Systematic review of surgical innovation reporting in laparoendoscopic colonic polyp resection

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2015, Pages

  Currie, A ^a   Brigic, A ^a   Blencowe, N S ^b   Potter, S ^b   Faiz, O D ^a,d   Kennedy, R H ^a,d   Blazeby, J M ^b,c  

^a ST MARK S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BRISTOL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY; HUMAN; INVENTION; LAPAROSCOPY; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SELECTION; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; HUMANS; INVENTIONS; LAPAROSCOPY; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PATIENT SELECTION; RESEARCH DESIGN; THERAPIES, INVESTIGATIONAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84923047109     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9675     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Angelos P., The ethical challenges of surgical innovation for patient care. Lancet 2010; 376: 1046-1047.
2. Ergina PL, Cook JA, Blazeby JM, Boutron I, Clavien PA, Reeves BC, et al. Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet 2009; 374: 1097-1104.
3. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 2009; 374: 1105-1112.
4. Blazeby JM, Blencowe NS, Titcomb DR, Metcalfe C, Hollowood AD, Barham CP,. Demonstration of the IDEAL recommendations for evaluating and reporting surgical innovation in minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 544-551.
5. Ahmed HU, Hindley RG, Dickinson L, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Sahu M, et al. Focal therapy for localised unifocal and multifocal prostate cancer: a prospective development study. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: 622-632.
6. Beck DE, Karulf RE,. Laparoscopic-assisted full-thickness endoscopic polypectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 693-695.
7. Brigic A, Southgate A, Sibbons P, Clark SK, Fraser C, Kennedy RH,. Full-thickness laparoendoscopic colonic excision in an experimental model. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 1649-1654.
8. Laws ER,. Complications of transsphenoidal surgery: the shortcomings of meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013; 84: 829.
9. Warnke PC,. Case series analysis, meta-analysis or no analysis in the evaluation of neurosurgical techniques: get better or get out. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013; 84: 828.
10. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG,; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 264-269, W264.
11. Blencowe N, Boddy A, Harris A, Hanna T, Whiting P, Cook J, et al. Accounting for intervention complexity in RCTs in surgery: new approaches for intervention definition and methods for monitoring fidelity. Trials 2013; 14 (Suppl 1): O86.
12. Smedh K, Skullman S, Kald A, Anderberg B, Nyström P,. Laparoscopic bowel mobilization combined with intraoperative colonoscopic polypectomy in patients with an inaccessible polyp of the colon. Surg Endosc 1997; 11: 643-644.
13. Hensman C, Luck AJ, Hewett PJ,. Laparoscopic-assisted colonoscopic polypectomy: technique and preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 231-232.
14. Prohm P, Weber J, Bönner C,. Laparoscopic-assisted coloscopic polypectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 746-748.
15. Winter H, Lang RA, Spelsberg FW, Jauch KW, Hüttl TP,. Laparoscopic colonoscopic rendezvous procedures for the treatment of polyps and early stage carcinomas of the colon. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007; 22: 1377-1381.
16. Wilhelm D, von Delius S, Weber L, Meining A, Schneider A, Friess H, et al. Combined laparoscopic-endoscopic resections of colorectal polyps: 10-year experience and follow-up. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 688-693.
17. Franklin ME Jr, Portillo G,. Laparoscopic monitored colonoscopic polypectomy: long-term follow-up. World J Surg 2009; 33: 1306-1309.
18. Agrawal D, Chak A, Champagne BJ, Marks JM, Delaney CP,. Endoscopic mucosal resection with full-thickness closure for difficult polyps: a prospective clinical trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 1082-1088.
19. Wood JJ, Lord AC, Wheeler JM, Borley NR,. Laparo-endoscopic resection for extensive and inaccessible colorectal polyps: a feasible and safe procedure. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2011; 93: 241-245.
20. Grunhagen DJ, van Ierland MC, Doornebosch PG, Bruijninckx MM, Winograd R, de Graaf EJ,. Laparoscopic-monitored colonoscopic polypectomy: a multimodality method to avoid segmental colon resection. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13: 1280-1284.
21. Cruz RA, Ragupathi M, Pedraza R, Pickron TB, Le AT, Haas EM,. Minimally invasive approaches for the management of 'difficult' colonic polyps. Diagn Ther Endosc 2011; 2011: 682793.
22. Lee SW, Garrett KA, Shin JH, Trencheva K, Sonoda T, Milsom JW,. Dynamic article: long-term outcomes of patients undergoing combined endolaparoscopic surgery for benign colon polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56: 869-873.
23. Lee MK, Chen F, Esrailian E, Russell MM, Sack J, Lin AY, et al. Combined endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery may be an alternative to bowel resection for the management of colon polyps not removable by standard colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 2082-2086.
24. Fukunaga Y, Tamegai Y, Chino A, Ueno M, Nagayama S, Fujimoto Y, et al. New technique of enbloc resection of colorectal tumor using laparoscopy and endoscopy cooperatively (laparoscopy and endoscopy cooperative surgery-colorectal). Dis Colon Rectum 2014; 57: 267-271.
25. Goh C, Burke JP, McNamara DA, Cahill RA, Deasy J,. Endolaparoscopic removal of colonic polyps. Colorectal Dis 2014; 16: 271-275.
26. Kang DC, Hardee MJ, Fesperman SF, Stoffs TL, Dahm P,. Low quality of evidence for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: results of a systematic review of the published literature. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 930-937.
27. Biffl WL, Spain DA, Reitsma AM, Minter RM, Upperman J, Wilson M, et al. Responsible development and application of surgical innovations: a position statement of the Society of University Surgeons. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 206: 1204-1209.
28. Strasberg SM, Ludbrook PA,. Who oversees innovative practice? Is there a structure that meets the monitoring needs of new techniques? J Am Coll Surg 2003; 196: 938-948.
29. American College of Surgeons. Statement on emerging surgical technologies. Bull Am Coll Surg 1994; 79: 40-41.
30. American College of Surgeons. Statement on issues to be considered before new surgical technology is applied to the care of patients. Bull Am Coll Surg 1995; 80: 46-47.
31. Neugebauer EA, Becker M, Buess GF, Cuschieri A, Dauben HP, Fingerhut A, et al. EAES recommendations on methodology of innovation management in endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 1594-1615.
32. Singer PA, Siegler M, Whitington PF, Lantos JD, Emond JC, Thistlethwaite JR, et al. Ethics of liver transplantation with living donors. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 620-622.
33. Currie A, Askari A, Nachiappan S, Sevdalis N, Faiz O, Kennedy R,. A systematic review of patient preference elicitation methods in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2015; 17: 17-25.