On flavour and naturalness of composite Higgs models

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2015, Issue 2, 2015, Pages

  Matsedonskyi, Oleksii ^a  

^a SCUOLA NORMALE SUPERIORE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Technicolor and Composite Models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923811676     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2015)154     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
2. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
3. D.B. Kaplan and H. Georgi, SU(2) × U(1) breaking by vacuum misalignment, Phys. Lett.B 136 (1984) 183 [INSPIRE].
4. D.B. Kaplan, H. Georgi and S. Dimopoulos, Composite Higgs scalars, Phys. Lett.B 136 (1984) 187 [INSPIRE].
5. H. Georgi, D.B. Kaplan and P. Galison, Calculation of the composite Higgs mass, Phys. Lett.B 143 (1984) 152 [INSPIRE].
6. T. Banks, Constraints on SU(2) × U(1) breaking by vacuum misalignment, Nucl. Phys.B 243 (1984) 125 [INSPIRE].
7. H. Georgi and D.B. Kaplan, Composite Higgs and custodial SU(2), Phys. Lett.B 145 (1984) 216 [INSPIRE].
8. M.J. Dugan, H. Georgi and D.B. Kaplan, Anatomy of a composite Higgs model, Nucl. Phys.B 254 (1985) 299 [INSPIRE].
9. R. Contino, Y. Nomura and A. Pomarol, Higgs as a holographic pseudo-Goldstone boson, Nucl. Phys.B 671 (2003) 148 [hep-ph/0306259] [INSPIRE].
10. K. Agashe, R. Contino and A. Pomarol, The minimal composite Higgs model, Nucl. Phys.B 719 (2005) 165 [hep-ph/0412089] [INSPIRE].
11. R. Contino, The Higgs as a composite Nambu-Goldstone boson, arXiv:1005.4269 [INSPIRE].
12. R. Contino, L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol, Light custodians in natural composite Higgs models, Phys. Rev.D 75 (2007) 055014 [hep-ph/0612048] [INSPIRE].
13. O. Matsedonskyi, G. Panico and A. Wulzer, Light top partners for a light composite Higgs, JHEP01 (2013) 164 [arXiv:1204.6333] [INSPIRE].
14. D. Marzocca, M. Serone and J. Shu, General composite Higgs models, JHEP08 (2012) 013 [arXiv:1205.0770] [INSPIRE].
15. A. Pomarol and F. Riva, The composite Higgs and light resonance connection, JHEP08 (2012) 135 [arXiv:1205.6434] [INSPIRE].
16. M. Redi and A. Tesi, Implications of a light Higgs in composite models, JHEP10 (2012) 166 [arXiv:1205.0232] [INSPIRE].
17. G. Panico, M. Redi, A. Tesi and A. Wulzer, On the tuning and the mass of the composite Higgs, JHEP03 (2013) 051 [arXiv:1210.7114] [INSPIRE].
18. Z. Chacko, H.-S. Goh and R. Harnik, The twin Higgs: natural electroweak breaking from mirror symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.96 (2006) 231802 [hep-ph/0506256] [INSPIRE].
19. N. Craig, S. Knapen and P. Longhi, Neutral naturalness from the orbifold Higgs, arXiv:1410.6808 [INSPIRE].
20. G. Burdman, Z. Chacko, R. Harnik, L. de Lima and C.B. Verhaaren, Colorless top partners, a 125 GeV Higgs and the limits on naturalness, arXiv:1411.3310 [INSPIRE].
21. M. Geller and O. Telem, A holographic twin Higgs model, arXiv:1411.2974 [INSPIRE].
22. R. Contino and G. Servant, Discovering the top partners at the LHC using same-sign dilepton final states, JHEP06 (2008) 026 [arXiv:0801.1679] [INSPIRE].
23. J. Mrazek and A. Wulzer, A strong sector at the LHC: top partners in same-sign dileptons, Phys. Rev.D 81 (2010) 075006 [arXiv:0909.3977] [INSPIRE].
24. F. Caracciolo, A. Parolini and M. Serone, UV completions of composite Higgs models with partial compositeness, JHEP02 (2013) 066 [arXiv:1211.7290] [INSPIRE].
25. J. Barnard, T. Gherghetta and T.S. Ray, UV descriptions of composite Higgs models without elementary scalars, JHEP02 (2014) 002 [arXiv:1311.6562] [INSPIRE].
26. G. Ferretti and D. Karateev, Fermionic UV completions of composite Higgs models, JHEP03 (2014) 077 [arXiv:1312.5330] [INSPIRE].
27. G. Ferretti, UV completions of partial compositeness: the case for a SU(4) gauge group, JHEP06 (2014) 142 [arXiv:1404.7137] [INSPIRE].
28. R. Contino, T. Kramer, M. Son and R. Sundrum, Warped/composite phenomenology simplified, JHEP05 (2007) 074 [hep-ph/0612180] [INSPIRE].
29. S.R. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 1, Phys. Rev.177 (1969) 2239 [INSPIRE].
30. C.G. Callan Jr., S.R. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 2, Phys. Rev.177 (1969) 2247 [INSPIRE].
31. A. De Simone, O. Matsedonskyi, R. Rattazzi and A. Wulzer, A first top partner hunter’s guide, JHEP04 (2013) 004 [arXiv:1211.5663] [INSPIRE].
32. C. Grojean, O. Matsedonskyi and G. Panico, Light top partners and precision physics, JHEP10 (2013) 160 [arXiv:1306.4655] [INSPIRE].
33. A. Azatov, G. Panico, G. Perez and Y. Soreq, On the flavor structure of natural composite Higgs models & top flavor violation, JHEP12 (2014) 082 [arXiv:1408.4525] [INSPIRE].
34. O. Antipin, S. De Curtis, M. Redi and C. Sacco, Muon magnetic moment and the pseudo-Goldstone Higgs boson, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 065016 [arXiv:1407.2471] [INSPIRE].
35. R. Barbieri, D. Buttazzo, F. Sala, D.M. Straub and A. Tesi, A 125 GeV composite Higgs boson versus flavour and electroweak precision tests, JHEP05 (2013) 069 [arXiv:1211.5085] [INSPIRE].
36. M. Redi, Composite MFV and beyond, Eur. Phys. J.C 72 (2012) 2030 [arXiv:1203.4220] [INSPIRE].
37. B. Keren-Zur et al., On partial compositeness and the CP asymmetry in charm decays, Nucl. Phys.B 867 (2013) 394 [arXiv:1205.5803] [INSPIRE].
38. M. König, M. Neubert and D.M. Straub, Dipole operator constraints on composite Higgs models, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 2945 [arXiv:1403.2756] [INSPIRE].
39. B. Gripaios, A. Pomarol, F. Riva and J. Serra, Beyond the minimal composite Higgs model, JHEP04 (2009) 070 [arXiv:0902.1483] [INSPIRE].
40. M. Frigerio, A. Pomarol, F. Riva and A. Urbano, Composite scalar dark matter, JHEP07 (2012) 015 [arXiv:1204.2808] [INSPIRE].
41. J. Mrazek et al., The other natural two Higgs doublet model, Nucl. Phys.B 853 (2011) 1 [arXiv:1105.5403] [INSPIRE].
42. D. Marzocca and A. Urbano, Composite dark matter and LHC interplay, JHEP07 (2014) 107 [arXiv:1404.7419] [INSPIRE].
43. D. Pappadopulo, A. Thamm and R. Torre, A minimally tuned composite Higgs model from an extra dimension, JHEP07 (2013) 058 [arXiv:1303.3062] [INSPIRE].
44. M. Baak et al., The electroweak fit of the standard model after the discovery of a new boson at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J.C 72 (2012) 2205 [arXiv:1209.2716] [INSPIRE].
45. A. Azatov, R. Contino, A. Di Iura and J. Galloway, New prospects for Higgs compositeness in h → Zγ, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 075019 [arXiv:1308.2676] [INSPIRE].
46. A. Falkowski, S. Rychkov and A. Urbano, What if the Higgs couplings to W and Z bosons are larger than in the standard model?, JHEP04 (2012) 073 [arXiv:1202.1532] [INSPIRE].
47. G. Cacciapaglia et al., A GIM mechanism from extra dimensions, JHEP04 (2008) 006 [arXiv:0709.1714] [INSPIRE].
48. R. Barbieri, G. Isidori and D. Pappadopulo, Composite fermions in electroweak symmetry breaking, JHEP02 (2009) 029 [arXiv:0811.2888] [INSPIRE].
49. R. Barbieri, B. Bellazzini, V.S. Rychkov and A. Varagnolo, The Higgs boson from an extended symmetry, Phys. Rev.D 76 (2007) 115008 [arXiv:0706.0432] [INSPIRE].
50. S. De Curtis, M. Redi and E. Vigiani, Non minimal terms in composite Higgs models and in QCD, JHEP06 (2014) 071 [arXiv:1403.3116] [INSPIRE].
51. S. Weinberg, Precise relations between the spectra of vector and axial vector mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett.18 (1967) 507 [INSPIRE].
52. C. Anastasiou, E. Furlan and J. Santiago, Realistic composite Higgs models, Phys. Rev.D 79 (2009) 075003 [arXiv:0901.2117] [INSPIRE].
53. M. Gillioz, A light composite Higgs boson facing electroweak precision tests, Phys. Rev.D 80 (2009) 055003 [arXiv:0806.3450] [INSPIRE].
54. L. Lavoura and J.P. Silva, The oblique corrections from vector-like singlet and doublet quarks, Phys. Rev.D 47 (1993) 2046 [INSPIRE].
55. B. Batell, S. Gori and L.-T. Wang, Higgs couplings and precision electroweak data, JHEP01 (2013) 139 [arXiv:1209.6382] [INSPIRE].
56. D.M. Straub, Anatomy of flavour-changing Z couplings in models with partial compositeness, JHEP08 (2013) 108 [arXiv:1302.4651] [INSPIRE].
57. −) as an electroweak precision test, Phys. Lett.B 724 (2013) 63 [arXiv:1302.3909] [INSPIRE].
58. D. Atwood, S. Bar-Shalom, G. Eilam and A. Soni, Flavor changing Z decays from scalar interactions at a giga Z linear collider, Phys. Rev.D 66 (2002) 093005 [hep-ph/0203200] [INSPIRE].
59. F. del Aguila, M. Pérez-Victoria and J. Santiago, Effective description of quark mixing, Phys. Lett.B 492 (2000) 98 [hep-ph/0007160] [INSPIRE].
60. F. del Aguila, M. Pérez-Victoria and J. Santiago, Observable contributions of new exotic quarks to quark mixing, JHEP09 (2000) 011 [hep-ph/0007316] [INSPIRE].
61. J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra and M. Pérez-Victoria, Top couplings and top partners, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.452 (2013) 012037 [arXiv:1302.5634] [INSPIRE].
62. M. Redi and A. Weiler, Flavor and CP invariant composite Higgs models, JHEP11 (2011) 108 [arXiv:1106.6357] [INSPIRE].
63. 3symmetry, JHEP07 (2012) 181 [arXiv:1203.4218] [INSPIRE].
64. J. Galloway, J.A. Evans, M.A. Luty and R.A. Tacchi, Minimal conformal technicolor and precision electroweak tests, JHEP10 (2010) 086 [arXiv:1001.1361] [INSPIRE].
65. A. Parolini, Phenomenological aspects of supersymmetric composite Higgs models, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 115026 [arXiv:1405.4875] [INSPIRE].
66. K. Agashe, R. Contino, L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol, A custodial symmetry forZbb¯$$ Zb\overline{b} $$, Phys. Lett.B 641 (2006) 62 [hep-ph/0605341] [INSPIRE].
67. J. Mrazek et al., The other natural two Higgs doublet model, Nucl. Phys.B 853 (2011) 1 [arXiv:1105.5403] [INSPIRE].
68. G. Panico and A. Wulzer, The discrete composite Higgs model, JHEP09 (2011) 135 [arXiv:1106.2719] [INSPIRE].
69. S. De Curtis, M. Redi and A. Tesi, The 4D composite Higgs, JHEP04 (2012) 042 [arXiv:1110.1613] [INSPIRE].
70. M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections, Phys. Rev.D 46 (1992) 381 [INSPIRE].
71. R. Barbieri, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi and A. Strumia, Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2, Nucl. Phys.B 703 (2004) 127 [hep-ph/0405040] [INSPIRE].
72. M. Gillioz, R. Gröber, A. Kapuvari and M. Mühlleitner, Vector-like bottom quarks in composite Higgs models, JHEP03 (2014) 037 [arXiv:1311.4453] [INSPIRE].
73. −data, JHEP12 (2013) 009 [arXiv:1309.2466] [INSPIRE].
74. −), Eur. Phys. J.C 72 (2012) 2172 [arXiv:1208.0934] [INSPIRE].
75. −time-dependent rate, JHEP07 (2013) 077 [arXiv:1303.3820] [INSPIRE].
76. Particle Data Group collaboration, K.A. Olive et al., Review of particle physics, Chin. Phys.C 38 (2014) 090001 [INSPIRE].
77. R. Barbieri, G. Isidori, J. Jones-Perez, P. Lodone and D.M. Straub, U(2) and minimal flavour violation in supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J.C 71 (2011) 1725 [arXiv:1105.2296] [INSPIRE].
78. −decays at the LHCb experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 101805 [arXiv:1307.5024] [INSPIRE].
79. −with the CMS experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 101804 [arXiv:1307.5025] [INSPIRE].
80. −from the CMS and LHCb experiments, CMS-PAS-BPH-13-007, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
81. L. Calibbi, Z. Lalak, S. Pokorski and R. Ziegler, Universal constraints on low-energy flavour models, JHEP07 (2012) 004 [arXiv:1204.1275] [INSPIRE].
82. R. Rattazzi, V.S. Rychkov, E. Tonni and A. Vichi, Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT, JHEP12 (2008) 031 [arXiv:0807.0004] [INSPIRE].
83. V.S. Rychkov and A. Vichi, Universal constraints on conformal operator dimensions, Phys. Rev.D 80 (2009) 045006 [arXiv:0905.2211] [INSPIRE].
84. R. Rattazzi, S. Rychkov and A. Vichi, Bounds in 4D conformal field theories with global symmetry, J. Phys.A 44 (2011) 035402 [arXiv:1009.5985] [INSPIRE].
85. A. Vichi, Improved bounds for CFT’s with global symmetries, JHEP01 (2012) 162 [arXiv:1106.4037] [INSPIRE].
86. D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Vichi, Carving out the space of 4D CFTs, JHEP05 (2012) 110 [arXiv:1109.5176] [INSPIRE].
87. O. Domenech, A. Pomarol and J. Serra, Probing the SM with dijets at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 074030 [arXiv:1201.6510] [INSPIRE].
88. CMS collaboration, Search for top-quark partners with charge 5/3 in the same-sign dilepton final state, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 171801 [arXiv:1312.2391] [INSPIRE].
89. CMS collaboration, Inclusive search for a vector-like T quark with charge 2/3 in pp collisions ats=8$$ \sqrt{s}=8 $$TeV, Phys. Lett.B 729 (2014) 149 [arXiv:1311.7667] [INSPIRE].
90. ATLAS collaboration, Search for pair and single production of new heavy quarks that decay to a Z boson and a third generation quark in pp collisions ats=8$$ \sqrt{s}=8 $$TeV with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2014-036, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2014).
91. A. Azatov, M. Salvarezza, M. Son and M. Spannowsky, Boosting top partner searches in composite Higgs models, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 075001 [arXiv:1308.6601] [INSPIRE].
92. O. Matsedonskyi, G. Panico and A. Wulzer, On the interpretation of top partners searches, JHEP12 (2014) 097 [arXiv:1409.0100] [INSPIRE].
93. O. Matsedonskyi, G. Panico and A. Wulzer, Composite Higgs facing data, to appear.
94. O. Matsedonskyi, F. Riva and T. Vantalon, Composite charge 8/3 resonances at the LHC, JHEP04 (2014) 059 [arXiv:1401.3740] [INSPIRE].
95. C. Delaunay et al., Light non-degenerate composite partners at the LHC, JHEP02 (2014) 055 [arXiv:1311.2072] [INSPIRE].
96. M. Redi, V. Sanz, M. de Vries and A. Weiler, Strong signatures of right-handed compositeness, JHEP08 (2013) 008 [arXiv:1305.3818] [INSPIRE].
97. ′bosons in pp collisions ats=8$$ \sqrt{s}=8 $$TeV, CMS-PAS-EXO-12-060, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2012).
98. −1of pp collisions ats=8$$ \sqrt{s}=8 $$TeV with the ATLAS experiment, ATLAS-CONF-2013-017, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
99. R. Contino, C. Grojean, D. Pappadopulo, R. Rattazzi and A. Thamm, Strong Higgs interactions at a linear collider, JHEP02 (2014) 006 [arXiv:1309.7038] [INSPIRE].
100. D. Pappadopulo, A. Thamm, R. Torre and A. Wulzer, Heavy vector triplets: bridging theory and data, JHEP09 (2014) 060 [arXiv:1402.4431] [INSPIRE].
101. D. Greco and D. Liu, Hunting composite vector resonances at the LHC: naturalness facing data, JHEP12 (2014) 126 [arXiv:1410.2883] [INSPIRE].
102. R. Contino, D. Marzocca, D. Pappadopulo and R. Rattazzi, On the effect of resonances in composite Higgs phenomenology, JHEP10 (2011) 081 [arXiv:1109.1570] [INSPIRE].
103. G.F. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol and R. Rattazzi, The strongly-interacting light Higgs, JHEP06 (2007) 045 [hep-ph/0703164] [INSPIRE].
104. C. Delaunay, C. Grojean and G. Perez, Modified Higgs physics from composite light flavors, JHEP09 (2013) 090 [arXiv:1303.5701] [INSPIRE].
105. J. Barnard, T. Gherghetta, A. Medina and T.S. Ray, Radiative corrections to the composite Higgs mass from a gluon partner, JHEP10 (2013) 055 [arXiv:1307.4778] [INSPIRE].
106. A. Carmona and F. Goertz, A naturally light Higgs without light top partners, arXiv:1410.8555 [INSPIRE].