Sponge cell aggregation: Checkpoints in development indicate a high level of organismal complexity

Invertebrate Biology

Volumn 134, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-18

  Eerkes Medrano, Dafne ^a   Feehan, Colette J ^b   Leys, Sally P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b MARINE LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^c DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cell lines; Development; Porifera; Regeneration; Stem cells

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; HALICLONA PERMOLLIS; METAZOA; PORIFERA; SPONGILLA LACUSTRIS;

EID: 84923768264     PISSN: 10778306     EISSN: 17447410     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ivb.12072     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Abbott A 2003. Biology's new dimension. Nature 424: 870-872.
2. Armstrong E, McKenzie JD, & Goldsworthy GT 1999. Aquaculture of sponges on scallops for natural products research and antifouling. J. Biotechnol. 70: 163-174.
3. Bagby RM 1972. Formation and differentiation of the upper pinacoderm in reaggregation masses of the sponge Microciona prolifera (Ellis and Solander). J. Exp. Zool. 180: 217-225.
4. Beadle LC & Booth FA 1938. The reorganization of tissue masses of Cordylophora lacustris and the effect of oral cone grafts, with supplementary observations on Obelia gelatinosa. J. Exp. Biol. 15: 303-326.
5. Belarbi EH, Contreras Gómez A, Chisti Y, García Camacho F, & Molina Grima E 2003. Producing drugs from marine sponges. Biotechnol. Adv. 21: 585-598.
6. Borojevic R & Lévi C 1964. Métamorphose artificielle des larves d'éponge, après dissociation et réaggregation des cellules larvaires. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 259: 4364-4366.
7. Borojevic R & Lévi C 1965. Morphogenèse expérimentale d'une éponge à partir de cellules de la larve nageante dissociée. Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 68: 57-69.
8. Brien P 1937. La réorganisation de l'éponge après dissociation par filtration et phénomènes d'involution chez Ephydatia fluviatilis (L). Arch. Biol. 48: 185-268.
9. Brockes JP 1997. Amphibian limb regeneration: rebuilding a complex structure. Science 276: 81-87.
10. Brockes JP & Kumar A 2008. Comparative aspects of animal regeneration. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 24: 525-549.
11. Brøndsted HV 1942. Formbildungsprozesse bei einem sehr primitiven Metazoon, dem Süsswasserschwamm Spongilla lacustris (L.). Protoplasma 37: 244-257.
12. Brøndsted HV 1953. The ability to differentiate, and the size of regenerated cells, after repeated regeneration in Spongilla lacustris. Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 94: 177-184.
13. Burton M 1947. Non-sexual reproduction in sponges, with special reference to a collection of young Geodia. Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond. 160: 163-178.
14. Buscema M, De Sutter D, & Van de Vyver G 1980. Ultrastructural study of differentiation processes during aggregation of purified sponge archaeocytes. Roux Arch. Dev. Biol. 188: 45-53.
15. Candia Carnevali MD 2006. Regeneration in echinoderms: repair, regrowth, cloning. Invertebr. Survival J. 3: 64-76.
16. de Caralt S, Agell G, & Uriz MJ 2003. Long-term culture of sponge explants: conditions enhancing survival and growth, and assembly of bioactivity. Biomol. Eng. 20: 339-347.
17. Chernogor LI, Denikina NN, Belikov SI, & Ereskovsky AV 2011. Long-term cultivation of primmorphs from freshwater Baikal sponges Lubomirskia baikalensis. Mar. Biotechnol. 13: 782-792.
18. Connes R 1964. Contribution a l'étude de la proliferation par voie asexuée chez le Sycon. Bull. Soc. Zool. France 89: 188-195.
19. Connes R 1967. Structure et développement des bourgeons chez l'éponge siliceuse Tethya lyncurium Lamarck. Recherches expérimentales et cytologiques. Arch. Zool. Exp. Générale 108: 157-195.
20. Cooper EL 2009. Putative stem cell origins in solitary tunicates. In: Stem Cells in Marine Organisms. Rinkevich B & Matranga V, eds., pp. 21-32. Springer, New York.
21. Cukierman E, Pankov R, Stevens DR, & Yamada KM 2001. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 294: 1708-1712.
22. Custodio MR, Prokic I, Steffen R, Koziol C, Borojevic R, Brümmer F, Nickel M, & Müller WEG 1998. Primmorphs generated from dissociated cells of the sponge Suberites domuncula: a model system for studies of cell proliferation and cell death. Mech. Ageing Dev. 105: 45-59.
23. De Sutter D & Van de Vyver G 1977. Aggregative properties of different cell types of the fresh-water sponge Ephydatia fluviatilis isolated on Ficoll gradients. Roux Arch. Dev. Biol. 181: 151-161.
24. Dondua AK & Kastyuchenko RP 2013. Concerning one obsolete tradition: does gastrulation in sponges exist? Russ. J. Dev. Biol. 44: 267-272.
25. Fell PE 1974. Diapause in the gemmules of the marine sponge, Haliclona loosanoffi, with a note on the gemmules of Haliclona oculata. Biol. Bull. 147: 333-351.
26. Fernàndez-Busquets X & Burger MM 2003. Circular proteoglycans from sponges: first members of the spongican family. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 60: 88-112.
27. 2+-dependent carbohydrate-carbohydrate cell adhesion provide clues to the Cambrian explosion. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26: 2551-2561.
28. Gaino E, Liaci LS, Sciscioli M, & Corriero G 2006. Investigation of the budding process in Tethya citrina and Tethya aurantium (Porifera, Demospongiae). Zoomorphology 125: 87-97.
29. Galtsoff PS 1923. The amoeboid movement of dissociated sponge cells. Biol. Bull. 45: 153-161.
30. Galtsoff PS 1925a. Regeneration after dissociation (an experimental study on sponges). II. Histogenesis of Microciona prolifera. J. Exp. Zool. 42: 223-255.
31. Galtsoff PS 1925b. Regeneration after dissociation (an experimental study on sponges). I. Behavior of dissociated cells of Microciona prolifera under normal and altered conditions. J. Exp. Zool. 42: 183-221.
32. García Camacho F, Belarbi EH, Cerón García MC, Sánchez Mirón A, Chile T, Chisti Y, & Molina Grima E 2005. Shear effects on suspended marine sponge cells. Biochem. Eng. J. 26: 115-121.
33. Gasic GJ & Galanti NL 1966. Proteins and disulfide groups in the aggregation of dissociated cells of sea sponges. Science 151: 203-205.
34. Giudice G 1962. Restitution of whole larvae from disaggregated cells of sea urchin embryos. Dev. Biol. 5: 402-411.
35. Grasela JJ, Pomponi SA, Rinkevich B, & Grima J 2012. Efforts to develop a cultured sponge cell line: revisiting an intractable problem. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. - Anim. 48: 12-20.
36. Herlant-Meewis H 1948. La gemmulation chez Suberites domuncula (Olivi) Nardo. Arch. Anat. Microsc. Morphol. Exp. 37: 289-322.
37. Hinegardner RT 1975. Morphology and genetics of sea-urchin development. Am. Zool. 15: 679-689.
38. Hoppe WF 1988. Growth, regeneration and predation in three species of large coral reef sponges. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 50: 117-125.
39. Humphreys T 1963. Chemical dissolution and in vitro reconstruction of sponge cell adhesions. I. Isolation and functional demonstration of the components involved. Dev. Biol. 8: 27-47.
40. Humphreys T 1970. Biochemical analysis of sponge cell aggregation. In: Biology of the Porifera. Fry WG, ed. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 25: 325-334.
41. Imsiecke G, Steffen R, Custodio M, Borojevic R, & Müller WEG 1995. Formation of spicules by sclerocytes from the freshwater sponge Ephydatia muelleri in short-term cultures in vitro. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 31: 528-535.
42. Johnston IS 1990. Behaviour of reaggregating cell suspensions and the phenomenon of allograft rejection in Callyspongia diffusa and Toxadocia violacea. In: New Perspectives in Sponge Biology. Ruetzler K, ed., pp. 91-95. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
43. Kawamura K, Sugino Y, Sunanaga T, & Fujiwara S 2008. Multipotent epithelial cells in the process of regeneration and asexual reproduction in colonial tunicates. Dev. Growth Differ. 50: 1-11.
44. Langenbruch P 1982. Development of the gemmule shells in Spongilla fragilis Leidy (Porifera). Zoomorphology 99: 221-234.
45. Laseter JL & Poirrier MA 1970. Free fatty acids in the protective coats of Spongilla wagneri gemmules. Lipids 5: 722-724.
46. Leininger S, Adamski M, Bergum B, Guder C, Liu J, Laplante M, Bråte J, Hoffmann F, Fortunado S, Jordal S, Tore Rapp H, & Adamska M 2014. Developmental gene expression provides clues to relationships between sponge and eumetazoan body plans. Nat. Commun. 5: 1-15. doi:10.1038/ncomms4905.
47. Lenhoff SG & Lenhoff HM 1986. Hydra and the Birth of Experimental Biology, 1744: Abraham Trembley's Memoirs Concerning the Natural History of a Type of Freshwater Polyp with Arms Shaped like Horns. Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove, California.
48. Levi C 1960. Reconstitution du squelette de l'éponge Ophlitaspongia seriata (Grant) à partir de suspensions cellulaires. Cah. Biol. Mar. 1: 353-358.
49. Levin M 2012. Morphogenetic fields in embryogenesis, regeneration, and cancer: non-local control of complex patterning. Biosystems 109: 243-261.
50. Maldonado M & Uriz MJ 1999. Sexual propagation by sponge fragments. Nature 398: 476.
51. Mashanov V, Dolmatov IY, & Heinzeller T 2005. Transdifferentiation in holothurian gut regeneration. Biol. Bull. 209: 184-193.
52. Mroue R & Bissell MJ 2013. Three-dimensional cultures of mouse mammary epithelial cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 945: 221-250.
53. Müller WEG, Diehl-Seifert B, Gramzow M, Friese U, Renneisen K, & Schroder HC 1988. Interaction between extracellular adhesion proteins and extracellular matrix in reaggregation of dissociated sponge cells. Int. Rev. Cytol. 111: 211-229.
54. Müller WEG, Wiens M, Batel R, Steffen R, Schröder HC, Borojevic R, & Custodio MR 1999. Establishment of a primary cell culture from a sponge: primmorphs from Suberites domuncula. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 178: 205-219.
55. Müller WEG, Grebenjuk VA, Le Pennec G, Schröder HC, Brümmer F, Hentschel U, Müller IM, & Breter HJ 2004. Sustainable production of bioactive compounds by sponges-cell culture and gene cluster approach: a review. Mar. Biotechnol. 6: 105-117.
56. Nickel M, Leininger S, Proll G, & Brümmer F 2001. Comparative studies on two potential methods for the biotechnological production of sponge biomass. J. Biotechnol. 92: 169-178.
57. Odintsova NA, Ermak AV, & Tsal LG 1994. Substrate selection for long-term cultivation of marine invertebrate cells. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 107A: 613-619.
58. Osinga R, Tramper J, & Wijffels RH 1999. Cultivation of marine sponges. Mar. Biotechnol. 1: 509-532.
59. Pavans de Ceccatty M 1982. In vitro aggregation of syncytia and cells of a hexactinellida sponge. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 6: 15-22.
60. Pavans de Ceccatty M & Mackie G 1982. Genèse et évolution des interconnexions syncytiales et cellulaires chez une éponge Hexactinellide en cours de réagrégation après dissociation in vitro. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 294: 939-944.
61. Pearse V, Pearse J, Buchsbaum M, & Buchsbaum R 1987. Living Invertebrates. The Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove, California. 848 pp.
62. Pomponi SA & Willoughby R 1994. Sponge cell culture for production of bioactive metabolites. In: Sponges in Time and Space. Van Soest RWM, Van Kempen TMG & Braekman JC, eds., pp. 395-400. Balkema, Rotterdam.
63. Richelle-Maurer E, Gomez R, Braekman JC, Van de Vyver G, Van Soest RWM, & Devijver C 2003. Primary cultures from the marine sponge Xestospongia muta (Petrosiidae, Haplosclerida). J. Biotechnol. 100: 169-176.
64. Rinkevich B 1999. Cell cultures from marine invertebrates: obstacles, new approaches and recent improvements. J. Biotechnol. 70: 133-153.
65. Rinkevich B, Blisko R, & Ilan M 1998. Further steps in the initiation of cell cultures from embryos and adult sponge colonies. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. - Anim. 34: 753-756.
66. Rinkevich Y, Matranga V, & Rinkevich B 2009. Stem cells in aquatic invertebrates: common premises and emerging unique themes. In: Stem Cells in Marine Organisms. Rinkevich B & Matranga V, eds., pp. 61-104. Springer, New York.
67. Rogers KW & Schier AF 2011. Morphogen gradients: from generation to interpretation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 27: 377-407.
68. Roskelley CD & Bissell MJ 1995. Dynamic reciprocity revisited: a continuous, bidirectional flow of information between cells and the extracellular matrix regulates mammary epithelial cell function. Biochem. Cell Biol. 73: 391-397.
69. Rychel AL & Swalla BJ 2009. Regeneration in hemichordates and echinoderms. In: Stem Cells in Marine Organisms. Rinkevich B & Matranga V, eds., pp. 245-266. Springer, New York.
70. Sánchez Alvarado A 2000. Regeneration in the metazoans: why does it happen? BioEssays 22: 578-590.
71. Sánchez Alvarado A 2006. Planarian regeneration: its end is its beginning. Cell 124: 241-245.
72. Schmidt H 1970. Anthopleura stellula (Actiniaria, Actiniidae) and its reproduction by transverse fission. Mar. Biol. 5: 245-255.
73. Simpson TL 1984. The Cell Biology of Sponges. Springer Verlag, New York. 662 pp.
74. Simpson TL & Gilbert JJ 1973. Gemmulation, gemmule hatching, and sexual reproduction in fresh-water sponges I. The life cycle of Spongilla lacustris and Tubella pennsylvanica. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 92: 422-433.
75. Tanaka K 2002. Growth dynamics and mortality of the intertidal encrusting sponge Halichondria okadai (Demospongiae, Halichondrida). Mar. Biol. 140: 383-389.
76. Valisano L, Pozzolini M, Giovine M, & Cerrano C 2012. Biosilica deposition in the marine sponge Petrosia ficiformis (Poiret, 1789): the model of primmorphs reveals time dependence of spiculogenesis. Hydrobiologia 687: 259-273.
77. Van de Vyver G 1971. Mise en evidence d'un facteur d'agrégation chez l'éponge d'eau douce, Ephydatia fluviatilis. Ann. Embr. Morph. 4: 373-381.
78. Van de Vyver G & Buscema M 1981. Capacités morphogènes des cellules d'éponges dissociées. Ann. Soc. R. Zool. Belg. 111: 9-19.
79. Vickery MS & McClintock JB 1998. Regeneration in metazoan larvae. Nature 394: 140.
80. Vickery MS, Vickery MCL, & McClintock JB 2002. Morphogenesis and organogenesis in the regenerating planktotrophic larvae of asteroids and echinoids. Biol. Bull. 203: 121-133.
81. Vilanova E, Coutinho C, Maia G, & Mourão PAS 2010. Sulfated polysaccharides from marine sponges: conspicuous distribution among different cell types and involvement on formation of in vitro cell aggregates. Cell Tissue Res. 340: 523-531.
82. Weis JS 1976. Effects of environmental factors on regeneration and molting in fiddler crabs. Biol. Bull. 150: 152-162.
83. Weissman IL 2000. Stem cells: units of development, units of regeneration, and units in evolution. Cell 100: 157-168.
84. Wetzel RG 2001. Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems, 3rd ed. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, California. 1006 pp.
85. Wilson HV 1907. A new method by which sponges may be artificially reared. Science 25: 912-915.
86. Wilson HV 1908. On some phenomena of coalescence and regeneration in sponges. J. Exp. Zool. 5: 245-258.
87. Windsor PJ & Leys SP 2010. Wnt signaling and induction in the sponge aquiferous system: evidence for an ancient origin of the organizer. Evol. Dev. 12: 484-493.
88. Wulff JL 2006. Ecological interactions of marine sponges. Can. J. Zool. 84: 146-166.
89. Wulff J 2010. Regeneration of sponges in ecological context: is regeneration an integral part of life history and morphological strategies? Integr. Comp. Biol. 50: 494-505.
90. Wulff J 2013. Recovery of sponges after extreme mortality events: morphological and taxonomic patterns in regeneration versus recruitment. Integr. Comp. Biol. 53: 512-523.