Supervision and computerized neurocognitive baseline test performance in high school athletes: An initial investigation

Journal of Athletic Training

Volumn 49, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 800-805

  Kuhn, Andrew Warren ^a   Solomon, Gary S ^b  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Concussions; ImPACT; Neurocognitive testing; Sports

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ATHLETE; ATHLETIC INJURIES; BRAIN CONCUSSION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROCEDURES; REACTION TIME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICE; SPORTS MEDICINE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; AGED; ATHLETES; ATHLETIC INJURIES; BRAIN CONCUSSION; COHORT STUDIES; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); REACTION TIME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES; SPORTS MEDICINE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 84923698252     PISSN: 10626050     EISSN: 1938162X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.66     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alves WM, Rimel RW, Nelson WE. University of Virginia prospective study of football-induced minor head injury: status report. Clin Sports Med. 1987;6(1):211-218.
2. Solomon GS, Haase RF. Biopsychosocial characteristics and neurocognitive test performance in National Football League players: an initial assessment. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008;23(5):563-577.
3. ImPACT 2007 Clinical Interpretation Manual. ImPACT Applications Web site. http://www.impacttest.com/pdf/ImPACT-Clinical-Interpretation-Manual.pdf. Accessed February 7, 2014.
4. Moser RS, Schatz P, Neidzwski K, Ott SD. Group versus individual administration affects baseline neurocognitive test performance. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(11):2325-2330.
5. Iverson GL, Lovell MR, Collins MW. Interpreting change on ImPACT following sport concussion. Clin Neuropsychol . 2003;17(4):460-467.
6. Echemendia RJ, Bruce JM, Bailey CM, Sanders JF, Arnett P, Vargas G. The utility of post-concussion neuropsychological data in identifying cognitive change following sports-related MTBI in the absence of baseline data. Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;26(7):1077-1091.
7. Collie A, Maruff P, Makdissi M, McStephen M, Darby DG, McCrory P. Statistical procedures for determining the extent of cognitive change following concussion. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38(3):273-278.
8. Collins MW, Grindel SH, Lovell MR, et al. Relationship between concussion and neuropsychological performance in college football players. JAMA. 1999;282(10):964-970.
9. Register-Mihalik JK, Kontos DL, Guskiewicz KM, Mihalik JP, Conder R, Shields EW. Age-related differences and reliability on computerized and paper-and-pencil neurocognitive assessment batteries. J Athl Train. 2012;47(3):297-305.
10. Jones NS, Young CC, Walter KD. Effect of language on baseline concussion screening tests in professional baseball players. Clin J Sport Med. 2011;21(2):153-184.
11. Harmon KG, Drezner JA, Gammons M, et al. American Medical Society for Sports Medicine position statement: concussion in sport. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(1):15-26.
12. Guskiewicz KM, Bruce SL, Cantu RC, et al. National Athletic Trainers' Association Position Statement: management of sportrelated concussion. J Athl Train. 2004;39(3):280-297.
13. Bailey CM, Samples HL, Broshek DK, Freeman JR, Barth JT. The relationship between psychological distress and baseline sportsrelated concussion testing. Clin J Sport Med. 2010;20(4):272-277.
14. Bailey CM, Echemendia RJ, Arnett PA. The impact of motivation on neuropsychological performance in sports-related mild traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006;12(4):475-484.
15. Erdal K. Neuropsychological testing for sports-related concussion: how athletes can sandbag their baseline testing without detection. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;27(5):473-479.
16. Schatz P, Glatts C. "Sandbagging" baseline test performance on ImPACT, without detection, is more difficult than it appears. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;28(3):236-244.
17. Covassin T, Elbin RJ, Stiller-Ostrowski JL, Kontos AP. Immediate post-concussion assessment and cognitive testing (ImPACT) practices of sports medicine professionals. J Athl Train. 2009;44(6):639-644.
18. Collie A, Maruff P. Computerised neuropsychological testing. Br J Sports Med. 2003;37(1):2-3.
19. Echemendia RJ, Herring S, Bailes J. Who should conduct and interpret the neuropsychological assessment in sports-related concussion? Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(suppl 1):i32-i35.
20. Kehrer CA, Sanchez PN, Habif UJ, Rosenbaum GJ, Townes BD. Effects of a significant-other observer on neuropsychological test performance. Clin Neuropsychol. 2000;14(1):67-71.
21. Eastvold AD, Belanger HG, Vanderploeg RD. Does a third party observer affect neuropsychological test performance? It depends. Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;26(3):520-541.
22. Axelrod B, Barth J, Faust D, et al. Presence of third party observers during neuropsychological testing: official statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology. Approved 5/15/99. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2000;15(5):379-380.
23. Bauer RM, Iverson GL, Cernich AN, Binder LM, Ruff RM, Naugle RI. Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices: joint position paper of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology and the National Academy of Neuropsychology. Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;26(2):177-196.
24. Lovell MR, Iverson GL, Collins MW, et al. Measurement of symptoms following sports-related concussion: reliability and normative data for the post-concussion scale. Appl Neuropsychol. 2006;13(3):166-174.
25. Schatz P, Sandel N. Sensitivity and specificity of the online version of ImPACT in high school and collegiate athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(2):321-326.
26. Elbin RJ, Schatz P, Covassin T. One-year test-retest reliability of the online version of ImPACT in high school athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(11):2319-2324.
27. Iverson GL, Brooks BL, Collins MW, Lovell MR. Tracking neuropsychological recovery following concussion in sport. Brain Inj. 2006;20(3):245-252.
28. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1969.
29. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 1992;1(3): 98-101.
30. McCrory P, Meeuwisse WH, Aubry M, et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012. Br J Sports Med. 2013:47(5):250-258.
31. Randolph C. Baseline neuropsychological testing in managing sportrelated concussion: does it modify risk? Curr Sports Med Rep. 2011;10(1):21-26.
32. Resch JE, McCrea MA, Cullum CM. Computerized neurocognitive testing in the management of sport-related concussion: an update. Neuropsychol Rev. 2013;23(4):335-349.
33. Schatz P, Neidzwski K, Moser RS, Karpf R. Relationship between subjective test feedback provided by high-school athletes during computer-based assessment of baseline cognitive functioning and selfreported symptoms. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010;25(4):285-292.
34. Schatz P, Moser RS, Solomon GS, Ott SD, Karpf R. Prevalence of invalid computerized baseline neurocognitive test results in high school and collegiate athletes. J Athl Train. 2012;47(3):289-296.