Corrigendum to “Structure and composition of the Trinil femora: Functional and taxonomic implications” [Journal of Human Evolution 80 (2015) 147–158](S0047248414003042)(10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.12.004);Structure and composition of the Trinil femora: Functional and taxonomic implications

Journal of Human Evolution

Volumn 80, Issue , 2015, Pages 147-158

  Ruff, Christopher B ^a   Puymerail, Laurent ^b,c   Macchiarelli, Roberto ^c,d   Sipla, Justin ^e   Ciochon, Russell L ^f  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^f E11 SSH   (United States)

Author keywords

Eugene Dubois; Femur; Homo erectus; Java; Skeletal structure; Solo River

Indexed keywords

BONE; CRANIUM; HOMINID; MORPHOLOGY; PLEISTOCENE; SKELETON; TAXONOMY;

GREATER SUNDA ISLANDS; JAVA; SUNDA ISLES;

HOMO ERECTUS;

ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; BONE DENSITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMUR; FOSSIL; HOMINID; INDONESIA; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY;

ANIMALS; BONE DENSITY; FEMUR; FOSSILS; HOMINIDAE; INDONESIA; PHYLOGENY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84923380911     PISSN: 00472484     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2021.103109     Document Type: Erratum

References (76)

1. Aiello L., Dean C. An Introduction to Human Evolutionary Anatomy 1990, Academic Press, London.
2. Antón S.C. Natural history of Homo erectus. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2003, (Suppl.37):126-170.
3. Antón S.C., Spoor F., Fellmann C.D., Swisher C.C. Defining Homo erectus: size considered. Handbook of Paleoanthropology 2007, Vol. 3:1655-1693. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
4. Barstra G.-J. The river-laid strata near Trinil, site of Homo erectus, Java, Indonesia. Mod. Quart. Res. S.E. Asia 1982, 7:97-130.
5. Bartsiokas A., Day M.H. Electron-probe energy-dispersive x-ray-microanalysis (edxa) in the investigation of fossil bone - the case of Java Man. Proc. R.Soc. Lond. Series B 1993, 252:115-123.
6. Bergman R.A.M. The fluorine content of Pithecanthropus and of other specimens from the Trinil fauna. Proc. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Series B 1952, 55:150-152.
7. Bondioli L., Bayle P., Dean C., Mazurier A., Puymerail L., Ruff C., Stock J.T., Volpato V., Zanolli C., Macchiarelli R. Technical note: Morphometric maps of long bone shafts and dental roots for imaging topographic thickness variation. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2010, 142:328-334.
8. Buxton L.H.D. Platymeria and platycnemia. J.Anat. 1938, 73:31-36.
9. Clark W.E.L.G. The relationship between Pithecanthropus and Sinanthropus. Nature 1939, 145:70-71.
10. Clark W.E.L.G. The Fossil Evidence for Human Evolution 1964, University Chicago Press, Chicago. 2nd ed.
11. Cleveland W.S. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J.Am. Stat. Assoc. 1979, 74:829-836.
12. Cunningham D.J. Dr. Dubois' so-called missing link. Nature 1895, 51:428-429.
13. Day M.H. Postcranial remains of Homo erectus from Bed IV, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Nature 1971, 232:383-387.
14. Day M.H. The postcranial remains of Homo erectus from Africa, Asia, and possibly Europe 1984, 113-121. Cour. Foresch. Inst. Senckenberg 69.
15. Day M.H. Bipedalism: Pressures, origins and modes. Major Topics in Primate and Human Evolution 1986, 188-202. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. B. Wood, L. Martin, P. Andrews (Eds.).
16. Day M.H. Homo erectus: an old species with new problems. Bull. Soc. R.Belge Anthropol. Prehist. 1986, 97:33-44.
17. Day M.H., Molleson T.I. The Trinil femora. Human Evolution. Symp. S.S.H.B. 1973, Vol. 11.:127-154. Taylor and Francis, London. M. Day (Ed.).
18. Day M.H., Leakey R.E.F., Walker A.C., Wood B.A. New hominids from East Rudolf, Kenya, I. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1975, 42:461-476.
19. de Vos J. Receiving an ancestor in the phylogenetic tree. J.Hist. Biol. 2008, 42:361-379.
20. Dubois E. Palaeontologische onderzoekingen op Java. Verslag van het Mijnwezen Third Quarter 1892, p. 13; translated in: Meikle, W.E., Parker, S.T., 1994. Naming our Ancestors. An Anthology of Hominid Taxonomy 1893, 37-40. Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, Illinois.
21. Dubois E. Pithecanthropus erectus, eine menschednahnliche Uebergangsform aus Java 1894, National Press, Batavia.
22. Dubois E. On Pithecanthropus erectus of the Pliocene of Java. Bull. Soc. Belge Geol. 1895, 9:151-160.
23. Dubois E. On Pithecanthropus erectus: a transitional form between man and the apes. J.Anthropol. Inst. Great Britain and Ireland 1896, 25:240-255.
24. Dubois E. On the principal characters of the femur of Pithecanthropus erectus. Proc. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen 1926, 29:730-743.
25. Dubois E. The distinct organization of Pithecanthropus of which the femur bears evidence, now confirmed from other individuals of the described species. Proc. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen 1932, 35:716-722.
26. Dubois E. New evidence of the distinct organization of Pithecanthropus. Proc. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen 1934, 37:139-145.
27. Dubois E. The sixth (fifth new) femur of Pithecanthropus erectus. Proc. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen 1935, 38:850-852.
28. Elftman H. Torsion of the lower extremity. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1945, 3:255-265.
29. Feldesman M.R., Kleckner J.G., Lundy J.K. The femur/stature ratio and estimates of stature in mid- and late-Pleistocene fossil hominids. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1990, 83:359-372.
30. Fellmann C.D. Estimation of femoral length and stature in fossil and modern hominins: a test of methods 2004, MA thesis, Rutgers University.
31. Gilbert W.H. Daka member hominid postcranial remains. Homo erectus: Pleistocene Evidence from the Middle Awash, Ethiopia 2008, 373-396. University California Press, Berkeley. W.H. Gilbert, B. Asfaw (Eds.).
32. Hendee W.H. The Physical Principles of Computed Tomography 1983, Little, Brown and Co., Boston.
33. Hepburn D. The Trinil femur (Pithecanthropus erectus) contrasted with the femora of various savage and civilized races. J.Anat. Physiol. 1896, 11:1-17.
34. Howells W. Mankind in the Making 1959, Doubleday and Co., New York.
35. Jacobs K. Estimating femur and tibia length from fragmentary bones: an evaluation of Steele's (1970) method using a prehistoric European sample. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1992, 89:333-345.
36. Joordens J.C., d'Errico F., Wesselingh F.P., Munro S., de Vos J., Wallinga J., Ankjaergaard C., Reimann T., Wijbrans J.R., Kuiper K.F., Mucher H.J., Coqueugniot H., Prie V., Joosten I., van Os B., Schulp A.S., Panuel M., van der Haas V., Lustenhouwer W., Reijmer J.J., Roebroeks W. Homo erectus at Trinil on Java used shells for tool production and engraving. Nature 2014, 10.1038/nature13962.
37. Kennedy G.E. Some aspects of femoral morphology in Homo erectus. J.Hum. Evol. 1983, 12:587-616.
38. Klein R. The Human Career 1999, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 2nd ed.
39. Lam Y.M., Chen X.B., Marean C.W., Frey C.J. Bone density and long bone representation in archaeological faunas: comparing results from CT and photon densitometry. J.Archaeol. Sci. 1998, 25:559-570.
40. Lordkipanidze D., Jashashvili T., Vekua A., Ponce de Leon M.S., Zollikofer C.P., Rightmire G.P., Pontzer H., Ferring R., Oms O., Tappen M., Bukhsianidze M., Agusti J., Kahlke R., Kiladze G., Martinez-Navarro B., Mouskhelishvili A., Nioradze M., Rook L. Postcranial evidence from early Homo from Dmanisi, Georgia. Nature 2007, 449:305-310.
41. Lovejoy C.O. Contemporary methodological approaches to individual primate fossil analysis. Environment, Behavior and Morphology: Dynamic Interactions in Primates 1979, 229-243. Gustav Fischer, New York. M.E. Morbeck, H. Preuschoft, N. Gomberg (Eds.).
42. Mafart B., Guipert G., de Lumley M.A., Subsol G. Three-dimensional computer imaging of hominid fossils: a new step in human evolution studies. Canad. Assoc. Radiol. J. 2004, 55:264-270.
43. Mayr E. On the concepts and terminology of vertical subspecies and species. Natl. Res. Council Bull. (Documents of the Committee on Common Problems of Genetics, Paleontology, and Systematics) 1944, 2:11-16.
44. Mayr E. Taxonomic categories in fossil hominids. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 1950, 15:109-118.
45. Organ J.M., Ward C.V. Contours of the hominoid lateral tibial condyle with implications for Australopithecus. J.Hum. Evol. 2006, 51:113-127.
46. Pearson K., Bell J. AStudy of the Long Bones of the English Skeleton 1919, Cambridge University Press, London.
47. Pilbeam D.R. The Evolution of Man 1970, Thames and Hudson, London.
48. Puymerail L., Ruff C.B., Bondioli L., Widianto H., Trinkaus E., Macchiarelli R. Structural analysis of the Kresna 11 Homo erectus femoral shaft (Sangiran, Java). J.Hum. Evol. 2012, 63:741-749.
49. Rightmire G. The Evolution of Homo erectus 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
50. Ruff C.B. Sexual dimorphism in human lower limb bone structure: relationship to subsistence strategy and sexual division of labor. J.Hum. Evol. 1987, 16:391-416.
51. Ruff C.B. Biomechanics of the hip and birth in early Homo. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1995, 98:527-574.
52. Ruff C.B. Long bone articular and diaphyseal structure in Old World monkeys and apes, I: locomotor effects. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2002, 119:305-342.
53. Ruff C.B. Body size prediction from juvenile skeletal remains. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2007, 133:698-716.
54. Ruff C.B. Relative limb strength and locomotion in Homo habilis. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2009, 138:90-100.
55. Ruff C.B., Hayes W.C. Cross-sectional geometry of Pecos Pueblo femora and tibiae - a biomechanical investigation. I. Method and general patterns of variation. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1983, 60:359-381.
56. Ruff C.B., Leo F.P. Use of computed tomography in skeletal structure research. Yrbk. Phys. Anthropol. 1986, 29:181-195.
57. Ruff C.B., Holt B.M., Sladek V., Berner M., Murphy W.A., zur Nedden D., Seidler H., Recheis W. Body size, body proportions, and mobility in the Tyrolean "Iceman". J.Hum. Evol. 2006, 51:91-101.
58. Ruff C.B., Holt B.M., Niskanen M., Sladek V., Berner M., Garofalo E., Garvin H.M., Hora M., Maijanen H., Niinimaki S., Salo K., Schuplerova E., Tompkins D. Stature and body mass estimation from skeletal remains in the European Holocene. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2012, 148:601-617.
59. Shipman P. The Man Who Found the Missing Link: Eugene Dubois and his Lifelong Quest to Prove Darwin Right 2001, Simon and Schuster, New York.
60. Soriano M. The fluoric origin of the bone lesion in the Pithecanthropus erectus femur. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1970, 32:49-57.
61. Spoor C.F., Zonneveld F.W., Macho G.A. Linear measurements of cortical bone and dental enamel by computed tomography: applications and problems. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1993, 91:469-484.
62. Steele D.G. Estimation of stature from fragments of long limb bones. Personal Identification in Mass Disasters 1970, 85-97. National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC. T.D. Stewart (Ed.).
63. Steele D.G., McKern T.W. Amethod for assessment of maximum long bone length and living stature from fragmentary long bones. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1969, 31:215-227.
64. Stock J.T., Shaw C.N. Which measures of diaphyseal robusticity are robust? A comparison of external methods of quantifying the strength of long bone diaphyses to cross-sectional geometric properties. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2007, 134:412-423.
65. Theunissen B. Eugene Dubois and the Ape-Man from Java 1989, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
66. Trinkaus E. The lower limb remains. Early Modern Human Evolution in Central Europe. The People of Dolní Vestonice and Pavlov 2006, 380-418. Oxford University Press, Oxford. E. Trinkaus, J. Svoboda (Eds.).
67. Trinkaus E., Ruff C.B. Diaphyseal cross-sectional morphology and biomechanics of the Fond-de-Forêt 1 femur and the Spy 2 femur and tibia. Bull. Soc. R.Belge Anthropol. Préhist. 1989, 100:33-42.
68. Trinkaus E., Ruff C.B. Diaphyseal cross-sectional geometry of Near Eastern Middle Paleolithic humans: the femur. J.Archaeol. Sci. 1999, 26:409-424.
69. Trinkaus E., Ruff C.B. Femoral and tibial diaphyseal cross-sectional geometry in Pleistocene Homo. PaleoAnthropology 2012, 2012:13-62.
70. Trinkaus E., Stringer C.B., Ruff C.B., Hennessy R.J., Roberts M.B., Parfitt S.A. Diaphyseal cross-sectional geometry of the Boxgrove 1 Middle Pleistocene human tibia. J.Hum. Evol. 1999, 37:1-25.
71. Virchow R. Die frage vondem Pithecanthropus erectus. Zeitschrift fur Ethnologie 1895, 27:435-442.
72. von Koenigswald G.H.R., Weidenreich F. The relationship between Pithecanthropus and Sinanthropus. Nature 1939, 144:926-929.
73. Weidenreich F. The discovery of the femur and the humerus of Sinanthropus pekinensis. Nature 1938, 141:614-617.
74. Weidenreich F. The extremity bones of Sinanthropus pekinensis. Paleont. Sinica (N.S. D.) 1941, 5D:1-150.
75. Wolpoff M.H. Some implications of relative biomechanical neck length in hominid femora. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1978, 48:143-148.
76. Zatz L.M. Basic principles of computed tomography scanning. Radiology of the Skull and Brain: Technical Aspects of Computed Tomography 1981, 3853-3876. C.V. Mosby, St. Louis. T.H. Newton, D.G. Potts (Eds.).