Risk factors associated with conversion of laparoscopic simple closure in perforated duodenal ulcer

International Journal of Surgery

Volumn 15, Issue , 2015, Pages 40-44

  Kim, Ji Hyun ^a   Chin, Hyung Min ^a   Bae, You Jin ^a   Jun, Kyong Hwa ^a  

^a The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Conversion; ICU; Laparoscopic simple closure; LSC; Perforated duodenal ulcer; PPI; PPU; Totally laparoscopic

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; DISEASE DURATION; DUODENUM ULCER; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPE; LAPAROSCOPIC RETRACTOR; LAPAROSCOPIC SIMPLE CLOSURE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC VIDEO CAMERA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEEDLE; OPERATING TABLE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SEX RATIO; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURE LEAKAGE; TREATMENT FAILURE; ULCER PERFORATION; VERESS NEEDLE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; COMPLICATION; DUODENAL ULCER; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; PEPTIC ULCER PERFORATION; SUTURING METHOD; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; DUODENAL ULCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PEPTIC ULCER PERFORATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TREATMENT FAILURE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84923859292     PISSN: 17439191     EISSN: 17439159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.01.028     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Wang Y.R., Richter J.E., Dempsey D.T. Trends and outcomes of hospitalizations for peptic ulcer disease in the United States, 1993 to 2006. Ann. Surg. 2010, 251(1):51-58.
2. Lau J.Y., Sung J., Hill C., et al. Systematic review of the epidemiology of complicated peptic ulcer disease: incidence, recurrence, risk factors and mortality. Digestion 2011, 84(2):102-113.
3. Wysocki A., Budzynski P., Kulawik J., et al. Changes in the localization of perforated peptic ulcer and its relation to gender and age of the patients throughout the last 45 years. World J. Surg. 2011, 35(4):811-816.
4. Thorsen K., Soreide J.A., Kvaloy J.T., et al. Epidemiology of perforated peptic ulcer: age- and gender-adjusted analysis of incidence and mortality. World J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 19(3):347-354.
5. Mouret P., Francois Y., Vignal J., et al. Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Br. J. Surg. 1990, 77(9):1006.
6. Bertleff M.J., Halm J.A., Bemelman W.A., et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of the perforated peptic ulcer: the LAMA trial. World J. Surg. 2009, 33(7):1368-1373.
7. Siu W.T., Leong H.T., Law B.K., et al. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann. Surg. 2002, 235(3):313-319.
8. Bhogal R.H., Athwal R., Durkin D., et al. Comparison between open and laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer disease. World J. Surg. 2008, 32(11):2371-2374.
9. Lau H. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis. Surg. Endosc. 2004, 18(7):1013-1021.
10. Moller M.H., Adamsen S., Wojdemann M., et al. Perforated peptic ulcer: how to improve outcome?. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2009, 44(1):15-22.
11. Sartelli M., Viale P., Catena F., et al. 2013 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections. World J. Emerg. Surg. 2013, 8(1):3.
12. Lunevicius R., Morkevicius M. Systematic review comparing laparoscopic and open repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Br. J. Surg. 2005, 92(10):1195-1207.
13. Dominguez-Vega G., Pera M., Ramon J.M., et al. Acomparison of laparoscopic versus open repair for the surgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcers. Cir. Esp. 2013, 91(6):372-377.
14. Sauerland S., Agresta F., Bergamaschi R., et al. Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg. Endosc. 2006, 20(1):14-29.
15. Thorsen K., Glomsaker T.B., von Meer A., et al. Trends in diagnosis and surgical management of patients with perforated peptic ulcer. J.Gastrointest. Surg. 2011, 15(8):1329-1335.
16. Soreide K., Thorsen K., Soreide J.A. Strategies to improve the outcome of emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer. Br. J. Surg. 2014, 101(1):e51-64.
17. Lunevicius R., Morkevicius M. Management strategies, early results, benefits, and risk factors of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. World J. Surg. 2005, 29(10):1299-1310.
18. Bertleff M.J., Lange J.F. Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature. Surg. Endosc. 2010, 24(6):1231-1239.
19. Lohsiriwat V., Prapasrivorakul S., Lohsiriwat D. Perforated peptic ulcer: clinical presentation, surgical outcomes, and the accuracy of the Boey scoring system in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality. World J. Surg. 2009, 33(1):80-85.
20. Simone G., Ismail C., Christian G., et al. Laparoscopic repair of perforated paptic ulcer: single-center results. Surg. Endosc. 2014, 28:2302-2308.
21. Katkhouda N., Mavor E., Mason R.J., et al. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: outcome and efficacy in 30 consecutive patients. Arch. Surg. 1999, 134(8):845-848. discussion 9-50.
22. Lee F.Y., Leung K.L., Lai P.B., et al. Selection of patients for laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Br. J. Surg. 2001, 88(1):133-136.
23. Lee F.Y., Leung K.L., Lai B.S., et al. Predicting mortality and morbidity of patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcers. Arch. Surg. 2001, 136(1):90-94.
24. Lunevicius R., Morkevicius M. Risk factors influencing the early outcome results after laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer and their predictive value. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 2005, 390(5):413-420.