Effects of a significant-other observer on neuropsychological test performance

Clinical Neuropsychologist

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 67-71

  Kehrer, Constance A ^a   Sanchez, Phyllis N ^a,b   Habif, Ulya ^a   Rosenbaum, J Gail ^a   Townes, Brenda D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEARNING DISORDER; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; OBSERVATION; PARENT; SIBLING; SPOUSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

EID: 0033907821     PISSN: 13854046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/1385-4046(200002)14:1;1-8;FT067     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. American Psychological Association (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597-1611.
2. American Psychological Association (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: APA.
3. Bell, P.A., & Yee, L.A. (1989). Skill level and audience effects on performance of a Karate drill. Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 191-200.
4. Binder, L.M., & Johnson-Greene, D. (1995). Observer effects on neuropsychological performance: A case report. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 9, 74-78.
5. Code of Civil Procedure, Civil Practice Law 5/2 - 1003 (d) (Illinois 1982).
6. Lezak, M.D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Linehan, M.M. (1993). Skills training manual for treating borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press.
8. McCaffrey, R.J., Fisher, J.M., Gold, B.A., & Lynch, J.K. (1996). Presence of third parties during neuropsychological evaluations: Who is evaluating whom? The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 10, 1-15.
9. McSweeny, A.J., Becker, B.C., Naugle, R.I., Snow, W.G., Binder, L.M., & Thompson, L.L. (1998). Ethical issues related to the presence of third party observers in clinical neuropsychology evaluations. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12, 552-559.
10. Sacks, T.L., Clark, C.R., Pols, R., & Geffen, L.B. (1991). Comparability and stability of performance on six alternate forms of the Dodrill-Stroop Colour-Word Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 5, 220-225.
11. Stuss, D.T., Stethem, L.L., & Poirier, C.A. (1987). Comparison of three tests of attention and rapid information processing across six age groups. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1, 139-152.
12. Teitjen vs. Department of Labor and Industries, 13, Washington App. 86, 534 P. 2d 151 (1975).
13. Vinson vs. Superior Court, 43 CA. 3d 833, 740 P. 2d (1987).
14. Washington Administrative Code 245-924-363 (8) (1998).