Reflections on the psychology and social science of cyberspace

Psychological Aspects of Cyberspace: Theory, Research, Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-12

  Barak, Azy ^a   Suler, John ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

^b RIDER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923393419     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511813740.002     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2005). Personality and the Internet. InY. Amichai-Hamburger (Ed.), The social net: Human behavior in cyberspace (pp. 27-55). New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Antoniou, G., & van Harmelen, F. (2004). A semantic web primer. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
3. Barak, A. (1999). Psychological applications on the Internet: A discipline on the threshold of a new millennium. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 8, 231-246.
4. Barak, A. (2007). Phantom emotions: Psychological determinants of emotional experiences on the Internet. In A. Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, T. Postmes, & U. D. Reips (Eds.), Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 303-329). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5. Barak, A., & Bloch, N. (2006). Factors related to perceived helpfulness in supporting highly distressed individuals through an online support chat. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9, 60-68.
6. Barak, A.,&Gluck-Ofri, O. (2007). Degree and reciprocity of self-disclosure in online forums. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 407-417.
7. Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2004). The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573-590.
8. Beck, C. T. (2005). Benefits of participating in Internet interviews: Women helping women. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 411-422.
9. Chen, H. (2006). Flow on the net-detecting Web users' positive affects and their flow states. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 221-233.
10. Dietz-Uhler, B., Bishop-Clark, C., & Howard, E. (2005). Formation of and adherence to a self-disclosure norm in an online chat. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8, 114-120.
11. Engel, C. (2006). The role of law in the governance of the Internet. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 20, 201-216.
12. Fink, J. (Ed.). (1999). How to use computers and cyberspace in the clinical practice of psychotherapy. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
13. Gackenbach, J. (Ed.). (1998). Psychology and the Internet. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14. Galin, A., Gross, M., & Gosalker, G. (2007). E-negotiation versus face-to-face negotiation what has changed-if anything? Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 787-797.
15. Greenfield, D. N. (1999). Virtual addiction. Oakland, CA: NewHarbinger Publications.
16. Haythornthwaite, C.,&Hagar, C. (2004). The socialworlds of theWeb. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 39, 311-346.
17. Joinson, A. N. (2001). Knowing me, knowing you: Reciprocal self-disclosure in Internet-based surveys. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4, 587-591.
18. King, S. A. (1999). Internet gambling and pornography: Illustrative examples of the psychological consequences of communication anarchy. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2, 175-193.
19. Kraut, R., Lundmark, V., Patterson, M., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox:Asocial technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53, 1017-1031.
20. Leung, L. (2002). Loneliness, self-disclosure, and ICQ ("I Seek You") use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5, 241-251.
21. Levine, D. (2000).Virtual attraction: What rocks your boat. CyberPsychology&Behavior, 3, 565-573.
22. Mantovani, G. (2002). Internet haze: Why new artifacts can enhance situation ambiguity. Culture & Psychology, 8, 307-326.
23. McCoyd, J. L. M., & Schwaber Kerson, T. (2006). Conducting intensive interviews using email: A serendipitous comparative opportunity. Qualitative Social Work, 5, 389-406.
24. McKenna, K., & Seidman, G. (2005). You, me, and we: Interpersonal processes in electronic groups. In Y. Amichai-Hamburger (Ed.), The social net: Human behavior in cyberspace (pp. 191-217). New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Norton, M. I., Frost, J. H., & Ariely, D. (2007). Less is more: The lure of ambiguity, or why familiarity breeds contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 97-105.
26. O'Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved March 1, 2007, from http://www. oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
27. Riva, G., Botella, C., Légeron, P., & Optale, G. (Eds.). (2004). Cybertherapy: Internet and virtual reality as assessment and rehabilitation tools for clinical psychology and neuroscience. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
28. Riva, G., Gaggioli, A., Villani, D., Preziosa, A., Morganti, F., Corsi, R., Faletti, G., & Vezzadini, L. (2007). NeuroVR: an open source virtual reality platform for clinical psychology and behavioral neurosciences. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 125, 394-399.
29. Rollman, J. B., Krug, K.,&Parente, F. (2000). The chat room phenomenon: Reciprocal communication in cyberspace. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 161-166.
30. Rollman, B., & Parente, F. (2001). Relation of statement length and type and type of chat room reciprocal communication on the Internet. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4, 617-622.
31. Sassenberg, K., Boos, M., Pstmes, T., & Reips, U. D. (2003). Studying the Internet: A challenge for modern psychology. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 62, 75-77.
32. Suler, J. (1996). The black hole phenomenon. Retrieved March 1, 2007, from http://www.rider.edu/∼suler/psycyber/blackhole.html. Suler, J. (1996-2007). The psychology of cyberspace. Retrieved March 1, 2007, from http://www.rider.edu/∼suler/psycyber/psycyber.html.
33. Suler, J. (1999). Cyberspace as psychological space. Retrieved on March 1, 2007, from http://www.rider.edu/∼suler/psycyber/psychspace.html.
34. Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 321-326.
35. Tanis, M., & Postmes, T. (2007). Two faces of anonymity: Paradoxical effects of cues to identity in CMC. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 955-970.
36. Thatcher, A., & De La Cour, A. (2003). Small group decision-making in face-to-face and computer-mediated environments: the role of personality. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22, 203-218.
37. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
38. Turkle, S. (2004). Whither psychoanalysis in computer culture? Psychoanalytic Psychology, 21, 16-30.
39. Wallace, P. (1999). The psychology of the Internet. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Weber, W., Rabaey, J. M., & Aarts, E. (Eds.). (2006). Ambient intelligence. New York: Springer.
42. Whitty, T. E., & Carr, A. N. (2006). Cyberspace romance: The psychology of online relationships. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
43. Yao, M. Z.,&Flanagin, A. J. (2006). A self-awareness approach to computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 518-544.
44. Young, K. (1998). Caught in the net. New York: Wiley.