Composite dark matter and LHC interplay

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2014, Issue 7, 2014, Pages

  Marzocca, David ^a,b   Urbano, Alfredo ^a  

^a SISSA   (Italy)

^b SEZIONE DI TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Global Symmetries; Higgs Physics; Technicolor and Composite Models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906490317     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2014)107     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. F. Englert and R. Brout, Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett.13 (1964) 321 [INSPIRE].
2. P.W. Higgs, Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.13 (1964) 508 [INSPIRE].
3. P.W. Higgs, Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields, Phys. Lett.12 (1964) 132 [INSPIRE].
4. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
5. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
6. A. Djouadi, The anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. I: the Higgs boson in the Standard Model, Phys. Rept.457 (2008) 1 [hep-ph/0503172] [INSPIRE].
7. A. Djouadi, The anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. II: the Higgs bosons in the minimal supersymmetric model, Phys. Rept.459 (2008) 1 [hep-ph/0503173] [INSPIRE].
8. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept.267 (1996) 195 [hep-ph/9506380] [INSPIRE].
9. A. Arvanitaki, M. Baryakhtar, X. Huang, K. van Tilburg and G. Villadoro, The last vestiges of naturalness, JHEP03 (2014) 022 [arXiv:1309.3568] [INSPIRE].
10. T. Gherghetta, B. von Harling, A.D. Medina and M.A. Schmidt, The price of being SM-like in SUSY, JHEP04 (2014) 180 [arXiv:1401.8291] [INSPIRE].
11. D.B. Kaplan and H. Georgi, SU(2) × U(1) breaking by vacuum misalignment, Phys. Lett.B 136 (1984) 183 [INSPIRE].
12. H. Georgi and D.B. Kaplan, Composite Higgs and custodial SU(2), Phys. Lett.B 145 (1984) 216 [INSPIRE].
13. D.B. Kaplan, H. Georgi and S. Dimopoulos, Composite Higgs scalars, Phys. Lett.B 136 (1984) 187 [INSPIRE].
14. M.J. Dugan, H. Georgi and D.B. Kaplan, Anatomy of a composite Higgs model, Nucl. Phys.B 254 (1985) 299 [INSPIRE].
15. R. Contino, Y. Nomura and A. Pomarol, Higgs as a holographic pseudo-Goldstone boson, Nucl. Phys.B 671 (2003) 148 [hep-ph/0306259] [INSPIRE].
16. K. Agashe, R. Contino and A. Pomarol, The minimal composite Higgs model, Nucl. Phys.B 719 (2005) 165 [hep-ph/0412089] [INSPIRE].
17. O. Matsedonskyi, G. Panico and A. Wulzer, Light top partners for a light composite Higgs, JHEP01 (2013) 164 [arXiv:1204.6333] [INSPIRE].
18. M. Redi and A. Tesi, Implications of a light Higgs in composite models, JHEP10 (2012) 166 [arXiv:1205.0232] [INSPIRE].
19. D. Marzocca, M. Serone and J. Shu, General composite Higgs models, JHEP08 (2012) 013 [arXiv:1205.0770] [INSPIRE].
20. A. Pomarol and F. Riva, The composite Higgs and light resonance connection, JHEP08 (2012) 135 [arXiv:1205.6434] [INSPIRE].
21. D. Pappadopulo, A. Thamm and R. Torre, A minimally tuned composite Higgs model from an extra dimension, JHEP07 (2013) 058 [arXiv:1303.3062] [INSPIRE].
22. M. Frigerio, A. Pomarol, F. Riva and A. Urbano, Composite scalar dark matter, JHEP07 (2012) 015 [arXiv:1204.2808] [INSPIRE].
23. H. Murayama and J. Shu, Topological dark matter, Phys. Lett.B 686 (2010) 162 [arXiv:0905.1720] [INSPIRE].
24. V. Silveira and A. Zee, Scalar phantoms, Phys. Lett.B 161 (1985) 136 [INSPIRE].
25. J. McDonald, Gauge singlet scalars as cold dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 50 (1994) 3637 [hep-ph/0702143] [INSPIRE].
26. C.P. Burgess, M. Pospelov and T. ter Veldhuis, The minimal model of nonbaryonic dark matter: a singlet scalar, Nucl. Phys.B 619 (2001) 709 [hep-ph/0011335] [INSPIRE].
27. B. Patt and F. Wilczek, Higgs-field portal into hidden sectors, hep-ph/0605188 [INSPIRE].
28. B. Gripaios, A. Pomarol, F. Riva and J. Serra, Beyond the minimal composite Higgs model, JHEP04 (2009) 070 [arXiv:0902.1483] [INSPIRE].
29. R. Contino, D. Marzocca, D. Pappadopulo and R. Rattazzi, On the effect of resonances in composite Higgs phenomenology, JHEP10 (2011) 081 [arXiv:1109.1570] [INSPIRE].
30. S.R. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 1, Phys. Rev.177 (1969) 2239 [INSPIRE].
31. C.G. Callan Jr., S.R. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 2, Phys. Rev.177 (1969) 2247 [INSPIRE].
32. A. De Simone, O. Matsedonskyi, R. Rattazzi and A. Wulzer, A first top partner hunter’s guide, JHEP04 (2013) 004 [arXiv:1211.5663] [INSPIRE].
33. A. Azatov, M. Salvarezza, M. Son and M. Spannowsky, Boosting top partner searches in composite Higgs models, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 075001 [arXiv:1308.6601] [INSPIRE].
34. C. Grojean, O. Matsedonskyi and G. Panico, Light top partners and precision physics, JHEP10 (2013) 160 [arXiv:1306.4655] [INSPIRE].
35. D. Marzocca, A. Parolini and M. Serone, Supersymmetry with a PNGB Higgs and partial compositeness, JHEP03 (2014) 099 [arXiv:1312.5664] [INSPIRE].
36. G.F. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol and R. Rattazzi, The strongly-interacting light Higgs, JHEP06 (2007) 045 [hep-ph/0703164] [INSPIRE].
37. M. Montull, F. Riva, E. Salvioni and R. Torre, Higgs couplings in composite models, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 095006 [arXiv:1308.0559] [INSPIRE].
38. A. Urbano, Remarks on analyticity and unitarity in the presence of a strongly interacting light Higgs, arXiv:1310.5733 [INSPIRE].
39. ATLAS collaboration, Updated coupling measurements of the Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector using up to 25 fb−1of proton-proton collision data, ATLAS-CONF-2014-009, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2014).
40. CMS collaboration, Combination of Standard Model Higgs boson searches and measurements of the properties of the new boson with a mass near 125 GeV, CMS-PAS-HIG-13-005, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
41. ATLAS collaboration, Search for invisible decays of a Higgs boson produced in association with a Z boson in ATLAS, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 201802 [arXiv:1402.3244] [INSPIRE].
42. CMS collaboration, Search for the Higgs boson decaying to invisible particles produced in association with Z bosons decaying to bottom quarks, CMS-PAS-HIG-13-028, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
43. A. Falkowski, F. Riva and A. Urbano, Higgs at last, JHEP11 (2013) 111 [arXiv:1303.1812] [INSPIRE].
44. P.P. Giardino, K. Kannike, I. Masina, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, The universal Higgs fit, JHEP05 (2014) 046 [arXiv:1303.3570] [INSPIRE].
45. D. Carmi, A. Falkowski, E. Kuflik, T. Volansky and J. Zupan, Higgs after the discovery: a status report, JHEP10 (2012) 196 [arXiv:1207.1718] [INSPIRE].
46. A. Azatov, R. Contino and J. Galloway, Model-independent bounds on a light Higgs, JHEP04 (2012) 127 [Erratum.04 (2013) 140] [arXiv:1202.3415] [INSPIRE].
47. M. Montull and F. Riva, Higgs discovery: the beginning or the end of natural EWSB?, JHEP11 (2012) 018 [arXiv:1207.1716] [INSPIRE].
48. J.R. Espinosa, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner and M. Trott, First glimpses at Higgs’ face, JHEP12 (2012) 045 [arXiv:1207.1717] [INSPIRE].
49. J. Ellis and T. You, Updated global analysis of Higgs couplings, JHEP06 (2013) 103 [arXiv:1303.3879] [INSPIRE].
50. D. Pappadopulo, A. Thamm, R. Torre and A. Wulzer, Heavy vector triplets: bridging theory and data, arXiv:1402.4431 [INSPIRE].
51. N. Vignaroli, New W′signals at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 095027 [arXiv:1404.5558] [INSPIRE].
52. M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, A new constraint on a strongly interacting Higgs sector, Phys. Rev. Lett.65 (1990) 964 [INSPIRE].
53. R. Barbieri, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi and A. Strumia, Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2, Nucl. Phys.B 703 (2004) 127 [hep-ph/0405040] [INSPIRE].
54. M. Baak et al., The electroweak fit of the Standard Model after the discovery of a new boson at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J.C 72 (2012) 2205 [arXiv:1209.2716] [INSPIRE].
55. CMS collaboration, Search for top-quark partners with charge 5/3 in the same-sign dilepton final state, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 171801 [arXiv:1312.2391] [INSPIRE].
56. ATLAS collaboration, Search for exotic same-sign dilepton signatures (b′quark, T5/3and four top quarks production) in 4.7 fb−1of pp collisions ats$$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2012-130, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2012).
57. CMS collaboration, Inclusive search for a vector-like T quark with charge23$$ \frac{2}{3} $$in pp collisions ats$$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 8 TeV, Phys. Lett.B 729 (2014) 149 [arXiv:1311.7667] [INSPIRE].
58. ATLAS collaboration, Search for pair production of heavy top-like quarks decaying to a high-pTW boson and a b quark in the lepton plus jets final state in pp collisions ats$$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector,ATLAS-CONF-2013-060, CERN, GenevaSwitzerland (2013).
59. ATLAS collaboration, Search for heavy top-like quarks decaying to a Higgs boson and a top quark in the lepton plus jets final state in pp collisions ats$$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2013-018, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
60. W.-C. Huang, A. Urbano and W. Xue, Fermi bubbles under dark matter scrutiny part II: particle physics analysis, JCAP04 (2014) 020 [arXiv:1310.7609] [INSPIRE].
61. Planck collaboration, P.A.R. Ade et al., Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters, arXiv:1303.5076 [INSPIRE].
62. J.M. Cline and K. Kainulainen, Electroweak baryogenesis and dark matter from a singlet Higgs, JCAP01 (2013) 012 [arXiv:1210.4196] [INSPIRE].
63. P. Ciafaloni et al., The role of electroweak corrections for the dark matter relic abundance, JCAP10 (2013) 031 [arXiv:1305.6391] [INSPIRE].
64. F. Boudjema, G.D. La Rochelle and A. Mariano, Relic density calculations beyond tree-level, exact calculations versus effective couplings: the ZZ final state, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 115020 [arXiv:1403.7459] [INSPIRE].
65. LUX website, http://luxdarkmatter.org/.
66. LUX collaboration, D.S. Akerib et al., First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 091303 [arXiv:1310.8214] [INSPIRE].
67. A. Berlin, D. Hooper and S.D. McDermott, Simplified dark matter models for the galactic center gamma-ray excess, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 115022 [arXiv:1404.0022] [INSPIRE].
68. P. Junnarkar and A. Walker-Loud, Scalar strange content of the nucleon from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 114510 [arXiv:1301.1114] [INSPIRE].
69. A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter and M. Procura, Accurate evaluation of hadronic uncertainties in spin-independent WIMP-nucleon scattering: disentangling two- and three-flavor effects, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 054021 [arXiv:1312.4951] [INSPIRE].
70. G. Bertone et al., Particle dark matter: observations, models and searches, Cambridge Univ. Pr., Cambridge U.K. (2010).
71. M. Cirelli et al., PPPC 4 DM ID: a Poor Particle Physicist Cookbook for dark matter indirect detection, JCAP03 (2011) 051 [Erratum.10 (2012) E01] [arXiv:1012.4515] [INSPIRE].
72. F. Donato et al., Anti-protons from spallations of cosmic rays on interstellar matter, Astrophys. J.563 (2001) 172 [astro-ph/0103150] [INSPIRE].
73. G. Di Bernardo, C. Evoli, D. Gaggero, D. Grasso and L. Maccione, Unified interpretation of cosmic-ray nuclei and antiproton recent measurements, Astropart. Phys.34 (2010) 274 [arXiv:0909.4548] [INSPIRE].
74. S. Profumo, TASI 2012 lectures on astrophysical probes of dark matter, arXiv:1301.0952 [INSPIRE].
75. H. Matsunaga et al., Measurement of low-energy cosmic ray anti-protons at solar minimum, Phys. Rev. Lett.81 (1998) 4052 [astro-ph/9809326] [INSPIRE].
76. BESS collaboration, T. Maeno et al., Successive measurements of cosmic ray anti-proton spectrum in a positive phase of the solar cycle, Astropart. Phys.16 (2001) 121 [astro-ph/0010381] [INSPIRE].
77. Y. Asaoka et al., Measurements of cosmic ray low-energy anti-proton and proton spectra in a transient period of the solar field reversal, Phys. Rev. Lett.88 (2002) 051101 [astro-ph/0109007] [INSPIRE].
78. PAMELA collaboration, O. Adriani et al., PAMELA results on the cosmic-ray antiproton flux from 60 MeV to 180 GeV in kinetic energy, Phys. Rev. Lett.105 (2010) 121101 [arXiv:1007.0821] [INSPIRE].
79. AMS-02 website, http://www.ams02.org/.
80. C. Evoli, I. Cholis, D. Grasso, L. Maccione and P. Ullio, Antiprotons from dark matter annihilation in the galaxy: astrophysical uncertainties, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 123511 [arXiv:1108.0664] [INSPIRE].
81. P. Ullio, A. Urbano and W. Xue, Constraining the Higgs portal with antiprotons, to appear.
82. N. Fornengo, L. Maccione and A. Vittino, Constraints on particle dark matter from cosmic-ray antiprotons, JCAP04 (2014) 003 [arXiv:1312.3579] [INSPIRE].
83. M. Cirelli and G. Giesen, Antiprotons from dark matter: current constraints and future sensitivities, JCAP04 (2013) 015 [arXiv:1301.7079] [INSPIRE].
84. PAMELA collaboration, O. Adriani et al., PAMELA measurements of cosmic-ray proton and helium spectra, Science332 (2011) 69 [arXiv:1103.4055] [INSPIRE].
85. PYTHIA 8.1 website, http://home.thep.lu.se/∼torbjorn/Pythia.html.
86. P. Ciafaloni et al., Weak corrections are relevant for dark matter indirect detection, JCAP03 (2011) 019 [arXiv:1009.0224] [INSPIRE].
87. P. Ciafaloni et al., On the importance of electroweak corrections for Majorana dark matter indirect detection, JCAP06 (2011) 018 [arXiv:1104.2996] [INSPIRE].
88. J.F. Navarro et al., The diversity and similarity of cold dark matter halos, arXiv:0810.1522 [INSPIRE].
89. A.W. Graham, D. Merritt, B. Moore, J. Diemand and B. Terzic, Empirical models for dark matter halos. I. Nonparametric construction of density profiles and comparison with parametric models, Astron. J.132 (2006) 2685 [astro-ph/0509417] [INSPIRE].
90. J.F. Navarro, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White, The structure of cold dark matter halos, Astrophys. J.462 (1996) 563 [astro-ph/9508025] [INSPIRE].
91. A. Burkert, The structure of dark matter halos in dwarf galaxies, IAU Symp.171 (1996) 175 [Astrophys. J.447 (1995) L25] [astro-ph/9504041] [INSPIRE].
92. DRAGON website, http://www.dragonproject.org/Home.html.
93. D. Gaggero, L. Maccione, G. Di Bernardo, C. Evoli and D. Grasso, Three-dimensional model of cosmic-ray lepton propagation reproduces data from the alpha magnetic spectrometer on the International Space Station, Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 021102 [arXiv:1304.6718] [INSPIRE].
94. G. Di Bernardo, C. Evoli, D. Gaggero, D. Grasso and L. Maccione, Cosmic ray electrons, positrons and the synchrotron emission of the galaxy: consistent analysis and implications, JCAP03 (2013) 036 [arXiv:1210.4546] [INSPIRE].
95. O. Adriani et al., A new measurement of the antiproton-to-proton flux ratio up to 100 GeV in the cosmic radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett.102 (2009) 051101 [arXiv:0810.4994] [INSPIRE].
96. M. Tavakoli, I. Cholis, C. Evoli and P. Ullio, Constraints on dark matter annihilations from diffuse gamma-ray emission in the galaxy, JCAP01 (2014) 017 [arXiv:1308.4135] [INSPIRE].
97. R. Contino, C. Grojean, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini and R. Rattazzi, Strong double Higgs production at the LHC, JHEP05 (2010) 089 [arXiv:1002.1011] [INSPIRE].