Community forestry: Local values, conflict and forest governance

Community Forestry: Local Values, Conflict and Forest Governance

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-186

  Bullock, Ryan C L ^a   Hanna, Kevin S ^b  

^a University of Saskatchewan   (Canada)

^b WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923767749     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511978678     Document Type: Book

References (306)

1. Agrawal, A. and Gibson, C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development 27(4): 629–49.
2. Ambus, L. (2008). The evolution of devolution: evaluation of the Community Forest Agreement in British Columbia. Unpublished Master’s thesis University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
3. Anderson, N. and Horter, W. (2002). Connecting Lands and People: Community Forests in British Columbia. Victoria: Dogwood Initiative.
4. Angeles, L. and Gurstein, P. (2007). Learning civil societies for democratic planning and governance. In Gurstein, P. and Angeles, L. (eds.), Learning Civil Societies: Shifting Contexts for Democratic Planning and Governance. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 3–22.
5. Armitage, D. (2005). Adaptive capacity and community-based natural resource management. Environmental Management 35(6): 703–15.
6. Armitage, D., Berkes, F. and Doubleday, D. (eds.) (2007). Adaptive Co-Management: Collaboration, Learning and Multi-Level Governance. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
7. Baker, M. and Kusel, J. (2003). Community Forestry in the United States. Washington, DC: Island Press.
8. Beckley, T. (1998). Moving toward consensus-based forest management: A comparison of industrial, co-managed, community and small private forests in Canada. Forestry Chronicle 74(5): 736–44.
9. Behan, R. (1990). Multiresource forest management: A paradigmatic challenge to professional forestry. Journal of Forestry 88(4): 12–18.
10. Belsky, J. (2008). Creating community forests. In Donoghue, E. and Sturtevant, V. (eds.), Forest Community Connections. Implications for Research, Management and Governance. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, pp. 219–42.
11. Berkes, F. (2003). Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology 18(3): 621–30.
12. Brendler, T. and Carey, H. (1998). Community forestry, defined. Journal of Forestry 96(3): 21–3.
13. Bryant, R. and Wilson, G. (1998). Rethinking environmental management. Progress in Human Geography 22(3): 321–43.
14. Bullock, R. (2006). An analysis of community forest implementation in British Columbia, Canada. Unpublished MES thesis. Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario.
15. Bullock, R. (2010). A critical frame analysis of Northern Ontario’s “forestry crisis”. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario.
16. Bullock, R. and Hanna, K. (2008). Community forestry: Mitigating or creating conflict in British Columbia: Society and Natural Resources 21(1): 77–85.
17. Bullock, R., Hanna, K. and Slocombe, S. (2009). Learning from community forestry experience: Challenges and lessons from British Columbia. Forestry Chronicle 85(2): 293–304.
18. Bullock, R. and Watelet, A. (2006). Exploring conservation authority operations in Sudbury, Northern Ontario: Constraints and opportunities. Environments 34(2): 29–50.
19. Burda, C. (1998). Forests in trust: A blueprint for tenure reform and Community Forestry in British Columbia. Ecoforestry May: 12–15.
20. Borgerhoff Mulder, M. and Coppolillo, P. (2005). Conservation: Linking Ecology, Economics, and Culture. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
21. Clapp, R.A. (1998). The resource cycle in forestry and fishing. Canadian Geographer 42(2): 129–44.
22. Colfer, C. (2005). The Equitable Forest: Diversity, Community, and Resource Management. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
23. Danks, C. (2008). Institutional arrangements in community-based forestry. In Donoghue, E. and Sturtevant, V. (eds.) Forest Community Connections. Implications for Research, Management and Governance. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, pp. 185–204.
24. Donoghue, E. and Sturtevant, V. (eds.) (2008). Forest Community Connections. Implications for Research, Management and Governance. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
25. Duinker, P., Matakala, P. and Zhang, D. (1991). Community forestry and its implications for Northern Ontario. Forestry Chronicle 67(2): 131–5.
26. Duinker, P. and Pulkki, R. (1998). Community forestry, Italian style: The Magnifica Comunita di Fiemme. Forestry Chronicle 74: 385–92.
27. Flint, C., Luloff, A. and Finley, J. (2008). Where is “community” in communitybased forestry? Society and Natural Resources 21: 526–37.
28. Gerhold, H. (2007). Origins of urban forestry. In Kuser, J. (ed.), Urban and Community Forestry in the Northeast, second edition. New York: Springer, pp. 1–24.
29. Gill, A. and Reed, M. (1997). The reimaging of a Canadian resource town: Postproductivism in a North American context. Applied Geographic Studies 1(2): 129–47.
30. Gunter, J. (ed). (2004). The Community Forest Guidebook: Tools and Techniques for Communities in British Columbia. Kamloops and Kaslo: Forest Research Extension Partnership and British Columbia Community Forest Association, No. 15.
31. Gunter, J. and Jodway, S. (1999). Community-based natural resource management: A strategy for community economic development. CED for Forest Communities Project (draft paper). Simon Fraser University, British Columbia.
32. Haley, D. (2002). Community forests in British Columbia: The past is prologue. Forest, Trees, and People 46: 54–61.
33. Hammond, H. (1991). Seeing the Forest among the Trees: The Case for Wholistic Forest Use. Vancouver, BC: Polestar Press Ltd.
34. Harrington, C., Curtis, A. and Black, R. (2008). Locating communities in natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 10(2): 199–215.
35. Holling, C.S. (1995). What barriers? What bridges? In Gunderson, L., Holling, C.S. and Light, S. (eds.), Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 3–36.
36. Hutchings, J., Walters, C. and Haedrich, R. (1997). Is scientific inquiry incompatible with government information control? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54: 1198–210.
37. Kellert, S., Mehta, J., Ebbin, S. and Lichtenfeld, L. (2000). Community natural resource management: Promise, rhetoric, and reality. Society and Natural Resources 13: 705–15.
38. Kruger, L., Mazza, R. and Stielef, M. (2008). Amenity migration, rural communities, and public lands. In Donoghue, E. and Sturtevant, V. (eds.) Forest Community Connections. Implications for Research, Management and Governance. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, pp. 127–42.
39. Krogman, N. and Beckley, T. (2002). Corporate “bail-outs” and local “buyouts”: Pathways to community forestry? Society and Natural Resources 15: 109–27.
40. Kuser, J. (ed.). (2007). Urban and Community Forestry in the Northeast, second edition. New York: Springer.
41. Lawrence, A., Anglezarke, B., Frost, B., Nolan, P. and Owen, R. (2009). What does community forestry mean in a devolved Great Britain? International Forestry Review 11(2): 281–97.
42. Leach, M., Mearns, R. and Scoones, I. (1999). Environmental entitlements: Dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management. World Development 27(2): 225–47.
43. Lee, R., Field, D. and Burch, W. (1990). Introduction: Forestry, community, and sociology of natural resources. In Lee, R., Field, D. and Burch, W. (eds.), Community and Forestry: Continuities in the Sociology of Natural Resources. Boulder, San Francisco and London: Westview Press, pp. 3–14.
44. Lemos, M. and Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31: 297–325.
45. Magis, K. (2010). Community resilience: An indicator of social sustainability. Society and Natural Resources 23(5): 401–16.
46. Mallik, A. and Rahman, H. (1994). Community forestry in developed and developing countries: A comparative study. Forestry Chronicle 70(6): 731–35.
47. McCullough, R. (1995). Landscape of Community: A History of Communal Forest in New England. Hanover, New Hampshire: University of New England Press.
48. McIlveen, K. and Bradshaw, B. (2009). Community forestry in British Columbia, Canada: The role of local community support and participation. Local Environment 14(2): 193–205.
49. Menzies, N. (2004). Communities and their partners: Governance and community- based forest management. Conservation and Society 2(2): 449–56.
50. M’Gonigle, M. (1996). Living Communities in a Living Forest: Towards an Ecosystem- Based Structure of Local Tenure and Management. Discussion paper. Victoria, BC.
51. M’Gonigle, M. (1997). Reinventing British Columbia: Towards a new political economy in the forest. In Barnes T. and Hayter, R. (eds.), Troubles in the Rainforest: British Columbia’s Forest Economy in Transition. Victoria: Western Geographical Press, pp. 37–52.
52. M’Gonigle, M. (1998). Structural instruments and sustainable forests: A political ecology approach. In Tollefson, C. (ed.), The Wealth of Forests: Markets, Regulation, and Sustainable Forestry. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press, pp. 102–20.
53. Mitchell, B. (2002). Resource and Environmental Management. Harlow, England and NewYork: Prentice Hall/Pearson Education.
54. Mitchell, B. and Shrubsole, D. (1992). Ontario Conservation Authorities: Myth and Reality. Waterloo, Ontario: Department of Geography, University of Waterloo.
55. Nozick, M. (1999). Sustainable development begins at home: Community solutions to global problems. In Pierce J. and Dale, A. (eds.), Communities, Development, and Sustainability Across Canada. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press, pp. 3–23.
56. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, England; New York: Cambridge University Press.
57. Padgee, A., Kim, Y. and Daugherty, P. (2006). What makes community forest management successful? A meta-study from community forests throughout the world. Society and Natural Resources 19: 33–52.
58. Parsons, R. and Prest, G. (2003). Aboriginal forestry in Canada. Forestry Chronicle 79(4): 779–84.
59. Patriquin, M., Parkins, J. and Stedman, R. (2007). Socio-economic status of boreal communities in Canada. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 80(3): 279–91.
60. Peterson, G. (2007). Using scenario planning to enable an adaptive co-management process in the Northern Highlands Lake District of Wisconsin. In Armitage, D., Berkes, F. and Doubleday, D. (eds.). Adaptive Co-management: Collaboration, Learning and Multi-Level Governance. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press, pp. 286–307.
61. Pinkerton, E., Heaslip, R., Silver, J. and Furman, K.. (2008). Finding “space” for comanagement of forests within the neoliberal paradigm: Rights, strategies, and tools for asserting a local agenda. Human Ecology, 36: 343–55.
62. Plummer, R. and FitzGibbon, J. (2004). Co-management of natural resources: A proposed framework. Environmental Management 33(6): 876–85.
63. Poffenberger, M. (1990). Keepers of the Forest: Land Management Alternatives in Southeast Asia. Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press Library of Management Development.
64. Reed, M. (1995). Cooperative management of environmental resources: A casestudy from Northern Ontario, Canada. Economic Geography 71(2): 132–49.
65. Reed, M. and McIlveen, K. (2006). Toward a pluralistic civic science? Assessing community forestry. Society and Natural Resources 19: 591–607.
66. Robinson, D. (2009). Dark horses and tenure reform. Northern Ontario Business, June issue. Available at: http://www.northernontariobusiness.com/DisplayArticle.aspx?id=19211&terms=dark%20horses/ Accessed July 1, 2011.
67. Röling, N. (2002). Beyond the aggregation of individual preferences. In Leeuwis, C. and Pyburn, R. (eds.), Wheelbarrows Full of Frogs: Social Learning in Rural Resource Management. Assen, Netherlands, Koniniklijke: Van Gorcum, pp. 25–47.
68. Silva Forest Foundation (2003). The Power of Community: Ecosystem-based Conservation Planning across Canada. British Columbia, Canada: Silva Forest Foundation.
69. Slocombe, S. (1993). Implementing ecosystem-based management: Development of theory, practice, and research for planning and managing a region. Bioscience 43(9): 612–22.
70. St Martin, K. (2001). Making space for community resource management in fisheries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91: 122–42.
71. Stevenson, M. and Webb, J. (2003). Just another stakeholder? First Nations and sustainable forest management in Canada’s boreal forest. In Burton, P., Messier, C., Smith, D. and Adamowicz, A. (eds.), Towards Sustainable Management of the Boreal Forest. Ottawa: National Research Press, pp. 65–112.
72. Sturtevant, E. and Donoghue, V. (2008). Community and forest connections: Continuity and change. In Donoghue, E. and Sturtevant, V. (eds.), Forest Community Connections. Implications for Research, Management and Governance Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, pp. 3–26.
73. Teitelbaum, S., Beckley, T. and Nadeau, S. (2006). A national portrait of community forestry on public land in Canada. Forestry Chronicle 82(3): 416–28.
74. Watts, M. (2000). Political ecology. In Sheppard, E. and Barnes, T.J. (eds.), A Companion to Economic Geography. Maldem, MA; Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 257–74
75. Weber, E. and Herzog, C. (2003). Connecting the dots: United States grass-roots ecosystem management and sustainable communities. In Shindler, B., Beckley, T. and Finley, M. (eds.), Two Paths Toward Sustainable Forests: Public Values in Canada and the United States. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press, pp. 170–93.
76. Wismer, S. and Mitchell, B. (2005). Community-based approaches to resource and environmental management. Environments 33(1): 1–4.
77. Allan, K. and Frank, D. (1994). Community forests in British Columbia: Models that work. Forestry Chronicle 70(6): 721–4.
78. Appelstrand, M. (2002). Participation and societal values: The challenge for lawmakers and policy practitioners. Forest Policy and Economics 4(4): 281–90.
79. Baker, M. and Kusel, J. (2003). Community Forestry in the United States, Washington DC: Island Press.
80. Beckley, T. (1998). Moving toward consensus-based forest management: A comparison of industrial, co-managed, community and small private forests in Canada. Forestry Chronicle 74 (5): 736–44.
81. Bradshaw, B. (2003). Questioning the credibility and capacity of community-based resource management. Canadian Geographer 47(2): 137–50.
82. Brekke, J.S. (1987). The model-guided method for monitoring program implementation. Evaluation Review 11(3), 281–99.
83. Briggs, X.S. (1998). Doing democracy up close: Culture, power, and communication in community building. Journal of Planning Education and Research 18: 1–13.
84. Buchy, M. and Hoverman, S. (2000). Understanding public participation in forest planning: A review. Forest Policy and Economics 1(1): 15–25.
85. Bullock, R. and Hanna, K. (2008). Community forestry: Mitigating or creating conflict in British Columbia? Society and Natural Resources 21(1): 77–85.
86. Bullock, R., Hanna, K. and Slocombe, S. (2009). Learning from community forestry experience: Challenges and lessons from British Columbia. Forestry Chronicle 85(2): 293–304.
87. Carrow, R. (1994). Integrated resource management in Canada-a case study of unrealized potential. Forestry Chronicle 70(1): 19–21.
88. Clark, T. (2002). The Policy Process: A Practical Guide for Natural Resource Professionals. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
89. Coleman, W. (1988). Business and Politics: A Study of Collective Action. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s Press.
90. Deutsch, M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
91. Dorcey, A. (1986). Bargaining in the Governance of Pacific Coastal Resources: Research and Reform. Vancouver, BC: Westwater Research Centre, University of British Columbia Press.
92. Dryzek, J.S. (1990). Designs for environmental discourse: The greening of the administrative state. In Paehlke, R. and Torgenson, D. (eds.), Managing Leviathan, Peterborough: Broadview.
93. Duinker, P., Matakala, P., Chege, F. and Bouthillier, L. (1994). Community forestry in Canada: An overview. Forestry Chronicle 70(6): 711–20.
94. Duinker, P., Matakala, P. and Zhang, D. (1991). Community forestry and its implications for Northern Ontario. Forestry Chronicle 67(2): 131–5.
95. Easterbrook, S.M., Beck, E.E., Goodlet, J.S. et al. (1993). A survey of empirical studies of conflict. In Easterbrook, S. (ed.), Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 1–66.
96. Forester, J. (1999). The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
97. Freeman, H. (1980). The present status of evaluation research. In Evaluating Social Action Projects. New York: UNESCO, pp. 9–46.
98. Ham, C. and Hill, M. (1993). The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State. Toronto: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
99. Hanna, K. (1999). Integrated resource management in the Fraser River estuary: Stakeholder’s perceptions of the state of the river and program influence. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 54(2): 490–8.
100. Hanna, K. (2000). The paradox of participation and the hidden role of information. Journal of the American Planning Association 66(4): 398–410.
101. Hanna, K. and Slocombe, S. (eds.) (2007). Integrated Resource and Environmental Management: Concepts and Practice. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
102. Harvey, S. and Hillier, B. (1994). Community forestry in Ontario. Forestry Chronicle 70(6): 725–30.
103. Hessing, M. and Howlett, M. (1997). Canadian Natural Resource and Environmental Policy. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
104. Hyder, M. (1984). Implementation: The evolutionary model. In Lewis, D. and Wallace, H. (eds.), Policies into Practice: National and International Case Studies in Implementation. London: Heinemann Educational Books, pp. 1–18.
105. Johnson, P. and Duinker, P. (1993). Beyond Dispute: Collaborative Approaches to Resolving Natural Resources Conflicts. Thunder Bay, Ontario: Lakehead University, School of Forestry.
106. Jones, C. (1984). An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy. Monterey: Brooks Cole.
107. Kimmins, J.P. (2002). Future shock in forestry: Where have we come from; where are we going; is there a “right way” to manage forests? Lessons from Thoreau, Leopold, Toffler, Botkin and Nature. Forestry Chronicle 78(2): 263–71.
108. Kusel, J., Doak, S., Carpenter, S. and Sturtevant, V. (1996). The Role of the Public in Adaptive Ecosystem Management, Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress, Vol 2, Assessment and Scientific Basis for Management Options. Davis: University of California, Davis, Centres for Water and Wildland Resources.
109. Linder, S. and Peters, B. (1989). Instruments of government: Perceptions and contexts. Journal of Public Policy 9(1): 35–58.
110. Margerum, R. and Born, S. (1995). Integrated environmental management: Moving from theory to practice. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 38(3): 371–90.
111. Margerum, R.D. (1999). Getting past yes: From capital creation to action. Journal of the American Planning Association 65(2): 181–92.
112. Margerum, R.D. and Born, S.M. (2000). A coordination diagnostic for improving integrated environmental management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 43(1), 5–21.
113. Mazmanian, D. and Sabatier, P. (1981). Effective Policy Implementation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
114. Mitchell, B. (1986). The evolution of integrated resource management. In Lang, R. (ed.), Integrated Approaches to Resource Management. Calgary: University of Calgary Press, pp. 13–26.
115. Mitchell, B. (1989). Geography and Resource Analysis, second edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
116. Mitchell, B. (2002). Resource and Environmental Management. Harlow, UK and New York: Prentice Hall/Pearson Education.
117. Paehlke, R. (1990). Democracy and environmentalism: Opening a door to the administrative state. In Paehlke R. and Torgerson, D. (eds.), Managing Leviathan. Peterborough: Broadview, pp. 35–58.
118. Platt, J. (1973). Social traps, American Psychologist, August 1973.
119. Putnam, L. and Poole, M. (1987). Conflict and negotiation. In Jablin, F., Putnam, L., Roberts, K. and Porter, L. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 549–99.
120. Rayner, S. (1991). A cultural perspective on the structure and implementation of global environmental agreements. Evaluation Review 15(1): 75–102.
121. Robbins, S. (1989). Organisational Behaviour: Concepts, Controversies and Applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
122. Robinson, D., Robson, M. and Rollins, R. (2001). Towards increased influence in Canadian forest management. Environments 29(2): 21–41.
123. Rossi, P. and Freeman, H. (1985). Evaluation: A Systemic Approach. Newbury: Sage.
124. Skogstad, G. and Kopas, P. (1992). Environmental policy in a federal system: Ottawa and the Provinces. In Boardman, R. (ed.), Canadian Environmental Policy: Ecosystems, Politics, and Process. Toronto: Oxford, pp. 43–59.
125. Swanson, L. (2001). Rural policy and direct local participation: Democracy, inclusiveness, collective agency and locality-based policy. Rural Sociology 66(1): 1–21.
126. Teitelbaum, S., Beckley, T. and Nadeau, S. (2006). A national portrait of community forestry on public land in Canada. Forestry Chronicle 82(3): 416–28.
127. Torgerson, D. (1990). Obsolescent Leviathan: Problems of order in administrative thought. In Paehlke, R. and Torgerson, D. (eds.), Managing Leviathan. Peterborough: Broadview, pp. 17–34.
128. Van Meter, D. and Van Horn, C. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration and Society 6(4): 445–88.
129. Walther, P. (1987). Against idealistic beliefs in the problem solving capacities of integrated resource management. Environmental Management 11(4): 439–46.
130. Weale, A. (1992). Implementation failure: A suitable case for review? In Lykke, E. (ed.), Achieving Environmental Goals: The Concept and Practice of Environmental Performance Review. London: Belhaven Press, pp. 43–66.
131. Wellstead, A., Richard, S. and John, P. (2003). Understanding the concept of representation within the context of local forest management decision making. Forest Policy and Economics 5(1): 1–11.
132. Wouters, G. (2000). Shaping our Future: BC Forest Policy Review. Victoria, BC: British Columbia Ministry of Forests.
133. Belsky, J. (2008). Creating community forests. In Donoghue, E. and Sturtevant, V. (eds.). Forest Community Connections: Implications for Research, Management, and Governance. Washington: Resources for the Future Press, pp 219–42.
134. Bullock, R. (2006). An analysis of community forest implementation in British Columbia Canada. Unpublished MES thesis. Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario.
135. Bullock, R. (2007). Two sides of the forest. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 62(1): 12A–15A.
136. Community Forest Collaborative (2007). Community Forests: A Community Investment Strategy. A report by the Community Forest Collaborative.
137. Donahue, B. (1999). Reclaiming the Commons. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
138. Freedom Conservation Commission (2007). Freedom Town Forest Regulations. RSA 31:112, RSA 41:11. New Hampshire: Freedom Conservation Commission.
139. Freedom Town Forest (2008). Freedom Town Forest Backgrounder. Freedom Town Forest, NH.
140. Irland, L. (1982). Wildlands and Woodlots: The Story of New England’s Forests. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
141. Irland, L. (1999). The Northeast’s Changing Forest. Petersham, MA: Harvard University Press.
142. Lavigne, P. (2003). Community forestry at the urban–rural interface: The Beaver Brook Association and the Merrimack River Watershed. In Kusel, J. and Adler, E. (eds.) Forest Communities, Community Forests. Oxford, UK: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 257–80.
143. McBane, C. and Barrett, J. (1986). Town forest and community life: A management guide. Research Report Number 109. Durham, New England: New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station, University of New Hampshire.
144. McCullough, R. (1995). Landscape of Community: A history of Communal Forests in New England. Hanover, NH: University of New England Press.
145. Northern Community Forestry Center (2003). Engaging Residents in Planning for Municipal Forests: A Case Study of Lincoln, Vermont. Northern Community Forestry Center, Northern Forest Region.
146. USDA (2011). Forest Legacy Program. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/spf/coop/programs/loa/flp.shtml. Accessed June 1, 2011.
147. Algonquin Forestry Authority (AFA) (2010a). Annual Report. Pembroke and Huntsville, ON: AFA.
148. Algonquin Forestry Authority (AFA) (2010b). Algonquin Forestry Authority homepage. Available at http://www.algonquinforestry.on.ca/. Accessed October 30, 2010.
149. Armson, K. (2001). Ontario Forests: A Historical Perspective, Ontario: Fitzhenry and Whiteside Ltd. and Ontario Forestry Association.
150. Auden, A. (1944). Nipigon forest village. Forestry Chronicle 20(4): 209–61.
151. Bagby, K. and Kusel, J. (2003). Civic Science Partnerships in Community Forestry: Building Capacity for Participation among Underserved Communities. Taylorsville, CA: Forest Community Research.
152. Beckley, T. (1998). Moving toward consensus-based forest management: A comparison of industrial, co-managed, community and small private forests in Canada. Forestry Chronicle 74(5): 736–44.
153. Benidickson, J. (1995). Temagami old growth: Pine, politics, and public policy. Environments 23(2): 41–50.
154. Berry, A. (2006). Branching Out: Case Studies in Canadian Forest Management. Bozeman, MT: Property and Environment Research Centre.
155. Bullock, R. (2007). Two sides of the forest. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 62(1): 12A–15A.
156. Bullock, R. (in press).‘Mill town’ identity crisis: Reframing community and the culture of forest resource dependence in single industry towns. In Parkins, J. and Reed, M. (eds.), Social Transformation in Rural Canada: New Insights into Community, Cultures, and Collective Action. Vancouver, BC, UBC Press.
157. Bullock, R., Armitage, D. and Mitchell, B. (2012). Shadow networks, social learning and collaborating through crisis: Building resilient forest-based communities in Northern Ontario, Canada. In Goldstein, B. (ed.), Collaborative Resilience: Moving through Crisis to Opportunity. MIT Press, 309–37.
158. Clark, T., Harvey, S., Bruemmer, G. and Walker, J. (2003). Large-scale Community Forestry in Ontario, Canada: A Sign of the Times. Paper submitted to the XII World Forestry Congress, 2003, Quebec City.
159. Danks, C. (2008). Institutional arrangements in community-based forestry. In Donoghue, E. and Sturtevant, V. (eds.), Forest Community Connections: Implications for Research, Management, and Governance. Washington: Resources for the Future, pp.185–204.
160. Durocher, C. (2008). Westwind Forest Stewardship Inc. Financial Statements. March 31, 2008. Parry Sound, ON: Westwind Forest Stewardship Inc.
161. Dust, T. (1995). The Impact of Aboriginal Land Claims and Self-Government on Canadian municipalities: The Local Government Perspective. Toronto: ICURR Press.
162. Earthroots (2009). Environmental organizations band together to appeal Algonquin sustainable forest certification. Available at http://earthroots.org. Accessed December 9, 2010.
163. Harvey, S. (1995). Ontario Community Forest Pilot Project: Lessons Learned 1991–1994. Taking Stock of Ontario’s Community Forestry Experience. Sault Ste Marie: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
164. Harvey, S. and Hillier, B. (1994). Community forestry in Ontario. Forestry Chronicle 70: 725–30.
165. Laronde, M. (1993). Co-management of lands and resources in n’Daki Menan. In Mawhiney, A. (ed.), Rebirth: Political, Economic, and Social Development in First Nations. Toronto, ON: Dundurn Press, pp. 93–106.
166. Matakala, P. (1995). Decision-making and conflict resolution in co-management: Two cases from Temagami, Northeastern Ontario. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario.
167. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR) (1986). Evergreen Challenge: The Agreement Forest Story. Toronto, ON: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
168. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR) (1987). A Review of the Conservation Authorities Program. Toronto, ON: OMNR.
169. Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services (OMCSS) (2008). Info notes: Aboriginal population. Info Notes 6, March 2008.
170. P.J. Usher Consulting Services (PJUCS) (1994). Partnerships for Community Involvement in Forestry: A Comparative Analysis of Community Involvement in Natural Resource Management. Sault Ste Marie: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.
171. Reed, M. (1990). Managing for sustainable development: A case study of a hinterland community, Ignace, Ontario, Canada. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Waterloo, ON: Department of Geography, University of Waterloo, Ontario.
172. Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (RCAP) (1997). Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada.
173. Richardson, A. (1974). Conservation by the People: The History of the Conservation Movement in Ontario to 1970. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
174. Robinson, D. (2008). The Science of Community Forests. Part 1: Approaching Regime Change Systematically. INORD Working Paper 2–08.
175. Robson, M. (2010). Sustainable forestry in the 21st century: Multiple voices, multiple knowledges. Forestry Chronicle 86(6): 667–8.
176. Shute, J. and Knight, D. (1995). Obtaining an understanding of environmental knowledge: Wendaban Stewardship Authority. Canadian Geographer 39(2): 101–11.
177. Smith, P. and Whitmore, G. (1990). Community Forestry: Proceedings of the Lakehead University Forestry Association 23rd Annual Symposium, January 25–26. Occasional Paper 8. Centre for Northern Studies, Lakehead University.
178. Teitelbaum, S., Beckley, T. and Nadeau, S. (2006). A national portrait of community forestry on public land in Canada. Forestry Chronicle 82(3): 416–28.
179. Teme-Augama Anishnabai (2009). Temagami First Nation homepage: TAA negotiations office. Available at http://www.temagamifirstnation.ca/. Accessed December 1, 2010.
180. Westwind Stewardship Inc. (WSI) (2005). Homepage. Available at http://www.westwindforest.ca. Accessed December 1, 2010.
181. Zavitz, E. (1909). Fifty Years of Reforestation in Ontario. Toronto, ON: Ontario Department of Lands and Forest.
182. British Columbia Ministry of Forests (BCMOF) (2004). News release: Kootenays benefit from community forest opportunity. August 11, 2004. BCMOF. Available at http://www2.news.gov.bc.ca/archive/2001-2005/2004FOR0037-000642.htm. Accessed April 4, 2011.
183. British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Range (BCMFR) (2008). News release: Creston to benefit from community forest. Available at http://www2.news.gov.bc.ca/news_releases_2005-2009/2008FOR0145-001668.htm. Accessed April 4, 2011.
184. Leslie, E., Bradley, T. and Hammond, H. (2003). Creston Valley Forest Corporation Initial Ecosystem-Based Plan. Silva Forest Foundation.
185. Mitchell, B. (2002). Resource and Environmental Management. Harlow, UK and New York: Prentice Hall/Pearson Education.
186. Olsson, P., Folke, C. and Hahn, T. (2004). Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: The development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecology and Society 9(4): 2.
187. Selin, S. and Chavez, D. (1995). Developing a collaborative model for environmentalplanning and management. EnvironmentalManagement 19(2): 189–95.
188. Smith, J. (2004). Community trust and watershed management in Creston, British Columbia, Canada. In Baumgartner, D. (ed.) Human Dimensions of Family, Farm, and Community Forestry International Symposium. Pullman, WA: Washington State University, pp. 155–58.
189. Statistics Canada (2006). Community profiles. Available at http://www.statcan.gc.ca. Accessed July 1, 2011.
190. Sunderman, R. (2003). Establishment of the Creston log sort yard: Case study. BC Journal of Ecosystems and Management. 3(1): 1–6.
191. Town of Creston (2001). Town of Creston homepage. Available at http://www.Crestonbc.com. Accessed: January 2, 2012.
192. Town of Creston (2004). Town of Creston homepage. Available at http://www.Crestonbc.com. Accessed: July 1, 2011.
193. Town of Creston (2005). Official Community Plan: Consolidated Bylaw 1532. Creston, BC: Town of Creston.
194. Beattie, D. (1997). Industrial forestry within a fragile island against its largest landowner. The Voice, October 1997: 4–11.
195. Behan, R. (1990). Multiresource forest management: A paradigmatic challenge to professional forestry. Journal of Forestry 88(4): 12–18.
196. Bradley, T., Hoffman, J. and Hammond, H. (1998). An Ecosystem-based Assessment of Denman Island. British Columbia: Silva Ecosystem Consultants Ltd.
197. British Columbia Ministry of Environment (BCMOE) (2010). New Release: B.C. protects sensitive lands on Denman Island. Available at http://www2.news.gov.bc.ca/news_releases_2009-2013/2010ENV0062-001243.htm. Accessed January 10, 2012.
198. Bullock, R., Hanna, K. and Slocombe, S. (2009). Learning from community forestry experience: Challenges and lessons from British Columbia. Forestry Chronicle 85(2): 293–304.
199. Cortes Ecoforestry Society (2002). Cortes Community Forest Agreement Proposal, Draft. Manson’s Landing, Cortes Island, BC: Cortes Ecoforestry Society. Cortes Ecoforestry Society (undated). Summary. Cortes Island, BC: Cortes Ecoforestry Society.
200. Denman Community Forest Cooperative (DCFC) (2001). Denman Community Forest Cooperative homepage. Available at http://www.denmanis.bc.ca/forestry.htm. Accessed March 1, 2005.
201. Gibson, C., E. Ostrom and Ahn, T. (2000). The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: A survey. Ecological Economics 32: 217–39.
202. Gill, A. and Reed, M. (1997). The reimaging of a Canadian resource town: Postproductivism in a North American context. Applied Geographic Studies 1(2): 129–47.
203. Gill, A. and Reed, M. (1999). Incorporating post-productivist values into sustainable community processes. In Pierce, J. and Dale, A. (eds.), Communities, Development, and Sustainability across Canada. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
204. Hanna, K. (2005). Planning for sustainability: Two contrasting communities. Journal of the American Planning Association 71(1): 27–40.
205. Hanna, K. and Slocombe, D.S. (eds.) (2007). Integrated Resource and Environmental Management: Concepts and Practice. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.
206. Islands Trust (2008). Islands Trust Briefing on Private Managed Forest Land Act. Available at http://www.islandstrust.bc.ca. Accessed July 1, 2011.
207. Islands Trust (2011). Islands Trust Council homepage. Available at http://www.islandstrust.bc.ca. Accessed July 1, 2011.
208. Jentoft, S. (2000). The community: A missing link of fisheries management. Marine Policy 24: 53–9.
209. Klahoose First Nation, Cortes Ecoforestry Society, and Weyerhaeuser Company Ltd. (2000). The Cortes Initiative: A Proposal to the Government of British Columbia. A proposal prepared by the Klahoose First Nation, Cortes Ecoforestry Society, and Weyerhaeuser Company Limited.
210. Lemos, M. and Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31: 297–325.
211. Silva Forest Foundation (1996). Initial Report on the Methodology and Results of Cortes Island Ecosystem Based Plan. British Columbia, Canada: Silva Forest Foundation.
212. Statistics Canada (2006). Community Profiles 2006. Available at http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2006/dp-pd/prof/92-591/index.cfm?Lang=E. Accessed July 1, 2011.
213. Statistics Canada (2001). Community Profiles 2001. Available at http://www12.statcan.ca/english/profil01/CP01/. Accessed July 1, 2011.
214. Watershed Sentinel (2011). Cortes Island Community Forest: Coming home. Available at http://www.watershedsentinel.ca/content/cortes-island-communityforest-coming-home. Accessed January 10, 2011.
215. Baker, M. and Kusel, J. (2003). Community Forestry in the United States. Washington DC: Island Press.
216. Bertelson, R. (1996). Danger for the Endangered Species Act: Catron County Board of Commissioners, New Mexico v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Journal of Natural Resources & Environmental Law 12: 167.
217. Blackburn, T. and Anderson, K. (eds.) (1993). Before the Wilderness. Menlo Park, CA: Ballena Press.
218. Burns, S. (2003). Catron County, New Mexico: Mirroring the West, healing the land, rebuilding community. In Kusel, J. and Adler, E. (eds.), Forest Communities, Community Forests. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
219. Carlson, A. (1990). The Spanish-American Homeland: Four Centuries in Mexico’s Rio Arriba. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
220. Chaloupka, W. (1996). The County Supremacy and Militia Movements: Federalism as an issue on the radical right. Publius 26(3): 161–75.
221. Charnley, S. and Poe, M.R. (2007). Community forestry in theory and practice: Where are we now? Annual Review of Anthropology 36: 301–36.
222. Christoffersen, N., Don, L., Martha, W. and Wyckoff, B. (2008). Status of communitybased forestry in theUnited States. In A Report to the US Endowment for Forestry and Communities. Greenville, SC: US Endowment.
223. Davis, T. (1996). Catron County’s politics heat up as its land goes bankrupt. High Country News, June 26.
224. Fernandez-Gimenez, M.E., Ballard, H. and Sturtevant, V. (2008). Adaptive management and social learning in collaborative and community-based monitoring: A study of five community-based forestry organizations in the western USA. Ecology and Society 13(2): 4.
225. Gray, G.J., Enzer, M.J. and Kusel, J. (eds.) (2001). Understanding Community-Based Ecosystem Management in the United States. New York: Hawthorn Press.
226. Helvarg, D. (1999). The anti-enviro connection. In Dizard, J., Muth, R. and Andrews, S. Jr (eds.), Guns in America: A Reader. New York: New York University Press.
227. Johnson, N.H., Ravnborg, M., Westermann, O. and Probst, K. (2001). User participation in watershed management and research. Water Policy 3: 507–20.
228. Krech, S. (1999). The Ecological Indian: Myth and History. New York: W.W. Norton.
229. Kusel, J., Doak, S., Carpenter, S. and Sturtevant, V. (1996). The Role of the Public in Adaptive Ecosystem Management, Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final report to Congress, Vol 2. Assessment and Scientific Basis for Management Options. Davis, CA: University of California, Davis, Centres for Water and Wildland Resources.
230. Lawrence, N. and Murphy, D. (1992). New perspectives or old priorities? Conservation Biology 6: 465.
231. McCarthy, J. (2002). First World political ecology: Lessons from the Wise Use movement. Environment and Planning A 34(7): 1281–302.
232. McDermott, M. (2009a). Locating benefits, expanding decision-spaces, resource access and equity in U.S. community-based forestry. Geoforum 40(2): 249–59.
233. McDermott, M. (2009b). Equity first or later? How US community-based forestry distributes benefits. International Forestry Review 11(2): 207–20.
234. Miller, A. (1993). All is not quiet on the Western Front. Urban Lawyer 25: 827–40.
235. Miller, A. (1994). Western Front revisited. Urban Lawyer 26: 845–57.
236. Miller, A. (1995). Private rights in public lands: The battle intensifies. Urban Lawyer 27: 889.
237. Moote, M., Brown, B., Kingsley, E. et al, (2001). Process: Redefining relationships. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 12: 97–116.
238. Padgee, A., Kim, Y. and Daugherty, P. (2006). What makes community forest management successful? A meta-study from community forests throughout the world. Society and Natural Resources 19: 33–52.
239. Salwasser, H. (1991). New perspectives for sustaining diversity in US National Forest Ecosystems. Conservation Biology 5: 567–69.
240. Swanson, L. (2001). Rural policy and direct local participation: Democracy, inclusiveness, collective agency and locality-based policy. Rural Sociology 66(1): 1–21.
241. Walker, G. (2001). Process: Redefining relationships. In Gray, G., Enzer, M. and Kusel, J. (eds.) Understanding Community Based Forest Ecosystem Management. Binghamton, NY: Food Products Press.
242. White, R. (1997). The current weirdness in the West. The Western Historical Quarterly 28(1): 4–16.
243. Wilson, R. (2003). Community-based management and national forests in the western United States: Five challenges. Policy Matters 12: 216–24.
244. Wilson, R. (2006). Collaboration in context: Rural change and community forestry in the four corners. Society and Natural Resources 19(1): 53–70.
245. Wyckoff-Baird, B. (2005). Growth Rings: Communities and Trees, Lessons from the Ford Foundation Community-Based Forestry Demonstration Program, 2000–2005. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
246. Arnold, J. (1993). Management of forests resources as common property. Commonwealth Forestry Review 72(93): 157–61.
247. Bäckström, P.-O. (2001). Några erfarenheter av svensk skogspolitik. In Ekelund, H. and Hamilton, G. (eds.), Skogspolitisk historia. Rapport 8a. Jönköping: Skogsstyrelsen.
248. Bengtsson, B. (2004). Allemansrätten-Vad säger lagen? Stockholm: Naturvårdsverket.
249. Berg, A., Ostlund, L., Mowen, J. and Olofsson, J. (2008). A century of logging and forestry in a reindeer herding area in northern Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management 256: 1009–20.
250. Boström, M. (2002). Skogen märks-Hur svensk skogscertifiering kom till och dess konsekvenser. SCORE report. Stockholm University. Available at www.score.su.se/pdfs/2002–3.pdf.
251. Boström, M. (2003). How state-dependent is a non-state-driven rule-making project? The case of forest certification in Sweden. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 5(2):165–80.
252. Burger, J. and Gochfield, M. (1998). The tragedy of the commons 30 years later. Environment 40(10): 4–27.
253. Carlsson, L. (2001). Keeping away from the leviathan: The case of the Swedish Forest Commons. Research paper prepared for the MOST Project on Circumpolar Coping Processes. Lulea: Lulea University of Technology.
254. Donner-Amnell, J. (2011). New factors challenging the character and legitimacy of forest use in Finland. Conference presentation, Yhteiskuntatieteellisen ympäristötutkimuksen seura ry Fall 2011 Colloquium. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
255. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P. and Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 441–73.
256. Frisen, R. (2001). Skogsbruk och naturvård under ett halvt sekel, 1950–2000. Jönköping: Skogsstyrelsen.
257. Hanna, K. (2010). Transition and the need for innovation in Canada’s forest sector. In Mitchell, B. (ed.), Resource and Environmental Management in Canada: Addressing Conflict and Uncertainty. Toronto, ON: Oxford University Press.
258. Hanna, K., Pölönen, I. and Raitio, K. (2011). A potential role for EIA in Finnish forest planning: Learning from experiences in Ontario, Canada. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 29(2).
259. Hellström, E. (2001). Conflict Cultures: Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Environmental Conflicts in Forestry. Silva Fennica, Monographs 2, Helsinki: Finnish Society of Forest Science.
260. Hysing, E. (2009). Governing without government? The private governance of forest certification in Sweden. Public Administration 87(2): 312–26.
261. Irvine, D. (1999). Certification and community forestry: current trends and challenges and potential. A background paper prepared for the World Bank/WWF Alliance on Independent Certification. Washington: World Bank/WWF Alliance on Independent Certification.
262. Keskitalo, E.C.H., Sandström, C., Tysiachniouk, M. and Johansson, J. (2009). Local consequences of applying international norms: Differences in the application of forest certification in northern Sweden, northern Finland, and northwest Russia. Ecology and Society 14(2). Available at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art1/
263. Kiser, L. and Ostrom, E. (1982). The three worlds of action: A metatheoretical synthesis of institutional approaches. In Ostrom, E. (ed.), Strategies of Political Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
264. Kittredge, D. (2003). Private forestland owners in Sweden, large-scale cooperation inaction. Journal of Forestry 101(2): 41–6.
265. Kokko, K. (2009). A legal method and tools for evaluation the effectiveness of regulation: Safeguarding forest biodiversity in Finland. Nordic Environmental Law Journal 2009: 57–78.
266. Lawrence, A., Anglezarke, B., Frost, B., Nolan, P. and Owen, R. (2009). What does community forestry mean in a devolved Great Britain? International Forestry Review 11(2): 281–97.
267. Leskinen, L. (2004). Purposes and challenges of public participation in regional and local forestry in Finland. Forest Policy and Economics 6: 605–18.
268. Lockie, S. and Higgins, V. (2007). Roll-out neoliberalism and hybrid practices of regulation in Australian Agri-Environmental Governance. Journal of Rural Studies 23(1): 1–11.
269. McCarthy, J. (2005). Devolution in the woods: Community forestry as hybrid neoliberalism. Environment and Planning A 37(6) 995–1014.
270. McCarthy, J. (2006). Neoliberalism and the politics of alternatives: Community forestry in British Columbia and the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96(1): 84–104.
271. METLA (Finnish Forest Research Institute) (2001). Forest Finland in Brief, 2001. Joensuu: METLA.
272. METLA (Finnish Forest Research Institute) (2009). Forest Finland in Brief, 2009. Joensuu: METLA.
273. METLA (Finnish Forest Research Institute) (2010). Metsätilastollinen vuosikirja (Finnish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry). Sastamala: Vammalan Kirjapaino Oy.
274. Naturvårdsverket (2011). What is the Right of Public. Available at http://www.naturvardsverket.se. Accessed July 14, 2011.
275. Nylund, J.-E. (2010). Swedish Forest Policy since 1990-Reforms and Consequences. Report No. 16. Uppsala: SLU Department of Forest Products.
276. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
277. Pappila, M. (2011). Metsäsääntely Suomessa ja Venäjällä: Näkökulmia kestävään metsä- talouteen. Turku: Turku University.
278. Pinkerton, E., Heaslip, R., Silver, J. and Furman, K. (2008). Finding “space” for comanagement of forests within the neoliberal paradigm: Rights, strategies, and tools for asserting a local agenda. Human Ecology 36: 343–55.
279. Pölönen, I. (2007). Ympäristövaikutusten arviointimenettely. Tutkimus YVA-menettelyn oikeudellisesta asemasta ja kehittämistarpeista ympäristöllisen vaikuttavuuden näkökulmasta. [Environmental impact assessment.] A-sarja No. 280. Jyväskylä: Suomalaisen Lakimiesyhdistyksen julkaisuja.
280. Primmer, E. and Kyllönen, S. (2006). Goals for public participation implied by sustainable development, and the preparatory process of the Finnish National Forest Programme. Forest Policy and Economics 8: 838–53.
281. Pykälä, J. (2007). Implementation of forest act in Finland: Does it protect the right habitats for threatened species? Forest Ecology and Management 242: 281–7.
282. Raitio, K. (2008). “You Can’t Please Everyone”-Conflict Management Practices, Frames, and Institutions in Finnish State Forests. Publications in Social Sciences 86. Joensuu: University of Joensuu.
283. Schluter, A., Stjerquist, I. and Bäckstrand, K. (2009). Not seeing the forest for the trees? The environmental effectiveness of forest certification in Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics 11(5–6): 375–82.
284. Schultz, L., Folke, C. and Olsson, P. (2007). Enhancing ecosystem management through social–ecological inventories: Lessons from Kristianstads Vattenrike, Sweden. Environmental Conservation 34(2): 140–52.
285. Skogsstyrelsen (2010). Skogsstatistisk årsbok 2010. [Swedish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 2010.] Jönköping: Skogsstyrelsen.
286. St Martin, K. (2001). Making space for community resource management in fisheries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91:122–42.
287. Sveaskog (2011). Om Sveaskog, Skogsinnehav. Available at http://www.sveaskog.se/Om-Sveaskog/Skogsinnehav/.
288. Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance, innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies 42: 1991–2006.
289. Tikkanen, J. (2006). Osapuolten välinen yhteistyö yksityismetsien suunnittelussa. Metsäsuunnittelu ja ekonomia, Metsätieteellinen tiedekunta. Dissertationes Forestales 26.
290. Tikkanen, J. and Kurttila, M. (2007). Participatory and regional approach in forest planning. Present state and an ideal model for private land in Finland. Reports of Finnish Environmental Institute 26/2007, pp. 112–22.
291. Belsky, J. (2008). Creating community forests. In Donoghue, E. and Sturtevant, V. (eds.), Forest Community Connections. Implications for Research, Management and Governance. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 219–42.
292. Bullock, R. (in press). “Mill town” identity crisis: Reframing community and the culture of forest resource dependence in single industry towns. In Parkins, J. and Reed, M. (eds.), Social Transformation in Rural Canada: New Insights into Community, Cultures, and Collective Action. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
293. Bullock, R., Armitage, D. and Mitchell, B. (2012). Shadow networks, social learning, and collaborating through crisis: Building resilient forest-based communities in Northern Ontario, Canada. In Goldstein, B. (ed.), Collaborative Resilience: Moving from Crisis to Opportunity. The MIT Press, 309–37.
294. Bullock, R., Hanna, K. and Slocombe, S. (2009). Learning from community forestry experience: challenges and lessons from British Columbia. Forestry Chronicle 85(2): 293–304.
295. Gill, A. and Reed, M. (1997). The reimaging of a Canadian resource town: postproductivism in a North American context. Applied Geographic Studies 1(2): 129–47.
296. Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
297. Keen, M., Brown, V.A. and Dyball, R. (2005). Social Learning in Environmental Management: Towards a Sustainable Future. London, Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
298. Kimmins, J.P. (2002). Future shock in forestry: Where have we come from; where are we going; is there a “right way” to manage forests? Lessons from Thoreau, Leopold, Toffler, Botkin and Nature. Forestry Chronicle 78(2): 263–71.
299. Kusel, J. and Adler, E. (eds.) (2003). Forest Communities, Community Forests. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
300. Olsson, P., Folke, C. and Hahn, T. (2004). Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: The development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecology and Society 9(4): 2.
301. Plummer, R. (2006). Sharing the management of a river corridor: A case study of the comanagement process. Society and Natural Resources 19(8): 709–21.
302. Plummer, R. and FitzGibbon, J. (2004). Co-management of natural resources: A proposed framework. Environmental Management 33(6): 876–85.
303. Ravindra, M. (2004). A road to tomorrow: Local organizing for a biosphere reserve. Environments 32(3): 43–59.
304. Selin, S. and Chavez, D. (1995). Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and management. Environmental Management 19(2): 189–95.
305. Sturtevant, V. and Lange, J. (2003). From “them” to “us”: The Applegate Partnership. In Kusel, J. and Adler, E. (eds.), Forest Communities, Community Forests. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 117–33.
306. Teitelbaum, S., Beckley, T. and Nadeau, S. (2006). A national portrait of community forestry on public land in Canada. Forestry Chronicle 82(3): 416–28.