Process: Redefining relationships

Journal of Sustainable Forestry

Volumn 12, Issue 3-4, 2001, Pages 97-116

  Moote, Margaret A ^a   Brown, Beverly A ^b   Kingsley, Eric ^c   Lee, Steven X ^d   Marshall, Steve ^e   Voth, Donald E ^f   Walker, Gregg B ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b Jefferson Center for Educ/Res   (United States)

^c New Hampshire Division of Public Health Services   (United States)

^d Heritage Museum and the Benjamin Bannek er Historical Park and Museum   (United States)

^e USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

^g OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Community capacity; Community based; Diversity; Ecosystem management; Forest(ry); Inclusiveness

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEMS;

HUMAN RELATIONSHIPS;

FORESTRY;

COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; PARTY POLITICS; POLITICAL PARTICIPATION;

EID: 0034886455     PISSN: 10549811     EISSN: 1540756X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J091v12n03_05     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Blumberg, L. and D. Knuffke. 1998. Count us out: Why The Wilderness Society opposed the Quincy Library Group legislation. Chronicle of Community. 2(2):41-44.
2. Bachrach, P. and M.S. Baratz. 1970. Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford Press.
3. Clark, L.R. 2001. The Evolution of Watershed Councils and the Oregon Plan: Tempering the Populist Tradition. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 13(1/2):205-221.
4. Coggins, G.C. 1998. Of Californicators, quislings, and crazies. Chronicle of Community 2(2):27-33.
5. Cortner, H.J. et al. 2001. Governance and Institutions: Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 12(3/4):65-96.
6. Daly, C. 2001. Surviving the Transition: Issues for Maturing Community Forestry Groups. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 13(1/2):321-334.
7. Kusel, J. et al. 1996. The role of the public in adaptive ecosystem management. Pages 611-622 in: Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress, Volume II, Assessment and Scientific Basis for Management Options. Davis: University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources.
8. Lee, K.N. 1993. Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
9. McLain, R. 1993. Toward more effective ecological learning: procedural guidelines for the USMAB landscape sustainability project (draft manuscript). Seattle, WA: University of Washington College of Forest Resources.
10. McLain, R. and R.G. Lee. 1996. Adaptive management: Promises and pitfalls. Environmental Management 20(4): 437-448.
11. Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary. Tenth Edition. 1993. Springfield, Massachusetts: Merriam-Websters, Incorporated.
12. White, A.T. et al. 1994. Collaboration and Community-Based Management of Coral Reefs: Lessons from Experience. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.
13. Williams, E.M. and P.V. Ellefson. 1997. Going into partnership to manage a landscape. Journal of Forestry 95(3):29-33.
14. Bock, L., K. Fedor, D. Gangloff, and K. Lipkis. 1996. Building Effective Partnerships for City Trees. Washington, DC: American
15. Conservation Technology Information Center. Watershed Partnership Guides (Building Local Partnerships, Leading and Communicating, Managing Conflict, Getting to Know Your Local Watershed, Putting Together a Watershed Management Plan). West Lafayette, IN: Conservation Technology Information Center.
16. Kusel, J., S.C. Doak, S. Carpenter, and V.E. Sturtevant. 1996. The role of the public in adaptive ecosystem management. Davis, CA: University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources.
17. Moote, A. 1997. Partnership Handbook: A Resource and Guidebook for Community-Based Partnership Groups Addressing Environmental, Natural Resource, or Land Use Issues. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Water Resources Research Center. Available on the Web (ag.arizona.edu/partners/).