Enhanced invasion of metastatic cancer cells via extracellular matrix interface

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2015, Pages

  Zhu, Jiangrui ^a   Liang, Long ^b   Jiao, Yang ^b,c   Liu, Liyu ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS   (China)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Arizona State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOCHIP; BREAST CANCER CELL LINE; CANCER CELL; CELL INVASION; CELL MIGRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; IN VITRO STUDY; METASTASIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; CELL MOTION; DRUG COMBINATION; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SECOND CANCER; TUMOR CELL LINE; TUMOR INVASION; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT;

COLLAGEN; DRUG COMBINATION; LAMININ; MATRIGEL; PROTEOGLYCAN;

CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL MOVEMENT; COLLAGEN; DRUG COMBINATIONS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMANS; LAMININ; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM METASTASIS; NEOPLASMS, SECOND PRIMARY; PROTEOGLYCANS; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT;

EID: 84923321140     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118058     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Sahai E. Mechanisms of cancer cell invasion. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. 2005; 15: 87-96.
2. Wirtz D, Konstantopoulos K, Searson PC. The physics of cancer: the role of physical interactions and mechanical forces in metastasis. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2011; 11: 512-522. doi: 10.1038/nrc3080 PMID: 21701513
3. Joyce JA, Pollard JW. Microenvironmental regulation of metastasis. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2009; 9(4): 239-252. doi: 10.1038/nrc2618 PMID: 19279573
4. Schedin P, Keely PJ. Mammary Gland ECM Remodeling, Stiffness, and Mechanosignaling in Normal Development and Tumor Progression. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011; 3: a003228. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a003228 PMID: 20980442
5. Théry M, Racine V, Piel M, Pépin A, Dimitrov A, Chen Y, et al. Anisotropy of cell adhesivemicroenvironment governs cell internal organization and orientation of polarity. PNAS. 2006; 103(52): 19711-19776.
6. Lu P, Takai K, Weaver VM, Werb Z. Extracellular Matrix Degradation and Remodeling in Development and Disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011; 3(12): a005058. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a005058 PMID: 21917992
7. Friedl P, Locker J, Sahai E, Segall JE. Classifying collective cancer cell invasion. Nature Cell Biology. 2012; 14(8): 777-83. doi: 10.1038/ncb2548 PMID: 22854810
8. Friedl P, Wolf K. Tube Travel: The Role of Proteases in Individual and Collective Cancer Cell Invasion. Cancer Research. 2014; 68(18): 7247-9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0784 PMID: 18794108
9. Das A, Kapoor A, Mehta GD, Ghosh SK, Sen S. Extracellular Matrix Density Regulates Extracellular Proteolysis via Modulation of Cellular Contractility. Journal of Carcinogenesis and mutagenesis. 2013; 13: 003.
10. Harjanto D, Maffei JS, Zaman MH. Quantitative Analysis of the Effect of Cancer Invasiveness and Collagen Concentration on 3D Matrix Remodeling. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6(9): e24891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024891 PMID: 21980363
11. Menon S, Beningo KA. Cancer Cell Invasion Is Enhanced by Applied Mechanical Stimulation. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6(2): e17277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017277 PMID: 21359145
12. Tilghman RW, Cowan CR, Mih JD, Koryakina Y, Gioeli D, Slack-Davis JK, et al. Matrix Rigidity Regulates Cancer Cell Growth and Cellular Phenotype. PLoS ONE. 2010; 5(9): e12905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012905 PMID: 20886123
13. Sander EA, Stylianopoulos T, Tranquillo RT, Barocas VH. Image-based multiscale modeling predicts tissue-level and network-level fiber reorganization in stretched cell-compacted collagen gels. PNAS. 2009; 106 (42): 17675-17680. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903716106 PMID: 19805118
14. Edgar LT, Underwood CJ, Guilkey JE, Hoying JB, Weiss JA. Extracellular Matrix density regulates the rate of neovessel growth and branching in sprouting angiogenesis. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(1): e85178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085178 PMID: 24465500
15. Gillette BM, Rossen NS, Das N, Leong D, Wang M, Dugar A, et al. Engineering extracellular matrix structure in 3D multiphase tissues. Biomaterials. 2011; 32: 8067-8076. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.043 PMID: 21840047
16. Dallon JC, Sherratt JA, Maini PK. Mathematical modelling of extracellular matrix dynamics using discrete cells: fiber orientation and tissue regeneration. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 1999; 199(4): 449-71. PMID: 10441462
17. Yu X, Machesky LM. Cells assemble invadopodia-like structures and invade into matrigel in a matrix metalloprotease dependent manner in the circular invasion assay. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(2): e30605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030605 PMID: 22347388
18. Hulkower KI, Herber RL. Cell migration and invasion assays as tools for drug discovery. Pharmaceutics. 2011;(1): 107-24.
19. Wlodkowic D, Cooper JM. Tumors on chips: oncology meets microfluidics. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 2010; 14(5): 556-67. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.08.016 PMID: 20832352
20. Evensen NA, Li J, Yang J, Yu X, Sampson NS, Zucker S, et al. Development of a high-throughput three-dimensional invasion assay for anti-cancer drug discovery. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(12): e82811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082811 PMID: 24349367
21. Torquato S. Toward an Ising model of cancer and beyond. Phys Biol. 2011; 8(1): 015017. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/8/1/015017 PMID: 21301063
22. Byrne HM. Dissecting cancer through mathematics: from the cell to the animal model. Nature Review Cancer. 2010; 10(3): 221-30.
23. Anderson AR, Chaplain MA. Continuous and discrete mathematical models of tumor-induced angiogenesis. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. 1998; 60(5): 857-99. PMID: 9739618
24. Kansal AR, Torquato S, Harsh GR IV, Chiocca EA, Deisboeck TS. Simulated braintumor growth using a three-dimensional cellular automaton. J Theor Biol. 2000; 203(4): 367-82. PMID: 10736214
25. Kansal AR, Torquato S, Chiocca EA, Deisboeck TS. Emergence of a subpopulation in a computational model of tumor growth. J Theor Biol. 2000; 207(3): 431-41. PMID: 11082311
26. Schmitz JE, Kansal AR, Torquato S. A Cellular Automaton Model of Brain Tumor Treatment and Resistance. J Theor Med. 2002; 4: 223-239.
27. Gevertz JL, Torquato S. Modeling the effects of vasculature evolution on early brain tumor growth. J Theor Biol. 2006; 243: 517-531. PMID: 16938311
28. Gevertz JL, Gillies GT, Torquato S. Simulating tumor growth in conned heterogeneous environments. Phys Biol. 2008; 5: 036010. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/5/3/036010 PMID: 18824788
29. Gevertz JL, Torquato S. Growing heterogeneous tumors in silico. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009; 80: 051910. PMID: 20365009
30. Anderson AR. A hybrid mathematical model of solid tumor invasion: the important of cell adhesion. Math Med Biol. 2005; 22: 163-86. PMID: 15781426
31. Anderson AR, Weaver AM, Cummings PT, Quaranta V. Tumor morphology and phenotypic evolution driven by selective pressure from microenvironment. Cell. 2006; 127(5): 905-15. PMID: 17129778
32. Bankhead A III, Heckendorn RB. Using evolvable genetic cellular automata to model breast cancer. Genet Program Evolvable Mach. 2007; 8(4): 381-393.
33. Alarcon T, Byrne HM, Maini PK. A cellular automaton model for tumour growth in inhomogeneous environment. J Theor Biol. 2003; 225(2): 257-74. PMID: 14575659
34. Oshmyansky AR, Maini PK. A new neurosurgical tool incorporating differential geometry and cellular automata techniques. Biophysical Reviews and Letters. 2008; 3: 103-110.
35. Deutsch A, Dormann S. Cellular Automaton Modeling of Biological Pattern Formation. Basel: Birkhäuser. 2004;300 p.
36. Shin Y, Jeon JS, Han S, Jung GS, Shin S, Lee SH, et al. In vitro 3D collective sprouting angiogenesis under orchestrated ANG-1 and VEGF gradients. Lab Chip. 2011; 11(13): 2175-81. doi: 10.1039/c1lc20039a PMID: 21617793
37. Haessler U, Kalinin Y, Swartz MA, Wu M. Anagarose-based microfluidic platform with a gradient buffer for 3D chemotaxis studies. Biomed Microdevices. 2009; 11(4): 827-835. doi: 10.1007/s10544-009-9299-3 PMID: 19343497
38. Kothapalli CR, van Veen E, de Valence S, Chung S, Zervantonakis IK, Gertler FB, et al. A highthroughput microfluidic assay to study neurite response to growth factor gradients. Lab Chip. 2011; 11(3): 497-507. doi: 10.1039/c0lc00240b PMID: 21107471
39. Poincloux R, Lizárraga F, Chavrier P. Matrix invasion by tumour cells: a focus on MT1-MMP trafficking to invadopodia. Journal of Cell Science. 2009; 122(17): 3015-24. doi: 10.1242/jcs.034561 PMID: 19692588
40. Poincloux R, Collin O, Lizárraga F, Romao M, Debray M, Piel M, et al. Contractility of the cell rear drives invasion of breast tumor cells in 3D Matrigel. PNAS. 2010; 108(5): 1943-1948.
41. Koch TM, Munster S, Bonakdar N, Butler JP, Fabry B. 3D Traction Forces in Cancer Cell Invasion. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(3): e33476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033476 PMID: 22479403
42. Liu L, Duclos G, Sun B, Lee J, Wu A, Kam Y, et al. Minimization of thermodynamic costs in cancer cell invasion. PNAS. 2012; 110(5): 1686-1691. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221147110 PMID: 23319630
43. Kabla AJ. Collective cell migration: leadership, invasion and segregation. J R Soc Interface. 2012; 9(77): 3268-78. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0448 PMID: 22832363
44. Nguyen-Ngoc KV, Cheung KJ, Brenot A, Shamir ER, Gray RS, Hines WC, et al. ECM microenvironment regulates collective migration and local dissemination in normal and malignant mammary epithelium. PNAS. 2012; 109(39):E2595-E2604. PMID: 22923691
45. Muinonen Martin AJ, Veltman DM, Kalna G, Insall RH. An Improved Chamber for Direct Visualisation of Chemotaxis. PLoS ONE. 2010; 5(12): e15309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015309 PMID: 21179457
46. Jiao Y, Torquato S. Emergent Behaviors from a Cellular Automaton Model for Invasive Tumor Growth in Heterogeneous Microenvironments. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011; 7(12): e1002314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002314 PMID: 22215996
47. Jiao Y, Torquato S. Diversity of dynamics and morphologies of invasive solid tumors. AIP Advances. 2012; 2: 011003.
48. Jiao Y, Torquato S. Evolution and morphology of microenvironment-enhanced malignancy of threedimensional invasive solid tumors. Phys Rev E. 2013; 87(5): 052707. PMID: 23767566
49. Chen D, Jiao Y, Torquato S. A Cellular Automaton Model for Tumor Dormancy: Emergence of a Proliferative Switch. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(10): e109934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109934 PMID: 25329892
50. Dewitt DD, Kaszuba SN, Thompson DM, Stegemann JP. Collagen I-Matrigel scaffolds for enhanced schwann cell survival and control of three-dimensional cell morphology. Tissue Engineering Part A. 2009; 15(10): 2785-93. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2008.0406 PMID: 19231925
51. Neofytou EA, Chang E, Patlola B, Joubert LM, Rajadas J, Gambhir SS, et al. Adipose tissue-derived stem cells display a proangiogenic phenotype on 3D scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011; 98(3): 383-93. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.33113 PMID: 21630430