Exploring wind power: Improving mathematical thinking through digital fabrication

Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 401-421

  Tillman, Daniel A ^a   An, Song A ^a   Cohen, Jonathan D ^b   Kjellstrom, William ^c   Boren, Rachel L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923066897     PISSN: 10558896     EISSN: 19435916     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. An, S. A., Kulm, G., & Ma, T. (2008). The effects of a music composition activity on Chinese students' attitudes and beliefs towards mathematics: An exploratory study. Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 81-98.
2. An, S. A., Ma, T., & Capraro, M. M. (2011). Preservice teachers' beliefs and attitude about teaching and learning mathematics through music: An intervention study. School Science and Mathematics, 111, 235-247.
3. Berns, R., & Erickson, P. (2001). Contextual teaching and learning. National Dissemination Center, National Research Center. Retrieved from www.ncte.org/publications/infosynthesus/highlight-zone/highlight05/index.asp.
4. Berry, R., Bull, G., Browning, C., Thomas, C., Starkweather, K., & Aylor, J. (2010). Preliminary considerations regarding use of digital fabrication to incorporate engineering design principles in elementary mathematics education. CITE Journal, 10(2). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol10/iss2/editorial/article1.cfm
5. Brown, M. C., McNeil, N. M., & Glenberg, A. M. (2009). Using concreteness in education: Real problems, potential solutions. Child Development Perspectives, 3(3), 160-164.
6. Bull, G., & Groves, J. (2009). The democratization of production. Learning & Leading with Technology, 37(3), 36-37.
7. Clement, L. (2004, September). A model for understanding, using, and connecting representations. TCM, 97-102.
8. Clements, D. (2003). Teaching and learning geometry. In J. Kilpatrick, W. Martin & D. Shifter (Eds.), Research companion to Principles and Standards for school mathematics (pp. 151-178). Reston, VA: NCTM.
9. Cohen, J., Ducamp, G., Kjellstrom, W. & Tillman, D. (2012). What happens when children encounter the t-book?: The potential for transmedia books in teacher education. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (pp. 1033-1040). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
10. Contextual Learning Institute and Consortium. (1997). Project final report. Corvallis: Oregon State University School of Education.
11. Erickson, F. (1982). The analysis of audiovisual recordings as a primary data source. In A. Grimshaw (Ed.), Sound-image recordings in social interaction research. Special issue of Journal of Sociological Methods and Research, 11(2), 213-232.
12. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In Merlin Wittrock (Ed.) Handbook of research on teaching. AERA.
13. Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students learning. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371-404). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
14. Kaminski, J., Sloutsky, V., and Heckler, A. (2009). Transfer of mathematical knowledge: the portability of generic instantiations. Child Development Perspectives, 3(3), 151-155.
15. Kjellstrom, W., Tillman, D. & Cohen, J. (2012). The paper airplane contest: Fabricating for flight and mathematical problem solving. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (pp, 1046-1051). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
16. Knezek, G., Christensen, R., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2011). Contrasting perceptions of STEM content and careers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11(1). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol11/iss1/general/article1.cfm
17. Lajoie, S. (2003). Transitions and trajectories for studies of expertise. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 21-25.
18. Lynch, R., Padilla, M., Harnish, D., & DiStephano, C. (2001). A model of excellence for contextual teaching and learning in preservice teacher education: Final and summative report." Athens: University of Georgia.
19. Malcolm, P., Tillman, D. & Uguz, C. (2012). Customizable mechatronics tools for engineering design in teacher preparation and k-12 education. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (pp. 1060-1065). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
20. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, Second Edition. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
21. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA.: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2010). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA.: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
23. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
24. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition. NY, NY: The Free Press.
25. Roth, W. (1996). Art and artifact of children's designing: A situated cognition perspective. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 129-166.
26. Sears, S., & Hersh, S. (1999). Contextual teaching and learning: Teacher education programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
27. Slykhuis, D., Cline, T., Kjellstrom, W., Bell, R., Tillman, D., Lenk, C., Thornburg, D., Spector, M. & Barbier, S. (2012). Creating a NASA MMS transmedia book. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (pp. 1066-1069). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
28. Stevens, C. (1996). Elementary preservice teachers' knowledge and beliefs regarding science and mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 96(1), 2-9.
29. Tillman, D. (2011). Performance assessment of digital fabrication activities with embedded mathematics pedagogy. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (pp. 898-901). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
30. Tillman, D., Ducamp, G., Dejaegher, C., Cohen, J., Kjellstrom, W. & Smith, S. (2012). A role for digital fabrication activities utilizing the engineering design process in developing preservice elementary teachers' mathematics and science pedagogy. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (pp. 1085-1090). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
31. Tillman, D., Kjellstrom, K., Smith, S., & Yoder, E. (2011). Digital fabrication scaffolds for developing preservice elementary teachers' mathematics pedagogy. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (pp. 892-897). Chesapeake; VA: AACE.
32. Tyler-Wood, T., Knezek, G., & Christensen. R. (2010). Instruments for assessing interest in STEM content and careers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(2), 341-363. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/32311
33. U.S. Department of State. (2012). Virginia Standards of Learning and the No Child Left Behind Act. Retrieved from: http://www.state.gov/m/dghr/flo/c21998.htm
34. Williams, D. (2007). The what, why, and how of contextual teaching in a mathematics classroom. Mathematics Teacher, 100(8), 572-575.