Case series analysis, meta-analysis or no analysis in the evaluation of neurosurgical techniques: Get better or get out

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry

Volumn 84, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 828-

  Warnke, Peter C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CASE STUDY; EDITORIAL; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; HUMAN; HYPOPHYSIS ADENOMA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); MICROSCOPY; NEUROSURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR DISEASE;

EID: 84879928537     PISSN: 00223050     EISSN: 1468330X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-305130     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. Ammirat M, Wei L, Ciric I. Short-term outcome of endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013;84:843-9.
2. Laws ER. Complications of transsphenoidal surgery: the shortcomings of meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013;84:829.
3. Oldfield EH, Jane JA Jr: Endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary surgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013;84:827.
4. Schumpeter JA. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper, 1975.
5. Cushing H. The life of Sir William Osler. VolII. Oxford: Camden Press, 1925.