Tracking second thoughts: Continuous and discrete revision processes during visual lexical decision

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2015, Pages

  Barca, Laura ^a   Pezzulo, Giovanni ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTER MOUSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECELERATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DYNAMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; LINGUISTICS; LOW FREQUENCY WORDS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; PSEUDOWORDS; VELOCITY; VISUAL LEXICAL DECISION; DECISION MAKING; PHOTOSTIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SPEECH; THINKING;

DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SPEECH; THINKING; VOCABULARY;

EID: 84923683700     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116193     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Barca L, Bello A, Volterra V, Burani C (2010) Lexical-semantic reading in a shallow orthography: evidence from a girl with Williams Syndrome. Read Writ, 23: 569-588.
2. Pagliuca G, Arduino LS, Barca L, Burani C (2008) Fully transparent orthography, yet lexical reading aloud: The lexicality effect in Italian. Lang Cogn Process, 23: 422-433.
3. Freeman JB (2014) Abrupt category shifts during real-time person perception. Psychon Bull Rev, 21: 85-92. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0470-8 PMID: 23807761
4. Freeman JB, Dale R, Farmer TA (2011) Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Front Psychol, 2: 59. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00059 PMID: 21687437
5. McKinstry C, Dale R, Spivey MJ (2008) Action dynamics reveal parallel competition in decision making. Psychol Sci, 19: 22-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02041.x PMID: 18181787
6. Quinton JC, Catenacci Volpi N, Barca L, Pezzulo G (2013) The cat is on the mat. Or is it a dog? Dynamic competition in perceptual decision making. IEEE Trans Cybern, 44: 539-551. doi: 10.1109/TCYB. 2013.2259230 PMID: 23757567
7. Song HK, Nakayama K (2009) Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks. Trends Cogn Sci, 13: 360-366. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.009 PMID: 19647475
8. Spivey M, Grosjean M, Knoblich G (2005) Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 102: 10393-10398. PMID: 15985550
9. Bangert AS, Abrams RA, Balota DA (2012) Reaching for words and nonwords: Interactive effects of word frequency and stimulus quality on the characteristics of reaching movements, Psychon Bull Rev: 19, 513-520. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0234-x PMID: 22419404
10. Barca L, Pezzulo G (2012) Unfolding Visual Lexical Decision in Time. PLoS ONE 7(4): e35932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035932 PMID: 22563419
11. Freeman JB, Ambady N (2010) MouseTracker: software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behav Res Methods, 42: 226-241. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.226 PMID: 20160302
12. Spivey MJ, Dale R, Knoblich G, Grosjean M (2009) Do curved reaching movements emerge from competing perceptions? A reply to van der Wel et al. (2009). J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 36(1): 251-4. doi: 10.1037/a0017170 PMID: 20121308
13. van der Wel RPRD, Eder JR, Mitchel AD, Walsh MM, Rosenbaum DA (2009) Trajectories emerging from discrete versus continuous processing models in phonological competitor tasks: A commentary on Spivey, Grosjean, and Knoblich (2005). J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 35: 588-594. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523.35.2.588 PMID: 19331511
14. Resulaj A, Kiani R, Wolpert DM, Shadlen MN (2009) Changes of mind in decision-making. Nature, 461: 263-266. doi: 10.1038/nature08275 PMID: 19693010
15. Barca L, Burani C, Arduino LS (2002) Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput, 34: 424-434. PMID: 12395559
16. Kruschke JK (2013) Bayesian estimation supersedes the t test. J Exp Psychol Gen, 142: 573-603. doi: 10.1037/a0029146 PMID: 22774788
17. Ratcliff R (1978) A theory of memory retrieval. Psychol Rev, 85: 59-108, 1978.
18. Wong KF, Huk AC, Shadlen MN, Wang XJ (2007) Neural circuit dynamics underlying accumulation of time-varying evidence during perceptual decision making. Front Comput Neurosci, 1-6.
19. Tsetsos K, Usher M, McClelland JL (2011) Testing multi-alternative decision models with non-stationary evidence. Front Neurosci, 5:63. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00063 PMID: 21603227
20. Usher M, McClelland JL (2001) On the time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychol Rev, 108(3): 550-592. PMID: 11488378
21. Gold JI, Shadlen MN (2007) The neural basis of decision making. Annu Rev Neurosci, 30: 535-574. PMID: 17600525
22. Friston K (2010) The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nat Rev Neurosci, 11: 127-138. doi: 10.1038/nrn2787 PMID: 20068583
23. Lepora NF, Gurney KN (2012) The basal ganglia optimize decision making over general perceptual hypotheses. Neural Comput, 24: 2924-2945. doi: 10.1162/NECO-a-00360 PMID: 22920846
24. Bruhn P, Huette S, Spivey M (2014) Degree of certainty modulates anticipatory processes in real time. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 40(2): 525-538. doi: 10.1037/a0034365 PMID: 24041331
25. Coles MG, Gratton G, Bashore TR, Eriksen CW, Donchin E (1985) A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 11(5): 529-553. PMID: 2932529
26. Cisek P (2012) Making decisions through a distributed consensus. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol, 22 (6): 927-936. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.05.007 PMID: 22683275
27. Cisek P (2006) Integrated neural processes for defining potential actions and deciding between them: a computational model. J Neurosci, 26: 9761-9770. PMID: 16988047
28. Pezzulo G, Ognibene D (2011) Proactive Action Preparation: Seeing Action Preparation as a Continuous and Proactive Process. Motor Control, 16(3): 386-424.
29. Spivey M (2007) The continuity of mind. Oxford University Press, USA, 2007.
30. Tipper S, Howard L, Houghton G (2000) Behavioural consequences of selection from population codes. In: Attention and performance XVII. Monsell S, Driver J. MIT Press, 2000, 223-246.
31. Rigoux L, Guigon E (2012) A model of reward- and effort-based optimal decision making and motor control. PLoS Comput Biol, 8(10):e1002716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002716 PMID: 23055916
32. Cos I, Bélanger N, Cisek P (2011) The influence of predicted arm biomechanics on decision making. J. Neurophysiol., 105, 3022-3033. doi: 10.1152/jn.00975.2010 PMID: 21451055
33. Marcos E, Cos I, Cisek P, Girard B, Verschure PF (2013) Biomechanical costs of reaching movements bias perceptual decisions. BMC Neuroscience, doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-14-S1-P408
34. Lepora N, Pezzulo G (In Press) Embodied Choice: How action influences perceptual decision making.
35. Shiffrin RM, Steyvers M (1997) A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory. Psychon Bull Rev, 4: 145-166. doi: 10.3758/BF03209391 PMID: 21331823
36. Price CJ, Devlin JT (2011) The interactive account of ventral occipitotemporal contributions to reading. Trends Cogn Sci, 15: 246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.001 PMID: 21549634