Policy coherency and regime complexes: The case of genetic resources

Review of International Studies

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 303-324

  Morin, Jean Frédéric ^a   Orsini, Amandine ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^b FACULTÉS UNIVERSITAIRES SAINT LOUIS   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923267828     PISSN: 02602105     EISSN: 14699044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0260210513000168     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Robert O. Keohane, and David G. Victor, 'The Regime Complex for Climate Change', Perspectives on Politics, 9 (2011), pp. 7-23;
2. Amandine Orsini, Jean-Frédéric Morin, and Oran Young, 'Regime Complexes: A Buzz, a Boom or a Boost for Global Governance?', Global Governance, 19 (2013), p. 29.
3. Kal Raustiala and David G. Victor, 'The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources', International Organization, 32 (2004), p. 148.
4. Robin Pistorius, 'Forum Shopping: Issue Linkages in Genetic Resources Issue', in Robert V. Barlett, Priya A. Kurian, and Madhu Malik (eds), International Organisations and Environmental Policy (Westport: Greenwood Press, 1995), pp. 209-22;
5. Regine Andersen, 'The Time Dimension in International Regime Interplay', Global Environmental Politics, 2 (2003), pp. 98-117;
6. Kristin G. Rosendal, 'Impacts of Overlapping International Regimes: The Case of Biodiversity', Global Governance, 7 (2001), pp. 95- 117;
7. Laurence R. Helfer, 'Regime shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of Intellectual Property Lawmaking', Yale Journal of International Law, 29 (2004), pp. 1-83;
8. Christoph Görg and Ulrich Brand, 'Contested Regimes in the International Political Economy: Global Regulation of Genetic Resources and the Internationalization of the State', Global Environmental Politics, 6 (2006), pp. 101-23;
9. Kristin G. Rosendal, 'Regulating the Use of Genetic Resources Between International Authorities', European Environment, 16 (2006), pp. 265-77.
10. Marc L. Busch, 'Overlapping Institutions, Forum Shopping, and Dispute Settlement in International Trade', International Organization, 61 (2007), pp. 735-61;
11. Peter Drahos, and John Braithwaite, Information Feudalism (New York: New Press 2003).
12. Tana Johnson and Johannes Urpelainen, 'A Strategic Theory of Regime Integration and Separation', International Organization, 66:4 (2012), p. 673, emphasis added.
13. Sebastian Oberthür and Thomas Gehring, 'Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: The Case of the Cartagena Protocol and the World Trade Organization', Global Environmental Politics, 6 (2006), p. 26.
14. Robert O. Keohane, 'The Demand for International Regime', International Organization, 36 (1982), pp. 325-55.
15. Thomas Gehring, and Sebastian Oberthür, 'The Causal Mechanisms of Interaction between International Institutions', European Journal of International Relations, 15 (2009), pp. 129.
16. Jean-Frédéric Morin and Amandine Orsini, 'Regime Complexity and Policy Coherency', Global Governance, 19 (2013), pp. 41-51.
17. Michael Di Francesco, 'Process not Outcome in New Public Management? Policy Coherence in Australian Government', The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, 1 (2001), pp. 103-16.
18. Kathleen Thelen, 'Timing and Temporality in the Analysis of Institutional Evolution and Change', Studies in American Political Development, 14 (2000), p. 101.
19. Raymond F. Hopkins, 'The International Role of Domestic Bureaucracy', International Organization, 30 (1976), pp. 405-32;
20. Graham Allison and Philipp Zelikow, Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (Reading: Addison-Wesley 1999);
21. Daniel Drezner, 'Ideas, Bureaucratic Politics, and the Crafting of Foreign Policy', American Journal of Political Science, 44 (2000), pp. 733-49.
22. Robert O. Keohane, After Hegemony. Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984), p. 104.
23. Karen J. Alter and Sophie Meunier, 'The Politics of International Regime Complexity', Perspectives on Politics, 7 (2009), p. 20.
24. Peter J. May, Soshua Sapotichne, and Samuel Workman, 'Policy Coherence and Policy Domains', The Policy Studies Journal, 34 (2006), pp. 381-403.
25. Robert Jervis, Perception and Misperception in International Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976), p. 319.
26. Margaret S. Archer, Realist Social Theory: the Morphogenetic Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), p. 61;
27. Walter Carlsneas, 'The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis', International Studies Quarterly, 36 (1992), pp. 245-70.
28. Amandine Bled, 'Technological Choices in International Environmental Negotiations: An Actor-Network Analysis', Business & Society, 49 (2010), pp. 570-90.
29. Jean-Frédéric Morin, 'Rhetorical Discourses in International Patent Lawmaking: Property, Fairness, and Well-Being', Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy, 3 (2008), pp. 505-37.
30. Steven Bernstein, The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 2001).
31. David Vivas-Engui and Maria Julia Olivia, Biodiversity and Intellectual Property in North-South Free Trade Agreements (Geneva: ICTSD, 2010).
32. Valbona Muzaka, 'Regime Linkages, Contests and Overlaps in the Global Intellectual Property Rights', European Journal of International Relations, 20 (2010), pp. 1-22.
33. Frederick M. Abbott, 'The Future of the Multilateral Trading System in the Context of TRIPS', Hasting International and Comparative Law Review, 20 (1997), pp. 661-82;
34. Graham Dutfield, 'TRIPS-related Aspects of Traditional Knowledge', Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 33 (2001), pp. 233-75;
35. Ahmed A. Latif, Developing Country Coordination in International Intellectual Property Standard-Setting (Geneva: South Centre, 2005);
36. Michael Petit, Cary Fowler,Wanda Collins, Carlos Correa, and Carl-Gustaf Thornstom,Why Governments Can't Make Policy, The Case of Plant Genetic Resources in the International Arena (Lima, International Potato Centre, 2001).
37. Dirk De Bièvre and Lars Thomann, 'Forum Shopping in the Global Intellectual Property Rights Regime', paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, New Orleans (2010).
38. OECD, Key biotechnology indicators (December 2011), p. 6, available at: {http://www.oecd.org/science/innovationinsciencetechnologyandindustry/49303992.pdf}.
39. Matthias Buck and Clare Hamilton, 'The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity', Review of International Environmental Law, 20:1 (2011), pp. 47-61.
40. Steve Suppan, Amending WTO intellectual Property Rules to Prevent Bio-Piracy and Improve Patent Quality (Minneapolis: Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, 2006).
41. Sebastian Oberthür and Florian Rabitz, 'EU Performance in the Negotiations on the Nagoya Protocol: Revival of EU Global Environmental Leadership?', in Sebastian Oberthü r and Kristin Rosendal (eds), Global Governance of Genetic Resources: Access to and Benefit-Sharing after the Nagoya Protocol, (London: Routledge, 2013).
42. Philippe Cullet, 'Liability and Redress: International Trends and Domestic Policy Options', paper presented at the National Consultations on Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, New Delhi (2005).
43. Daniel Kraus and Markus Rûssli, 'Access and Benefit Sharing User Measures in Switzerland', The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 14 (2011), p. 5.
44. Marc Hufty, Tobias Schulz, and Maurice Tschopp, 'The role of Switzerland in the Nagoya Protocol Negotiations', in Oberthür and Rosendal (eds), Global Governance of Genetic Resources.