What authors need to know to navigate the review process successfully: Understanding and managing the editor's dilemma

Opening the Black Box of Editorship

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 239-249

  Eden, Dov ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992984524     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1057/9780230582590     Document Type: Chapter

References (8)

1. Baruch, Y., Sullivan, S. E., & Schepmyer, H. N. (Eds.). (2006). Winning reviews: A guide for evaluating scholarly writing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
2. Bergh, D. (2003). Thinking strategically about contribution. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 135-6.
3. Cummings, L. L., & Frost, P. J. (Eds.). (1995). Publishing in the organizational sciences (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks: Sage.
4. Daft, R. L. (1985). Why I recommended that your manuscript be rejected and what you can do about it. In L. L. Cummings & P. J. Frost (Eds.), Publishing in the organizational sciences (2nd ed., pp. 164-182). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
5. Huff, A. S. (1999). Writing for scholarly publication. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
6. Rynes, S. (2002). Some reflections on contribution. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 311-13.
7. Schminke, M. (2004). Raising the bamboo curtain. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 310-14.
8. Zahra, S. & Neubaum D. (2006). How to answer reviews to get an article published. In Y. Baruch, S. E. Sullivan, & H. N. Schepmyer, (Eds.), Winning reviews: A guide for evaluating scholarly writing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.