Turning good research into good publications

Nankai Business Review International

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 92-106

  Ahlstrom, David ^a   Bruton, Garry D ^b   Zhao, li ^c  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Editors; Journals; Paper organization; Publishing; Research design; Research work; Reviewers

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923651610     PISSN: 20408749     EISSN: 20408757     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/20408741311323317     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ahlstrom, D. (2010a), “Clearing the first hurdle at the Asia Pacific Journal of Management”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 171-177.
2. Ahlstrom, D. (2010b), “Innovation and growth: how business contributes to society”, Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 10-23.
3. Ahlstrom, D. (2010c), “Publishing in the Asia Pacific Journal of Management”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 1-8.
4. Ahlstrom, D. (2011), “Some helpful sources for prospective authors in Asia Pacific Journal of Management”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 661-665.
5. Ahlstrom, D. (2012a), “On the types of papers the Asia Pacific Journal of Management generally publishes”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 1-7.
6. Ahlstrom, D. (2012b), “Several key reasons why a paper is likely to be rejected at the Asia Pacific Journal of Management”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 519-524.
7. Bansal, P.T. and Corley, K. (2012), “Publishing in AMJ – part 7: what's different about qualitative research?”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 55 No. 3, pp. 509-513.
8. Bartunek, J.M., Rynes, S.L. and Ireland, R.D. (2006), “What makes management research interesting, and why does it matter?”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 9-15.
9. Baruch, Y., Konrad, A.M., Aguinis, H. and Starbuck, W.H. (Eds) (2008), Opening the Black Box of Editorship, Palgrave-Macmillan, New York, NY.
10. Bono, J.E. and McNamara, G. (2011), “Publishing in AMJ – part 2: research design”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 54 No. 4, pp. 657-660.
11. Bruton, G.D. (2009), “Perspectives”, Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 23 No. 1, p. 1.
12. Cohen, L. and Manion, L. (1998), Research Methods in Science Education, Routledge, New York, NY.
13. Colquitt, J.A. and George, G. (2011), “Publishing in AMJ – part 1: topic choice”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 54 No. 3, pp. 432-435.
14. Colquitt, J.A. and Zapata-Phelan, C.P. (2007), “Trends in theory building and theory testing: a five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50 No. 6, pp. 1281-1303.
15. Creswell, J.W. (2008), Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 3rd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
16. Cummings, L.L. and Frost, P.J. (Eds) (1985), Publishing in the Organizational Sciences, Irwin, Homewood, IL.
17. Cummings, L.L. and Frost, P.J. (Eds) (1995), Publishing in the Organizational Sciences, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
18. Davis, M.S. (1971), “That's interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 309-344.
19. DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983), “The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 147-160.
20. Eden, D (2008), “What authors need to know to navigate the review process successfully: understanding and managing the editor's dilemma”, in Baruch, Y., Konrad, A.M., Aguinis, H. and Starbuck, W.H. (Eds), Opening the Black Box of Editorship, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingsoke, pp. 239-249.
21. Feldman, D.C. (2004), “Being a developmental reviewer: easier said than done”, Journal of Management, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 161-164.
22. Geletkanycz, M. and Tepper, B.J. (2012), “Publishing in AMJ – part 6: discussing the implications”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 55 No. 2, pp. 256-260.
23. Grant, A.M. and Pollock, T.G. (2011), “Publishing in AMJ – part 3: setting the hook”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 54 No. 5, pp. 873-879.
24. Hedberg, B.L., Bystrom, P.C. and Starbuck, W.H. (1976), “Camping on seesaws: prescriptions for a self-designing organization”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 41-65.
25. Huang, C.L. (2007), “Publish or perish! An editorial perspective”, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Vol. 39 No. 02, pp. 223-229.
26. Huff, A.S. (1999), Writing for Scholarly Publication, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
27. Huff, A.S. (2008), Designing Research for Publication, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
28. Kerlinger, F.N. (1995), Foundations of Behavioral Research, 3rd ed., Prism Books Private Limited, Bangalore.
29. Kerlinger, F.N. (1997), Research Principles in Behavioral Sciences, Avaye Noor Publication, Tehran, Trans. Pasha S.H. and Najafi Z.J.
30. Kilduff, M. (2007), “Editor's comments: the top ten reasons why your paper might not be sent out for review”, Academy of Mgt Review, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 700-702.
31. Klein, K.J. and Zedeck, S. (2004), “Theory in applied psychology”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 89, pp. 931-933.
32. Machi, A. and McEvoy, B.T. (2008), The Literature Review: Six Steps to Success, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
33. Meyer, K.E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S.K. and Peng, M.W. (2009), “Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 30, pp. 61-80.
34. Peng, M.W. (2003), “Institutional transitions and strategic choices”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 275-296.
35. Peng, M.W. (2012), “Improving made-in-China management research”, Frontiers of Business Research in China, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 120-133.
36. Porter, M.E. (1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, The Free Press, New York, NY.
37. Ridley, D. (2008), The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
38. Rynes, S.L. (2002), “From the editors: some reflections on contribution”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, pp. 311-313.
39. Smith, K.G. and Hitt, M.A. (Eds) (2005), Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
40. Sparrowe, R.T. and Mayer, K.J. (2011), “Publishing in AMJ – part 4: grounding hypotheses”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 54 No. 6, pp. 1098-1102.
41. Su, Y.-S., Tsang, E.W.K. and Peng, M.W. (2009), “How do internal capabilities and external partnerships affect innovativeness?”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 309-331.
42. Sutton, R.I. and Staw, B.M. (1995), “What theory is not”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40, pp. 371-384.
43. Tsang, E.W.R. and Kwan, K.-M. (1999), “Replication and theory development in organizational science: a critical realist perspective”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 759-780.
44. Van de Ven, A.H. (2007), Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
45. Williamson, P.J. (1985), Varieties of Corporatism: A Conceptual Discussion, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
46. Young, M.N., Peng, M.W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G.D. and Jiang, Y. (2008), “Corporate governance in emerging economies: a review of the principal-principal perspective”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 196-220.
47. Zedeck, S. (2008), “Editing a top academic journal”, in Baruch, Y., Konrad, A.M., Aguinis, H. and Starbuck, W.H. (Eds), Opening the Black Box of Editorship, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingsoke, pp. 145-156.
48. Zhang, Y.A. and Shaw, J.D. (2012), “Publishing in AMJ – part 5: crafting the methods and results”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 55 No. 1, pp. 8-12.
49. Du, H., Zhu, G., Zhao, L. and Lv, T. (2012), “An empirical study of consumer adoption on 3G value-added services in China”, Nankai Business Review International, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 257-283.
50. Hu, W. and Zhang, Y. (2012), “New venture capability of the transformation from entrepreneurial orientation to new venture's performance: theory model and empirical study in China”, Nankai Business Review International, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 302-325.
51. Mai, Y. and Gu, X. (2012), “Is work experience helpful to the success of venture creation? Based on the on-the-job embeddedness analysis”, Nankai Business Review International, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 187-198.
52. Peng, Z.L. and Zhao, H.D. (2012), “Does organization citizenship behavior really benefit the organization? Study on the compulsory citizenship behavior in China”, Nankai Business Review International, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 75-92.
53. Yang, X. and Chu, X. (2012), “People value for team effectiveness in China: the mediating role of leader identification”, Nankai Business Review International, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 65-74.