Qualitative and Multimethod Research: Organizations, Publication, and Reflections on Integration

The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Collier, David ^a   Elman, Colin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Integrative approach; Multimethod work; Qualitative methods; Separate tracks approach

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924025996     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.003.0034     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. ABEL, T. 1977. The operation called Verstehen. In Understanding and Social Inquiry, ed. F. Dallmayr and T. A. McCarthy, Notre Dame Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.
2. American Political Science Review 1995. Symposium on Designing Social Inquiry, 89: 454-81.
3. BENNETT, A., BARTH, A., and RUTHERFORD, K. 2003. Do we preach what we practice? Asurvey of methods in journals and graduate curricula. PS: Political Science and Politics, 36: 373-8.
4. BENNETT, A., and ELMAN, C. 2006. Qualitative research: recent developments in case study methods. Annual Review of Political Science, 9: 455-76.
5. BRADY, H. E., and COLLIER, D., (eds.) 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
6. CAMPBELL, D. 1975. Degrees of freedom and the case study. Comparative Political Studies, 8: 178-93.
7. COLLIER, D. 1993. The comparative method. Pp. 105-19 in Political Science: State of the Discipline II, ed. A. Finifter. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
8. COLLIER, D. 1998. Comparative method in the 1990s; and comparative-historical analysis: where do we stand? Letters from the president. APSA-CP, Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section for Comparative Politics, 9 (1): 1-5; and (2): 1-5.
9. COLLIER, D., BRADY, H. E., and SEAWRIGHT, J. 2004. Sources of leverage in causal inference: toward an alternative view of methodology. Pp. 229-66 in Brady and Collier 2004.
10. COLLIER, R. B. 1999. Paths toward Democracy: Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and South America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Comparative Political Studies 2007. Symposium on Qualitative Methods, 40: 111-214.
12. COPPEDGE, M. 1999. Thickening thin concepts and theories: combining large n and small in comparative politics. Comparative Politics, 31: 465-76.
13. ELMAN, C., and ELMAN, M. F., (eds.) 2001. Bridges and Boundaries: Historians, Political Scientists and the Study of International Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
14. ELMAN, C., (eds.) 2003. Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
15. FEARON, J. D. 1991. Counterfactuals and hypothesis testing in political science. World Politics, 43: 169-95.
16. FINNEMORE, M., and SIKKINK, K. 2001. Taking stock: the constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4: 391-416.
17. GEDDES, B. 2003. Paradigms and Sandcastles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
18. GEERTZ, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
19. GEORGE, A. L. 1979. Case studies and theory development: the method of structured, focused comparison. Pp. 43-68 in Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory and Policy, ed. P. G. Lauren. New York: Free Press.
20. GEORGE, A. L., and BENNETT, A. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
21. GERRING, J. 2001. Social Science Methodology: A Criterial Framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. GERRING, J. 2006. Letter from the editor. Qualitative Methods: Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Qualitative Methods, 4 (1): 1-2.
23. GERRING, J. 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. GOERTZ, G. 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User's Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25. GOERTZ, G., and STARR, H., (eds.) 2002. Necessary Conditions: Theory, Methodology, and Applications. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
26. GUZZINI, S., and LEANDNER, A. 2006. Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and his Critics. New York: Routledge.
27. JOWITT, K. 1978. The Leninist Response to National Dependency. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.
28. KATZENSTEIN, P. J., (ed.) 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
29. KEOHANE, R. 2003. Disciplinary schizophrenia: implications for graduate education in political science. Qualitative Methods: Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Qualitative Methods, 1 (1): 9-12.
30. KING, G., KEOHANE, R. O., and VERBA, S. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31. LANGE, P., and GARRETT, G. 1985. The politics of growth: strategic interaction and economic performance in advanced industrial democracies, 1974-1980. Journal of Politics, 47:792-827.
32. LIJPHART, A. 1971. Comparative politics and the comparative method. American Political Science Review, 65: 682-93.
33. LIJPHART, A. 1975. The comparable-cases strategy in comparative research. Comparative Political Studies, 8: 158-77.
34. LUSTICK, I. 1996. History, historiography, and political science: multiple historical records and the problem of selection bias. American Political Science Review, 90: 605-18.
35. MAHONEY, J., and Rueschemeyer, D., (eds.) 2003. Comparative-historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
36. MONROE, K. 2005. Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
37. MUNCK, G. L. 1998. Cannons of research design in qualitative analysis. Studies in Comparative International Development, 33: 18-45.
38. PIERSON, P. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39. Political Methodologist 1995. Symposium on Designing Social Inquiry, 6: 11-19.
40. PRZEWORSKI, A., and TEUNE, H. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley.
41. RAGIN, C. C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
42. RAGIN, C. C. 2000. Fuzzy Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. REUS-SMIT, C. 2002. Imagining society: constructivism and the English school. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 4: 487-509.
44. RUESCHEMEYER, D., STEVENS, E. H., and STEVENS, J. D. 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45. SARTORI, G. 1970. Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64: 1033-53.
46. SARTORI, G. 1984. Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
47. SMELSER, N. J. 1976. Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
48. STRYKER, R. 2002. Interpretive methods: macromethods. In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, ed. N.J. Smelser and P.B. Bates. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
49. TETLOCK P. E., and BELKIN, A., (eds.) 1996. Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50. VALLIER, I., (ed.) 1971. Comparative Methods in Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
51. VAN EVERA, S. 1997. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
52. WEDEEN, L. 2002. Conceptualizing culture: possibilities for political science. American Political Science Review, 96: 713-28.
53. WENDT, A. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
54. YANOW, D. 2000. Conducting Interpretive Policy Analysis. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
55. YANOW, D., and SCHWARTZ-SHEA, P., (eds.) 2006. Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.