The validation of the visual analogue scale for patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty

European Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 101-105

  Brokelman, Roy B G ^a   Haverkamp, Daniel ^b   van Loon, Corné ^a   Hol, Annemiek ^a   van Kampen, Albert ^c   Veth, Rene ^c  

^a RIJNSTATE HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Hip; Satisfaction; Validation; Visual analogue scale

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTENT VALIDITY; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HUMAN; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OXFORD HIP SCORE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VALIDATION PROCESS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX;

EID: 84871957918     PISSN: 18674569     EISSN: 18674577     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12570-012-0100-3     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aaronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PD, Essink-Bot ML, Fekkes M, Sanderman R, Sprangers MA, te Velde A, Verrips E (1998) Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 health survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol 51: 1055-1068.
2. Amadio PC (1993) Outcomes measurement: more questions; some answers. J Bone Joint Surg 75-A: 1583-1584.
3. Bellamy NW, Buchannan WW, Goldsmith CH, Cambell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC. J Rheumatol 15: 1833-1840.
4. Brokelman R, van Loon C, Rijnberg W (2003) Patient versus surgeon satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 85-B: 495-498.
5. Bryant MJ, Kernohan WG, Nixon JR, Mollan RAB (1993) A statistical analysis of hip scores. J Bone Joint Surg 75-B: 705-709.
6. Chapman CR, Casey KL, Dubner R, Foley KM, Gracely RH, Reading AE (1985) Pain measurement: an overview. Pain 22(1): 1-31.
7. Dolan P, Sutton M (1997) Mapping visual analogue scale health state valuations onto standard gamble and time trade-off values. Soc Sci Med 44: 1519-1530.
8. Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L (2001) Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty. Results of a survey of 3, 600 patients from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Joint Surg 83-B: 339-344.
9. Garellick G, Herberts P, Malchau H (1999) The value of clinical data scoring systems. J Arthroplasty 14: 1024-1029.
10. Gosens T, Hoefnagels NH, de Vet RC, Dhert WJ, van Langelaan EJ, Bulstra SK, Geesink RG (2005) The "Oxford Heup Score": the translation and validation of a questionnaire into Dutch to evaluate the results of total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scan 76(2): 204-211.
11. Guyatt GH, Townsend M, Berman LB, Keller JL (1987) A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function. J Chronic Dis 40: 1129-1133.
12. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fracture: treatment by mold arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 51-A: 737-755.
13. Haverkamp D, Sierevelt IN, van den Bekerom MP, Poolman RW, van Dijk CN, Marti RK (2008) The validity of patient satisfaction as single question in outcome measurement of total hip arthroplasty. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 18: 145-150.
14. Katz JN, Larson MG, Phillips CB, Fossel AH, Liang MH (1992) Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care 30: 917-925.
15. Knahr K, Kryspin-Exner I, Jagsch R, Freilinger W, Kasparek M (1998) Beurteilung der lebensqualität vor und nach implantation einer huft-totalendoprothese. Z Orthop 136: 321-329.
16. Lieberman JR, Dorey F, Shekelle P, Schumacher L et al (1996) Differences between patients' and physicians' evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 78-A: 835-838.
17. Lingard E, Hashimoto H, Clement S (2000) Development of outcome research for total joint arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 5: 175-177.
18. Robinson A, Dolan P, Williams A (1997) Valuing health status using VAS and TTO. Soc Sci Med 45: 1289-1297.
19. Roorda L, Jones C, Waltz M et al (2004) Satisfactory cross cultural equivalence of the Dutch WOMAC in patients with hip osteoarthritis waiting for arthroplasty. Ann Rheum Dis 63: 36-42.
20. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60: 34-42.
21. Wright JG, Feinstein AR (1992) Improving the reliability of orthopaedic measurements. J Bone Joint Surg 74-B: 287-291.
22. Wright JG, Young NL (1997) The patient-specific index: asking patients what they want. J Bone Joint Surg 79-A: 974-983.