No student left behind: a collaborative and competitive game-based learning environment to reduce the achievement gap of EFL students in Taiwan

Technology, Pedagogy and Education

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 35-49

  Hung, Hui Chun ^a   Young, Shelley Shwu Ching ^a   Lin, Chiu Pin ^a  

^a NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

English vocabulary acquisition; games; interactive learning technology; one to one technology enhanced learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922797068     PISSN: 1475939X     EISSN: 17475139     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2013.822412     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Admiraal, W., Huizenga, J., Akkerman, S., & ten Dam, G. (2011). The concept of flow in collaborative game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1185–1194.
2. Chan, T. W., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Kinshuk, Sharples, M., Brown, T., (2006). One-to-one technology-enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1, 3–29.
3. Chang, L. J., Yang, J. C., Chan, T. W., & Yu, F. Y. (2003). Development and evaluation of multiple competitive activities in a synchronous quiz game system. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40, 16–26.
4. Chang, V. W. (2006). English language education in Taiwan: A comprehensive survey. Journal of Educational Resources and Research, 69, 129–144.
5. Charsky, D., & Ressler, W. (2011). ‘Games are made for fun’: Lessons on the effects of concept maps in the classroom use of computer games. Computers & Education, 56, 604–615.
6. Chen, S. (1996). Current trends in TEFL planning for elementary schools in Taiwan: A Taipei case study. Proceedings of the fifth international symposium on English teaching, 27–34. Taipei: Crane publishing Co., Ltd.
7. Cropper, C. (1998). Is competition an effective classroom tool for the gifted student? Gifted Child Today Magazine, 21(3), 28–31.
8. Gay, G., Stefanone, M., Grace-Martin, M., & Hembrooke, H. (2001). The effects of wireless computing in collaborative learning environments. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 13, 257–276.
9. Goldman, P., & Kaufman, B. (2001). How to push an elephant through a straw: Using wireless technology in a web-enhanced skills program. International Review of Law Computers and Technology, 15, 281–299.
10. Hong, J.-C., Cheng, C.-L., Hwang, M.-Y., Lee, C.-K., & Chang, H.-Y. (2009). Assessing the educational values of digital games. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 423–437.
11. Inkpen, K. M., Booth, K. S., Klawe, M., & Upitis, R. (1995). Playing together beats playing apart, especially for girls. In Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, CSCL 1995 (pp. 177–181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
13. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (1998). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
14. Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 47–62. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.89.1.47.
15. Joiner, R., Stanton, D., & Luckin, R. (2003). Guest editorial: Children and new technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 145–148.
16. Julian, J., & Perry, F. (1967). Cooperation contrasted with intra-group and intergroup competition. Sociometry, 30, 79–90.
17. Karacapilidis, N., & Papadias, D. (2001). Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: The HERMES system. Information Systems, 26, 259–277.
18. Karakostas, A., & Demetriadis, S. (2011). Enhancing collaborative learning through dynamic forms of support: The impact of an adaptive domain-specific support strategy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 243–258.
19. Kluge, L. (1990). Cooperative learning. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
20. Kohn, A. (1986). No contest: The case against competition. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
21. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J. N., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. M. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49–74.
22. Kunz, W., & Rittel, H. (1970). Issue as elements of information systems. Working Paper 131. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
23. Lam, S., Law, J., & Cheung, R. (2004). The effects of competition on achievement motivation in Chinese classrooms. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 16, 281–296.
24. Liu, C. C., Don, P. H., Chung, C. W., Lin, S. J., Chen, G. D., & Liu, B. J. (2010). Contributing, exchanging and linking for learning: Supporting web co-discovery in one-to-one environments. Educational Technology & Society, 13, 126–139.
25. Liu, C. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). An analysis of peer interaction patterns as discoursed by on-line small group problem-solving activity. Computers & Education, 50, 627–639.
26. Liu, T. C., Wang, H. Y., Liang, J. K., Chan, T. W., Ko, H. W., & Yang, J. C. (2003). Wireless and mobile technologies to enhance teaching and learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 371–382.
27. Looi, C. K., Seow, P., Zhang, B. H., So, H. J., Chen, W. L., & Wong, L. H. (2010). Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: A research agenda. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 154–169.
28. Ministry of Education, Taiwan (2000). The English curriculum. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
29. National Teachers’ Association R.O.C. & Citigroup. (2004). An investigation on the current implementation of English learning and teaching in primary schools. Taiwan: National Teachers’ Association & Citigroup.
30. Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific Region. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 589–613.
31. Ravenscroft, A., & Matheson, M. (2002). Developing and evaluating dialogue games for collaborative e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 93–101.
32. Roschelle, J. (2003). Keynote paper: Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 260–272.
33. Shih, J.-L., Chu, H.-C., Hwang, G.-J., & Kinshuk (2011). An investigation of attitudes of students and teachers about participating in a context-aware ubiquitous learning activity. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 373–394.
34. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
35. Smith, G. G., Majchrzak, D., Hayes, S., & Drobisz, J. (2011). Computer games versus maps before reading stories: Priming readers’ spatial situation models. Educational Technology & Society, 14, 158–168.
36. Squire, K., & Klopfer, E. (2007). Augmented reality simulations on handheld computers. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 371–413.
37. SRI International. (2007). Group scribbles. Retrieved from http://groupscribbles.sri.com
38. Tsao, F. F., & Luo, Y. C. (1994). A continuous study of English learning of third grade primary school students. Educational Research and Information, 2(3), 111–122.
39. US Department of Education. (2011). No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/beginning.html
40. Wang, W. P. (2008). Teaching English to young learners in Taiwan: Issues relating to teaching, teacher education, teaching materials and teacher perspectives (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Waikato, New Zealand.
41. Whittemore, I. C. (1924). The influence of competition on performance: An experimental study. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 19, 236–253.
42. Yu, F. Y. (2001). Reflections upon cooperation–competition instructional strategy: Theoretical foundations and empirical evidence. The National Chi Nan University Journal, 5, 181–196.
43. Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2004). Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected hand-held computers. Computers & Education, 42, 289–314.