What are the causes for failures of primary hip arthroplasties in France?

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 471, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 3863-3869

  Delaunay, Christian ^a   Hamadouche, Moussa ^b   Girard, Julien ^c   Duhamel, Alain ^d  

^a Clinique de l'Yvette   (France)

^b Centre Hospitalo Universitaire Cochin Port Royal ^*  (France)

^c LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^d Faculté de Médecine Pôle Recherché   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGED; CONFERENCE PAPER; COXITIS; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD NECROSIS; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; FRANCE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DYSPLASIA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; MORTALITY; OSTEOLYSIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS DISLOCATION; PROSTHESIS FRACTURE; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; REOPERATION; SURGICAL ERROR; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT FAILURE; VERY ELDERLY;

EID: 84890442910     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-2935-5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Australian Orthopaedic Association. National Joint Replacement Report 2011. Available at: http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjirr/publications. Accessed October 25, 2012.
2. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:128-133.
3. Charnley J. Low Friction Arthroplasty of the Hip: Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Springer; 1979.
4. Delaunay C, Epinette JA, Dawson J, Murray D, Jolles BM. Cross cultural adaptations of the Oxford-12 Hip Score to the French speaking population. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95:89-99.
5. Dripps RD. New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology. 1963;24:111.
6. Furnes O, Lie SA, Espehaug B, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI. Hip disease and the prognosis of total hip replacements: a review of 53,698 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987-99. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:579-586.
7. Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G, Chevillotte C, Caret JP, Bejui-Hugues J. Unconstrained tripolar implants for primary total hip arthroplasty in patients at risk for dislocation. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:849-858.
8. Hamadouche M, Arnould H, Bouxin B. Is a cementless dual mobility socket in primary THA a reasonable option? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:3048-3053.
9. Hamadouche M, Biau DH, Huten D, Musset T, Gaucher F. The use of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:3248-3254.
10. [Health Authority. Evaluation of total hip prostheses: generic descriptions revising the list of reimbursable products and services of hip joint implants] [in French]. September 2007. Available at: http://www.has.sante. fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/rapport-evaluation-des-prothesesde- hanche.pdf. Accessed November 25, 2012.
11. Langlais F, Ropars M, Gaucher F, Musset T, Chaix O. Dual mobility cemented cups have low dislocation rates in THA revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:389-395.
12. Lecuire F, Benareau J, Rubini J, Basso M. [Intra-prosthetic dislocation of the Bousquet dual mobility socket] [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2004;90:249-255.
13. Lucht U. The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:433-439.
14. Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garellick G, Soderman P. The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(suppl 2):2-20.
15. Merle d'Aubigné R. [Numerical classification of the function of the hip. 1970] [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1990;76:371-374.
16. Mertl P, Philippot R, Rosset P, Migaud H, Tabutin J, Van de Velde D. Distal locking stem for revision femoral loosening and peri-prosthetic fractures. Int Orthop. 2011;35:275-282.
17. th Annual Report 2012. Available at: http://www.njrcentre.org.uk. Accessed January 27, 2013.
18. New Zealand Orthopaedic Association. The New Zealand Joint Registry: thirteen year report. Available at: www.cdhb.govt.nz/njr/. Accessed January 27, 2013.
19. Philippot R, Adam P, Reckhaus M, Delangle F, Verdot FX, Curvale G, Farizon F. Prevention of dislocation in total hip revision surgery using a dual mobility design. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95:407-413.
20. Philippot R, Boyer B, Farizon F. Intraprosthetic dislocation: a specific complication of the dual-mobility system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:965-970.
21. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report 2010. Available at: http://www.shpr.se/Libraries/Documents/AnnualReport-2010-2-eng.sflb.ashx. Accessed March 8, 2012.
22. Vielpeau C, Lebel B, Ardouin L, Burdin G, Lautridou C. The dual mobility socket concept: experience with 668 cases. Int Orthop. 2011;35:225-230.
23. Wetters NG, Murray TG, Moric M, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG, Della Valle CJ. Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:410-416.
24. Wolf BR, Lu X, Li Y, Callaghan JJ, Cram P. Adverse outcomes in hip arthroplasty: long-term trends. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:e103.