Presence of third party observers during neuropsychological testing: Official statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 379-380

  Axelrod, Bradley ^a   Barth, Jeffrey ^a   Faust, David ^a   Fisher, Jerid ^a   Heilbronner, Robert ^a   Larrabee, Glenn ^a   Pliskin, Neil ^a   Silver, Cheryl ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; ETHICS; FORENSIC MEDICINE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NONHUMAN;

EID: 0034125694     PISSN: 08876177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0887-6177(00)00053-6     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. 1985;Author, Washington, DC.
2. Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. The American Psychologist. 47:1992;1597-1611.
3. Anastasi A. Psychological Testing. 6th ed:1988;Macmillan Publishing Company, New York.
4. Binder L.M., Johnson-Greene D. Observer effects on neuropsychological performance. A case report The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 9:1995;74-78.
5. McCaffrey R.J., Fisher J.M., Gold B.A., Lynch J.K. Presence of third parties during neuropsychological evaluations. Who is evaluating whom? The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 10:1996;435-449.
6. McSweeny A.J., Becker B.C., Naugle R.I., Snow W.G., Binder L.M., Thompson L.L. Ethical issues related to third party observers in clinical neuropsychological evaluations. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 12(4):1998;552-559.
7. The WAIS-III, WMS-III Technical Manual. 1997;Author, San Antonio.