Greenhouse gas mitigation on marginal land: A quantitative review of the relative benefits of forest recovery versus biofuel production

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 2503-2511

  Evans, Samuel G ^a   Ramage, Benjamin S ^b,c   Dirocco, Tara L ^b   Potts, Matthew D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c RANDOLPH MACON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; BIOFUELS; CARBON; CLIMATE CHANGE; CROPS; CULTIVATION; ECOLOGY; GREENHOUSE GASES; LAND USE; PALM OIL; RECOVERY; REFORESTATION;

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIONS; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES; GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG); GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION; LAND USE/LAND COVER CHANGE; PRODUCTION PATHWAYS; SOIL CARBON DYNAMICS;

PETROLEUM INDUSTRY;

BIOFUEL; CLIMATE CHANGE; ENERGY CROP; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; FOREST RESOURCE; GREENHOUSE GAS; LAND MANAGEMENT; LAND USE PLANNING; SUCCESSION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; BIOENERGY; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; CARBON DYNAMICS; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CROP PRODUCTION; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; FOREST; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GREENHOUSE GAS; LAND USE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REFORESTATION; REVIEW; SOIL; AGRICULTURE; BIOMASS; CHEMISTRY; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; METABOLISM; PREVENTION AND CONTROL;

ELAEIS; POACEAE; ZEA MAYS;

BIOFUEL; CARBON; SOIL;

AGRICULTURE; BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; CARBON; ECOSYSTEM; FORESTS; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; SOIL;

EID: 84923106771     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es502374f     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Fargione, J.; Hill, J.; Tilman, D.; Polasky, S.; Hawthorne, P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt Science 2008, 319, 1235-1238
2. Gibbs, H. K.; Johnston, M.; Foley, J. A.; Holloway, T.; Monfreda, C.; Ramankutty, N.; Zaks, D. Carbon payback times for crop-based biofuel expansion in the tropics: The effects of changing yield and technology Environ. Res. Lett. 2008, 3, 034001
3. Lange, M. The GHG balance of biofuels taking into account land-use change Energy Policy 2011, 39, 2373-2385
4. Campbell, J. E.; Lobell, D. B.; Genova, R. C.; Field, C. B. The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agriculture lands Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 5791-5794
5. Somerville, C.; Youngs, H.; Taylor, C.; Davis, S. C.; Long, S. P. Feedstocks for lignocellulosic biofuels Science 2010, 329, 790-792
6. Wang, M.; Han, J.; Dunn, J. B.; Cai, H.; Elgowainy, A. Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane, and cellulosic biomass for US use Environ. Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 045905
7. Nilsson, S.; Schopfhauser, W. The carbon-sequestration potential of a global afforestation program Clim. Change 1995, 30, 267-293
8. Silver, W. L.; Ostertag, R.; Lugo, A. E. The potential for carbon sequestration through reforestation of abandoned tropical agricultural and pasture lands Restor. Ecol. 2000, 8, 394-407
9. Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Fifteenth Session, Held in Copenhagen from 7 to 19 December 2009; UNFCCC: Copenhagen, DM, 2010; p 43.
10. Edwards, D. P.; Fisher, B.; Boyd, E. Protecting degraded rainforests: Enhancement of forest carbon stocks under REDD+ Conserv. Lett. 2010, 3, 313-316
11. Houghton, R. A. Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850-2000 Tellus 2003, 55, 378-390
12. Anderson-Teixeira, K. J.; Delucia, E. H. The greenhouse gas value of ecosystems Global Change Biol. 2011, 17, 425-438
13. Righelato, R.; Spracklen, D. V. Carbon mitigation by biofuels or by saving and restoring forests? Science 2007, 317, 902
14. Searchinger, T.; Heimlich, R.; Houghton, R. A.; Dong, F.; Elobeid, A.; Fabiosa, J.; Tokgoz, S.; Hayes, D.; Yu, T.-H. Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change Science 2008, 319, 1238-1240
15. Kauffman, J. B.; Hughes, R. F.; Heider, C. Carbon pool and biomass dynamics associated with deforestation, land use, and agricultural abandonment in the neotropics Ecol. Appl. 2009, 19, 1211-1222
16. Hughes, R. F.; Kauffmann, J. B.; Jaramillo, V. J. Biomass, carbon, and nutrient dynamics of secondary forests in a humid tropical region of Mexico Ecology 1999, 80, 1892-1907
17. Tremblay, S.; Périé, C.; Ouimet, R. Changes in organic carbon storage in a 50 year white spruce plantation chronosequence established on fallow land in Quebec Can. J. For. Res. 2006, 36, 2713-2723
18. Alberti, G.; Peressotti, A.; Piussi, P.; Zerbi, G. Forest ecosystem carbon accumulation during a secondary succession in the eastern prealps of Italy Forestry 2008, 81, 1-11
19. Risch, A. C.; Jurgensen, M. F.; Page-Dumroese, D. S.; Wildi, O.; Schütz, M. Long-term development of above- and below-ground carbon stocks following land-use change in subalpine ecosystems of the Swiss National Park Can. J. For. Res. 2008, 38, 1590-1602
20. Ngo, K. M.; Turner, B. L.; Muller-Landau, H. C.; Davies, S. J.; Larjavaara, M.; Nik Hassan, N. F. B.; Lum, S. Carbon stocks in primary and secondary tropical forests in Singapore For. Ecol. Manage. 2013, 296, 81-89
21. Byrne, K. A. Carbon stocks and sequestration in plantation forests in the Republic of Ireland Forestry 2006, 79, 361-369
22. Gough, C. M.; Vogel, C. S.; Kazanski, C.; Nagel, L.; Flower, C. E.; Curtis, P. S. Coarse woody debris and the carbon balance of a north temperate forest For. Ecol. Manage. 2007, 244, 60-67
23. Palm, C. A.; Woomer, P. L.; Alegre, J.; Arevalo, L.; Castilla, C.; Cordeiro, D. G.; Feigl, B.; Hairiah, K.; Mendes, A.; Moukam, A.; Carbon Sequestration and Trace Gas Emissions in Slash-and-Burn and Alternative Land Uses in the Humid Tropics; ASB: Nairobi, Kenya, 1999.
24. Lewandowski, I.; Scurlock, J. M. O.; Lindvall, E.; Christou, M. The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe Biomass Bioenergy 2003, 25, 335-361
25. Guo, L. B.; Gifford, R. M. Soil carbon stocks and land-use change: A meta analysis Global Change Biol. 2002, 8, 345-360
26. IPCC. Agriculture, forestry, and other land use. In 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories; Eggleston, H. S.; Buendia, L.; Miwa, K.; Ngara, T.; Tanabe, K., Eds.; IGES: Japan, 2006; Vol. 4.
27. Mokany, K.; Raison, R. J.; Prokushkin, A. S. Critical analysis of root:shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes Global Change Biol. 2006, 12, 84-96
28. Bonner, M. T. L.; Schmidt, S.; Shoo, L. P. A meta-analytical global comparison of aboveground biomass accumulation between tropical secondary forests and monoculture plantations For. Ecol. Manage. 2013, 291, 73-86
29. Scown, C. D.; Nazaroff, W. W.; Mishra, U.; Strogen, B.; Lobscheid, A. B.; Masanet, E.; Santero, N. J.; Horvath, A.; McKone, T. E. Lifecycle greenhouse gas implications of US national scenarios for cellulosic ethanol production Environ. Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 1-9
30. Renewable Fuel Standard Program (RFS2) Regulatory Impact Analysis; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2010; p 1109.
31. Edwards, R.; Larive, J.-F.; Rickeard, D.; Weindorf, W. Well-to-Tank Version 4 JEC Well-to-Wheels Analysis; European Union: Luxembourg, 2013; p 134.
32. Miguez, F. E.; Maughan, M.; Bollero, G. A.; Long, S. P. Modeling spatial and dynamic variation in growth, yield, and yield stability of the bioenergy crops Miscanthus × Giganteus and Panicum virgatum across the conterminous United States GCB Bioenergy 2012, 4, 509-520
33. Corley, R. H. V.; Tinker, P. B. The Oil Palm; 4 th ed.; Blackwell Science Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2003.
34. Duval, B. D.; Anderson-Teixeira, K. J.; Davis, S. C.; Keogh, C.; Long, S. P.; Parton, W. J.; DeLucia, E. H. Predicting greenhouse gas emissions and soil carbon from changing pasture to an energy crop PLoS One 2013, 8, e72019
35. Anderson-Teixeira, K. J.; Davis, S. C.; Masters, M. D.; Delucia, E. H. Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops GCB Bioenergy 2009, 1, 75-96
36. Davis, S. C.; Parton, W. J.; Del Grosso, S. J.; Keough, C.; Marx, E.; Adler, P. R.; DeLucia, E. H. Impact of second-generation biofuel agriculture on greenhouse gas emissions in the corn-growing regions of the US Front. Ecol. Environ. 2011, 10, 69-74
37. 2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2008, 8, 389-395
38. Koponen, K.; Soimakallio, S.; Tsupari, E.; Thun, R.; Antikainen, R. GHG emission performance of various liquid transportation biofuels in Finland in accordance with the EU sustainability criteria Appl. Energy 2013, 102, 440-448
39. Camargo, G. G. T.; Ryan, M. R.; Richard, T. L. Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions from crop production using the farm energy analysis tool Bioscience 2013, 63, 263-273
40. Sugarcane-Based Bioethanol: Energy for Sustainable Development; BNDES and CGEE: Rio de Janeiro, 2008; pp 1-304.
41. Alston, J. M.; Beddow, J. M.; Pardey, P. G. Agriculture. Agricultural research, productivity, and food prices in the long run Science 2009, 325, 1209-1210
42. DiRocco, T.; Ramage, B.; Evans, S.; Potts, M. Accountable accounting: Carbon-based management on marginal lands Forests 2014, 5, 847-861
43. Rajagopal, D.; Hochman, G.; Zilberman, D. Indirect fuel use change (IFUC) and the lifecycle environmental impact of biofuel policies Energy Policy 2011, 39, 228-233
44. Xiaoguang Chen, M. K. The market-mediated effects of low carbon fuel policies AgBioForum 2012, 15, 89-105
45. Soimakallio, S. Toward a more comprehensive greenhouse gas emissions assessment of biofuels: The case of forest-based Fischer-Tropsch diesel production in Finland Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 3031-3038
46. Schwaiger, H. P.; Bird, D. N. Integration of albedo effects caused by land-use change into the climate balance: Should we still account in greenhouse gas units? For. Ecol. Manage. 2010, 260, 278-286
47. Kirschbaum, M. U. F.; Whitehead, D.; Dean, S. M.; Beets, P. N.; Shepherd, J. D.; Ausseil, A.-G. E. Implications of albedo changes following afforestation on the benefits of forests as carbon sinks Biogeosciences 2011, 8, 3687-3696
48. 2 concentrations on the climate of Amazonia J. Clim. 2000, 13, 18-34
49. Anderson-Teixeira, K. J.; Snyder, P. K.; Twine, T. E.; Cuadra, S. V.; Costa, M. H.; DeLucia, E. H. Climate-regulation services of natural and agricultural ecoregions of the Americas Nat. Clim. Change 2012, 2, 177-181
50. Bright, R. M.; Cherubini, F.; Strømman, A. H. Climate impacts of bioenergy: Inclusion of carbon cycle and albedo dynamics in life cycle impact assessment Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2012, 37, 2-11
51. Gibson, L.; Lee, T. M.; Koh, L. P.; Brook, B. W.; Gardner, T. A.; Barlow, J.; Peres, C. A.; Bradshaw, C. J. A.; Laurance, W. F.; Lovejoy, T. E. Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity Nature 2011, 478, 378-381
52. Green, R. E.; Cornell, S. J.; Scharlemann, J. P. W.; Balmford, A. Farming and the fate of wild nature Science 2005, 307, 550-555
53. Foley, J. A.; Defries, R.; Asner, G. P.; Barford, C.; Bonan, G.; Carpenter, S. R.; Chapin, F. S.; Coe, M. T.; Daily, G. C.; Gibbs, H. K. Global consequences of land use Science 2005, 309, 570-574
54. Smith, P.; Bustamante, M.; Ahammad, H.; Clark, H.; Dong, H.; Elsiddig, E.; Haberl, H.; Harper, R.; House, J.; Jafari, M.; Agriculture, forestry, and other land use (AFOLU). In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 2014; p 179.