Registries in orthopaedics

Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 2015, Pages S69-S75

  Delaunay, C ^a  

^a Clinique de l'Yvette   (France)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Implantable medical devices; Registry

Indexed keywords

BONE IMPLANT; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL DEVICE; ORTHOPEDICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTER; REVIEW; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; ARTHROPLASTY; COST CONTROL; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; JOINT PROSTHESIS; POSTMARKETING SURVEILLANCE;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; COST SAVINGS; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; INTERNATIONALITY; JOINT PROSTHESIS; ORTHOPEDICS; PRODUCT SURVEILLANCE, POSTMARKETING; REGISTRIES;

EID: 84923005618     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18770568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.06.029     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Robertsson O. Knee arthroplasty registers. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:1-4.
2. o653 au nom de la mission commune d'information portant sur les dispositifs médicaux implantables et les interventions à visée esthétique. Extraits concernant les DIM de classe III et les registres 2012, [Enregistré à la présidence du Sénat le 10juillet].
3. Delaunay C. Registres des prothèses totales de hanche: état des lieux, limites et futur. Prothèse totale de hanche: les choix 2005, 36-46. Elsevier, Paris. J. Puget (Ed.).
4. Tucker K., Gregg P., Kay P., et al. Monitoring the introduction and performance of a joint replacement: the United Kingdom metal-on-metal alert. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93(Suppl. 3E):37-42.
5. Labek G., Neuman D., Agreiter M., Schuh R., Böhler N. Impact of implant developers on published outcome and reproducibility of cohort-based clinical studies in arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93(Suppl. 3E):55-61.
6. Herberts P., Ahnfelt L., Malchau H., Stromberg C., Anderson G.B. Multicenter clinical trials and their value in assessing total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 249:48-55.
7. Malchau H., Herberts P., Eisler T., Garellick G., Söderman P. The Swedish total hip replacement register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84(Suppl. 2):2-20.
8. Puolakka T.J., Pajamäki K.J., Halonen P.J., Pulkkinen P.O., Paavolainen P., Nevalainen J.K. The Finnish Arthroplasty Register: report of the hip register. Acta Orthop Scand 2001, 72:433-441.
9. Lie S.A., Havelin L.L., Furnes O.N., Engesaeter L.B., Vollset S.E. Failure rates for 4762 revision total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004, 86:504-509.
10. Lucht U. The Danish hip arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop Scand 2000, 71(5):433-439.
11. Fender D., Van der Meulen J.H., Gregg P.J. Relationship between outcome and annual surgical experience for the Charnley total hip replacement: results from a regional hip register. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003, 85:187-190.
12. Hunt P., Darling B., Gregg P.J. National Joint Registry: launch of 1st annual report 2004, Manchester, England, [September 14-17].
13. Horan F. Editorial: the national joint registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003, 85:1-2.
14. Maloney W. National joint replacement registries: has the time come?. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001, 83:1582-1585.
15. Röder C., El-Kerdi A., Eggli S., Aebi M. A centralized total joint replacement registry using web-based technologies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86:2077-2079.
16. Furnes O., Lie S.A., Havelin L.I., Vollset S.E., Engesaeter L.B. Exeter and Charnley arthroplasties with Boneloc or high viscosity cement. Comparison of 1127 arthroplasties followed for 5 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 1997, 68:515-520.
17. Craviotto D.F. Dissemination of information, among orthopaedic surgeons, regarding early failure of total joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001, 83:1580-1581.
18. Peltola M., Malmivaara A., Paavola M. Learning curve for new technology? A nationwide register-based study of 46,363 total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013, 95:2097-2103.
19. Anand R., Graves S.E., de Steiger R.N., et al. What is the benefit of introducing new hip and knee prostheses?. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93(Suppl. 3E):51-54.
20. Labek G., Thaler M., Janda W., Agreiter M., Stöckl B. Revision rates after total joint replacement. Cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011, 93:293-297.
21. Delaunay C., Iovanescu L., Necas L., Hochgatterer R., Labek G. Quality and reproductibility of French publications on total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2013, 99:257-262. the Quality of literature in arthroplasty study group of the European Arthroplasty Register.
22. Visuri T., Pukkala E., Pulkkinen P., Paavolainen P. Cancer incidences and causes of death among total hip replacement patients: a review based on Nordic cohorts with a special emphasis on metal-on-metal bearings. Proc. ImechE. J Engl Med 2006, 220(Part II):399-406.
23. Robertsson, Stefansdottir A., Lidgren L., Ranstam J. Increased long-term mortality in patients less than 55 years old who have undergone knee replacement for osteoarthritis. Results from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:599-603.
24. Persson U., Persson M., Malchau H. The economics of preventing revisions in total hip replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 1999, 70:163-169.
25. Katz J.N., Losina E., Barrett J., Phillips C.B., Mahomed N.N., Lew R.A., et al. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the United States Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001, 83:1622-1629.
26. Spencer R.F., Villar R.N., Field R.E., Learmonth I.D. Surgeon records in the public domain. Ed Hip International 2013, 23(4):343-344.
27. Sadoghi P., Schröder C., Fottner A., et al. Application and survival curve of total hip arthroplasties: a systemic comparative analysis using worldwide hip arthroplasty registers. Intern Orthop (SICOT) 2012, 36:2197-2203.
28. Delaunay C., Hamadouche M., Girard J., Duhamel A. What are the causes for failures of primary hip arthroplasties in France?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013, 471:3863-3869. the SoFCOT group.
29. Katz J.N., Barrett J., Mahomed N.N., Baron J.A., Wright R.J., Losina E. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and the outcomes of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86:1909-1916.
30. Havelin L.I., Robertsson O., Fenstad A.M., Overgaard S., Garellick G., Furnes O. A Scandinavian experience of register colln: the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA). J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93(Suppl. 3E):13-19.
31. Iorio R., Robb W.J., Healy W.L., et al. Orthopaedic surgeon workforce and volume assessment for total hip and knee replacement in the United States: preparing for an epidemic. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:1598-1605.
32. Sedrakyan A., Paxton E.W., Phillips C., et al. The international consortium of orthopaedic registries: overview and summary. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93(Suppl. 3E):1-12.
33. Sedrakian A., Paxton E.W., Marinac-Dabic D. Stages and tools for multinational colln: the perspective from the coordinating center of the International Consortium of orthopaedic registries (ICOR). J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93(Suppl. 3E):76-80.