EAES recommendations on methodology of innovation management in endoscopic surgery

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 24, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1594-1615

  Neugebauer, Edmund A M ^a   Becker, Monika ^a   Buess, Gerhard F ^b   Cuschieri, Alfred ^c   Dauben, Hans Peter ^d   Fingerhut, Abe ^e   Fuchs, Karl H ^f   Habermalz, Brigitte ^a   Lantsberg, Leonid ^g   Morino, Mario ^h   Reiter Theil, Stella ⁱ   Soskuty, Gabriela ^j   Wayand, Wolfgang ^k   Welsch, Thilo ^l  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^d DIMDI German Institute of Medical Documentation and Information   (Germany)

^e CENTRE HOSPITALIER INTERCOMMUNAL   (France)

^f AGAPLESION MARKUS KRANKENHAUS   (Germany)

^g BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^h UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

^j B Braun Melsungen AG   (Germany)

^k KEPLER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Austria)

^l UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

Guideline; Health technology; Innovation; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY; SURGICAL TRAINING; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; ENDOSCOPY; MASS COMMUNICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WORKFLOW;

DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; ENDOSCOPY; HUMANS; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WORKFLOW;

EID: 77955661726     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0818-3     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Institute of Medicine (IOM) (2008) Learning healthcare system concepts v. 2008. Annual report. Available at: http://www.iom.edu/CMS/28312/RT-EBM/56903/ 57305.aspx, accessed 22 September 2009.
2. Strasberg SM, Ludbrook PA (2003) Who oversees innovative practice? Is there a structure that meets the monitoring needs of new techniques? J Am Coll Surg 196:938-948.
3. Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Bergamaschi R, Bonjer HJ, Cuschieri A, Fuchs KH, Jacobi C, Jansen FW, Koivusalo AM, Lacy A, McMahon MJ, Millat B, Schwenk W (2002) The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16:1121-1143.
4. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (2008) Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Available at: http://www.wma.net/e/policy/pdf/17c.pdf. October 2008; accessed 22 September 2009.
5. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (2000). 4th edn. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, pp xxxvii, 2074. ISBN:9780618082308.
6. Riskin DJ, Longaker MT, Gertner M, Krummel TM (2006) Innovation in surgery: a historical perspective. Ann Surg 244: 686-693.
7. Margo CE (2001) When is surgery research? Towards an operational definition of human research. J Med Ethics 27:40-43.
8. Reeves B (1999) Health-technology assessment in surgery. Lancet 353(Suppl 1):SI3-SI5.
9. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1979) The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
10. Barkun JS, Aronson JK, Feldman LS, Maddern GJ, Strasberg SM, Meakins JL, Altman DG, Ashby D, Black N, Blazeby JM, Boutron I, Bunker J, Burton M, Campbell WB, Campbell M, Chalkidou K, Chalmers I, Clavien PA, Cook JA, de Leval M, Deeks J, Ergina PL, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Grant A, Gray M, Greenhalgh R, Jenicek M, Kehoe S, Lilford R, Littlejohns P, Loke Y, Madhock R, Marshall JC, McCulloch P, McPherson K, Meakins J, Nicholl J, Reeves BC, Rothwell P, Seiler CM, Summerskill B, Taggart D, Tekkis P, Thompson M, Treasure T, Trohler U, Vandenbroucke J (2009) Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations. Lancet 374:1089-1096.
11. Bernstein M, Bampoe J (2004) Surgical innovation or surgical evolution: an ethical and practical guide to handling novel neurosurgical procedures. J Neurosurg 100:2-7.
12. Reitsma AM, Moreno JD (2002) Ethical regulations for innovative surgery: The last frontier? J Am Coll Surg 194:792-801.
13. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2004) The interventional procedures programme-programme manual. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/howwework/ developingniceinterventionalprocedures/interventionalproceduresprogrammemanual/ the-interventional-procedures-programme-programme-manual.jsp, accessed 22 September 2009.
14. Reitsma AM, Moreno JD (2005) Ethics of innovative surgery: US surgeons' definitions, knowledge, and attitudes. J Am Coll Surg 200:103-110.
15. Cuschieri A (2006) Nature of human error: implications for surgical practice. Ann Surg 244:642-648.
16. Paradis C (2008) Bias in surgical research. Ann Surg 248:180-188.
17. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2007) Interventional procedures programme-methods guide. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/ aboutnice/howwework/developingniceinterventionalprocedures/ interventionalproceduresprogrammemanual/interventional-procedures-programme- manual.jsp?domedia=1&mid=70C7F0D8-19B9-E0B5-D464C50580F580B1, October 2007; accessed 22 September 2009.
18. Ergina PL, Cook JA, Blazeby JM, Boutron I, Clavien PA, Reeves BC, Seiler CM (2009) Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet 374:1097-1104.
19. Kunz R, Vist G, Oxman AD (2007) Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):MR000012.
20. Black N (1996) Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. BMJ 312:1215-1218.
21. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, Nicholl J (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: The IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374:1105-1112.
22. Lewsey JD, Leyland AH, Murray GD, Boddy FA (2000) Using routine data to complement and enhance the results of randomised controlled trials. Health Technol Assess 4:1-55.
23. Gross M (1993) Innovations in surgery. A proposal for phased clinical trials. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:351-354.
24. Lilford R, Braunholtz D, Harris J, Gill T (2004) Trials in surgery. Br J Surg 91:6-16.
25. Mowatt G, Bower DJ, Brebner JA, Cairns JA, Grant AM, McKee L (1997) When and how to assess fast-changing technologies: a comparative study of medical applications of four generic technologies. Health Technol Assess 1: i-vi, 1-149.
26. Chalmers TC (1977) Randomize the first patient. N Engl J Med 296:107.
27. Neugebauer E, Troidl H, Spangenberger W, Dietrich A, Lefering R (1991) Conventional versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the randomized controlled trial. Cholecystectomy Study Group. Br J Surg 78:150-154.
28. Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) (2008) General methods 3.0. Available at: http://www.iqwig.de/general-methods.428.en. html; accessed 22 September 2009.
29. McCulloch P, Taylor I, Sasako M, Lovett B, Griffin D (2002) Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions. BMJ 324:1448-1451.
30. Gurusamy KS, Gluud C, Nikolova D, Davidson BR (2009) Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery. Br J Surg 96:342-349.
31. Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M, Clarke M, Montori VM, Cook DJ, Yusuf S, Sackett DL, Cina CS, Walter SD, Haynes B, Schunemann HJ, Norman GR, Guyatt GH (2005) Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ 330:88.
32. Ramsay CR, Grant AM, Wallace SA, Garthwaite PH, Monk AF, Russell IT (2000) Assessment of the learning curve in health technologies. A systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 16:1095-1108.
33. Talebpour M, Alijani A, Hanna GB, Moosa Z, Tang B, Cuschieri A (2009) Proficiency-gain curve for an advanced laparoscopic procedure defined by observation clinical human reliability assessment (OCHRA). Surg Endosc 23:869-875.
34. Joice P, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (1998) Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery-a human reliability analysis. Appl Ergon 29:409-414.
35. Tang B, Hanna GB, Joice P, Cuschieri A (2004) Identification and categorization of technical errors by observational clinical human reliability assessment (OCHRA) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 139:1215-1220.
36. Tang B, Hanna GB, Carter F, Adamson GD, Martindale JP, Cuschieri A (2006) Competence assessment of laparoscopic operative and cognitive skills: objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) or observational clinical human reliability assessment (OCHRA). World J Surg 30:527-534.
37. Rahbari NN, Diener MK, Wente M-N, Seiler CM (2007) Development and perspectives of randomized controlled trials in surgery. Am J Surg 194:S148-S152.
38. Altenstetter C (2003) EU and member state medical devices regulation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 19:228-248.
39. The Council of the European Communities (1993) Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices. Official J L 169:0001-0043.
40. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (2008) Identifizierung von Innovationshürden in der Medizintechnik, Berlin.
41. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (2005) Studie zur Situation der Medizintechnik in Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich, Berlin.
42. European Commission DG Enterprise and Industry (1994-2008) Guidelines relating to medical devices Directives. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/ enterprise/medical-devices/meddev/meddev-en.htm; accessed 22 September 2009.
43. European Commission DG Enterprise and Industry (2007) Guidelines on a medical device vigilance system. MEDDEV 212-1 rev 5. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/medical-devices/meddev/2-12-1-rev-5-2007-fin3. pdf. April 2007; accessed 22 September 2009.
44. European Commission DG Enterprise and Industry (2004) Guidelines on post market clinical follow-up.MEDDEV 212-2. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/ enterprise/medical-devices/meddev/2-12-2-05-2004.pdf. May 2004; accessed 22 September 2009.
45. McCormack K, Wake B, Perez J, Fraser C, Cook J, McIntosh E, Vale L, Grant A (2005) Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 9:1-203, iii-iv.
46. Raftery J, Roderick P, Stevens A (2005) Potential use of routine databases in health technology assessment. Health Technol Assess 9:1-92, iii-iv.
47. McDaid D, Cookson R (2003) Evaluating health care interventions in the European Union. Health Policy 63:133-139. (Pubitemid 36132299)
48. Schultz M, Lyle C (2009) Health economic analysis. Appl Clin Trial 18:40-48.
49. Dobrow MJ, Goel V, Upshur RE (2004) Evidence-based health policy: context and utilisation. Soc Sci Med 58:207-217.
50. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2001) Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, New York.
51. Tröhler U, Reiter-Theil S (1998) Ethics codes in medicine. Foundations and achievements since 1947. Ashgate, Aldershot.
52. Jonsen A, Veatch RM, Walters L (1998) Source book in bioethics. A documented history. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC.
53. Kimura R (1998) The forgotten history of Japan. In: Tröhler U, Reiter-Theil S (eds) Ethics codes in medicine: foundations and achievements since 1947. Aldershot, Ashgate, pp 119-126.
54. Rothmann DJ (1998) The Nuremberg Code in light of previous principles and practices in human experimentation. In: Tröhler U, Reiter-Theil S (eds) Ethics codes in medicine: foundations and achievements since 1947. Aldershot, Ashgate, pp 50-59.
55. Winslade WJ, Krause TL (1998) The Nuremberg code turns fifty. In: Tröhler U, Reiter-Theil S (eds) Ethics codes in medicine foundations, achievements since 1947. Aldershot, Ashgate, pp 140-162.
56. Faden R, Beauchamp TL (1986) A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
57. Hurst SA, Foerde R, Reiter-Theil S, Slowther AM, Perrier A, Pegoraro R, Danis M (2007) Physicians' views on resource availability and equity in four European health care systems. BMC Health Serv Res 7:137.
58. Albisser Schleger H, Reiter-Theil S (2007) "Age" and "Costs"- factors in treatment decisions at the end of life? An analysis of informal knowledge structures of doctors and nurses. Ethik Med 19:103-119.
59. Albisser Schleger H, Reiter-Theil S (2008) "Futility"- overtreatment at the end of life? Reasons for missed cessations of therapy in geriatric and critical care medicine. Z Palliativmed 9:67-75.
60. Hurst SA, Reiter-Theil S, Slowther AM, Pegoraro R, Forde R, Danis M (2008) Should ethics consultants help clinicians face scarcity in their practice? J Med Ethics 34:241-246.
61. Shirkey H (1999) Therapeutic orphans. Pediatrics 104:583-584.
62. Bartels S, Parker M, Hope T, Reiter-Theil S (2005) Are "Ethics Guidelines" helpful in taking critical treatment decisions? A comparative casuistic analysis of German, British and Swiss Guidelines regarding Palliative Care. Ethik Med 17:191- 205.
63. Hurst SA, Perrier A, Pegoraro R, Reiter-Theil S, Forde R, Slowther AM, Garrett-Mayer E, Danis M (2007) Ethical difficulties in clinical practice: experiences of European doctors. J Med Ethics 33:51-57.
64. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH) (1998) Core competences for health care ethics consultation. Glenview, IL, USA. doi:wiley.com/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00353.x.
65. Reiter-Theil S (2001) Ethics consultation in Germany. The present situation. Health Ethics Comm Forum 13:265-280.
66. Reiter-Theil S (2003) Balancing the perspectives. The patient's role in clinical ethics consultation. Med Health Care Philos 6:247-254.
67. Agich GJ (2001) Ethics and innovation in medicine. J Med Ethics 27:295-296.
68. Agich GJ (2008) The ethical challenge posed by surgical innovation. Lahey Clin Med Ethics Spring 15:1-2.
69. Brower V (2003) The ethics of innovation. Should innovative surgery be exempt from clinical trials and regulations? EMBO Rep 4:338-340.
70. Fins JJ (2008) Surgical innovation and ethical dilemmas: precautions and proximity. Cleve Clin J Med 75(Suppl 6):S7-S12.
71. Lynn J, Baily MA, Bottrell M, Jennings B, Levine RJ, Davidoff F, Casarett D, Corrigan J, Fox E, Wynia MK, Agich GJ, O'Kane M, Speroff T, Schyve P, Batalden P, Tunis S, Berlinger N, Cronenwett L, Fitzmaurice JM, Dubler NN, James B (2007) The ethics of using quality improvement methods in health care. Ann Intern Med 146:666-673.
72. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2009) Glossary. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/website/glossary/; accessed 30 September 2009.
73. International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) INAHTA health technology assessment (HTA) Glossary. Available at: http://www.inahta.org/GO-DIRECT-TO/Members/; Accessed 30 September 2009.
74. Community Eye Health Journal (2007) Glossary: research and training. Available at: http://www.cehjournal.org/0953-6833/20/jceh-20-61-017.html. March 2007; Accessed 30 September 2009.
75. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2009) Glossary of statistical terms. Available at: http://stats.oecd.org/glossary/; accessed 30 September 2009.