The study of cellulose structure and depolymerization through single-molecule methods

Industrial Biotechnology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 16-24

  Rose, Markus ^a   Babi, Mouhanad ^a   Moran Mirabal, Jose ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASPECT RATIO; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOCONVERSION; BIOHAZARDS; BIOMASS; ENZYMES; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; FLUOROPHORES; MOLECULAR ORIENTATION; MOLECULES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SUGARS; TOPOGRAPHY;

CELLULOSE STRUCTURES; CRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; ENZYMATIC TREATMENTS; HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS; LOCALIZATION AND TRACKING; MOLECULAR MECHANISM; SINGLE-MOLECULE METHODS; SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL RESOLUTIONS;

CELLULOSE;

EID: 84923105560     PISSN: 15509087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/ind.2014.0019     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Kumar P, Barrett DM, Delwiche MJ, Stroeve P. Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind Eng Chem Res 2009;48:3713-3729.
2. Regalbuto JR. Cellulosic biofuels - Got gasoline? Science 2009:325:822-824.
3. Pauly M, Keegstra K. Cell-wall carbohydrates and their modification as a resource for biofuels. Plant J 2008;54:559-568.
4. Chapple C, Ladisch M, Meilan R. Loosening lignin's grip on biofuel production. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25(7):746-748.
5. O'Sullivan AC. Cellulose: The structure slowly unravels. Cellulose 1997;4:173-207.
6. Zhang J, Elder TJ, Pu Y, Ragauskas AJ. Facile synthesis of spherical cellulose nanoparticles. Carbohyd Poly 2007;69:607-611.
7. Mosier N. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 2005;96:673-686.
8. Chandel AK, Chandrasekhar G, Radhika K. Bioconversion of pentose sugars into ethanol: A review and future directions. Biotechnol Mol Biol 2011;6:8-20.
9. Kumar R, Singh S, Singh OV. Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: Biochemical and molecular perspectives. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2008;35:377-391.
10. Duff S, Murray WD. Bioconversion of forest products industry waste cellulosics to fuel ethanol: A review. Bioresour Technol 1996;55:1-33.
11. Henrissat B, Teeri TT, Warren R. A scheme for designating enzymes that hydrolyse the polysaccharides in the cell walls of plants. FEBS Letters 1998;425(2):352-354.
12. Moran-Mirabal JM, Corgie SC, Bolewski JC, et al. Labeling and purification of cellulose-binding proteins for high resolution fluorescence applications. Anal Chem 2009;81:7981-7987.
13. Giepmans BNG. The fluorescent toolbox for assessing protein location and function. Science 2006;312:217-224.
14. Moran-Mirabal JM. The study of cell wall structure and cellulose-cellulase interactions through fluorescence microscopy. Cellulose 2013;20:2291-2309.
15. Hobbie JE, Daley RJ, Jasper S. Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 1977;33:1225-1228.
16. Lebaron P, Troussellier M, Got P. Accuracy of epifluorescence microscopy counts for direct estimates of bacterial numbers. J Microbiol Methods 1994;19:89-94.
17. White JG, Amos WB, Fordham M. An evaluation of confocal versus conventional imaging of biological structures by fluorescence light microscopy. J Cell Biol 1987;105:41-48.
18. Axelrod D, Burghardt TP, Thompson NL. Total internal reflection fluorescence. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng 1984;13:247-268.
19. Axelrod D. Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy in cell biology. Traffic 2001;2:764-774.
20. Paige MF, Bjerneld EJ, Moerner WE. A comparison of through-the-objective total internal reflection microscopy and epifluorescence microscopy for single-molecule fluorescence imaging. Single Mol 2001;2:191-201.
21. Böhmer M, Enderlein J. Orientation imaging of single molecules by wide-field epifluorescence microscopy. JOSA B 2003;20:554-559.
22. Jaqaman K, Loerke D, Mettlen M, et al. Robust single-particle tracking in live-cell time-lapse sequences. Nat Meth 2008;5:695-702.
23. Cheezum MK, Walker WF, Guilford WH. Quantitative comparison of algorithms for tracking single fluorescent particles. Biophys J 2001;81:2378-2388.
24. Sibarita JB. High-density single-particle tracking: Quantifying molecule organization and dynamics at the nanoscale. Histochem Cell Biol 2014;141:587-595.
25. Crocker J. Methods of digital video microscopy for colloidal studies. J Colloid Interface Sci 1996;179:298-310.
26. Ando T, Kodera N, Takai E, et al. A high-speed atomic force microscope for studying biological macromolecules. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2001;98:12468-12472.
27. Hell SW. Toward fluorescence nanoscopy. Nat Biotechnol 2003;21:1347-1355.
28. Gustafsson MGL. Nonlinear structured-illumination microscopy: Wide-field fluorescence imaging with theoretically unlimited resolution. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2005;102:13081.
29. Henriques R, Lelek M, Fornasiero EF, et al. QuickPALM: 3D real-time photoactivation nanoscopy image processing in ImageJ. Nat Methods 2010;7:339-340.
30. Bates M, Huang B, Zhuang X. Super-resolution microscopy by nanoscale localization of photo-switchable fluorescent probes. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2008;12:505-514.
31. Sedin DL, Rowlen KL. Influence of tip size on AFM roughness measurements. Appl Surface Sci 2001;182:40-48.
32. Chen Y, Huang W. Numerical simulation of the geometrical factors affecting surface roughness measurements by AFM. Meas Sci Technol 2004;15:2005.
33. Fotiadis D, Scheuring S, Müller SA, et al. Imaging and manipulation of biological structures with the AFM. Micron 2002;33:385-397.
34. Igarashi K, Koivula A, Wada M, et al. High speed atomic force microscopy visualizes processive movement of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I on crystalline cellulose. J Biol Chem 2009;284:36186-36190.
35. Marszalek PE, Dufrêne YF. Stretching single polysaccharides and proteins using atomic force microscopy. Chem Soc Rev 2012;41:3523-3534.
36. Dagel DJ, Liu YS, Zhong L, Luo Y. In situ imaging of single carbohydrate-binding modules on cellulose microfibrils. J Phys Chem B 2011;115:635-641.
37. Ding SY, Xu Q, Ali M, et al. Versatile derivatives of carbohydrate-binding modules for imaging of complex carbohydrates approaching the molecular level of resolution. BioTechniques 2006;41:435-443.
38. Xu Q, Tucker MP, Arenkiel P, et al. Labeling the planar face of crystalline cellulose using quantum dots directed by type-I carbohydrate-binding modules. Cellulose 2008;16:19-26.
39. Zhang M, Wu SC, Zhou W, Xu B. Imaging and measuring single-molecule interaction between a carbohydrate-binding module and natural plant cell wall cellulose. J Phys Chem B 2012;116:9949-9956.
40. Zhang M, Wang B, Xu B. Mapping single molecular binding kinetics of carbohydrate-binding module with crystalline cellulose by atomic force microscopy recognition imaging. J Phys Chem B 2014;118:6714-6720.
41. Moran-Mirabal JM, Bolewski JC, Walker LP. Thermobifida fusca cellulases exhibit limited surface diffusion on bacterial micro-crystalline cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 2013;110:47-56.
42. Vogelsang J, Kasper R, Steinhauer C, et al. A reducing and oxidizing system minimizes photobleaching and blinking of fluorescent dyes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2008;47:5465-5469.
43. Teeri TT, Koivula A, Linder M, Wohlfahrt G. Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolases: Why so efficient on crystalline cellulose? Biochem Soc Trans 1998;26:173-178.
44. Jung J, Sethi A, Gaiotto T, et al. Binding and movement of individual Cel7A cellobiohydrolases on crystalline cellulose surfaces revealed by single-molecule fluorescence imaging. J Biol Chem 2013;288:24164-24172.
45. Igarashi K, Uchihashi T, Koivula A, et al. Traffic jams reduce hydrolytic efficiency of cellulase on cellulose surface. Science 2011;333:1279-1282.
46. Shibafuji Y, Nakamura A, Uchihashi T, et al. Single-molecule imaging analysis of elementary reaction steps of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I (Cel7A) hydrolyzing crystalline cellulose Ia and IIII. J Biol Chem 2014;289:14056-14065.
47. Igarashi K, Wada M, Samejima, M. Activation of crystalline cellulose to cellulose IIII results in efficient hydrolysis by cellobiohydrolase. FEBS J 2007;274:1785-1792.
48. Rasnik I, McKinney SA, Ha T. Nonblinking and long-lasting single-molecule fluorescence imaging. Nat Methods 2006;3:891-893.
49. Beckham GT, Matthews JF, Peters B, et al. Molecular-level origins of biomass recalcitrance: Decrystallization free energies for four common cellulose polymorphs. J Phys Chem B 2011;115:4118-4127.