Comprehensive evaluation of embarrassment and pain associated with invasive urodynamics

Neurourology and Urodynamics

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 156-160

  Yiou, René ^a   Audureau, Etienne ^a   Loche, Catherine Marie ^b   Dussaud, Marie ^a   Lingombet, Odile ^a   Binhas, Michele ^a  

^a HENRI MONDOR HOSPITAL   (France)

^b Hopital Albert Chenevier   (France)

Author keywords

apprehension; embarrassment; invasive urodynamics; pain

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CYSTOMETRY; EMBARRASSMENT; EMOTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICTURITION; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PAIN; RATING SCALE; RISK FACTOR; SEX DIFFERENCE; URETHRA PRESSURE; URETHRAL CATHETER; URETHRAL CATHETERIZATION; UROGENITAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ANXIETY; DEVICES; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EVALUATION STUDY; INCIDENCE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; URINARY CATHETER; URINATION DISORDERS; URODYNAMICS; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANXIETY; DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, ROUTINE; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK FACTORS; URINARY CATHETERS; URINATION; URINATION DISORDERS; URODYNAMICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84922709403     PISSN: 07332467     EISSN: 15206777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nau.22521     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Clarke B,. The role of urodynamic assessment in the diagnosis of lower urinary tract disorders. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 1997; 8: 196-9.
2. Thompson PK, Duff DS, Thayer PS,. Stress incontinence in women under 50: Does urodynamics improve surgical outcome ? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2000; 11: 285-9.
3. Holtedahl K, Verelst M, Schiefloe A, et al. Usefulness of urodynamic examination in female urinary incontinence-Lessons from a population-based, randomized, controlled study of conservative treatment. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2000; 34: 169-74.
4. van Leijsen SA, Kluivers KB, Mol BW, et al. Can preoperative urodynamic investigation be omitted in women with stress urinary incontinence? A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn 2012; 31: 1118-23.
5. Hermieu JF, Cortesse A, Cardot V, et al. Summary of recommendations for the clinical evaluation of non-neurological female urinary incontinence. Prog Urol 2007; 17: 1239-41.
6. Ellerkmann RM, McBride AW, Dunn JS, et al. A comparison of anticipatory and postprocedure pain perception in patients who undergo urodynamic procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 1034-8.
7. Greenstein A, Bar-Yosef Y, Chen J, et al. Does information provided to men before a urodynamic study affect their expectation of pain ? BJU Int 2005; 96: 1307-9.
8. Ku JH, Kim SW, Kim HH, et al. Patient experience with a urodynamic study: A prospective study in 208 patients. J Urol 2004; 171: 2307-10.
9. Gorton E, Stanton S,. Women's attitudes to urodynamics: A questionnaire survey. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 851-6.
10. Kortmann BB, Sonke GS, D'Ancona FC, et al. The tolerability of urodynamic studies and flexible cysto-urethroscopy used in the assessment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms. BJU Int 1999; 84: 449-53.
11. Yokoyama T, Nozaki K, Nose H, et al. Tolerability and morbidity of urodynamic testing: A questionnaire-based study. Urology 2005; 66: 74-6.
12. Jensen MP, Miller L, Fisher LD,. Assessment of pain during medical procedures: A comparison of three scales. Clin J Pain 1998; 14: 343-9.
13. Paul SM, Zelman DC, Smith M, et al. Categorizing the severity of cancer pain: Further exploration of the establishment of cutpoints. Pain 2005; 113: 37-44.
14. Yiou R, De Laet K, Hisano M, et al. Neurophysiological testing to assess penile sensory nerve damage after radical prostatectomy. J Sex Med 2012; 9: 2457-66.
15. Hugonnet CL, Danuser H, Springer JP, et al. Urethral sensitivity and the impact on urinary continence in patients with an ileal bladder substitute after cystectomy. J Urol 2001; 165: 1502-5.
16. Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L, et al. Good urodynamic practices: Uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 2002; 21: 261-74.
17. Kent G,. Memory of dental pain. Pain 1985; 21: 187-94.
18. Linton SJ, Melin L,. The accuracy of remembering chronic pain. Pain 1982; 13: 281-5.
19. Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, et al. Studies comparing numerical rating scales, verbal rating scales, and visual analogue scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: A systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2011; 41: 1073-93.