Remastering morals with aristotle and confucius

Remastering Morals with Aristotle and Confucius

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-224

  Sim, May ^a  

^a Brown University College of the Holy Cross   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922849242     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511497841     Document Type: Book

References (104)

1. David Hall and Roger Ames, Thinking through Confucius (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1987).
2. Heiner Roetz, Confucian Ethics of the Axial Age: A Reconstruction under the Aspect of the Breakthrough toward Postconventional Thinking (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993).
3. Cheng Chung-ying, New Dimensions of Confucian and Neo-Confucian Philosophy (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1991).
4. Herbert Fingarette, “How the Analects Portrays the Ideal of Efficacious Authority,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 8 (1981): 29–49.
5. Alasdair MacIntyre, After Virtue (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981).
6. Antonio Cua, “functionally equivalent moral concepts” in Dimensions of Moral Creativity (State College: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1979), 76–78, and “Tasks of Confucian Ethics,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 6 (1979): 55–67.
7. Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation, trans. Roger T. Ames and Henry Rosemont, Jr. (New York: Ballantine Books, 1998).
8. Tu Weiming, in Confucian Thought: Selfhood as Creative Transformation (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1985).
9. Zeng, “The way of the Master is doing one’s utmost (zhong) and putting oneself in the other’s place (shu), nothing more.” Zhong and Shu, as Wing-tsit Chan, in A Sourcebook in Chinese Philosophy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963).
10. Herbert Fingarette, “The Music of Humanity in the Conversation of Confucius,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 10 (1983): 331–56.
11. Terence Irwin, Aristotle’s First Principles (New York: Oxford Clarendon Press, 1988).
12. Yu Jiyuan, “Virtue: Confucius and Aristotle,” Philosophy East and West 48 (1998): 323–47.
13. C. David C. Reeve’s Practices of Reason (New York: Oxford Clarendon Press, 1992).
14. Sarah Broadie. “broad” sense of justice in Ethics with Aristotle (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), 111–12.
15. David Balme, “The Snub,” Ancient Philosophy 4 (1984): 1–8.
16. Michael Loux, “Form, Species and Predication in Metaphysics Z, H, H,” Mind 88 (1979): k1–23.
17. John A. Driscoll, “EIDH in Aristotle’s Earlier and Later Theories of Substance,” in volume 9 of Studies in Aristotle, ed. Dominic J. O’Meara (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1981), 129–59.
18. Alan Code, “Aristotle: Essence and Accident,” in Philosophical Grounds of Rationality, ed. Richard E. Grandy and Richard Warner (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986), 411–39.
19. Ed Halper, One and Many in Aristotle’s Metaphysics: The Central Books (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1989).
20. Xinzhong Yao, “Self-Construction and Identity: The Confucian Self in Relation to some Western Perceptions,” Asian Philosophy 6 (1996): 186.
21. Roger Ames, “The Focus-Field Self in Classical Confucianism,” (TFFS hereafter) in Self as Person in Asian Theory and Practice, ed. Roger Ames, Wimal Dissanayake, and Thomas Kasulis (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994), 201.
22. Puzzles to Principles? Essays on Aristotle’s Dialectic, ed. May Sim (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 1999).
23. Philip J. Ivanhoe, “Reweaving the ‘One Thread’ of the Analects.” Philosophy East and West 40 (1990): 17–33, especially 31.
24. Michael R. Martin, “Ritual Action (Li) in Confucius and Hsun Tzu,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (1995): 18.
25. Chad Hansen’s “Freedom and Moral Responsibility in Confucian Ethics,” Philosophy East and West 22 (1972): 169–86.
26. Herbert Fingarette’s “Human Community as Holy Rite: An Interpretation of Confucius’ Analects,” Harvard Theological Review 59 (1966): 53–67.
27. Irwin, “The Metaphysical and Psychological Basis of Aristotle’s Ethics,” 51. The Crossroads of Norm and Nature: Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics and Metaphysics, ed. May Sim (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1995), especially chs. 1–3.
28. Benjamin Schwartz, The World of Thought in Ancient China (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985), 97ff.
29. Confucius, Confucian Analects, The Great Learning and The Doctrine of the Mean, trans. James Legge (New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1893).
30. Roetz, The Golden Rule in Chapter 10, “Humaneness (Ren),” in his Confucian Ethics of the Axial Age, and to Wang Qingjie’s “The Golden Rule and Interpersonal Care – From a Confucian Perspective,” Philosophy East and West 49 (1999): 415–38.
31. Alasdair MacIntyre, “Incommensurability, Truth, and the Conversation between Confucians and Aristotelians about the Virtues,” in Culture and Modernity: East–West Philosophic Perspectives, ed. Eliot Deutsch (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1991), 104–22.
32. David Hall and Roger Ames, prologue to Thinking from the Han (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998), xiff.
33. James T., Brestzke, S.J., “The Tao of Confucian Virtue Ethics,” International Philosophical Quarterly 35 (1995): 25–41.
34. Peter J. Mehl, “In the Twilight of Modernity: MacIntyre and Mitchell on Moral Traditions and Their Assessment,” Journal of Religious Ethics 19 (1991): 21–54.
35. Angus C. Graham, “Relating Categories to Question Forms in Pre-Han Chinese Thought,” in Studies in Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Literature (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990), 360–411.
36. Frede, “Dialectical Communities: From the One to the Many and Back,” in From Puzzles to Principles? Essays on Aristotle’s Dialectic, ed. May Sim (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 1999), 183–214.
37. Michael Frede, “Categories in Aristotle,” in Essays in Ancient Philosophy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987), ch. 3.
38. Herbert Fingarette, “The Problem of Self in the Analects,” Philosophy East and West 29 (1979): 129–40.
39. Herbert Fingarette, “Comment and Response,” in Rules, Rituals and Responsibility: Essays Dedicated to H. Fingarette, ed. Mary I. Bockover (La Salle, Il: Open Court, 1991), 200.
40. Aristotle, Posterior Analytics, Topica, The Loeb Classical Library from Aristotle, trans. Hugh Tredennick and E. S. Foster (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960).
41. G. E. R. Lloyd, Adversaries and Authorities: Investigations into Ancient Greek and Chinese Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 55.
42. Chad Hansen, Language and Logic in Ancient China (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1983), 58.
43. Hansen’s A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).
44. Angus C. Graham “China, Europe, and the Origins of Modern Science: Needham’s The Grand Titration,” in Chinese Science: Explorations of an Ancient Tradition, ed. Shigeru Nakayama and Nathan Sivin (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1973), 62.
45. Ho Peng-Yoke, Li, Qi and Shu: An Introduction to Science and Civilization in China (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1985), 120.
46. Ho Peng-Yoke and F. Peter Lisowski, A Brief History of Chinese Medicine, 2nd edition (Singapore: World Scientific, 1998), 120.
47. Dominique Hoizey and Marie-Joseph Hoizey, A History of Chinese Medicine (Vancouver: Edinburgh University Press, 1993), 25.
48. Robert Eno, The Confucian Creation of Heaven (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990).
49. Richard Bosley, “What Is a Mean? – The Question Considered Comparatively and Systematically,” Philosophy East and West 36 (1986): 3–12, and his On Virtues and Vices (New York: Peter Lang, 1991).
50. Kanaya Osamu, “The Mean in Original Confucianism,” in Chinese Language, Thought, and Culture, ed. Philip J. Ivanhoe (La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1996).
51. Tu Weiming, Centrality and Commonality (hereafter CC) (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1989), 12–17.
52. Focusing the Familiar, trans. Roger Ames and David Hall (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2001), 26–27, 143–46.
53. Stephen Leighton, “Relativizing Moral Excellence in Aristotle,” Apeiron 25 (1992): 49–66.
54. Peter Losin, “Aristotle’s Doctrine of the Mean,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 4(3) (1987): 329–41.
55. William A. Welton and Ronald Polansky, “The Viability of Virtue in the Mean,” in Aristotle, Virtue and the Mean, ed. Richard Bosley, Roger A. Shiner, and Janet D. Sisson (Edmonton: Academic Printing & Publishing, 1995), 79–102, see especially 91–92.
56. Lesley Brown, “What Is ‘the Mean Relative to Us’ in Aristotle’s Ethics?” Phronesis 42(1) (1997): 77–93.
57. Chan Wing-tsit, “The Evolution of the Confucian Concept Jên,” Philosophy East and West 4 (1955): 295–320.
58. Hall and Ames, The Democracy of the Dead (Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1999), 42.
59. Shun Kwong-loi, “Jen and Li in the Analects,” Philosophy East and West 43 (1993): 457–79.
60. Chong Kim-Chong, “The Practice of Jen,” Philosophy East and West 49 (1999): 298–316.
61. Tu’s “Beyond the Enlightenment Mentality,” in Confucianism and Ecology, ed. Mary Tucker and John Berthrong (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998), 18–19.
62. C. W. DeMarco, The Greeks and the Environment, ed. Laura Westra and Tim Robinson (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1997).
63. Stephen R. L. Clark, in his Aristotle’s Man (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).
64. Angus C. Graham’s Studies in Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Literature (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990), 18–22.
65. Bryan W. Van Norden’s “Mengzi and Xunzi: Two Views of Human Agency,” International Philosophical Quarterly 32 (1992): 161–84.
66. Philip J. Ivanhoe, Confucian Moral Self-Cultivation, 2nd ed. (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2000).
67. The Chinese Classics, Vol. II, The Works of Mencius, 3rd ed., trans. James Legge (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1960).
68. Ivanhoe’s “Human Nature and Moral Understanding in Xunzi,” International Philosophical Quarterly 34 (1994): 167–75.
69. Myles Burnyeat, “Aristotle on Learning to Be Good,” in Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics, ed. Amélie O. Rorty (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980), 69–92.
70. Herbert Fingarette, “The Problem of the Self in the Analects,” Philosophy East and West 29 (1979): 129–40.
71. Kwang-Sae Lee, in “Some Confucianist Reflections on the Concept of Autonomous Individual,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 21 (1994): 45–59.
72. Confucius, The Secular as Sacred (New York: Harper and Row, 1972).
73. Teemu H. Ruskola’s “Moral Choice in the Analects: A Way without a Crossroads?” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 19 (1992): 285–96.
74. Martha C. Nussbaum, Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990), 230–44.
75. “Jen and Li in the Analects,” Philosophy East and West 43 (1993): 457–79, reprinted (with slight modifications) in Bryan W. Van Norden, ed., Confucius and the Analects: New Essays (Oxford University Press, 2002), 53–72.
76. Tu Weiming’s “Creative Tension between Jen and li,” Philosophy East and West 18 (1968): 29–40.
77. The Politics of Aristotle, trans. E. Barker (New York: Oxford University Press, 1958).
78. Bekker, Loeb edition of the Politics, trans. H. Rackham (London: Harvard University Press, 1932).
79. Fred D. Miller, Jr., “Aristotle’s Political Naturalism,” Apeiron 22 (1989): 195–218.
80. Tu Weiming’s “An Inquiry on the Five Relationships in Confucian Humanism,” in The Psycho-Cultural Dynamics of the Confucian Family, ed. Walter H. Slote (Seoul: International Cultural Society of Korea, 1986).
81. Ambrose Y. C. King’s “The Individual and Group in Confucianism: A Relational Perspective,” in Individualism and Holism: Studies in Confucian and Taoist Values, ed. Donald Munro (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1985).
82. Peter Simpson, in A Philosophical Commentary on the Politics of Aristotle (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1998).
83. Peter Simpson, “Aristotle’s definition of city (a multitude of those who share in deliberation and judgment) effectively identifies the city with those who are in control of the city and hence with the regime” (Simpson, 138).
84. Richard G. Mulgan, in Aristotle’s Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press, 1977).
85. Peter Simpson, “Because he defines citizenship in terms of participation in deliberative and judicial office, the citizen body in any constitution will be coextensive with the supreme body” (Mulgan, 61). In discussing the topic of political distribution in Aristotle, Martha Nussbaum, in Nature, Function, and Capability: Aristotle on Political Distribution, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, supplementary volume (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988), 144–84.
86. Jean Elshtain, “Aristotle, the Public–Private Split, and the Case of the Suffragists,” in The Family in Political Thought, ed. Jean-Bethke Elshtain (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1982), 52.
87. Bernard Yack, The Problems of a Political Animal (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993).
88. James Legge, “‘The five Ching’ are the five canonical works, containing the truth upon the highest subjects from the sages of China, and which should be received as law by all generations” (Legge, Confucius: Confucian Analects, The Great Learning and The Doctrine of the Mean, 1).
89. Shih Ching (The Book of Songs), trans. Arthur Waley (New York: Grove Press, 1960).
90. David Hall and Roger Ames, The Democracy of the Dead, 108.
91. Leo Strauss, Natural Right and History (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953).
92. Alasdair C. MacIntyre, After Virtue, argue against any rights talk in Aristotle. Fred D. Miller, Jr., in Nature, Justice, and Rights in Aristotle’s Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).
93. John M. Cooper, “Justice and Rights in Aristotle’s Politics,” The Review of Metaphysics 49 (1996): 859–72.
94. Richard Kraut, “Are there Natural Rights in Aristotle?” The Review of Metaphysics, 49 (1996): 755–74.
95. “A Confucian Approach to Human Rights,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (2004): 337–56.
96. Nicholas Dixon, “The Friendship Model of Filial Obligations,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1995): 77–87.
97. Dixon, “The Friendship Model of Filial Obligations,” 83.
98. Elizabeth Belfiore, in “Family Friendship in Aristotle’s Ethics,” Ancient Philosophy 21 (2001): 113–32.
99. James Schall, “Friendship and Political Philosophy,” The Review of Metaphysics 50 (1996): 121–41.
100. Julie K. Ward’s “Focal Reference in Aristotle’s Account of U_k_: Eudemian Ethics VII 2,” Apeiron 28 (1995): 183–205, especially 202–3.
101. Andrew Payne, in “Character and the Forms of Friendship in Aristotle,” Apeiron 33 (2000): 53–74.
102. Charles Kahn’s “Aristotle and Altruism,” Mind 90 (1981): 20–40.
103. Dennis McKerlie, “Friendship, Self-love, and Concern for Others in Aristotle’s Ethics,” Ancient Philosophy 11 (1991): 85–101.
104. Robert Sokolowski’s “Friendship and Moral Action in Aristotle,” The Journal of Value Inquiry 35 (2001): 355–69.