A prospective observational study on tolerance and satisfaction to hepatic haemodynamic procedures

Liver International

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 695-703

  Casu, Stefania ^a   Berzigotti, Annalisa ^a   Abraldes, Juan G ^a   Baringo, M Angels ^a   Rocabert, Laura ^a   Hernández Gea, Virginia ^a   García Pagán, Joan Carles ^a   Bosch, Jaume ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

HVPG; Liver biopsy; Patient centred healthcare

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEPATIC HEMODYNAMIC PROCEDURE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL PROCEDURES; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERCEPTION; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; AGED; BIOPSY; HEMODYNAMICS; LIVER DISEASES; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN THRESHOLD; PATIENT CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; LIVER DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN THRESHOLD; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84922722112     PISSN: 14783223     EISSN: 14783231     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/liv.12522     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Darzi L. High quality care for all: NHS next stage review final report, Department of Health NU, 2008.
2. Charmel PA, Frampton SB. Building the business case for patient-centered care. Healthc Financ Manage 2008; 62: 80-5.
3. Charmel PA. Defining and evaluating excellence in patient-centered care. Front Health Serv Manage 2010; 26: 27-34.
4. Kanwal F. Patient-reported outcomes of cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 1043-5.
5. Brokelman RB, Haverkamp D, van Loon C, et al. The validation of the visual analogue scale for patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty. Eur Orthop Traumatol 2012; 3: 101-5.
6. Cox JM, Davison A. The visual analogue scale as a tool for self-reporting of subjective phenomena in the medical radiation sciences. Radiographer 2005; 52: 22-4.
7. McEntire J, Sahota J, Hydes T, Trebble TM. An evaluation of patient attitudes to colonoscopy and the importance of endoscopist interaction and the endoscopy environment to satisfaction and value. Scand J Gastroenterol 2013; 48: 366-73.
8. Paul-Dauphin A, Guillemin F, Virion JM, Briancon S. Bias and precision in visual analogue scales: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 150: 1117-27.
9. Usichenko TI, Rottenbacher I, Kohlmann T, et al. Implementation of the quality management system improves postoperative pain treatment: a prospective pre-/post-interventional questionnaire study. Br J Anaesth 2013; 110: 87-95.
10. Procopet B, Bureau C, Metivier S, et al. Tolerance of liver biopsy in a tertiary care center: comparison of the percutaneous and the transvenous route in 143 prospectively followed patients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24: 1209-13.
11. Arjona JE, Mino M, Cordon J, et al. Satisfaction and tolerance with office hysteroscopic tubal sterilization. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 1182-6.
12. Bosch J, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, Garcia-Pagan JC. The clinical use of HVPG measurements in chronic liver disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 6: 576-82.
13. Gluud C, Brok J, Gong Y, Koretz RL. Hepatology may have problems with putative surrogate outcome measures. J Hepatol 2007; 46: 734-42.
14. Bravo AA, Sheth SG, Chopra S. Liver biopsy. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 495-500.
15. Kalambokis G, Manousou P, Vibhakorn S, et al. Transjugular liver biopsy-indications, adequacy, quality of specimens, and complications-a systematic review. J Hepatol 2007; 47: 284-94.
16. Seijo S, Plessier A, Hoekstra J, et al. Good long-term outcome of Budd-Chiari syndrome with a step-wise management. Hepatology 2013; 57: 1962-8.
17. Poynard T, Lebrec D. The inconvenience of investigations used in hepatology: patients' and hepatologists' opinions. Liver 1982; 2: 369-75.
18. Colle I, Van VH, Troisi R, De Hemptinne B. Transplanted liver: consequences of denervation for liver functions. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2004; 280: 924-31.
19. Targownik LE, Spiegel BM, Dulai GS, Karsan HA, Gralnek IM. The cost-effectiveness of hepatic venous pressure gradient monitoring in the prevention of recurrent variceal hemorrhage. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 1306-15.
20. Imperiale TF, Chalasani N, Klein RW. Measuring the hemodynamic response to primary pharmacoprophylaxis of variceal bleeding: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 2742-50.
21. Detrait M, Pothen D, Brenard R, Starkel P, Hermans C. Feasibility, safety and cost-effectiveness of transjugular liver biopsy following major surgery in patients with haemophilia. Haemophilia 2007; 13: 588-92.