theMw 6.3 2009 L'aquila (central Italy) earthquake: 1. Multiple finite-extent source inversion, J. geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 117(B4), doi:10.1029/2011JB008709.
13. Gallovĭc, F., Kaser, M., Burjanek, J. Papaioannou, C., 2010. Threedimensional modeling of near-fault ground motions with nonplanar rupture models and topography: case of the 2004 Parkfield earthquake, J. geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 115(B3), doi:10.1029/2008JB006171.
14. Grant, M. Boyd, S., 2008. Graph implementations for nonsmooth convex programs, in Recent Advances in Learning and Control, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, pp. 95-110, eds Blondel, V., Boyd, S. Kimura, H., Springer-Verlag Limited.
15. Grant, M. Boyd, S., 2013. CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.0 beta, http://cvxr.com/cvx.
16. Hartzell, S.H. Heaton, T.H., 1983. Inversion of strong ground motion and teleseismic waveform data for the fault rupture history of the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 73(6A), 1553-1583.
17. Haskell, N.A., 1969. Elastic displacements in the near-field of a propagating fault, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 59(2), 865-908.
18. Ide, S., 2007. Slip inversion, Treatise on Geophysics, pp. 193-223, ed. Schubert, G., Elsevier.
19. Ji, C., Wald, D.J. Helmberger, D.V., 2002. Source description of the 1999 Hector Mine, California, earthquake. Part I: wavelet domain inversion theory and resolution analysis, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 92(4), 1192- 1207.
20. Koketsu, K., Hikima, K., Miyazaki, S. Ide, S., 2004. Joint inversion of strong motion and geodetic data for the source process of the 2003 Tokachi-oki, Hokkaido, earthquake, Earth Planets Space, 56(3), 329- 334.
21. Koketsu, K. et al., 2011. A unified source model for the 2011 Tohoku earthquake, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 310(3-4), 480-487.
22. Konca, A.O., Kaneko, Y., Lapusta, N. Avouac, J.-P., 2013. Kinematic inversion of physically plausible earthquake source models obtained from dynamic rupture simulations, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 103(5), 2621- 2644.
23. Maercklin, N., Festa, G., Colombelli, S. Zollo, A., 2012. Twin ruptures grew to build up the giant 2011 Tohoku, Japan, earthquake., Scientific Reports, 2, 709, doi:10.1038/srep00709.
24. Mai, P.M., 2013. Uncertainty quantification in earthquake source inversions: the source inversion validation (SIV) project, in Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly Conference, Abstracts, Vol. 15, p. 3596.
25. Mai, P.,Burjanek, J., Delouis,B., Festa, G., Francois-Holden, C.,Monelli,D., Uchide, T. Zahradnik, J., 2007. Earthquake source inversion blindtest: initial results and further developments, EOS, Trans. Am. geophys. Un., 88(52), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract S53C-08.
26. Mendez, A.J. Anderson, J.G., 1991. The temporal and spatial evolution of the 19 September 1985 Michoaćan earthquake as inferred from near-source ground-motion records, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 81(3), 844- 861.
27. Minson, S.E., Simons, M. Beck, J.L., 2013. Bayesian inversion for finite fault earthquake source models. I-theory and algorithm, Geophys. J. Int., 194(3), 1701-1726.
28. Minson, S.E. et al., 2014. Bayesian inversion for finite fault earthquake source models. II- the 2011 great Tohoku-Oki, Japan earthquake, Geophys. J. Int., 198(2), 922-940.
29. Monelli, D. Mai, P.M., 2008. Bayesian inference of kinematic earthquake rupture parameters through fitting of strong motion data, Geophys. J. Int., 173(1), 220-232.
30. Monelli, D., Mai, P.M., Jonsson, S. Giardini, D., 2009. Bayesian imaging of the 2000 Western Tottori (Japan) earthquake through fitting of strong motion and GPS data, Geophys. J. Int., 176(1), 135-150.
31. Olson, A.H. Anderson, J.G., 1988. Implications of frequency-domain inversion of earthquake ground motions for resolving the space-time dependence of slip on an extended fault, Geophys. J. Int., 94(3), 443-455.
32. Olson, A.H. Apsel, R.J., 1982. Finite faults and inverse theory with applications to the 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 72(6A), 1969-2001.
33. Page, M., Mai, P.M. Schorlemmer, D., 2011. Testing earthquake source inversion methodologies, EOS, Trans. Am. geophys. Un., 92(9), 75-75.
34. Razafindrakoto, H.N.T.Mai, P.M., 2014. Uncertainty in earthquake source imaging due to variations in source time function and Earth structure, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 104, 855-874.
35. Shao, G. Ji, C., 2012. What the exercise of the SPICE source inversion validation blindtest 1 did not tell you, Geophys. J. Int., 189(1), 569-590.
36. Spudich, P. Archuleta, R.J., 1987. Techniques for earthquake groundmotion calculation with applications to source parameterization of finite faults, in Seismic Strong Motion Synthetics, Computational Techniques, pp. 205-265, ed. Bolt, B., Academic Press.
37. Tong, X., Sandwell, D.T. Fialko, Y., 2010. Coseismic slip model of the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake derived from joint inversion of interferometric synthetic aperture radar, GPS, and field data, J. geophys. Res., 115(B4), doi:10.1029/2009JB006625.
38. Trifunac, M.D., 1974. A three-dimensional dislocation model for the San Fernando, California, earthquake of February 9, 1971, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 64(1), 149-172.
39. Uchide, T., Ide, S. Beroza, G.C., 2009. Dynamic high-speed rupture from the onset of the 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36(4), doi:10.1029/2008GL036824.
40. Valĺee, M. Bouchon, M., 2004. Imaging coseismic rupture in far field by slip patches, Geophys. J. Int., 156(3), 615-630.
41. Xenaki, A., Gerstoft, P.Mosegaard, K., 2014. Compressive beamforming, J. acoust. Soc. Am., 136(1), doi:10.1121/1.4883360.
42. Yagi, Y., 2004. Source rupture process of the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake determined by joint inversion of teleseismic body wave and strong ground motion data, Earth planet. Sci., 56(3), 311-316.
43. Yagi, Y. Fukahata, Y., 2011. Introduction of uncertainty of Green's function into waveform inversion for seismic source processes, Geophys. J. Int., 186(2), 711-720.
44. Yao, H., Gerstoft, P., Shearer, P.M. Mecklenbrauker, C., 2011. Compressive sensing of the Tohoku-Oki Mw 9.0 earthquake: frequencydependent rupture modes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38(20), doi:10.1029/2011 GL049223.
45. Yokota, Y., Koketsu, K., Fujii, Y., Satake, K., Sakai, S., Shinohara, M. Kanazawa, T., 2011. Joint inversion of strong motion, teleseismic, geodetic, and tsunami datasets for the rupture process of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38(7), doi:10.1029/2011GL050098.
46. Yue, H., Lay, T. Koper, K.D., 2012. En echelon and orthogonal fault ruptures of the 11 April 2012 great intraplate earthquakes, Nature, 490(7419), 245-249.