Niche conservatism among non-native vertebrates in Europe and North America

Ecography

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 321-329

  Strubbe, Diederik ^a   Beauchard, Olivier ^a,b   Matthysen, Erik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b ROYAL NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR SEA RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; COLONIZATION; DISPERSAL; INVASIVE SPECIES; NICHE; POPULATION STRUCTURE; RISK FACTOR; VERTEBRATE;

EUROPE; NORTH AMERICA;

VERTEBRATA;

EID: 84923923315     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.00632     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Anderson, R. P. 2012 Harnessing the world's biodiversity data: promise and peril in ecological niche modeling of species distributions - Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1260: 66-80.
2. Anderson, R. P. 2013. A framework for using niche models to estimate impacts of climate change on species distributions. - Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1297: 8-28.
3. Anderson, R. P. and Raza, A. 2010. The effect of the extent of the study region on GIS models of species geographic distributions and estimates of niche evolution: preliminary tests with montane rodents (genus Nephelomys) in Venezuela. - J. Biogeogr. 37: 1378-1393.
4. Araujo, M. B. and Peterson, A. T. 2012. Uses and misuses of bioclimatic envelope modeling. - Ecology 93: 1527-1539.
5. Araujo, M. B. and Rozenfeld, A. 2014. The geographic scaling of biotic interactions. - Ecography 37: 406-415.
6. Barve, N. et al. 2011. The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. - Ecol. Model. 222: 1810-1819.
7. BirdLife International and NatureServe 2011. Bird species distribution maps of the world. - BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK and NatureServe, Arlington, USA.
8. Boakes, E. H. et al. 2010. Distorted views of biodiversity: spatial and temporal bias in species occurrence data. - PLoS Biol. 8: e1000385.
9. Broennimann, O. et al. 2007. Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion. - Ecol. Lett. 10: 701-709.
10. Broennimann, O. et al. 2012. Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 21: 481-497.
11. Brosse, S. et al. 2012. Fish-SPRICH: a database of freshwater fish species richness throughout the World. - Hydrobiologia 700: 343-349.
12. Burnham, K. and Anderson, D. R. 2002. Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. - Springer.
13. Caiola, N. and de Sostoa, A. 2005. Possible reasons for the decline of two native toothcarps in the Iberian Peninsula: evidence of competition with the introduced eastern mosquitofish. - J. Appl. Ichthyol. 21: 358-363.
14. Caissie, D. 2006. The thermal regime of rivers: a review. - Freshwater Biol. 51: 1389-1406.
15. Capinha, C. et al. 2014. Response of non-native European terrestrial gastropods to novel climates correlates with biogeographical and biological traits. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. doi: 10.1111/geb.12176
16. Chase, J. M. and Leibold, M. A. 2003. Ecological niches: linking classical and contemporary approaches. - Univ. of Chicago Press.
17. Colautti, R. I. et al. 2006. Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. - Biol. Invasions 8: 1023-1037.
18. Devictor, V. et al. 2010. Defining and measuring ecological specialization. - J. Appl. Ecol. 47: 15-25.
19. Dormann, C. F. et al. 2012. Correlation and process in species distribution models: bridging a dichotomy. - J. Biogeogr. 39: 2119-2131.
20. Elith, J. and Leathwick, J. R. 2009. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40: 677-697.
21. Elith, J. et al. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. - Ecography 29: 129-151.
22. Fitzpatrick, M. C. et al. 2007. The biogeography of prediction error: why does the introduced range of the fire ant over-predict its native range? - Globa. Ecol. Biogeogr. 16: 24-33.
23. Guisan, A. et al. 2012. Response to comment on 'Climatic niche shifts are rare among terrestrial plant invaders'. - Science 338: 193.
24. Guisan, A. et al. 2014. Unifying niche shift studies: insights from biological invasions. - Trends Ecol. Evol. In press, .
25. Hayes, K. R. and Barry, S. C. 2008. Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success? - Biol. Invasions 10: 483-506.
26. Heikkinen, R. K. et al. 2007. Biotic interactions improve prediction of boreal bird distributions at macro-scales. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 16: 754-763.
27. Hijmans, R. et al. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. - Int. J. Climatol. 25: 1965-1978.
28. Hirzel, A. H. et al. 2006. Evaluation the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences. - Ecol. Model. 199: 142-152.
29. IUCN 2009. IUCN Red List of threatened species. Version 2009. - .
30. Jeschke, J. M. and Strayer, D. L. 2006. Determinants of vertebrate invasion success in Europe and North America. - Global Change Biol. 12: 1608-1619.
31. Kanarek, A. R. and Webb, C. T. 2010. Allee effects, adaptive evolution, and invasion success. - Evol. Appl. 3: 122-135.
32. Kark, S. and Sol, D. 2005. Establishment success across convergent Mediterranean ecosystems: an analysis of bird introductions. - Conserv. Biol. 19: 1519-1527.
33. Kearney, M. et al. 2010. Modelling the ecological niche from functional traits. - Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365: 3469-3483.
34. Keith, P. and Allardi, J. 1998. The introduced freshwater fish of France: status, impacts and management. - In: Cowx, I. G. (ed.), Stocking and introduction of fish. MPG Books, pp. 153-166.
35. Lauzeral, C. et al. 2011. Identifying climatic niche shifts using coarse-grained occurrence data: a test with non-native freshwater fish. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 20: 407-414.
36. Lee, K. A. et al. 2005. Responding to inflammatory challenges is less costly for a successful avian invader, the house sparrow (Passer domesticus), than its less-invasive congener. - Oecologia 145: 244-251.
37. Lever, C. 2003. Naturalized reptiles and amphibians of the world. - Oxford Univ. Press.
38. Lever, C. 2005. Naturalized birds of the world. - T and AD Poyser.
39. Matthews, W. J. and Marsh-Matthews, E. 2011. An invasive fish species within its native range: community effects and population dynamics of Gambusia affinis in the central United States. - Freshwater Biol. 56: 2609-2619.
40. Medley, K. A. 2010. Niche shifts during the global invasion of the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus Skuse (Culicidae), revealed by reciprocal distribution models. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 19: 122-133.
41. Munoz-Fuentes, V. et al. 2007. Hybridization between white-headed ducks and introduced ruddy ducks in Spain. - Mol. Ecol. 16: 629-638.
42. Olson, D et al. 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the World: a new map of life on Earth. - Bio Science 51: 933-938.
43. Pearman, P. B. et al. 2008. Niche dynamics in space and time. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 23: 149-158.
44. Pearson, R. G. and Dawson, P. T. 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? - Globa. Ecol. Biogeogr. 12: 361-371.
45. Peterson, A. T. 2011. Ecological niche conservatism: a time- structured review of evidence. - J. Biogeogr. 38: 817-827.
46. Peterson, A. T. et al. 2011. Ecological niches and geographic distributions. - Princeton Univ. Press.
47. Petitpierre, B. et al. 2012. Climatic niche shifts are rare among terrestrial plant invaders. - Science 335: 1344-1348.
48. Pheloung, P. C. et al. 1999. A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. - J. Environ. Manage. 57: 239-251.
49. Rödder, D. and Engler, J. O. 2011. Quantitative metrics of overlaps in Grinnellian niches: advances and possible drawbacks. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 20: 915-927.
50. Sanderson, E. et al. 2002. The human footprint and the last of the wild. - Bio Science 52: 891-904.
51. Shigesada, N. et al. 1995. Modeling stratified diffusion in biological invasions. - Am. Nat. 146: 229-251.
52. Simberloff, D. 2009. The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40: 81-102.
53. Soberon, J. 2007. Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distributions of species. - Ecol. Lett. 10: 1115-1123.
54. Strubbe, D. et al. 2013. Niche conservatism in non-native birds in Europe: niche unfilling rather than niche expansion. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 22: 962-970.
55. Warren, D. L. et al. 2008. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. - Evolution 62: 2868-2883.
56. Wiens, J. J. and Graham, C. H. 2005. Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 519-539.
57. Wiens, J. J. et al. 2010. Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology. - Ecol. Lett. 13: 1310-1324.
58. Wisz, M. S. et al. 2013. The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: implications for species distribution modelling. - Biol. Rev. 88: 15-30.
59. Zenni, R. D. et al. 2014. Rapid evolution and range expansion of an invasive plant are driven by provenance-environment interactions. - Ecol. Lett. doi: 10.1111/ele.12278