Some helpful sources for prospective authors in Asia Pacific Journal of Management

Asia Pacific Journal of Management

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 661-665

  Ahlstrom, David ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80255141856     PISSN: 02174561     EISSN: 15729958     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10490-011-9272-6     Document Type: Editorial

References (48)

1. Abbott, A. 2004. Methods of discovery: Heuristics for the social sciences. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
2. Ahlstrom, D. 2010a. Publishing in the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(1): 1-8.
3. Ahlstrom, D. 2010b. Clearing the first hurdle at the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(2): 171-177.
4. Ahlstrom, D. 2010c. Avoiding common missteps: Writing papers suitable for the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(4): 583-586.
5. Ahlstrom, D. 2011a. On the aims and scope of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management: What does APJM really seek to publish?. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(2): 215-219.
6. Ahlstrom, D. 2011b. A checklist for prospective authors of Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(3): 449-452.
7. Ahlstrom, D., Lamond, D., & Ding, Z. 2009. Reexamining some management lessons from military history. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(4): 617-642.
8. Bartunek, J. M., & Rynes, S. L. 2010. The construction and contributions of implications for practice: What's in them and what might they offer?. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9: 100-117.
9. Bhagat, R. S., McDevitt, A. S., & McDevitt, I. 2010. On improving the robustness of Asian management theories: Theoretical anchors in the era of globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(2): 179-192.
10. Bono, J. E., & McNamara, G. 2011. From the editors: Publishing in AMJ-Part 2: Research design. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4): 657-660.
11. Carney, M., Gedajlovic, E., & Yang, X. 2009. Varieties of Asian capitalism: Toward an institutional theory of Asian enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(3): 361-380.
12. Christensen, C. M., & Carlile, P. R. 2009. Course research: Using the case method to build and teach management theory. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(2): 240-251.
13. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. 2003. Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9): 66-74.
14. Christensen, C. M. 2006. The ongoing process of building a theory of disruption. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1): 39-55.
15. Colquitt, J. A., & George, G. 2011. From the editors. Publishing in AMJ-Part 1: Topic choice. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3): 432-435.
16. Colquitt, J. A., & Ireland, R. D. 2009. From the editors: Taking the mystery out of AMJ's reviewer evaluation form. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2): 224-228.
17. Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. 2011. Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution?. Academy of Management Review, 36(1): 12-32.
18. Creswell, J. W. 2008. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications (3rd edition).
19. Cummings, L. L., & Frost, P. J. (Eds.). 1985. Publishing in the organizational sciences. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
20. Cummings, L. L., & Frost, P. J. (Eds.). 1995. Publishing in the organizational sciences, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. 2007. Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4): 1155-1179.
22. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 25-32.
23. Fang, T. 2010. Asian management research needs more self-confidence: reflection on Hofstede (2007) and beyond. Asia Pacific Journal of Management., 27(1): 155-170.
24. Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2): 219-245.
25. Hayton, J. C., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. 2002. National culture and entrepreneurship: A review of behavioral research. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice., 26(4): 33-52.
26. Huff, A. S. 1999. Writing for scholarly publication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Huff, A. S. 2008. Designing research for publication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Ismail, K. M., & Ford, D. L. 2010. Organizational leadership in Central Asia and the Caucasus: Research considerations and directions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(2): 321-340.
29. Kilduff, M. 2007. Editor's comments: The top ten reasons why your paper might not be sent out for review. Academy of Management Review, 32: 700-702.
30. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. 2009. Has goal setting gone wild, or have its attackers abandoned good scholarship?. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(1): 17-23.
31. Machi, A., & McEvoy, B. T. 2008. The literature review: Six steps to success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
32. Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Peng, M. W. 2009. Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 61-80.
33. Peng, M. W. 2004. Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transitions. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 453-471.
34. Peng, M. W., & Dess, G. G. 2010. In the spirit of scholarship. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(2): 282-298.
35. Peng, M. W., Li, Y., Xie, E., & Su, Z. 2010. CEO duality, organizational slack, and firm performance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(4): 611-624.
36. Rynes, S. L. 2002. From the editors: Some reflections on contribution. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 311-313.
37. Rynes, S., & Gephart, R. P. 2004. From the editors: Qualitative research and the "Academy of Management Journal". Academy of Management Journal, 47(4): 454-462.
38. Rynes, S. L., Hillman, A., Ireland, R. D., Kirkman, B., Miller, C. C., Rajagopalan, N., & Shapiro, D. 2005. From the editors: Everything you've always wanted to know about AMJ (but may have been afraid to ask). Academy of Management Journal, 48(5): 732-737.
39. Shane, S. A. 2008. The illusions of entrepreneurship: The costly myths that entrepreneurs, investors, and policy makers live by. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
40. Siggelkow, N. 2007. Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 20-24.
41. Smith, K. G., & Hitt, M. A. (Eds.). 2005. Great minds in management: The process of theory development. New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Stevens, C. E., & Cooper, J. T. 2010. A behavioral theory of governments' ability to make credible commitments to firms: The case of the East Asian paradox. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(4): 587-610.
43. Su, Y.-S., Tsang, E. W. K., & Peng, M. W. 2009. How do internal capabilities and external partnerships affect innovativeness?. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(2): 309-331.
44. Suddaby, R. 2006. From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4): 633-642.
45. Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. 1995. What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 371-384.
46. van de Ven, A. H. 2007. Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47. Whetten, D. A. 1989. What constitutes a theoretical contribution?. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 490-495.
48. Yin, R. K. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.